Lighting may affect impressions of public squares. Following studies on office interior lighting, the present research manipulated three modes of lighting—non-uniform–uniform, peripheral–overhead, and dim–bright—in three virtual squares. One study had 32 participants (15 men, 17 women) judge the spaciousness and privacy of each of the 24 public squares. A second study had a different group of 30 participants (16 men, 14 women) rate the appeal, safety from crime, and excitement of each square. Study 1 found that judged spaciousness increased with uniform and bright lighting, and that privacy increased with non-uniform, dim, and peripheral lighting. Study 2 found that rated appeal increased with uniform and bright lighting, as did safety from crime and excitement. Across the two studies, the uniform and bright lighting conditions contributed most to the kinds of favorable experiences people might expect to have in public spaces after dark.
AbdulkarimD.NasarJ. L. (2014a). Are livable elements also restorative?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 29-38. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.003
2.
AbdulkarimD.NasarJ. L. (2014b). Do seats, food vendors, and sculptures improve plaza visitability?Environment and Behavior, 46, 805-825. doi:10.1177/0013916512475299
3.
AltmanI. (1975). The environment and social behavior: Privacy, personal space, territory, and crowding. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
4.
ArcheaJ. (1985). The use of architectural props in the conduct of criminal acts. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 245-259. Retrieved form http://www.jstor.org/stable/43028774
5.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175-184. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
6.
BergkvistL.RossiterJ. R. (2009). Tailor-made single-item measures of doubly concrete constructs. International Journal of Advertising, 28, 607-621. doi:10.2501/S0265048709200783
7.
BerlyneD. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York, NY: Appleton Century Crofts.
8.
BoomsmaC.StegL. (2014a). The effect of information and values on acceptability of reduced street lighting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39, 22-31. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.11.004
9.
BoomsmaC.StegL. (2014b). Feeling safe in the dark: Examining the effect of entrapment, lighting levels, and gender on feelings of safety and lighting policy acceptability. Environment and Behavior, 46, 193-212. doi:10.1177/0013916512453838
BoyceP. R. (2003). Human factors in lighting. London, England: Taylor & Francis.
12.
BoyceP. R.EklundN. H.HamiltonB. J.BrunoL. D. (2000). Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research & Technology, 32, 79-91. doi:10.1177/096032710003200205
13.
ButlerD. L.BinerP. M. (1987). Preferred lighting levels variability among settings, behaviors, and individuals. Environment and Behavior, 19, 695-721. doi:10.1177/0013916587196003
14.
CattellV.DinesN.GeslerW.CurtisS. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place, 14, 544-561. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007
15.
CozensP. M.SavilleG.HillierD. (2005). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Property Management, 23, 328-356. doi:10.1108/02637470510631483
16.
de KortY. A.VeitchJ. A. (2014). From blind spot into the spotlight. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39, 1-4.
17.
DiamantopoulosA.SarstedtM.FuchsC.WilczynskiP.KaiserS. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 434-449. doi:10.1007s11747-011-0300-3
18.
DurakA.OlguntürkN.YenerC.GüvençD.GürçınarY. (2007). Impact of lighting arrangements and illuminances on different impressions of a room. Building and Environment, 42, 3476-3482. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.10.048
19.
FarringtonD. P.WelshB. C. (2002). Improved street lighting and crime prevention. Justice Quarterly, 19, 313-342. doi:10.1080/07418820200095261
20.
FisherB.NasarJ. L. (1992). Fear of crime in relation to three exterior site features: Prospect, refuge and escape. Environment and Behavior, 24, 35-65. doi:10.1177/0013916592241002
21.
FlynnJ. E. (1988). Lighting-design decisions as interventions in human visual space. In NasarJ. L. (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research and applications (pp. 156-1170). New York, NY: Cambridge.
22.
FosterS.Giles-CortiB. (2008). The built environment, neighborhood crime and constrained physical activity: An exploration of inconsistent findings. Preventive Medicine, 47, 241-251. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.017
23.
FotiosS.UnwinJ.FarrallS. (2015). Road lighting and pedestrian reassurance: A review. Lighting Research & Technology, 47, 449-469. doi:10.1177/1477153514524587
24.
GatesL. B.RoheW. M. (1987). Fear and reactions to crime a revised model. Urban Affairs Review, 22, 425-453. doi:10.1177/004208168702200305
25.
GehlJ. (2011). Life between buildings: Using public space. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26.
HaansA.de KortY. A. (2012). Light distribution in dynamic street lighting: Two experimental studies on its effects on perceived safety, prospect, concealment, and escape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 342-352. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.006
27.
HanyuK. (1997). Visual properties and affective appraisals in residential areas after dark. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, 301-315. doi:10.1006/jevp.1997.0067
28.
HawkesR. J.LoeD. L.RowlandsE. (1979). A note towards the understanding of lighting quality. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 8, 111-120. doi:10.1080/00994480.1979.10748578
29.
HendrickC.MartyniukO.SpencerT. J.FlynnJ. E. (1977). Procedures for investigating the effect of light on impression simulation of a real space by slides. Environment and Behavior, 9, 491-510. doi:10.1177/001391657794003
30.
HerzogT. R.Flynn-SmithJ. A. (2001).Preference and perceived danger as a function of the perceived curvature, length, and width of urban alleys. Environment and Behavior, 33, 653-666. doi:10.1177/001391602237250
31.
HordeskiM. F. (2004). Dictionary of energy efficiency technologies. Lilburn, GA: The Fairmont Press.
32.
