In 2014, the Canary Islands were exposed to a decision-making process for an oil drilling project 80 kilometers offshore. Whereas the national government was in favor of oil drilling, the local government was against it because of the environmental impact, and the effect on tourism and the coastal ecosystem. In this study, we analyze the reactions of the local community to this project by connecting beliefs, perceived benefits, perceived risk, procedural justice, negative emotions, and acceptance through a tested structural equation model. The results showed that acceptance was essentially explained by perceived benefits and negative emotions, whereas perceived benefits and procedural justice predicted negative emotions. Several differences between males and females were found. These results are discussed in relation to the importance of understanding the effects and emotional reactions of this type of project on the population before the final decision making.
AjzenI. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27-58. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
2.
Arroyo-LópezP. E. (2012). Design of e-waste recycling programmes taking participant motivations into account: An exploratory study in the State of Mexico. Psyecology, 3, 63-74.
3.
BatelS.Devine-WrightP.TangelandT. (2013). Social acceptance of low carbon energy and associated infrastructures: A critical discussion. Energy Policy, 58, 1-5. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.018
4.
BearthA.SiegristM. (2016). Are risk or benefit perceptions more important for public acceptance of innovative food technologies: A meta-analysis. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 49, 14-23. doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2016.01.003
5.
BeaudryA.PinsonneaultA. (2005). Understanding user responses to information technology: A coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly, 29, 493-524. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148693
6.
BentlerP. M. (1989). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
7.
BidwellD. (2013). The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy, 58, 189-199. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010
8.
BinderA. R.ScheufeleD. A.BrossardD.GuntherA. C. (2011). Interpersonal amplification of risk? Citizen discussions and their impact on perceptions of risks and benefits of a biological research facility. Risk Analysis, 31, 324-334. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01516.x
9.
BollenK. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
10.
BriñolP.GandarillasB.HorcajoJ.BecerraA. (2010). Emotion and meta-cognition: Implications for attitude change. Revista de Psicología Social, 25, 157-183. doi:10.1174/021347410791063787
11.
CacciatoreM. A.BinderA. R.ScheufeleD. A.ShawB. R. (2012). Public attitudes toward biofuels: Effects of knowledge, political partisanship, and media use. Politics and the Life Sciences, 31, 36-51. doi:10.2990/31_1-2_36
12.
CarlisleJ. E.FeezellJ. T.MichaudK. E.SmithE. R.SmithL. (2010). The public’s trust in scientific claims regarding offshore oil drilling. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 514-527. doi:10.1177/0963662510375663
13.
CarrusG.PassafaroP.BonnesM. (2008). Emotions, habits and rational choices in ecological behaviors: The case of recycling and use of public transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.003
14.
ChaudhuriA. (2002). A study of emotion and reason in products and services. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 1, 267-279. doi:10.1002/cb.72
15.
Corral-VerdugoV.CarrusG.BonnesM.MoserG.SinhaJ. (2008). Environmental beliefs and endorsement of sustainable development principles in water conservation: Towards a new human interdependence paradigm scale. Environment and Behavior, 40, 703-725. doi:10.1177/0013916507308786
16.
Corral-VerdugoV.FríasM. B.GaxiolaJ.FraijoB.TapiaC.CorralN. (2014). Ambientes positivos: Ideando entornos sostenibles para el bienestar humano y la calidad ambiental [Positive environments. Designing sustainable environments for human well-being and environmental quality]. México City, México: Pearson Educación.
17.
DamasioA. (1998). Emotion and reason in the future of human life. In CartldedgeB. (Ed.), Mind, brain and the environment: The Linacre lectures 1995–96 (pp. 57-71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
DeCiccoJ.YanT.KeuschF.MuñozD. H.NeidertL. (2015). US consumer attitudes and expectations about energy. Energy Policy, 86, 749-758. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.022
19.
Devine-WrightP. (2007). Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: A critical review. Manchester, UK: School of Environment and Development, University of Manchester. Retrieved from http://geography.exeter.ac.uk/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/bn_wp1_4.pdf
20.
Devine-WrightP. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426-441. doi:10.1002/casp.1004
21.
Devine-WrightP. (2011). Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: A UK case study. Energy Policy, 39, 83-93. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2010.09.012
22.
DincerI. (1999). Environmental impacts of energy. Energy Policy, 27, 845-854. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(99)00068-3
23.
