There has been little policy effort to address sea level rise in coastal states in the US. It is important to examine, at the state level, how the multitude of different (and changing) actors with different preferences and perspectives contribute to such inertia. This study examines state-level legislative inaction with regards to sea level rise. Using Kingdon's multiple streams framework, we draw a picture of the policy landscape in Virginia as one where the problem of sea level rise is perceived as a low priority, with little consensus on achievable policy solutions, and is politically controversial. We find that policy inertia in Virginia is a result of (1) fractious viewpoints regarding sea level rise as a problem, (2) a lack of clear consensus on policy solutions, and (3) conflicting perspectives of the role of the state.
AgnoneJ (2007) “Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the U.S. environmental movement”. Social Forces85: 1593–1620
2.
AmundsenHBerglundFWestskogôH (2010) “Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation – a question of multilevel governance?”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy28: 276–289
3.
BaumgartnerF RJonesB D (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
4.
Biesbroek G R, Termeer C J A M, Kabat P, Klostermann J E M, 2009, “Institutional governance barriers for the development and implementation of climate adaptation strategies”, International Human Dimensions Programme (IHDP) Conference “Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet”, Amsterdam, 2–4 December, http://www.earthsystemgovernance.org/ac2009/papers/AC2009-0044.pdf
5.
BinderB (2011) “Impact of climate change on public health”. Public Manager40: 32–36
BrodySGroverHLindquistEVedlitzA (2010) “Examining climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviours among public sector organisations in the USA”. Local Environment15: 591–603
8.
BrownC P (2007) “Examining the streams of a retention policy to understand the politics of high-stakes reform”. Education Policy Analysis Archives15: 1–26
9.
CookB J (2010) “Arenas of power in climate change policymaking”. Policy Studies Journal38: 465–486
10.
CulpR F (2005) “The rise and stall of prison privatization: An integration of policy analysis perspectives”. Criminal Justice Policy Review16: 412–442
11.
CrabbéPRobinM (2006) “Institutional adaptation of water resource infrastructures to climate change in Eastern Ontario”. Climatic Change78: 103–133
12.
DannevigHHovelsrudG KHusabøI A (2013) “Driving the agenda for climate change adaptation in Norwegian municipalities”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy31: 490–505
13.
DownsA (1972) “Up and down with ecology—the ‘issue-attention cycle’”. The Public Interest28: 38–50
Francesch-HuidobroM (2012) “Institutional deficit and lack of legitimacy: the challenges of climate change governance in Hong Kong”. Environmental Politics21: 791–810
Hjerpe M, Storbjörk S, Alberth J, 2014, ““There is nothing political in it”: triggers of local political leaders' engagement in climate adaptation” Local Environment Epub ahead of print, DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2013.872092
21.
HowlettMRameshMPerlA (2009) Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles & Policy Subsystems, 3rd. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press
22.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptations and Vulnerability, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
23.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Pysical Science Basis, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
24.
JacquesP JDunlapR EFreemanM (2008) “The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism”. Environmental Politics17: 349–385
25.
KingdonJ W (1995) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman
26.
LubellMZahranSVedlitzA (2007) “Collective action and citizen responses to global warming”. Political Behavior29: 391–413
27.
MacNeilR (2013) “Alternative climate policy pathways in the US”. Climate Policy13: 259–276
MoserSKaspersonRYoheGAgyemanJ (2008) “Adaptation to climate change in the Northeast United States: opportunities, processes, constraints”. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change13: 643–659
30.
MoserS C (2005) “Impact assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: an exploration of human-dimension uncertainties”. Global Environmental Change15: 353–369
31.
MozumderPFlugmanERandhirT (2011) “Adaptation behavior in the face of global climate change: survey responses from experts and decision makers serving the Florida Keys”. Ocean and Coastal Management54: 37–44
32.
NæssL OBangGEriksenSVevatneJ (2005) “Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway”. Global Environmental Change15: 125–138
NichollsR JKebedeA S (2012) “Indirect impacts of coastal climate change and sea-level rise: the UK example”. Climate Policy12: S28–S52
36.
NisbetM CMyersT (2007) “The polls—trends: twenty years of public opinion about global warming”. Public Opinion Quarterly71: 444–470
37.
OrderuG IKelmanI (2011) “Norweigan mayoral awareness of and attitudes towards climate change”. International Journak of Environmental Studies68: 667–686
38.
Penning-RowsellEJohnsonCTunstallS (2006) “'Signals' from pre-crisis discourse: lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change?”. Global Environmental Change16: 323–339
PralleS B (2009) “Agenda-setting and climate change”. Environmental Politics18(5): 781–799
41.
PykeC RThomasRPorterR DHellmannJ JDukesJ SLodgeD MChavarriaG (2008) “Current practices and future opportunities for policy on climate change and invasive species”. Conservation Biology22: 585–592
42.
RabeB G (2010) “Introduction: the challenges of U.S. climate governance”. In: B GRabe (eds) Greenhouse Governance: Addressing Climate Change in America, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, pp. 3–23
43.
SelinHVan DeveerS D (2007) “Political science and prediction: what's next for U.S. climate change policy?”. Review of Policy Research24: 1–27
44.
SelmanJDaigleM (2011) “Attracting strange bedfellows: climate users reshape the conversation”. Public Manager40: 51–54
45.
SimonM VAlmL R (1995) “Policy windows and two-level games: explaining the passage of acid-rain legislation in the Clean Air Act of 1990”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy13: 459–478
SoleckiW DShelleyF M (1996) “Pollution, political agendas, and policy windows: environmental policy on the eve of Silent Spring”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy14: 451–468
49.
StammK RClarkFEblacasP R (2000) “Mass communication and public understanding of environmental problems: the case of global warming”. Public Understanding of Science9: 219–237
50.
Strauss B H, Ziemlinski R, Weiss J L, & Overpeck J T, 2012. “Tidally adjusted estimates of topographic vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding for the contiguous United States” Environmental Research Letters, DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/7/1/014033
51.
SundbladE-LBielAGärlingT (2009) “Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons”. Environment and Behavior41: 281–302
52.
UrwinKJordanA (2008) “Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance”. Global Environmental Change18: 180–191
53.
Coastline Population Trends in the United States: 1960 to 20082010Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, pp. P25–1139
54.
WeingartPEngelsAPansegrauP (2000) “Risks of communication: discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media”. Public Understanding of Science9: 261–283
55.
WheelerS M (2008) “State and municipal climate change plans: the first generation”. Journal of the American Planning Association74: 481–496
56.
WuS-YNajjarRSiewertJ (2009) “Potential impacts of sea-level rise on the mid- and upper-Atlantic region of the United States”. Climatic Change95: 121–138
57.
YusufJ-ESt JohnBAshI (2014) “The role of politics and proximity in sea level rise policy salience: A study of Virginia legislators' perceptions”. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science4: 208–217
58.
ZahranSBrodyS DVedlitzAGroverHMillerC (2008) “Vulnerability and capacity: explaining local commitment to climate-change policy”. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26: 544–562
