Activity-based work environments (WEs) aim to support office workers doing both concentrated and communicative work, but empirical tests are rare. We expected the availability of different WEs to be beneficial for job attitudes and vitality, and that the benefits would be stronger when available WEs were perceived to fit to tasks, and when workers used WEs appropriately. As predictors of appropriate use of WEs, we postulated need for routine seeking and trust in management. Hypotheses were tested in a questionnaire study with 560 office workers from different organizations. The availability of WEs that support undisturbed working was positively related to job attitudes and vitality. For WEs that support communicative work, job attitudes and vitality were additionally explained by the relative fit to the task and appropriate use of WEs. Finally, appropriate use of WEs correlated positively with trust in management and negatively with workers’ need for routine seeking.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. M. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
3.
AllenN. J.MeyerJ. M. (1996). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: An examination of construct validity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 49, 252-276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1996.0043
4.
AltmanI. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
5.
Appel-MeulenbroekR. (2010). Knowledge sharing through co-presence: Added value of facilities. Facilities, 28, 189-205. doi:10.1108/02632771011023140
6.
Appel-MeulenbroekR.GroenenP.JanssenI. (2011). An end user’s perspective on activity based office concepts. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 13, 122-135. doi:10.1108/14630011111136830
7.
AshkanasyN. M.AyokoO. B.JehnK. A. (2014). Understanding the physical environment of work and employee behavior: An affective events perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 1169-1184. doi:10.1002/job.1973
8.
BakkerA. B.DemeroutiE. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309-328. doi:10.1108/02683940710733115
9.
BeckerF.SimsW.SchossJ. H. (2003). Interaction, identity and collocation: What value is a corporate campus?Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 5, 344-365. doi:10.1108/14630010310812163
10.
BeckersR.van der VoordtT.DewulfG. (2015). A conceptual framework to identify spatial implications of new ways of learning in higher education. Facilities, 33, 2-19. doi:10.1108/F-02-2013-0013
11.
BeckersR.van der VoordtT.DewulfG. (2016). Learning space preferences of higher education students. Building and Environment, 104, 243-252. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.013
12.
BlauP. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
13.
Bodin DanielssonC.BodinL. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and Behavior, 40, 636-668. doi:10.1177/0013916507307459
14.
Bodin DanielssonC.BodinL. (2009). Differences in satisfaction with office environment among employees in different office types. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 26, 241-257.
BrennanA.ChughJ. S.KlineT. (2002). Traditional versus open office design: A longitudinal field study. Environment and Behavior, 34, 279-299. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003001
17.
BruniaS.de BeenI.van der VoordtT. J. M. (2016). Accommodating new ways of working: Lessons from best practices and worst cases. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18, 30-47. doi:10.1108/JCRE-10-2015-0028
18.
CableD. M.DeRueD. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 875-884. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.875
19.
CableD. M.EdwardsJ. R. (2004). Complementary and supplementary fit: A theoretical and empirical integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 822-834. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.822
20.
CasperW. J.HarrisC. M. (2008). Work-life benefits and organizational attachment: Self-interest utility and signaling theory models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 95-109. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.10.015
21.
DavenportT. H. (2013). Thinking for a living: How to get better performances and results from knowledge workers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
22.
DavisM. C.LeachD. J.CleggC. W. (2011). The physical environment of the office: Contemporary and emerging issues. In HodgkinsonG. P.FordJ. K. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1993-1237). Chichester, UK: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781119992592
23.
De BeenI.BeijerM. (2014). The influence of office type on satisfaction and perceived productivity support. Journal of Facilities Management, 12, 142-157. doi:10.1108/JFM-02-2013-0011
24.
De BeenI.BeijerM.Den HollanderD. (2015). How to cope with dilemmas in activity based work environments-results from user-centred research. Conference Paper 14th EuroFM Research Symposium, EuroFM research papers (pp. 1-10).
25.
De BruyneE.BeijerM. (2015). Calculating NWoW office space with the PACT model. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 17(2), 122-133. doi:10.1108/JCRE-12-2014-0032
26.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499-512. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
27.
DesorJ. A. (1972). Toward a psychological theory of crowding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 79-83. doi:10.1037/h0032112
28.
DevlooT.AnseelF.de BeuckelaerA. (2011). Do managers use feedback seeking as a strategy to regulate demands-abilities misfit? The moderating role of implicit person theory. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 453-465. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9200-7
29.
DuffyF.PowellK. (1997). The New Office. London, England: Conran Octopus.
30.
EdwardsJ. R. (1991). Person-job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 283-357). New York, NY: John Wiley.
