The aim of the study was to empirically test whether grouping people according to their general beliefs, combined with positional factors, can explain environmental concern, and whether there are country differences in this respect. The study is based on the United States, Canadian, Norwegian, and Swedish parts of The International Social Survey Program (ISSP) survey 2000 on environmental concern. The four countries were paired resulting in a comparison between North America and Scandinavia. The results showed that general beliefs, together with education and political affiliation, were the most stable predictors of environmental concern, and that adding general beliefs to the analysis improves the explanatory power in a significant way.
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behaviour. In J. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-63). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Beck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: Sociology of the second age of modernity. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 79-105.
4.
Bennulf, M. (1994). Miljöopinionen i Sverige [The environmental opinion in Sweden]. Lund, Sweden: Dialogos.
5.
Bennulf, M., & Selin, H. (1994). Skiftningar i grönt. Om livsstilar och miljö i olika sociala grupper. In M. Rolén (Ed.) Forskning om livsstil och miljö [Research addressing life styles and environment] (Vol. 6), Stockholm, Sweden: Forskningsrådsnämnden.
6.
Dekker, P., Ester, P., & Nas, M. (1997). Religion, culture and environmental concern: An empirical cross-national analysis. Social Compass, 44(3), 443-458.
7.
Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behaviour, 30(4), 450-471.
8.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
9.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2003). Environmental attitudes and values. In R. Fernández-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 364-369). London: Sage.
10.
Dunlap, R. E., & van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “new environmental paradigm.” Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10-19.
11.
Dunlap, R. E., van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A reversed NEP scale. Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
12.
Engel, U., & Plötschke, M. (1998). Willingness to pay for the environment: Social structure, value orientations and environmental behaviour in a multilevel perspective. Innovation, 1(3), 315-332.
13.
Ester, P., Halman, L., & de Moor, R. (1993). Value shift in Western societies. In P. Ester, L. Halman, & R. de Moor (Eds.), The individualising society: Value change in Europe and North America (pp. 1-20). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
14.
Flanagan, S. C. (1982). Changing values in advanced industrial societies. Comparative Political Studies, 14, 403-444.
15.
Franzen, A. (2003). Environmental attitudes in international comparison: An analysis of the ISSP surveys 1993 and 2000. Social Science Quarterly, 84(2), 297-308.
16.
Guth, J. L., Green, J., Kellstadt, L., & Smidt, C. (1995). Onward Christian soldiers: Religious activist groups in American politics. In A. Cigler & B. Loomis (Eds.), Interest group politics (pp. 55-76). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
17.
Heijs, W., & Midden, C. (1997). Explaining attitudes towards biotechnology. In S. Lundin & M. Ideland (Eds.), Gene technology and the public: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 145-163). Lund, Sweden: Nordic Academic Press.
18.
Hayes, B. C. (2001). Gender, scientific knowledge, and attitudes toward the environment: A cross-national analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 54(3), 657-671.
19.
Howlett, M. (1994). The judicialization of Canadian environmental policy, 1980-1990: A test of the Canada-United States convergence thesis. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 27, 1-1.
20.
Hviid Nielsen, T., Jelsøe, E., & Öhman, S. (2002). Traditional blue and modern green resistance. In M. W. Bauer & G. Gaskell (Eds.), Biotechnology: The making of a global controversy (pp. 179-202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Johnson, C. Y., Bowker, J. M., & Cordell, K. H. (2004). Ethic variation in environmental belief and behaviour: An examination of the new ecological paradigm in a social psychological context. Environment and Behaviour, 36(2), 157-186.
25.
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have there been any changes?Rural Sociology, 57(1), 28-47.
26.
Knutsen, O. (1989). The priorities of materialist and post-materialist values in the Nordic countries—A five-nation comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies, 12, 221-243.
27.
Knutsen, O. (1990). Materialist and postmaterialist values and social structures in the Nordic countries. Comparative Politics, 22, 85-104.
28.
Krebs, D. (1992). Werte in den alten und neuen Bundesländern. In J. Zinnecker (Ed.), Im Spiegel der Wissenschaften [The mirror of science] (2nd, ed., pp. 35-48). Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
29.
Kuehn, S. (1998). Livsstilens betydning for energiforbruget [The importance of life style for energy consumption]. Köpenhamn, Denmark: Köpenhamns Universitet.
30.
Mertig, A. G., & Dunlap, R. E. (2001). Environmentalism, new social movements and the new class: A cross-national investigation. Rural Sociology, 66(1), 113-137.
31.
McCutcheon, A. L. (1987). Series: Quantitative applications in the social sciences: Vol. 64. Latent class analysis. London: Sage.
32.
Munk Christiansen, P., & Lundqvist, L. J. (1996). Conclusions: A Nordic environmental policy model? In P. Munk Christiansen (Ed.), Governing the environment: Politics, policy and organization in the Nordic countries (Vol. 5, pp. 339-363). Copenhagen, Denmark: Nord.
33.
Neumayer, E. (2002). Do we trust the data? On the validity and reliability of cross-national environmental surveys. Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 332-340.
34.
Öhman, S. (2001). Different shades of green: Lifestyles and environmental attitudes in Sweden. In J. D. Miller (Ed.), Perceptions of biotechnology: Public understanding and attitudes (n.p.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
35.
Öhman, S. (2002). Public perceptions of gene technology: On the edge of risk society?Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University.
36.
Olsson (now Öhman), S. (1994). What happened to the “silent revolution”? Postmaterialist values across generations. In M. Kloep (Ed.), Youth in a changing world (Vol. 20, pp. 13-30) Östersund, Sweden: Mid Sweden University.
37.
Pakulski, J., Tranter, B., & Crook, S. (1998). The dynamics of environmental issues in Australia: Concerns, clusters and carriers. Australian Journal of Political Science, 33(2), 235-252.
38.
Rasinski, K., Smith, T. W., & Zuckerbraun, S. (1994). Fairness motivations and tradeoffs underlying public support for government environmental spending in nine nations. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 179-197.
39.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
40.
Schwartz, S. H., & Blisky, W. (1987). Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personal Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
41.
Skrentny, J. D. (1993). Concern for the environment: A cross-national perspective. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(4), 335-352.
42.
Svallfors, S. (1999). National differences in national identities? An introduction to the international social survey program. In N. Tos, P. Ph. Mohler, & B. Malnar (Eds.), Modern society and values: A comparative analysis based on ISSP project (pp.3-13). Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences.
43.
van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-199.
44.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2000). Latent GOLD—user’s guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
45.
Wright, M., & Klÿn, B. (1998). Environmental attitude—behaviour correlations in 21 countries. Journal of Empirical Generalisations and Marketing Science, 3, 42-60.
