Audiences that view sea level rise as a distant hazard or hold doubtful or dismissive beliefs about climate change in general may not be receptive to information about this hazard. This study explores how maps may address these challenges to sea level rise communication by making visible the impacts of sea level rise on local communities. Using an interactive map of sea level rise in Sarasota, Florida and an accompanying online survey, it considers how college students from nearby and far away from Sarasota, and with different views about climate change, vary in their risk perceptions. Results show that, consistent with spatial optimism bias, risk perceptions increased more from pre- to post map for respondents far away from Sarasota than for those nearby, while respondents who were initially doubtful or cautious about climate change showed larger increases in risk perceptions than those who were disengaged or alarmed.
BostromA.AnselinL.FarrisJ. (2008). Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1128, 29-40. doi:10.1196/annals.1399.005
2.
BotzenW. J. W.AertsJ. C. J. H.van den BerghJ. C. J. M. (2009). Dependence of flood risk perceptions on socioeconomic and objective risk factors. Water Resources Research, 45, W10440. doi:10.1029/2009WR007743
3.
BoykoffM. T.BoykoffJ. M. (2007). Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of US mass-media coverage. Geoforum, 38, 1190-1204. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.01.008
4.
BradleyR. A.TerryM. E. (1952). Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39, 324-345. doi:10.1093/biomet/39.3-4.324
5.
BrodyS. D.ZahranS.VedlitzA.GroverH. (2008). Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environment and Behavior, 40, 72-95. doi:10.1177/0013916506298800
6.
Bruine de BruinW.Wong-ParodiG.MorganM. G. (2014). Public perceptions of local flood risk and the role of climate change. Environment Systems and Decisions, 34, 591-599. doi:10.1007/s10669-014-9513-6
7.
CornerA.MarkowitzE.PidgeonN. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5, 411-422. doi:10.1002/wcc.269
8.
DavidsonD. J.FreudenburgW. R. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302-339. doi:10.1177/0013916596283003
9.
DittrichR.FrancisB.HatzingerR.KatzenbeisserW. (2007). A paired comparison approach for the analysis of sets of Likert-scale responses. Statistical Modelling, 7, 3-28. doi:10.1177/1471082X0600700102
FranssonN.GärlingT. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0141
13.
FrazierT. G.WoodN.YarnalB.BauerD. H. (2010). Influence of potential sea level rise on societal vulnerability to hurricane storm-surge hazards, Sarasota County, Florida. Applied Geography, 30, 490-505. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.05.005
14.
GeigerN.SwimJ. K. (2014, February). A single-item alternative to the six Americas screening instrument. Poster presented at Society for Personality and Social Psychology Convention, Sustainability Preconference, Austin, TX.
15.
GeigerN.SwimJ. K. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79-90. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002
16.
GiffordR. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. American Psychologist, 66, 290-302. doi:10.1037/a0023566
17.
GiffordR.ScannellL.KormosC.SmolovaL.BielA.BoncuS.KorpelaK. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 1-12. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
18.
GrometD. M.KunreutherH.LarrickR. P. (2013). Political ideology affects energy-efficiency attitudes and choices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 9314-9319. doi:10.1073/pnas.1218453110
19.
GrothmannT.PattA. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 199-213. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
20.
HartP. S.NisbetE. C. (2011). Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39, 701-723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646
21.
HatfieldJ.JobR. F. S. (2001). Optimism bias about environmental degradation: The role of the range of impact of precautions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 17-30. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0190
22.
HatzingerR.DittrichR. (2012). Prefmod: An R package for modeling preferences based on paired comparisons, rankings, or ratings. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-31. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i10
23.
HawkinsE.SuttonR. (2009). The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 1095-1107. doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2607.1
24.
KahanD. M.CrowD.BoykoffM. T. (2014). Making climate-science communication evidence-based: All the way down. In CrowD.BoykoffM. (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes our common future (pp. 203-220). London, England: Routledge.
25.
KellensW.TerpstraT.De MaeyerP. (2012). Perception and communication of flood risks: A systematic review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 33, 24-49. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01844.x
26.
KellerC.SiegristM.GutscherH. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26, 631-639. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00773.x
27.
KundaZ. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
28.
LeiserowitzA. (2007). Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In MoserS.DillingL. (Eds.), Creating a climate for change: Communicating climate change and facilitating social change (pp. 44-63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LeiserowitzA. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous?Risk Analysis, 25, 1433-1442. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
30.
LibermanN.TropeY.StephanE. (2007). Psychological distance. In KruglanskiA.HigginsE. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2, pp. 353-383). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
LorenzoniI.Nicholson-ColeS.WhitmarshL. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17, 445-459. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
33.
MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.LeiserowitzA. (2009). Global warming’s six Americas 2009: An audience segmentation analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies (Yale University); Center for Climate Change Communication, Department of Communication (George Mason University). Retrieved from http://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/global-warmings-six-americas-2009/
34.
MerrifieldM. A.MerrifieldS. T.MitchumG. T. (2009). An anomalous recent acceleration of global sea level rise. Journal of Climate, 22, 5772-5781. doi:10.1175/2009JCLI2985.1
35.
MonmonierM. (2008). Web cartography and the dissemination of cartographic information about coastal inundation and sea level rise. In PetersonP. M. P. (Ed.), International perspectives on maps and the Internet (pp. 49-71). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
36.
MoserS. C. (2010). Communicating climate change: History, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 31-53. doi:10.1002/wcc.11
37.
Nicholson-ColeS. A. (2005). Representing climate change futures: A critique on the use of images for visual communication. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29, 255-273. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.002
38.
NilssonA.von BorgstedeC.BielA. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 267-277. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.002
39.
NisbetM. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51, 12-23. doi:10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
40.
OckwellD.WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: Forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement?Science Communication, 30, 305-327. doi:10.1177/1075547008328969
41.
O’NeillS. J.HulmeM. (2009). An iconic approach for representing climate change. Global Environmental Change, 19, 402-410. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.07.004
42.
O’NeillS.Nicholson-ColeS. (2009). “Fear won’t do it”: Promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication, 30, 355-379. doi:10.1177/1075547008329201
43.
PidgeonN.FischhoffB. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature Climate Change, 1, 35-41. doi:10.1038/nclimate1080
44.
RaynerS.MaloneE. L. (1997). Zen and the art of climate maintenance. Nature, 390, 332-334. doi:10.1038/36975
45.
RetchlessD. P. (2014a). Communicating climate change: Spatial analog versus color-banded isoline maps with and without accompanying text. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 41, 55-74. doi:10.1080/15230406.2013.826479
46.
RetchlessD. P. (2014b). Sea level rise maps: How individual differences complicate the cartographic communication of an uncertain climate change hazard. Cartographic Perspectives, 77, 17-32. doi:10.14714/CP77.1235
47.
Roser-RenoufC.MaibachE.LeiserowitzA.FeinbergG.RosenthalS.KreslakeJ. (2014). Global warming’s six Americas, October, 2014: Perception of the health consequences of global warming and update on key beliefs. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change Communication (Yale University and George Mason University). Retrieved from http://environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Six-Americas-October-2014.pdf
48.
RothR. E. (2013). An empirically-derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19, 2356-2365. doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.130
49.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45, 60-85. doi:10.1177/0013916511421196
50.
SchrothO.PondE.SheppardS. R. J. (2015). Evaluating presentation formats of local climate change in community planning with regard to process and outcomes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 147-158. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.03.011
51.
SchultzP. W.MilfontT. L.ChanceR. C.TronuG.LuísS.AndoK.. . . GouveiaV. V. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46, 267-302. doi:10.1177/0013916512458579
52.
ShadishW. R.CookT. D.CampbellD. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (pp. 103-134). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
53.
ShawA.SheppardS.BurchS.FlandersD.WiekA.CarmichaelJ.. . . CohenS. (2009). Making local futures tangible—Synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change, 19, 447-463. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.002
54.
SheppardS. R. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science & Policy, 8, 637-654. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002
55.
SheppardS. R. J.ShawA.FlandersD.BurchS.WiekA.CarmichaelJ.. . . CohenS. (2011). Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures, 43, 400-412. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
56.
SlocumR. (2004). Polar bears and energy-efficient lightbulbs: Strategies to bring climate change home. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 22, 413-438. doi:10.1068/d378
57.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregorD. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
58.
SpenceA.PidgeonN. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656-667. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
59.
SpenceA.PoortingaW.PidgeonN. (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32, 957-972. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
60.
StraussB. H.ZiemlinskiR.WeissJ. L.OverpeckJ. T. (2012). Tidally adjusted estimates of topographic vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding for the contiguous United States. Environmental Research Letters, 7, 014033. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014033
61.
SwimJ.ClaytonS.DohertyT.GiffordR.HowardG.ReserJ.. . . WeberE. (2009). Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. A report by the American Psychological Association’s task force on the interface between psychology and global climate change. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/science/about/publications/climate-change.pdf
62.
ThomasM.PidgeonN.WhitmarshL.BallingerR. (2015). Mental models of sea-level change: A mixed methods analysis on the Severn Estuary, UK. Global Environmental Change, 33, 71-82. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.009
63.
UzzellD. L. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimension of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 307-318. doi:10.1006/jevp.2000.0175
64.
van der LindenS. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112-124. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012
65.
WhitmarshL. (2008). Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. Journal of Risk Research, 11, 351-374. doi:10.1080/13669870701552235
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