DominelliL. (2013). Environmental justice at the heart of social work practice: Greening the profession. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 431-439. doi:10.1111/ijsw.12024
24.
DreyerS. J.TeislM. F.McCoyS. K. (2015). Are acceptance, support, and the factors that affect them, different? Examining perceptions of US fuel economy standards. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 39, 65-75. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.06.002
25.
DuboisJ.AdolphsR. (2015). Neuropsychology: How many emotions are there?Current Biology, 25, 1945-1954. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.037
26.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK.MertigA.JonesR. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00176
27.
DuránM.AlzateM.LópezW.SabucedoJ. M. (2007). Emociones y comportamiento pro-ambiental [Emotions and pro-environmental behavior]. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 39, 287-296. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlps/v39n2/v39n2a06.pdf
28.
DuránM.FerracesM. J.RodríguezM.SabucedoJ. M. (2016). The role of anticipated emotions in recycling intention: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Psyecology, 7, 89-110. doi:10.1080/21711976.2015.1114215
29.
EdinoM. O.NsoforG. N.BombomL. S. (2010). Perceptions and attitudes towards gas flaring in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. The Environmentalist, 30, 67-75. doi:10.1007/s10669-009-9244-2
FirestoneJ.KemptonW. (2007). Public opinion about large offshore wind power: Underlying factors. Energy Policy, 35, 1584-1598. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010
35.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
36.
FrankE.EakinH.López-CarrD. (2011). Social identity, perception and motivation in adaptation to climate risk in the coffee sector of Chiapas, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 21, 66-76. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.001
37.
FriedM. (2000). Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 193-205. doi:10.1006/jevp.1999.0154
38.
GaillardJ. H. (2008). Alternative paradigms of volcanic risk perception: The case of Mt. Pinatubo in the Philippines. Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 172, 315-328. doi:10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2007.12.036
HernándezB.SuárezE.HessS.CorralV. (2010). Ecological worldviews. In CorralV.GarcíaC.FríasM. (Eds.), Psychological approaches to sustainability current trends in theory: Research and applications (pp. 83-107). New York, NY: Nova.
ImranS.AlamK.BeaumontN. (2014). Environmental orientations and environmental behavior: Perceptions of protected area tourism stakeholders. Tourism Management, 40, 290-299. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.003
43.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202. doi:10.1177/00139169921972056
44.
KraeuselJ.MöstD. (2012). Carbon capture and storage on its way to large-scale deployment: Social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany. Energy Policy, 49, 642-651. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.006
45.
LaiP.-H.KreuterU. P. (2012). Examining the direct and indirect effects of environmental change and place attachment on land management decisions in the hill country of Texas, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning, 104, 320-328. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.007
46.
LavergneK. J.SharpE. C.PelletierL. G.HoltbyA. (2010). The role of perceived style in the facilitation of self-determined and non self-determined motivation for pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 169-177. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.002
47.
LeiserowitzA. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change, 77, 45-72. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
48.
LeiserowitzA. A.KatesR. W.ParrisT. M. (2006). Sustainability values, attitudes, and behaviors: A review of multinational and global trends. Annual Review Environmental Resources, 31, 413-444. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102505.133552
49.
LilleyJ.FirestoneJ. (2013). The effect of the 2010 gulf oil spill on public attitudes toward offshore oil drilling and wind development. Energy Policy, 62, 90-98. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.139
50.
MackinnonA.JormA. F.ChristensenH.KortenA. E.JacombP. A.RodgersB. (1999). A short form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule: Evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27, 405-416. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00251-7
51.
MazerolleL.BennettS.DavisJ.SargeantE.ManningM. (2013). Procedural justice and police legitimacy: A systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 245-274. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9175-2
52.
MestreJ. M.GuilR. (2012). La regulación de las emociones [The regulation of emotions]. Madrid, Spain: Psicología Pirámide.
53.
MilliganM. J. (2003). Displacement and identity discontinuity: The role of nostalgia in establishing new identity categories. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 381-403. doi:10.1525/si.2003.26.3.381
54.
MoorsA.EllsworthP. C.SchererK. R.FrijdaN. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5, 119-124. doi:10.1177/1754073912468165
55.
MukherjeeD.RahmanM. A. (2016). To drill or not to drill? An econometric analysis of US public opinion. Energy Policy, 91, 341-351. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.11.023
56.
