Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-8
Exposure to Urban Nature and Tree Planting Are Related to Pro-Environmental Behavior via Connection to Nature,the Use of Nature for Psychological Restoration,and Environmental Attitudes
Pro-environmental behaviors (PEBs) may be associated with a personal relationship with nature. We conducted a quasi-experiment with 423 residents who had or had not actively participated in a tree-planting scheme and lived in 20 neighborhoods that differ in their greenness level. We tested whether exposure to nature (specified by the amount of vegetation cover in residents’ neighborhoods) and/or past PEB (specified by tree-planting participation) was associated with residents’ PEB and whether key psychological constructs would mediate these relationships. Structural equation mediation models revealed that the level of neighborhood vegetation and involvement in the planting scheme explained 46% of the variance in PEB, with connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes mediating the relationships. Connection to nature was more strongly associated with engagement in PEB than the use of nature for psychological restoration and environmental attitudes.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
2.
BerentsonP. (2013). Twenty years of providing free plants in an urban New Zealand setting: What affects community participation and planting success? (Master’s thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10063/2891
3.
BowlerD. E.Buyung-AliL. M.KnightT. M.PullinA. S. (2010). A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health, 10, Article 456. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-456
4.
BratmanG. N.HamiltonJ. P.DailyG. C. (2012). The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1249, 118-136. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x
5.
BrüggerA.KaiserF. G.RoczenN. (2011). Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist, 16, 324-333. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000032
6.
ByrkaK.HartigT.KaiserF. G. (2010). Environmental attitude as a mediator of the relationship between psychological restoration in nature and self-reported ecological behavior. Psychological Reports, 107, 847-859. doi:10.2466/07.PR0.107.6.847-859
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45-65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9.
ColladoS.StaatsH.CorralizaJ. A. (2013). Experiencing nature in children’s summer camps: Affective, cognitive and behavioural consequences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33, 37-44. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.08.002
10.
Corral-VerdugoV.GarciaF. I.Tapia-FonllemC.Fraijo-SingB. (2012). Sustainable behaviors and perceived psychological restoration. Acta De Investigaciόn Psicolόgica, 2, 749-764.
11.
CurtinS. (2009). Wildlife tourism: The intangible, psychological benefits of human–wildlife encounters. Current Issues in Tourism, 12, 47-55. doi:10.1080/13683500903042857
12.
DallimerM.IrvineK. N.SkinnerA. M. J.DaviesZ. G.RouquetteJ. R.MaltbyL. L.. . . GastonK. J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: Understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience, 62, 47-55. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.1.9
13.
De VriesS.VerheijR. A.GroenewegenP. P.SpreeuwenbergP. (2003). Natural environments-healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environment and Planning A, 35, 1717-1731. doi:10.1068/a35111
14.
DillmanD. A. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NY: John Wiley.
15.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
16.
FazioR. H.ZannaM. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 161-202). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X
17.
FrantzC. M.MayerF. S. (2014). The importance of connection to nature in assessing environmental education programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 41, 85-89. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.10.001
18.
FreemanC.DickinsonK.PorterS.Van HeezikY. (2012). “My garden is an expression of me”: Exploring householders’ relationships with their gardens. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 135-143. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.005
19.
FrickJ.KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: Exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1597-1613. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
20.
FullerR. A.IrvineK. N.Devine-WrightP.WarrenP. H.GastonK. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biology Letters, 3, 390-394. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149
HartigT.KaiserF. G.StrumseE. (2007). Psychological restoration in nature as a source of motivation for ecological behaviour. Environmental Conservation, 34, 291-299. doi:10.1017/S0376892907004250
23.
HuL.-T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
24.
HurM.NasarJ. L.ChunB. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 52-59. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
25.
KaiserF. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395-422. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
26.
KaiserF. G.HartigT.BrüggerA.DuvierC. (2011). Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell paradigm. Environment and Behavior, 45, 369-398. doi:10.1177/0013916511422444
27.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
28.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
29.
KearnsA.ParkinsonM. (2001). The significance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38, 2103-2110. doi:10.1080/00420980120087063
30.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
31.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359-371. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.09.003
32.
KuoF. E. (2001). Coping with poverty-impacts of environment and attention in the inner city. Environment and Behavior, 33, 5-34. doi:10.1177/00139160121972846
33.
LarsonL. R.WhitingJ. W.GreenG. T. (2011). Exploring the influence of outdoor recreation participation on proenvironmental behaviour in a demographically diverse population. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 16, 67-86. doi:10.1080/13549839.2010.548373
34.
LeopoldA. (1949). A Sand County almanac: And sketches here and there. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
MatsuokaR. H.KaplanR. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
36.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503-515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
37.
NaessA. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16, 95-100.
38.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M.MurphyS. A. (2009). The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715-740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748
39.
NutsfordD.PearsonA. L.KinghamS. (2013). An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health, 127, 1005-1011. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.016
40.
OuelletteJ. A.WoodW. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54-74. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54
SchultzP. W. (2000). Empathizing with nature: The effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 391-406.
43.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In SchmuckP.SchultzW. P. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 61-78.
SugiyamaT.LeslieE.Giles-CortiB.OwenN. (2008). Associations of neighbourhood greenness with physical and mental health: Do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62, Article e9. doi:10.1136/jech.2007.064287
46.
SullivanW. C.KuoF. E.DePooterS. F. (2004). The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces. Environment and Behavior, 36, 678-700. doi:10.1177/0193841x04264945
47.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
48.
TakanoT.NakamuraK.WatanabeM. (2002). Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: The importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 913-918.
49.
TamK.-P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64-78. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004
50.
TarrantM. A.GreenG. T. (1999). Outdoor recreation and the predictive validity of environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 21, 17-30. doi:10.1080/014904099273264
51.
TerryD. J.HoggM. A.WhiteK. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity, and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225-244. doi:10.1348/014466699164149
52.
UlrichR. S.SimonsR. F.LositoB. D.FioritoE.MilesM. A.ZelsonM. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201-230. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7
53.
Van DillenS. M.De VriesS.GroenewegenP. P.SpreeuwenbergP. (2012). Greenspace in urban neighborhoods and residents’ health: Adding quality to quantity. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 66, Article e8. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.104695
54.
Van HeezikY.FreemanC.PorterS.DickinsonJ. M. (2013). Garden size, householder knowledge, and socio-economic status influence plant and bird diversity at the scale of individual gardens. Ecosystems, 16, 1442-1454. doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9694-8
55.
Van HerzeleA.De VriesS. (2012). Linking green space to health: A comparative study of two urban neighbourhoods in Ghent, Belgium. Population and Environment, 34, 171-193. doi:10.1007/s11111-011-0153-1
56.
Wellington City Council. (2007). Biodiversity action plan. Wellington, New Zealand.
WhitburnJ. (2014). Urban vegetation, wellbeing and pro-environmental Behaviour: A socio-ecological experiment in Wellington City, New Zealand (Master’s thesis). Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10063/3774
60.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305-314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
