As specialty crop production has become increasingly important to U.S. agriculture, public and private stakeholders have called for research and outreach efforts centered on risks posed by climate change. Drawing on a survey of specialty crop farmers, this study explores farmers’ perceptions of climate change risks. Underlying cognitive, experiential, and socio-cultural factors hypothesized to influence farmers’ climate change risk perceptions are tested using structural equation modeling techniques. Results show that specialty crop farmers exhibit an overall moderate concern about climatic risks. The more capable and prepared farmers feel themselves to be, the less concerned they are about climate change. Farmers who have recently experienced more extreme weather events perceive climate change to present greater risks. In addition, farmers’ risk perceptions are also shaped by attitudes toward human exemptionalism and productivism values. Based on these findings, we provide recommendations for outreach and future research.
AbidM.SchillingJ.ScheffranJ.ZulfiqarF. (2016). Climate change vulnerability, adaptation and risk perceptions at farm level in Punjab, Pakistan. Science of the Total Environment, 547, 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.125
2.
AhmedS.SteppJ. R. (2016). Beyond yields: Climate effects on specialty crop quality and agroecological management. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 92. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000092
3.
AllisonP. D. (2010). Missing data. In MarsdenP. V.WrightJ. D. (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 631–657). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
4.
AndersonJ. (2011). Historical climate trends in Michigan and the Great Lakes Region. In DietzT.BidwellD. (Eds.), Climate change in the Great Lakes region: Navigating an uncertain future (pp. 17–34). Michigan State University Press.
5.
AnsariM. A.JoshiS.RaghuvanshiR. (2018). Understanding farmers perceptions about climate change: A study in a North Indian State. Advances in Agriculture and Environmental Science, 1(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.30881/aaeoa.00015
6.
ArbuckleJ. G.MortonL. W.HobbsJ. (2015). Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: The roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513503832
7.
ArbuckleJ. G.MortonL. W.HobbsJ. (2013). Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: Evidence from Iowa. Climatic Change, 118(3–4), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0700-0
BanduraA. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge University Press.
12.
BrodtS.KlonskyK.TourteL. (2006). Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agricultural Systems, 89(1), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.08.005
13.
BrulleR. J.DunlapR. E. (2015). Sociology and global climate change. In DunlapR. E.BrulleR. J. (Eds.), Climate change and society: Sociological perspectives (pp. 1–31). Oxford University Press.
14.
BryantC. R.SmitB.BrklacichM.JohnstonT. R.SmithersJ.ChiottiQ.SinghB. (2000). Adaptation in Canadian agriculture to climatic variability and change. In KaneS. M.YoheG. W. (Eds.), Societal adaptation to climate variability and change (pp. 181–201). Springer.
15.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020, July6). Occupational employment statistics-occupational employment and wages: 45-2092 farmworkers and laborers, crop, nursery, and greenhouse. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes452092.htm
16.
CarltonJ. S.MaseA. S.KnutsonC. L.LemosM. C.HaighT.TodeyD. P.ProkopyL. S. (2016). The effects of extreme drought on climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation attitudes. Climatic Change, 135(2), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1561-5
17.
CattonW. R.DunlapR. E. (1978). Environmental sociology: A new paradigm. The American Sociologist, 13(1), 41–49.
18.
CornerA.MarkowitzE.PidgeonN. (2014). Public engagement with climate change: The role of human values. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 5(3), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.269
19.
De GrootJ. I.StegL. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
20.
DeressaT. T.HassanR. M.RinglerC.AlemuT.YesufM. (2009). Determinants of farmers’ choice of adaptation methods to climate change in the Nile Basin of Ethiopia. Global Environmental Change, 19(2), 248–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.002
21.
DietzT.BidwellD. (2011). Climate change in the great lakes region: Navigating an uncertain future. Michigan State University Press.
22.
DolnicarS.GrunB.LeischF.RossiterJ. (2011). Three good reasons NOT to use five and seven point Likert items. University of Wollongong Australia. https://ro.uow.edu.au/commpapers/775
EitzingerA.BinderC. R.MeyerM. A. (2018). Risk perception and decision-making: Do farmers consider risks from climate change?Climatic Change, 151(3–4), 507–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2320-1
25.