NapierJ. L.TylerT. R. (2008). Does moral conviction really override concerns about procedural justice? A reexamination of the value protection model. Social Justice Research, 21, 509-528. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0083-y
57.
NeceferL.Wong-ParodiG.JaramilloP.SmallM. J. (2015). Energy development and Native Americans: Values and beliefs about energy from the Navajo Nation. Energy Research & Social Science, 7, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.02.007
58.
O’ConnorR. E.BordR. J.FisherA. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461-471.
59.
OmerA. M. (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12, 2265-2300. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.05.001
60.
PalmeroF. (2001). La emoción en la actualidad: La relevancia de la adaptación [Emotion today: The relevance of adaptation]. Psicología Iberoamericana, 9, 38-45.
61.
PeroL. V.SmithT. F. (2008). Institutional credibility and leadership: Critical challenges for community-based natural resource governance in rural and remote Australia. Regional Environmental Change, 8, 15-29. doi:10.1007/s10113-007-0042-4
62.
PetersE. M.BurrastonB.MertzC. K. (2004). An emotion-based model of risk perception and stigma susceptibility: Cognitive appraisals of emotion, affective reactivity, worldviews, and risk perceptions in the generation of technological stigma. Risk Analysis, 24, 1349-1367. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00531.x
63.
PortneyK. E. (1991). Siting hazardous waste treatment facilities: The NIMBY syndrome. New York, NY: Auburn House.
64.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from https://www.R-project.org/
65.
RauI.Schweizer-RiesP.HildebrandtJ. (2012). The silver bullet for the acceptance of renewable energies. In KabischS.KunathA.Schweizer-RiesP.SteinfüherA. (Eds.), Vulnerability, risks, and complexity: Impact of global change on human habitats (pp. 177-191). New York, NY: Hogrefe.
66.
RosseelY. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1-36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
67.
RuizC.HernándezB. (2014). Emotions and coping strategies during an episode of volcanic activity and their relations to place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 279-287. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.03.008
68.
SeligmanM.ReivichK.JaycoxL.GillhamJ. (1995). The optimistic child. New York: Harper Perennial.
69.
SiegristM.CvetkovichG.RothC. (2000). Salient value similarity, social trust, and risk/benefit perception. Risk Analysis, 20, 353-362. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034
70.
SiegristM.GutscherH.EarleT. C. (2005). Perception of risk: The influence of general trust, and general confidence. Journal of Risk Research, 8, 145-156.
SjöbergL. (2003). Risk perception, emotion and policy: The case of nuclear technology. European Review, 11, 109-128. doi:10.1017/S1062798703000127
73.
SlimakM. W.DietzT. (2006). Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk analysis, 26, 1689-1705. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00832.x
74.
StegL.DreijerinkL.AbrahamseW. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 415-425. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003
75.
SteinR.Buzcu-GuvenB.Dueñas-OsorioL.SubramanianD.KahleD. (2013). How risk perceptions influence evacuations from hurricanes and compliance with government directives. Policy Studies Journal, 41, 319-342. doi:10.1111/psj.12019
76.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT. D.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-97. Retrieved from http://cedar.wwu.edu/hcop_facpubs/1
77.
ThompsonE. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 227-242. doi:10.1177/0022022106297301
78.
TobinG. A.WhitefordL. M.JonesE. C.MurphyA. D.GarrenS. J.PadrosC. V. (2011). The role of individual well-being in risk perception and evacuation for chronic vs. acute natural hazards in Mexico. Applied Geography, 31, 700-711. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.12.008
79.
UphamP.OltraC.BosoÀ. (2015). Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 100-112. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003
80.
VenkateshV. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, 342-365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
81.
ViningJ.EbreoA. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodologic al perspective on conservation behavior. In BechtelR.ChurchmanA. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541-558). New York, NY: John Wiley.
82.
VisschersV. H.SiegristM. (2012). Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants. Energy Policy, 46, 292-300. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.062
83.
VisschersV. H.SiegristM. (2014). Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 117-130. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.007
84.
WalkerB. J.WiersmaB.BaileyE. (2014). Community benefits, framing and the social acceptance of offshore wind farms: An experimental study in England. Energy Research & Social Science, 3, 46-54. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.07.003
85.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative emotions: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
