In this article we investigate licensing behavior across and within sustainability domains. In a survey study based on a random sample of residents of the state of Maine, USA (N = 668), we find that an individual’s choice in a future policy scenario was significantly impacted by recalling his/her own previous sustainable behavior. We find evidence of domain-specific licensing in the energy realm, where individuals who participated in past sustainable energy behaviors are less likely to support a proposed public policy investment in energy efficiency/renewable energy. We employ a novel environmental motivation scale and determine that licensing impacts are mediated by an individual’s internal environmental motivation. Our results suggest that care must be taken in how we encourage sustainable behavior, without triggering licensing.
AllcottH. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 1082-1095. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003
2.
BarghJ. A.ChaikenS.GovenderR.PrattoF. (1992). The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893
3.
BerkhoutP. H. G.MuskensJ. C.VelthuijsenJ. W. (2000). Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28, 425-432. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00022-7
4.
BrattC. (1999). Consumers’ environmental behavior: Generalized, sector-based, or compensatory?Environment and Behavior, 31, 28-44. doi:10.1177/00139169921971985
5.
BrunerJ. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152. doi:10.1037/h0043805
6.
ChaikenS.BaldwinM. W. (1981). Affective-cognitive consistency and the effect of salient behavioral information on the self-perception of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 1-12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.1
7.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464-478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.464
8.
ClotS.GrolleauG.IbanezL. (2016). Do good deeds make bad people?European Journal of Law and Economics, 42(3), 491-513. doi:10.1007/s10657-014-9441-4
9.
De YoungR. (1986). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems, 154, 281-292. doi:10.2190/3FWV-4WM0-R6MC-2URB
10.
De YoungR. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00181
EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1618-1634. doi:10.1177/0146167210385922
13.
GaterslebenB.StegL.VlekC. (2002). Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34, 335-362. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004
14.
GawronskiB.DeutschR.SeidelO. (2005). Contextual influences on implicit evaluation: A test of additive versus contrastive effects of evaluative context stimuli in affective priming. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1226-1236. doi:10.1177/0146167205274689
15.
GoldsteinN.CialdiniR.GriskeviciusV. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482. doi:10.1086/586910
Graham-RoweE.SkipponS.GardnerB.AbrahamC. (2011). Can we reduce car use and, if so, how? A review of available evidence. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45, 401-418. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2011.02.001
18.
HardinG. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
19.
HollandR. W.VerplankenB.van KnippenbergA. (2002). On the nature of attitude-behavior relations: The strong guide, the weak follow. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 869-876. doi:10.1002/ejsp.135
20.
JanssonJ.MarellA.NordlundA. (2010). Green consumer behavior: Determinants of curtailment and eco-innovation adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 27, 358-370. doi:10.1108/07363761011052396
21.
KaidaN.KaidaK. (2015). Spillover effect of congestion charging on pro-environmental behavior. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17, 409-421. doi:10.1007/s10668-014-9550-9
22.
KaufmannH. R.PanniM. F. A. K.OrphanidouY. (2012). Factors affecting consumers’ green purchasing behavior: An integrated conceptual framework. Amfiteatru Economic, 14(31), 50-69.
23.
KhanU.DharR. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 259-266. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259
24.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?Environmental Education Research, 8, 239-260. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401
25.
LacasseK. (2015). The importance of being green: The influence of green behaviors on Americans’ political attitudes toward climate change. Environment and Behavior, 47, 754-781. doi:10.1177/0013916513520491
26.
MainieriT.BarnettE. G.ValderoT.UnipanJ. B.OskampS. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137, 189-204. doi:10.1080/00224549709595430
27.
MazarN.ZhongC. (2010). Do green products make us better people?Psychological Science, 21, 494-498. doi:10.1177/0956797610363538
28.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 115-155). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43003-8.
29.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 33-43. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33
30.
NobletC. L.AndersonM. W.TeislM. F. (2015). Thinking past, thinking future: An empirical test of the effects of retrospective assessment on future preferences. Ecological Economics, 114, 180-187. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.002
31.
NobletC. L.TeislM. F.EvansK.AndersonM. W.McCoyS.CervoneE. (2015). Public preferences for investments in renewable energy production and energy efficiency. Energy Policy, 87, 177-186. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.003
32.
OlanderF.ThogersenJ. (1995). Understanding of consumer behavior as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 345-385.
33.
ReeseG.LoewK.SteffgenG. (2014). A towel less: Social norms enhance pro-environmental behavior in hotels. The Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 97-100. doi:10.1080/00224545.2013.855623
34.
RichterJ.FrimanM.GärlingT. (2011). Soft transport policy measures: Gaps in knowledge. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5, 199-215. doi:10.1080/15568318.2010.490289
35.
SachdevaS.IlievR.MedinD. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20, 523-528. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
36.
SalancikG.R.ConwayM. (1975). Attitude inferences from salient and relevant cognitive content about behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 829-840. doi: 1037//0022-3514.32.5.829
37.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x
38.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309-317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
39.
SteinhorstJ.KlöcknerC. A.MatthiesE. (2015). Saving electricity—For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 125-135. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.012
40.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175
41.
StradlingS. G.MeadowsM. L.BeattyS. (2000). Helping drivers out of their cars integrating transport policy and social psychology for sustainable change. Transport Policy, 7, 207-215. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(00)00026-3
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
44.
TaberneroC.HernándezB. (2011). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation guiding environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43, 658-675. doi:10.1177/0013916510379759
45.
TeislM. F.McCoyS. K.MarrinanS. J.NobletC. L.JohnsonT. R.WibberlyM.. . . KleinS. (2015). Will offshore energy face “Fair winds and following seas”? Understanding the factors influencing offshore wind acceptance. Estuaries and Coasts, 38(Suppl. 1), 279-286. doi:10.1007/s12237-014-9777-6
46.
TeislM. F.RoeB.VaydaM. (2006). Incentive effects on response rates, data quality, and survey administration costs. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 364-373. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh106
47.
ThøgersenJ. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 53-81. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(98)00043-9
48.
ThøgersenJ. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00039-2
49.
ThøgersenJ.CromptonT. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32, 141-163. doi:10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1
50.
ThøgersenJ.NobletC. L. (2012). Does green consumerism increase the acceptance of wind power?Energy Policy, 51, 854-862. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.044
51.
ThøgersenJ.ÖlanderF. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605-630. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00120-4
52.
ThøgersenJ.ÖlanderF. (2003). Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 225-236. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00018-5
53.
TiefenbeckV.StaakeT.RothK.SachsO. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160-171. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.021
54.
Van der WerffE.StegL.KeizerK. (2013). It is a moral issue: The relationship between environmental self-identity, obligation-based intrinsic motivation and pro-environmental behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 23, 1258-1265. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.018
55.
Von BorgstedeC.AnderssonM.JohnssonF. (2013). Public attitudes to climate change and carbon mitigation—implications for energy-associated behaviours. Energy Policy, 57, 182-193. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.051
56.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 305-314. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