31.
EdwardsJ. R. (1994). Regression analysis as an alternative to difference scores. Journal of Management, 20, 683-689. doi:10.1177/014920639402000311
32.
EdwardsJ. R. (1996). An examination of competing versions of the person-environment fit approach to stress. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 292-339. doi:10.2307/256782
33.
EdwardsJ. R. (2002). Alternatives to difference scores: Polynomial regression analysis and response surface methodology. In DrasgowF.SchmittN. (Eds.), Advances in measurement and data analysis (pp. 350-400). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34.
EdwardsJ. R.CableD.WilliamsonI. O.LambertL. S.ShippA. J. (2006). The phenomenology of fit: Linking the person and environment to the subjective experience of person-environment fit. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 802-827. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.802
35.
EdwardsJ. R.CaplanR. D.Van HarrisonR. (1998). Person-environment fit theory. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28-67). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
EdwardsJ. R.HarrisonR. V. (1993). Job demands and worker health: Three-dimensional reexamination of the relationship between person-environment fit and strain. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 628-648. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.628
37.
EdwardsJ. R.ParryM. E. (1993). On the use of polynomial regression equations as an alternative to difference scores in organizational research. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1577-1613. doi:10.2307/256822
38.
EdwardsJ. R.RothbardN. (1999). Work and family stress and well-being: An examination of person-environment fit in the work and family domains. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 85-129. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2813
39.
EdwardsJ. R.ShippA. J. (2007). Perspectives on organizational fit. Perspectives on Organizational Fit, 40, 209-258. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01160_6.x
40.
ElsbachK. D.PrattM. G. (2007). The physical environment in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 181-224. doi:10.1080/078559809
41.
FisherD. M. (2014). A multilevel cross-cultural examination of role overload and organizational commitment: Investigating the interactive effects of context. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 723-736. doi:10.1037/a0035861
42.
FrenchJ. R. P.CaplanR. D.Van HarrisonR. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. New York, NY: John Wiley.
43.
FrenchJ. R. P.RodgersW. L.CobbS. (1974). Adjustment as person-environment fit. In CoelhoG.HamburgD.AdamsJ. (Eds.), Coping and adaptation (pp. 316-333). New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
FurnhamA.SchaefferR. (1984). Person-environment fit, job satisfaction and mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57, 295-307. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00170.x
45.
GerdenitschC.KorunkaC.HertelG. (2017). Need–supply fit in an activity-based flexible office. Environment and Behavior, 50, 273-297. doi:10.1177/0013916517697766
46.
GöritzA. S. (2007). Using online panels in psychological research. In JoinsonA. N.McKennaK. Y. A.PostmesT.ReipsU.-D. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of internet psychology, (pp. 473-485). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
GregurasG. J.DiefendorffJ. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: Linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-determination theory. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 465-477. doi:10.1037/a0014068
48.
HarrisonR. V. (1978). Person-environment fit and job stress. In CooperC. L.PayneR. (Eds.), Stress at work (pp. 175-205). New York, NY: John Wiley.
49.
HarrisonR. V. (1985). The person-environment fit model and the study of job stress. In BeehrT. A.BhagatR. S. (Eds.), Human stress and cognition in organizations (pp. 23-55). New York, NY: John Wiley.
50.
HaynesB. P. (2008a). An evaluation of the impact of the office environment on productivity. Facilities, 26, 178-195. doi:10.1108/02632770810864970
51.
HaynesB. P. (2008b). Impact of workplace connectivity on office productivity. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 10, 286-302. doi:10.1108/14630010810925145
52.
HeerwagenJ. H.KampschroerK.PowellK. M.LoftnessV. (2004). Collaborative knowledge work environments. Building Research & Information, 32, 510-528. doi:10.1080/09613210412331313025
53.
HertelG.RauschenbachC.ThielgenM. M.KrummS. (2015). Are older workers more active copers? Longitudinal effects of age-contingent coping on strain at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 514-537. doi:10.1002/job.1995
54.
HirstA. (2011). Settlers, vagrants and mutual indifference: Unintended consequences of hot-desking. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 24, 767-788. doi:10.1108/09534811111175742
55.
HoendervangerJ. G.De BeenI.Van YperenN. W.MobachM. P.AlbersC. J. (2016). Flexibility in use. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 18, 48-62. doi:10.1108/JCRE-10-2015-0033
56.
KimJ.CandidoC.ThomasL.de DearR. (2016). Desk ownership in the workplace: The effect of non-territorial working on employee workplace satisfaction, perceived productivity and health. Building and Environment, 103, 203-214. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.015
57.