FellmannT. (2012). The assessment of climate change-related vulnerability in the agricultural sector: Reviewing conceptual frameworks. In MeybeckA.LankoskiJ.RedfernS. (Eds.), Building resilience for adaptation to climate change in the agriculture sector (pp. 37–61). Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/agphome/documents/faooecd/oecd_proceedings.pdf#page=44
26.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
27.
FrankE.EakinH.López-CarrD. (2011). Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.001
28.
GardeziM.ArbuckleJ. G. (2019). Spatially representing vulnerability to extreme rain events using midwestern farmers’ objective and perceived attributes of adaptive capacity. Risk Analysis, 39(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12943
29.
GardeziM.ArbuckleJ. G. (2020). Techno-optimism and farmers’ attitudes toward climate change adaptation. Environment and Behavior, 52(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518793482
30.
GarlandD. (2003). The rise of risk. In DoyleA.EricsonR. V. (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 48–86). University of Toronto Press.
31.
GrothmannT.PattA. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002
32.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
33.
HairJ. F.HultG.T.M.RingleC.SarstedtM. (2017). A Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
34.
HanG.SchoolmanE. D.MortonL. W.ArbuckleJ. G. (2018). 2017 survey of specialty crop growers in Michigan and Ohio. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. https://store.extension.iastate.edu/product/15450
35.
HatfieldJ. L.MortonL. W.HallB. (2018). Vulnerability of grain crops and croplands in the Midwest to climatic variability and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change, 146, 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1997-x
36.
HitayezuP.WaleE.OrtmannG. (2017). Assessing farmers’ perceptions about climate change: A double-hurdle approach. Climate Risk Management, 17, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2017.07.001
37.
HoustonL.CapalboS.SeavertC.DaltonM.BrylaD.SagiliR. (2018). Specialty fruit production in the Pacific Northwest: Adaptation strategies for a changing climate. Climatic Change, 146, 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1951-y
38.
HowdenS. M.SoussanaJ. F.TubielloF. N.ChhetriN.DunlopM.MeinkeH. (2007). Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50), 19691–19696. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701890104
39.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
40.
HylandJ. J.JonesD. L.ParkhillK. A.BarnesA. P.WilliamsA. P. (2016). Farmers’ perceptions of climate change: Identifying types. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-015-9608-9
JanssenM.OstromE. (2006). Resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation: A cross-cutting theme of the international human dimensions programme on global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 237–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.003
KaspersonR. E.RennO.SlovicP.BrownH. S.EmelJ.GobleR.KaspersonJ. X.RatickS. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
47.
KistnerE.KellnerO.AndresenJ.TodeyD.MortonL. W. (2018). Vulnerability of specialty crops to short-term climatic variability and adaptation strategies in the Midwestern USA. Climatic Change, 146, 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2066-1
LeiserowitzA. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
50.
LinL. C.HuangP. H.WengL. J. (2017). Selecting path models in SEM: A comparison of model selection criteria. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 24(6), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2017.1363652
MarlonJ. R.LindenS.HoweP. D.LeiserowitzA.WooS. H. L.BroadK. (2019). Detecting local environmental change: The role of experience in shaping risk judgements about global warming. Journal of Risk Research, 22(7), 936–950. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1430051
53.
MaseA. S.ChoH.ProkopyL. (2015). Enhancing the social amplifications of risk framework (SARF) by exploring trust, the availability heuristic, and agricultural advisors’ belief in climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.004
54.
MaseA. S.GramigB. M.ProkopyL. S. (2017). Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern US crop farmers. Climate Risk Management, 15, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.11.004
55.
MattsC.ConnerD. S.FisherC.TylerS.HammM. W. (2016). Farmer perspectives of Farm to Institution in Michigan: 2012 Survey results of vegetable farmers. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 31(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170514000465
56.
McGuireJ. M.MortonL. W.ArbuckleJ. G.CastA. D. (2015). Farmer identities and responses to the social–biophysical environment. Journal of Rural Studies, 39, 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.011
57.
McGuireJ.MortonL. W.CastA. D. (2013). Reconstructing the good farmer identity: Shifts in farmer identities and farm management practices to improve water quality. Agriculture and Human Values, 30(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-012-9381-y
58.
