In the interdisciplinary context of the Swiss National Research Project eMotion—mapping museum experience, an integrative methodology for visitor research was developed. The goal was to investigate aesthetic experien-ces in the environment of a fine-arts museum. The methodology and technical setup merged different data levels (movement tracking data, heart rate and skin conductance, sociological variables, emotional and aesthetic evaluations of specific artworks) into one integrated data set. The merging was achieved online with high spatial and temporal resolution, using data gloves and a wireless network. This data set was used to generate information cartographies of visitors, visualizing their spatial behavior and physiological responses in the environment. In a field study with 576 museum visitors, the methodology was successfully implemented. Significant associations between physiology and aesthetic evaluations supported the validity of the cartographic representations; participants reported little reactivity toward the technical equipment. This methodology appears feasible for environmental behavior research in general.
BagozziR. P.GopinathM.NyerP. U. (1999). The role of emotions in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 184-206.
5.
BaileyE.BronnenkantK.KelleyJ.HeinG. E. (1998). Visitor behavior at a constructivist exhibition: Evaluating investigate! at Boston’s Museum of Science. In Dufresne-TasséC. (Ed.), Évaluation et éducation muséale: nouvelles tendances [Evaluation and education in museums: new trends] (pp. 149-168). Montreal, QC: ICOM/CECA.
6.
BaurJ. (Ed.). (2010). Museumsanalyse: Methoden und Konturen eines neuen Forschungsfeldes [Analyzing Museums: Methods and Context of a New Research Area]. Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
7.
BurnhamR.Kai-KeeE. (Ed.). (2011). Teaching in the art museum: Interpretation as experience. Los Angeles, CA: The J. Paul Getty Museum.
8.
CetinaK. K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
CritchleyH. D.ElliottR.MathiasC. J.DolanR. J. (2000). Neural activity relating to generation and representation of Galvanic skin conductance responses: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 3033-3040.
11.
DoeringZ. D. (1999). Stranger, guests, or clients? Visitor experience in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 42, 74-87.
12.
FalkJ. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
13.
GreenbergR.FergusonB.NairneS. (Ed.). (2005). Thinking about exhibitions. London, England: Routledge.
14.
GriswoldW. (2004). Cultures and societies in a changing world. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
15.
Groeppel-KleinA. (2005). Arousal and consumer in-store behavior. Brain Research Bulletin, 67, 428-437.
16.
GumbrechtH. U. (2004). Diesseits der Hermeneutik: Die Produktion von Präsenz [The Production of Presence]. Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.
17.
JacobsenT.SchubotzR. I.HöfelL.CramonD. Y. V. (2006). Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. NeuroImage, 29, 276-285.
18.
KantI. (1929). Critique of pure reason (SmithN. K., Trans.). Retrieved from www.hkbu.edu.hk/~ppp/cpr/aesth.html (Original work published 1781)
19.
KawabataH.ZekiS. (2004). Neural correlates of beauty. Journal of Neurophysiology, 91, 1699-1705.
20.
KirchbergV. (2010). Besucherforschung in Museen: Evaluation von Ausstellungen. In BaurJ. (Ed.), Museumsanalyse: Methoden und Konturen eines neuen Forschungsfeldes [Analyzing Museums: Methods and context of a new research area]. (pp. 171-184). Bielefeld, Germany: Transcript.
21.
KleinH. J. (1993). Tracking visitor circulation in museum settings. Environment & Behavior, 25, 782-800.
22.
KoelschS. (2005). Investigating emotion with music: Neuroscientific approaches. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 412-418.
23.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24.
MacdonaldS. (Ed.). (2006). A companion to Museums Studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
25.
MartindaleC. (2007). Recent trends in the psychological study of aesthetics, creativity, and the arts. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25, 121-141.
26.
NakaharaH.FuruyaS.ObataS.MasukoT.KinoshitaH. (2009). Emotion-related changes in heart rate and its variability during performance and perception of music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1169, 359-362.
27.
RobinsonE. S. (1928). The behaviour of the museum visitor (New Series No. 5). Washington, DC: The American Association of Museums.
28.
RoethlisbergerF. J.DicksonW. J. (2003). Management and the worker: An account of a research program conducted by the Western Electric Company, Hawthorne Works, Chicago (1939). In ThompsonK. (Ed.), The early sociology of management and organizations. Oxon, UK: Routledge.
29.
SkovM.VartanianO. (Ed.). (2009). Neuroaesthetics (Foundations and frontiers in aesthetics). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
30.
TröndleM.GreenwoodS.BitterliK.van den BergK. (in press). The affective effects of curatorial contextuality: How curatorial arrangements effect art reception in a fine art museum. Journal of Arts Administration, Law and Society.
31.
TröndleM.GreenwoodS.RamakrishnanC.TschacherW.KirchbergV.WintzerithS.. . . WäspeR. (2011). The entanglement of arts and sciences: On the transaction costs of transdisciplinary research settings. Journal for Artistic Research. Retrieved from http://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/12219/12220
32.
TröndleM.TschacherW. (2012). The physiology of phenomenology: The effects of artworks. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 30, 75-113.
33.
TröndleM.WintzerithS.TschacherW.van den BergK.KirchbergV. (in press). Is this art? A field study on the decision art/non-art of visitors to a fine art museum. Cultural Sociology.
34.
TröndleM.WintzerithS.WäspeR.TschacherW. (2012). Looking for the museĩon of the 21st century. Museum Management and Curatorship. Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 27.
35.
TschacherW.BergomiC. (Eds.). (2011). The implications of embodiment: Cognition and communication. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.
36.
TschacherW.GreenwoodS.KirchbergV.WintzerithS.van den BergK.TröndleM. (2012). Physiological correlates of aesthetic perception in a museum. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 96-103.
Umiker-SebeokJ. (1994). Behavior in a museum: A semio-cognitive approach to museum consumption experiences. Signifying Behavior: Journal of Research in Semiotics, Communication Theory, and Cognitive Science, 1, 52-100. Retrieved from http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/umikerse/papers/museum.html
39.
WeibelD.WissmathB.HabeggerS.SteinerY.GronerR. (2008). Playing online games against computer versus human controlled opponents: Effects on presence, flow, and enjoyment. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24, 2274-2291.
40.
WinemanJ. D.PeponisJ. (2010). Constructing spatial meaning. Spatial affordances in museum design. Environment & Behavior, 42, 86-109.
