A prevailing marketing tactic, called cause-related marketing (CRM), involves donating to a charity contingent on consumer purchases. Building on moral licensing theory, the current research identifies a negative effect of engagement in CRM on consumers’ subsequent pro-environmental behaviors through two studies. Study 1 (N = 100) established that people act in less eco-friendly ways (i.e., consuming more water) after engaging in CRM that is associated with environmental benefits. Study 2 (N = 301) verified the above results in a larger sample and further revealed that even though engaging in CRM has no apparent environmental benefits, it also reduces the probability of behaving in environmentally friendly ways (i.e., choosing a low-carbon mode of transportation). Overall, the current research shows that the effects of CRM could spill over from the consumption domain into the environmental domain, calling attention to the net environmental effect of CRM.
AdlerN. E.EpelE. S.CastellazzoG.IckovicsJ. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy White women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592.
2.
BaronJ.SprancaM. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.
3.
BaroneM. J.MiyazakiA. D.TaylorK. A. (2000). The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: does one good turn deserve another?. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 248–262.
4.
BerglindM.NakataC. (2005). Cause-related marketing: More buck than bang?. Business Horizons, 48(5), 443–453.
5.
ChangC. T.ChenP. C.ChuX. Y.KungM. T.HuangY. F. (2018). Is cash always king? Bundling product-cause fit and product type in cause-related marketing. Psychology & Marketing, 35(12), 990–1009.
6.
ChangC. T.ChengZ. H. (2015). Tugging on heartstrings: Shopping orientation, mindset, and consumer responses to cause-related marketing. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 337–350.
7.
CialdiniR. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109.
8.
ConwayP.PeetzJ. (2012). When does feeling moral actually make you a better person? Conceptual abstraction moderates whether past moral deeds motivate consistency or compensatory behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(7), 907–919.
9.
CraneA. (2001). Unpacking the ethical product. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(4), 361–373.
10.
EffronD. A.CameronJ. S.MoninB. (2009). Endorsing Obama licenses favoring whites. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 590–593.
11.
EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Letting people off the hook: When do good deeds excuse transgressions?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(12), 1618–1634.
12.
EikenberryA. M. (2009). The hidden costs of cause marketing. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7(3), 51–55.
13.
EinhornH. J.HogarthR. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 53–88.
14.
GengL.ChengX.TangZ.ZhouK.YeL. (2016). Can previous pro-environmental behaviours influence subsequent environmental behaviours? The licensing effect of pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 10, e9.
15.
GneezyA.ImasA.BrownA.NelsonL. D.NortonM. I. (2012). Paying to be nice: Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179–187.
16.
GriskeviciusV.TyburJ. M.Van den BerghB. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.
17.
GuptaS.PirschJ. (2006). The company-cause-customer fit decision in cause-related marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(6), 314–326.
18.
HoekJ.GendallP. (2008). An analysis of consumers’ responses to cause related marketing. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 20(2), 283–297.
19.
HollanderE. P. (1958). Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit. Psychological Review, 65(2), 117–127.
KhanU.DharR. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259–266.
22.
KlöcknerC. A.NayumA.MehmetogluM. (2013). Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 21, 32–38.
23.
Koschate-FischerN.StefanI. V.HoyerW. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910–927.
24.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.KeltnerD. (2009). Social class, the sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004.
25.
LangeF.SteinkeA.DewitteS. (2018). The Pro-Environmental Behavior Task: A laboratory measure of actual pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 56, 46–54.
26.
LongoniC.GollwitzerP. M.OettingenG. (2014). A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 50(1), 158–165.
27.
MendiniM.PeterP. C.GibbertM. (2018). The dual-process model of similarity in cause-related marketing: How taxonomic versus thematic partnerships reduce skepticism and increase purchase willingness. Journal of Business Research, 91, 195–204.
28.
MerrittA. C.EffronD. A.MoninB. (2010). Moral self-licensing: When being good frees us to be bad. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(5), 344–357.
29.
MilfontT. L.SchultzP. W. (2016). Culture and the natural environment. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 194–199.
30.
MillerD. T.EffronD. A. (2010). Psychological license: When it is needed and how it functions. In MarkP. Z.JamesM. O. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 43, pp. 115–155). Elsevier Academic Press.
31.
MoninB.MillerD. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43.
32.
MüllerS. S.FriesA. J.GedenkK. (2014). How much to give?—The effect of donation size on tactical and strategic success in cause-related marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(2), 178–191.
33.
NisanM. (1991). The moral balance model: Theory and research extending our understanding of moral choice and deviation. In KurtinesW. M.GewirtzJ. L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 213−249). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
ReedA.IIForehandM. R.PuntoniS.WarlopL. (2012). Identity-based consumer behavior. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29, 310−321.
35.
SachdevaS.IlievR.MedinD. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528.
36.
SimbrunnerP.SchlegelmilchB. B. (2017). Moral licensing: A culture-moderated meta-analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 67(4), 201–225.
37.
SmithG.StodghillR. (1994). Are good causes good marketing. Business Week, 21(1), 64–66.
38.
StrahilevitzM. A.MyersJ. (1998). Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 434–446.
39.
TiefenbeckV.StaakeT.RothK.SachsO. (2013). For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign. Energy Policy, 57, 160–171.
40.
TrueloveH. B.CarricoA. R.WeberE. U.RaimiK. T.VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138.
41.
VaradarajanP. R.MenonA. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. The Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.
42.
WebbD. J.MohrL. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.