MitterH.LarcherM.SchönhartM.StöttingerM.SchmidE. (2019). Exploring farmers’ climate change perceptions and adaptation intentions: Empirical evidence from Austria. Environmental Management, 63(6), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01158-7
59.
MortonL. W. (2020). Social understandings and expectations: Agricultural management and conservation of soil and water resources in the United States. In DelgadoJ. A.GantzerC. J.SassenrathG. F. (Eds.), Soil and water conservation: A celebration of 75 years (pp. 42–56). Soil and Water Conservation Society.
60.
MortonL. W.HobbsJ.ArbuckleJ. G.LoyA. (2015). Upper Midwest climate variations: Farmer responses to excess water risks. Journal of Environmental Quality, 44(3), 810–822. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2014.08.0352
61.
MortonL. W.Roesch-McNallyG.WilkeA. K. (2017). Upper Midwest farmer perceptions: Too much uncertainty about impacts of climate change to justify changing current agricultural practices. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 72(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.72.3.215
62.
MoscoviciS. (1973). Foreword. In HerzlichC. (Ed.), Health and illness: A social psychological analysis (pp. ix–xiv). Academic Press.
63.
MoscoviciS. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
MoshagenM.ErdfelderE. (2016). A new strategy for testing structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 23(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.950896
NilesM. T.BrownM.DynesR. (2016). Farmer’s intended and actual adoption of climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. Climatic Change, 135, 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1558-0
RennO.SwatonE. (1984). Psychological and sociological approaches to study risk perception. Environment International, 10(5), 557–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(84)90063-1
76.
SandersonM. R.CurtisA. L. (2016). Culture, climate change and farm-level groundwater management: An Australian case study. Journal of Hydrology, 536, 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.02.032
77.
SchattmanR. E.ConnerD.MéndezV. E. (2016). Farmer perceptions of climate change risk and associated on-farm management strategies in Vermont, northeastern United States. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 000131. https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000131
78.
SchoolmanE. D. (2020) Local food and civic engagement: Do farmers who market local food feel more responsible for their communities?Rural Sociology, 85(3), 806–839. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12326
79.
SchoolmanE. D.MortonL. W.ArbuckleJ. G.HanG. (2021). Marketing to the foodshed: Why do farmers participate in local food systems?Journal of Rural Studies, 84, 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.055
80.
SchumackerR. E.LomaxR. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
81.
SearaT.ClayP. M.ColburnL. L. (2016). Perceived adaptive capacity and natural disasters: A fisheries case study. Global Environmental Change, 38, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.01.006
82.
SinghH. C. P. (2013). Adaptation and mitigation strategies for climate-resilient horticulture. In SinghH. C. P.RaoN. K. S.ShivashankarK. S. (Eds.), Climate-resilient horticulture: Adaptation and mitigation strategies (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0974-4
SlovicP. (2010). The feeling of risk: New perspectives on risk perception. Routledge.
85.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregorD. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
86.
SmitB.SkinnerM. W. (2002). Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: A typology. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015862228270
SternP. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
89.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
90.
SundbladE. L.BielA.GärlingT. (2007). Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.003
VaillancourtJ. G. (2010). From environmental sociology to global ecosociology: The Dunlap-Buttel debates. In RedcliftM. R.WoodgateG. (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 48–62). Edward Elgar Publishing.
93.
van der LindenS. (2014). On the relationship between personal experience, affect and risk perception: The case of climate change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2008
94.
van der LindenS. (2015). The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 41, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.11.012
95.
van der LindenS. (2017). Determinants and measurement of climate change risk perception, worry, and concern. In NisbetM. C.SchaferM.MarkowitzE.HoS.O’NeillS.ThakerJ. (Eds.), The Oxford encyclopedia of climate change communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2953631
WatsonR. (2011). Risk in the context of (human-induced) climate change. In SkinnsL.ScottM.CoxT. (Eds.), Risk (pp. 159–180). Cambridge University Press.
98.
WeberE. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
99.
WeberE. U.SternP. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
100.
YehM. C.Glick-BauerM.WechslerS. (2016). Fruit and vegetable consumption in the United States: Patterns, barriers and federal nutrition assistance programs. In WatsonR. R.PreedyV. R. (Eds.), Fruits, vegetables, and herbs (pp. 411–422). Academic Press.
