Recent research suggests that mindfulness may foster sustainable consumption behavior through the reduction of the so-called attitude–behavior gap, or by weakening material values while increasing subjective well-being. The current controlled longitudinal study tested these propositions by employing a sustainability-adapted mindfulness-based intervention (sMBI) to two different samples (n = 60 university students; n = 71 employees). Although the intervention successfully enhanced mindful experiences in both samples, we found no evidence for neither direct effects on sustainable consumption behavior or related attitudes, nor for the reduction of the attitude–behavior gap. However, the intervention led to greater well-being in the student sample and suggested a decline of materialistic value orientations in both samples. The results blunt previous claims about potential causal effects of mindfulness practice on sustainable consumption behavior. Nevertheless, they indicate that the sMBI affects behavior-distal variables, such as material values and well-being, which in turn could influence consumption behavior in the long run.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
2.
Analayo. (2007). Sati in den Pali Lehrreden [Sati in the Pali lectures]. München, Germany: Buddhistische Gesellschaft München e.V.
3.
BaerR. A.SmithG. T.HopkinsJ.KrietemeyerJ.ToneyL. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13, 27-45. doi:10.1177/1073191105283504
4.
BarbaroN.PickettS. M. (2015). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. 93, 137-142. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026
5.
BergomiC.TschacherW.KupperZ. (2013). The Assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4, 191-202.
6.
BergomiC.TschacherW.KupperZ. (2014). Konstruktion und erste Validierung eines Fragebogens zur umfassenden Erfassung von Achtsamkeit. [Construction and first validation of a scale for the comprehensive assessment of mindfulness]. Diagnostica, 60, 111-125. doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000109
7.
BilharzM.SchmittK. (2011). Going big with big matters. The key points approach to sustainable consumption. Gaia, 20, 232-235.
8.
BishopS. R. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230-241. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bph077
BöhmeT.GeigerS. M.GrossmanP.StanszusL.SchraderU. (2016). Arbeitsdefinition von Achtsamkeit im Projekt BiNKA [Working defintition of mindfulness in the BiNKA project] (Technical paper). Berlin, Germany: Technische Universität.
11.
BrownK. W.KasserT. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74, 349-368. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8
12.
BrownK. W.KasserT.RyanR. M.LinleyA. P.OrzechK. (2009). When what one has is enough: Mindfulness, financial desire discrepancy, and subjective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 727-736. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.002
13.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822-848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
14.
CarmodyJ.BaerR. A. (2008). Relationships between mindfulness practice and levels of mindfulness, medical and psychological symptoms and well-being in a mindfulness-based stress reduction program. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 31, 23-33. doi:10.1007/s10865-007-9130-7
15.
ChatzisarantisN.HaggerM. (2007). Mindfulness and the intention-behavior relationship within the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 663-676. doi:10.1177/0146167206297401
16.
CondonP. (2017). Mindfulness, compassion and pro-social behavior. In KarremansJ. C.PapiesE. K. (Eds.), Current issues in social psychology. Mindfulness in social psychology (pp. 124-138). London, England: Routledge.
17.
Corral VerdugoV. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 651-666. doi:10.1007/s10668-012-9346-8
18.
DavidsonR. J.KaszniakA. W. (2015). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. The American Psychologist, 70, 581-592. doi:10.1037/a0039512
19.
DienerE.LucasR. E.ScollonC. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. The American Psychologist, 61, 305-314. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305
20.
DittmarH.BondR.HurstM.KasserT. (2014). The relationship between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 879-924. doi:10.1037/a0037409
21.
EberthJ.SedlmeierP. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 3, 174-189. doi:10.1007/s12671-012-0101-x
22.
EidM.GollwitzerM.SchmittM. (2017). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden: Mit Online-Materialien [Statistics and research methods]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
European Environment Agency. (2013). Environmental pressures from European consumption and production. A Study in Integrated Environmental and Economic Analysis (Technical Report No. 2/2013). Copenhagen, Denmark: Author.
FischerD. (2017). Relevante konsumpädagogische Formate für die Entwicklung eines konsumspezifischen Achtsamkeitstrainings [Relevant educational formats for sustainable consumption for the development of a consumption specific mindfulness training] (Technical Report). Berlin, Germany: Technische Universität. Retrieved from http://achtsamkeit-und-konsum.de/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/2016_Fischer_RelevanteKonsumformate.pdf
28.
FischerD.StanszusL.GeigerS. M.GrossmanP.SchraderU. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 544-558. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.007
29.
GeigerS. M.FischerD.SchraderU. (2017). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development, 26, 18-33. doi:10.1002/sd.1688
30.
GeigerS. M.GrossmanP.SchraderU. (2018). Mindfulness and sustainability: Correlation or Causation?Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 23-27. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.010
31.
GeigerS. M.KellerJ. (2017). Shopping for clothes and sensitivity for the suffering of others: The role of compassion and values in sustainable fashion consumption. Environment and Behavior, 50, 1119-1144. doi:10.1177/0013916517732109
32.
GeigerS. M.OttoS.SchraderU. (2018). Mindfully green and healthy: An indirect path from mindfulness to ecological behavior. Frontiers of Psychology: Environmental Psychology, 8, Article 2306. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02306
33.
GrossmanP. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23, 1034-1040. doi:10.1037/a0022713
34.