JohanssonM.PedersenE.Maleetipwan-MattssonP.KuhnL.LaikeT. (2014). Perceived outdoor lighting quality (POLQ): A lighting assessment tool. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 39, 14-21. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.002
33.
JohanssonM.RosénM.KüllerR. (2011). Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research & Technology, 43, 31-43.
34.
JoardarS. D.NeillJ. (1978). The subtle differences in configurations of small public spaces. Landscape architecture, 68, 487-491.
35.
JoardarS. D. (1977). Emotional and behavioral responses of people to urban plazas: A case study of downtown Vancouver (Doctoral dissertation, University of Vancouver, Canadian thesis on microfiche, no. 3854). Retrieved from https://circle.ubc.ca/handle/2429/20684
36.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
37.
KasmarJ. V. (1970). The development of a usable lexicon of environmental descriptors. Environment and Behavior, 2, 153-169. doi: 10.1177/001391657000200202
38.
KüllerR.BallalS.LaikeT.MikellidesB.TonelloG. (2006). The impact of light and colour on psychological mood: A cross-cultural study of indoor work environments. Ergonomics, 49, 1496-1507. doi:10.1080/00140130600858142
39.
MiwaY.HanyuK. (2006).The effects of interior design on communication and impressions of a counselor in a counseling room. Environment and Behavior, 38, 484-502. doi:10.1177/0013916505280084
40.
MehtaV. (2007). Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27, 165-187.
41.
MoyerJ. L. (2005). The landscape lighting book (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
42.
NasarJ. L. (1983). Adult viewer preferences in residential scenes: A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15, 589-614. doi:10.1177/0013916583155003
43.
NasarJ. L. (1988). Editor’s introduction. In NasarJ. L. (Ed.), Environmental aesthetics: Theory, research, and appliclations (pp. 257-259). New York, NY: Cambridge University.
44.
NasarJ. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: Evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26, 377-401. doi:10.1177/001391659402600305
45.
NasarJ. L.FisherB. (1993). “Hot-spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80173-2
46.
NasarJ. L.JonesK. M. (1997).Landscapes of fear and stress. Environment and Behavior, 29, 291-323. doi:10.1177/001391659702900301
47.
NewshamG. R.RichardsonC.BlanchetC.VeitchJ. A. (2005). Lighting quality research using rendered images of offices. Lighting Research & Technology, 37, 93-112. doi:10.1191/1365782805li132oa
48.
OwenD. (2007, August20). The dark side: Making war on light pollution. The New Yorker, p. 28.
49.
PainterK. (1988). Lighting and crime prevention: The Edmonton project. London, England: Middlesex Polytechnic.
50.
PainterK. (1991). Evaluation of public lighting as a crime prevention strategy with special focus on women and elderly people. Manchester, UK: University of Manchester.
51.
PainterK. (1994). The impact of street lighting on crime, fear of crime and pedestrian activity. Security Journal, 5, 116-124.
52.
PainterK. A. (1996). The influence of street lighting improvements on crime, fear and pedestrian street use, after dark. Landscape and Urban Planning, 35, 193-201. doi:10.1016/0169-2046(96)00311-8
53.
PosnerJ.RussellJ. A.PetersonB. S. (2005). The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 715-734. doi:10.10170S0954579405050340
PurcellA. T. (1987). Landscape perception, preference, and schema discrepancy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 14, 67-92. doi:10.1068/b140067
56.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-1178. doi:10.1037/h0077714
57.
RussellJ. A.LewickaM.NittT. (1989). A cross-cultural study of the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 848-856. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.5.848
58.
RussellJ. A.PrattG. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 311. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.311
59.
StampsA. E. (1990). Use of photographs to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 71, 907-913. doi:10.2466/pms.1990.71.3.907
60.
StampsA. E. (1999). Demographic effects in environmental aesthetics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Planning Literature, 14, 155-175. doi:10.1177/08854129922092630
61.
StampsA. E.III. (2010). Use of static and dynamic media to simulate environments: A meta-analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 111, 355-364. doi:10.2466/22.24.27.PMS.111.5.355-364
62.
TaylorR. B.GottfredsonS. (1986). Environmental design, crime, and prevention: An examination of community dynamics. Crime and Justice, 8, 387-416. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147433
63.
TienJ. M. (1979). Street lighting projects. Washington, DC: Department of Justice, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.
64.
TillerD. K. (1990).Toward a deeper understanding of psychological aspects of lighting. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 19(2), 59-65. doi:10.1080/00994480.1990.10747963
65.
Van SantenC. (2006). Light zone city: Light planning in the urban context. Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.
66.
VeitchJ. A.NewshamG. R. (1998). Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance, mood, health, satisfaction, and comfort. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 27, 107-129. doi:10.1080/00994480.1998.10748216
67.
VitaleS.EllweinL.CotchM. F.FerrisF. L.SperdutoR. (2008). Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004. Archives of Ophthalmology, 126, 1111-1119. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.8.1111
68.
VrijA.WinkelF. W. (1991). Characteristics of the built environment and fear of crime: A research note on interventions in unsafe locations. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 12, 203-215. doi:10.1080/01639625.1991.9967873
69.
WhyteW. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Washington, DC: The Conservation Foundation.
70.
WhyteW. H. (1988). City: Rediscovering the center. New York, NY: Doubleday.
71.
WickerA. W. (2002). Ecological psychology: Historical contexts, current conception, prospective directions. In StokolsD.AltmanI. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 114-126). New York, NY: John Wiley.
72.
WohlwillJ. F. (1976).Environmental aesthetics: The environment a source of affect. In AltmanI.WohlwillJ. F. (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (pp. 37-86). New York, NY: Plenum.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
