In environmental literature it is argued that three different value orientations may be relevant for understanding environmental beliefs and intentions: egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric. Until now, the distinction between altruistic and biospheric value orientations has hardly been supported empirically. In this article, three studies are reported aimed to examine whether an egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientation can indeed be distinguished empirically by using an adapted value instrument. Also, it is examined whether these value orientations are differently and uniquely related to general and specific beliefs and behavioral intention. Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the value instrument. All studies replicated the distinction into three value orientations, with sufficient internal consistency. Furthermore, when altruistic and biospheric goals conflict, they seem to provide a distinct basis for proenvironmental intentions. The value instrument could therefore be useful to better understand relationships between values, beliefs, and intentions related to environmentally significant behavior.
Allport, G.W. (1963). Pattern and growth in personality. London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
2.
Axelrod, L.J. (1994). Balancing personal needs with environmental preservation: Identifying the values that guide decisions in ecological dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 50(3), 85-104.
3.
Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, S. (2003). Incentives, morality or habit? Predicting student's car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz and Triandis . Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264-285.
4.
Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S.H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1207-1220.
5.
Cameron, L.D., Brown, P.M., & Chapman, J.G. (1998). Social value orientations and decisions to take proenvironmental action. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 28(8), 675-697.
6.
Collins, C.M., Steg, L., & Koning, M.A.S. (in press). Customers' values, beliefs on sustainable corporate performance, and buying behavior. Psychology & Marketing.
7.
Corraliza, J.A., & Berenguer, J. (2000). Environmental values, beliefs, and actions. A situational approach. Environment and Behavior, 32, 832-848.
8.
De Groot, J.I.M., & Steg, L. (in press). Value orientations and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
9.
Dunlap, R.E., Grieneeks, J.K., & Rokeach, M. (1983). Human values and pro-environmental behavior. In W. D. Conn (Ed.), Energy and material resources: Attitudes, values, and public policy (pp. 145-168). Boulder, CO: Westview.
10.
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., & Jones, R.E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new environmental paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425-442.
11.
García Mira, R., Real Deus, E., Durán Rodríguez, M., & Romay Martínez, J. (2003). Predicting environmental attitudes and behavior. In G. Moser, E. Pol, Y. Bernard, M. Bonnes, J. A. Corraliza , & M. V. Giuliani (Eds.), People, places and sustainability (pp. 302-311). Seattle, WA : Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
12.
Gärling, T. (1999). Value priorities, social value orientations and cooperation in social dilemmas. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 397-408.
13.
Gärling, T., Fujii, S., Gärling, A., & Jakobsson, C. (2003). Moderating effects of social value orientation on determinants of proenvironmental behavior intention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 1-9.
14.
Gardner, G.T., & Stern, P.C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
15.
Guttman, L. (1952). Multiple group methods for common-factor analysis: Their basis, computation and interpretation. Psychometrika , 17, 209-222.
16.
Hendriks, P., & Kiers, H.A.L. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis methods compared: The multiple group method and maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis . Unpublished research report, University of Groningen , the Netherlands.
17.
Hopper, J.R., & Nielsen, J.M. (1991). Recycling as altruistic behaviour. Normative and behavioural strategies to expand participation in a community recycling program . Environment and Behavior, 23, 195-220.
18.
Joireman, J.A., Lasane, T.P., Bennet, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133-155.
19.
Joireman, J.A., Van Lange, P.A.M., Kuhlman, D.M., Van Vugt, M., & Shelley, G.P. (1997). An interdependence analysis of commuting decisions . European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 441-463.
20.
Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the Simplis Command Language. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
21.
Karp, D.G. (1996). Values and their effects on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 28, 111-133.
22.
Kiers, H.A.L. (1990). SCA: A program for simultaneous components analysis of variables measured in two or more populations. Groningen , The Netherlands: ProGAMMA.
23.
Kramer, R.M., McClintock, C.G., & Messick, D.M. (1986). Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisis. Journal of Personality, 54(3), 576-592.
24.
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
Liebrand, W.B.G. (1984). The effect of social motives, communication and group size on behaviour in an N-person multi-stage mixed-motive game. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14, 239-264.
26.
McCarty, J.A., & Shrum, L.J. (1994). The recycling of solid wastes: Personal values, value orientations, and attitudes about recycling as antecedents of recycling behavior. Journal of Business Research, 30, 53-62.
27.
McClintock, C.G. (1972). Social motivation-A set of propositions. Behavioral Science, 17(5), 438-454.
28.
McCrae, R.R., Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T., Bond, M.H., & Paunonen, S.V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO personality inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 552-566.
29.
Merchant, C. (1992). Radical ecology. The search for a livable world . New York: Routledge.
30.
Messick, D.M., & McClintock, C.G. (1968). Motivational basis of choice in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 4, 1-25.
31.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community, and lifestyle: An outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Nickerson, R.S. (2003). Psychology and environmental change. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Nilsson, A., Von Borgstede, C., & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 24, 267-277.
34.
Nordlund, A.M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind proenvironmental behavior . Environment and Behavior, 34, 740-756.
35.
Nordlund, A.M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 339-347.
36.
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Parks, C.D. (1994). The predictive ability of social values in resource dilemmas and public goods games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(4), 431-438.
38.
Reid, L. (1962). The sociology of nature. In N. Nelissen, J. Van der Straaten , & L. Klinkers (Eds.), Classics in environmental studies. An overview of classic texts in environmental studies (pp. 57-67). Utrecht, The Netherlands: International Books.
39.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
40.
Rokeach, M. (1979). Understanding human values. New York: Free Press.
41.
Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L.C. (1998). Values and pro-environmental behavior. A five-country survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 540-558.
42.
Schultz, P.W., & Zelezny, L.C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
43.
Schwartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
44.
Schwartz, S.H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45.
45.
Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation: A new ethics for our treatment of animals. New York: New York Review .
46.
Steg, L., Drijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: Testing VBN theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 25, 415-425.
47.
Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
48.
Stern, P.C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65-84.
49.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G.A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review , 6(2), 81-95.
50.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G.A. (1998). A brief inventory of values . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984-1001.
51.
Stern, P.C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
52.
Stuive, I., Kiers, H.A.L., Timmerman, M.E., & Ten Berge, J.M.F. (2006). A comparison of methods for the empirical verification of an assignment of items to subtests: Oblique multiple group method versus common confirmatory factor analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53.
Ten Berge, J.M.F. (1986). Rotation to perfect congruence and the cross-validation of components weights across populations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 21, 41-64.
54.
Ten Berge, J.M.F., & Siero, F.W. (2001). The basic ideas of factor analysis. Metodologia de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, 2(2), 217-232.
55.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology , 23, 605-630.
56.
Van Lange, P.A.M., & Liebrand, W.B.G. (1989). On perceiving morality and potency: Social values and the effects of person perception in a give-some dilemma. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 209-225.
57.
Van Vugt, M., Meertens, R.M., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). Car versus public transportation? The role of social value orientations in a real-life social dilemma. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 258-278.
58.
Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P.A.M., & Meertens, R.M. (1996). Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 373-395.
59.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (1992). Predicting recycling behavior from global and specific environmental attitudes and changes in recycling opportunities. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(20), 1580-1607.
60.
World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. In N. Nelissen, J. Straaten, & L. Klinkers (Eds.), Classics in environmental studies (pp. 275-284). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Universal Books.