GrossmanP. (2015). Mindfulness: Awareness informed by an embodied ethic. Mindfulness, 6, 17-22. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0372-5
35.
GrossmanP.NiemannL.SchmidtS.WalachH. (2004). Mindfulness-based stress reduction and health benefits: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 57, 35-43. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(03)00573-7
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
HayesS. C. (2016). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies [Republished Article]. Behavior Therapy, 47, 869-885. doi:10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.006
39.
HowellA. J.DigdonN. L.BuroK.SheptyckiA. R. (2008). Relations among mindfulness, well-being, and sleep. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 773-777. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.005
40.
HuneckeM.RichterN. (2018). Mindfulness, construction of meaning, and sustainable food consumption. Mindfulness, 111, 1140. doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0986-0
41.
HurstM.DittmarH.BondR.KasserT. (2013). The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 257-269. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.09.003
42.
HylandT. (2017). McDonaldizing spirituality: Mindfulness, education, and consumerism. Journal of Transformative Education, 15, 334-356. doi:10.1177/1541344617696972
43.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (1991). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Dell Publishing.
44.
KaiserF. G.ByrkaK.HartigT. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351-367. doi:10.1177/1088868310366452
45.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531-1544. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
46.
KaplanS. (2001). Meditation, restoration, and the management of mental fatigue. Environment and Behavior, 33, 480-506. doi:10.1177/00139160121973106
47.
KasserT. (2017). Living both well and sustainably: A review of the literature, with some reflections on future research, interventions and policy. Philosophical Transactions, Series A: Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 375, 20160369. doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0369
48.
KasserT.RosenblumK. L.SameroffA. J.DeciE. L.NiemiecC. P.RyanR. M.. . . HawksS. (2014). Changes in materialism, changes in psychological well-being: Evidence from three longitudinal studies and an intervention experiment. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 1-22. doi:10.1007/s11031-013-9371-4
49.
KilbourneW.PickettG. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61, 885-893. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.09.016
50.
KlauerK. J. (2001). Handbuch kognitives Training [Handbook Cognitive Training]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
51.
KokB. E.SingerT. (2016). Phenomenological fingerprints of four meditations: Differential state changes in affect, mind-wandering, meta-cognition, and interoception before and after daily practice across 9 months of training. Mindfulness. 8, 218-231. doi:10.1007/s12671-016-0594-9
52.
LeachM. A.RaworthK.RockströmJ. (2013). Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. In International Social Science Council (ISSC) & United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (Eds.), World social science report 2013: Changing global environments (pp. 84-89). Paris, France: OECD Publishing and UNESCO Publishing.
53.
LymeusF.LindbergP.HartigT. (2018). Building mindfulness bottom-up: Meditation in natural settings supports open monitoring and attention restoration. Consciousness and Cognition, 59, 40-56. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.01.008
54.
MalinowskiP. (2013). Neural mechanisms of attentional control in mindfulness meditation. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, Article 8. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00008
55.
MilfontT. L. (2009). The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. The Environmentalist, 29, 263-269. doi:10.1007/s10669-008-9192-2
56.
MüllerA.SmitsD. J. M.ClaesL.GefellerO.HinzA.de ZwaanM. (2013). The German version of the Material Values Scale. Psycho-Social Medicine, 10, 2-9. doi:10.3205/psm000095
57.
O’BrienC. (2008). Sustainable happiness: How happiness studies can contribute to a more sustainable future. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 289-295. doi:10.1037/a0013235
PannoA.GiacomantonioM.CarrusG.MaricchioloF.PirchioS.MannettiL. (2017). Mindfulness, pro-environmental behavior, and belief in climate change: The mediating role of social dominance. Environment and Behavior, 50, 864-888. doi:10.1177/0013916517718887
60.
PepperM.JacksonT.UzzellD. (2009). An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33, 126-136. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2009.00753.x
61.
RauH. K.WilliamsP. G. (2016). Dispositional mindfulness: A critical review of construct validation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 32-43. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.035
62.
RichinsM. L. (2004). The material values scale: Measurement properties and development of a short form. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 209-219. doi:10.1086/383436
63.
RichinsM. L.DawsonS. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 303. doi:10.1086/209304
64.
RosenbergE. L. (2004). Mindfulness and consumerism. In KasserT.KannerA. D. (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (1st ed., pp. 107-125). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
RuffaultA.BernierM.JugeN.FournierJ. F. (2016). Mindfulness may moderate the relationship between intrinsic motivation and physical activity: A cross-sectional study. Mindfulness, 7, 445-452. doi:10.1007/s12671-015-0467-7
66.
SchindlerS.PfattheicherS.ReinhardM.-A. (2019). Potential negative consequences of mindfulness in the moral domain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1055-1069. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2570
67.
SheeranP.WebbT. L. (2016). The Intention-Behavior Gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503-518. doi:10.1111/spc3.12265
68.
SchwarzerR. (2008). Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Applied Psychology, 57(1), 1-29. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x
69.
SolomonM. R. (2006). Consumer behaviour: A European perspective (3rd ed.). Harlow, UK; New York, NY: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
70.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845
71.
StanszusL.FischerD.BöhmeT.FrankP.FritzscheJ.GeigerS. M.. . . SchraderU. (2017). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness training: Development of a consumption-specific intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19, 5-21. doi:10.1515/jtes-2017-0001
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