KimJ.de DearR. (2013). Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 18-26. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.007
58.
KirtonM. (1980). Adaptors and innovators in organizations. Human Relations, 33, 213-224. doi:10.1177/001872678003300401
59.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1-49. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
60.
LaneC.BachmannR. (1996). The social constitution of trust: Supplier relations in Britain and Germany. Organization Studies, 17, 365-395. doi:10.1177/017084069601700302
61.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, coping and adaptation. New York, NY: Springer.
62.
LederS.NewshamG. R.VeitchJ. A.ManciniS.CharlesK. E. (2016). Effects of office environment on employee satisfaction: A new analysis. Building Research & Information, 44, 34-50. doi:10.1080/09613218.2014.1003176
63.
LeeS. Y.BrandJ. L. (2010). Can personal control over the physical environment ease distractions in office workplaces?Ergonomics, 53, 324-335. doi:10.1080/00140130903389019
64.
LockeE. A. (1969). What is job satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336.
65.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1343). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
66.
LuhmannN. (1979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
67.
MayD. R.OldhamG. R.RathertC. (2005). Employee affective and behavioral reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Human Resource Management, 44, 21-33. doi:10.1002/hrm.20038
68.
MayerR. C.DavisJ. H. (1999). The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 123-136. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.123
69.
McEvilyB.TortorielloM. (2011). Measuring trust in organisational research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1, 23-63. doi:10.1080/21515581.2011.552424
70.
McKnightD. H.ChervanyN. L. (2001). Trust and distrust definitions: One bite at a time In R. Falcone, M. Singh, and Y.-H. Tan (Eds.), Trust in cyber-societies (pp. 27-54). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
71.
MichaelisB.StegmaierR.SonntagK. (2009). Affective commitment to change and innovation implementation behavior: The role of charismatic leadership and employees’ trust in top management. Journal of Change Management, 9, 399-417. doi:10.1080/14697010903360608
72.
MillwardL. J.HaslamS. A.PostmesT. (2007). Putting employees in their place: The impact of hot desking on organizational and team identification. Organization Science, 18, 547-559. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0265
73.
MowdayR. T. (1996). Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. In SteersR. M.PorterL. W.BigleyA. (Eds.), Motivation and leadership at work (pp. 8-33). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
74.
NagyM. S. (2002). Using a single-item approach to measure facet job satisfaction. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 77-86. doi:10.1348/096317902167658
75.
OldhamG. R. (1988). Effects of changes in workspace partitions and spatial density on employee reactions: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 253-258. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.73.2.253
76.
OregS. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680-693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
77.
OregS. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 15, 73-101. doi:10.1080/13594320500451247
78.
PeponisJ.BafnaS.BajajR.BrombergJ.CongdonC.RashidM.. . . ZimringC. (2007). Designing space to support knowledge work. Environment and Behavior, 39, 815-840. doi:10.1177/0013916506297216
79.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539-569. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
80.
PullenW. R. (2014). Age, office type, job satisfaction and performance. Work&Place, 3(2), 18-22.
81.
RyanR. M.FrederickC. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529-565. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
82.
SchaufeliW. B. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 701-716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
83.
SeddighA.BerntsonE.Bodin DanielssonC.WesterlundH. (2014). Concentration requirements modify the effect of office type on indicators of health and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 167-174. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.009
84.
ShanockL. R.BaranB. E.GentryW. A.PattisonS. C.HeggestadE. D. (2010). Polynomial regression with response surface analysis: A powerful approach for examining moderation and overcoming limitations of difference scores. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 543-554. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9183-4
85.
SundstromE.BurtR. E.KampD. (1980). Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 101-117. doi:10.2307/255498
86.
ThielgenM. M.KrummS.HertelG. (2015). When being old pays off: Age mitigates adverse effects of low implicit-explicit motive congruency on work motivation. Journal of Career Assessment, 23, 459-480. doi:10.1177/1069072714547613
87.
van MeelJ. (2000). The European office: Office design and national context. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: 010 Publishers.
88.
WanousJ. P.HudyM. J. (2001). Single-item reliability: A replication and extension. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 361-375. doi:10.1177/109442810144003
89.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247
90.
WohlersC.HertelG. (2017). Choosing where to work at work—Towards a theoretical model of benefits and risks of activity-based flexible offices. Ergonomics, 60, 467-486. doi:10.1080/00140139.2016.1188220
91.
ZalesnyM.FaraceR. (1987). Traditional versus open offices: A comparison of sociotechnical, social relations, and symbolic meaning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 240-259.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
