The Behavioral Response to Increased Pedestrian and Staying Activity in Public Space: A Field Experiment

Abstract

William Whyte originally hypothesized that the presence of people in a public space would attract more people. Contemporary planners now refer to “sticky streets” as places where pedestrians are compelled to linger and enjoy vibrant public life. We test the hypothesis that adding users to a public space will attract more people using an experimental design with confederates to add pedestrian movement and staying activity in a residential street for 45 randomly selected hours. We observed staying behavior by gender with and without our intervention. We find that the addition of public users reduced the total number of people staying in our study area, especially among women. We find that women’s right to the city may be constrained by the mere presence of other individuals, even in safe spaces and during daylight hours. Our findings suggest that Whyte’s claim is not universal, but depends on the conditions of a particular site.

Keywords

behavior field experiment gender public life study public space urban design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdulkarim

Nasar

J. L.

(2014). Do seats, food vendors, and sculptures improve plaza visitability? Environment and Behavior, 46(7), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512475299

Akaltin

Chen

Cho

De Haan Bosch

Flock

Grondin

Guzmán

I. A.

King

Kinman

McCausland

Oscilowicz

Rachelson

Roe

Soler Cruz

Kang

Y. K.

Zhu

Muxí

Honey-Rosés

(2019). Life in poblenou: Observing spaces in transition. School of Community and Regional Planning. University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0384917

Anderson

Chin

Dara

Harlos

Johnson

Labahn

LaRocque

Lloyd

Lone

McBurnie

Nakao

Nesbitt

Oswald

Raphael

Shen

van der Veen

Zhou

Villagomez

Honey-Rosés

(2018). Life in poblenou: Observation and exploration. School of Community and Regional Planning. University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0372821

Anderson

Ruggeri

Steemers

Huppert

(2017). Lively social space, Well-being activity, and urban design: Findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and Behavior, 49(6), 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516659108

Aoki

Downes

E. J.

(2003). An analysis of young people’s use of and attitudes toward cell phones. Telematics and Informatics, 20(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00018-2

Arias

Muxi

(2018). Feminist contributions to architecture and cities for a change of paradigm. Habitat y Sociedad, 11, 5–12.

Barlow Rogers

(1987). Rebuilding Central Park. MIT Press.

Broberg

Kyttä

Fagerholm

(2013). Child-friendly urban structures: Bullerby revisited. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.06.001

Cameron

A. C.

Trivedi

P. K.

(2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata (2nd ed.). Stata Press.

10.

Casanovas

Ciocoletto

Fonseca Salinas

Gutiérrez Valdivia

Muxí

Ortiz Escalante

(2014). Mujeres Trabajando. Guía de reconocimiento urbano con perspectiva de género. Col.lectiu Punt 6 Comanegra.

11.

Chen

Liu

(2016). Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: A case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.027

12.

Ciocoletto

(2014). Espacios para la vida cotidiana. Comanegra Col.lectiu Punt 6.

13.

City of Vancouver. (2018). Downtown Vancouver public space and public life study. City of Vancouver.

14.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/141613a0

15.

Coley

R. L.

Kuo

F. E.

Sullivan

W. C.

(1997). Where does community grow? The social context Created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 468–494.

16.

Cook

C. C.

(1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 115–149.

17.

Day

(2011). Feminist approaches to urban design. In Banerjee

Loukaitou-Sideris

(Eds.), Companion to urban design (pp. 150–161). Routledge Companions.

18.

Garcia-Mira

Arce

Sabucedo

J. M.

(1997). Perceived quality of neighbourhoods in a city in Northwest Spain: An individual differences scaling approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(3), 243–252.

19.

Gärling

Svensson-Gärling

Valsiner

(1984). Parental concern about children’s traffic safety in residential neighborhoods. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80045-6

20.

Gehl

(2010). Cities for People. Island Press.

21.

Gehl

Svarre

(2013). How to study public life. In How to study public life. Springer. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0_1

22.

Gerber

A. S.

Green

D. P.

(2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. W. W. Norton & Company.

23.

Gifford

(2014). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.). Optimal Books.

24.

Gifford

Peacock

(1979). Crowding: More fearsome than crime-provoking? Comparison of an Asian city and a North American city. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 22(2), 79–83.

25.

Glennerster

Takavarasha

(2013). Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton University Press.

26.

Grabosky

P. N.

(1995). Fear of crime, and fear reduction strategies. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 7(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.1995.12036675

27.

Hall

E. T.

(1963). A System for the notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65(5), 1003–1026.

28.

Hassinger

(1985). Fear of crime in public environments. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2(4), 289–300.

29.

Henley

N. M.

(1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Prentice Hall.

30.

Honey-Rosés

(2019a). A review of field Eexperiments in planning and urban research. Planning Practice & Research, 34(5), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2019.1647394

31.

Honey-Rosés

(2019b). Measuring neighbourhood change in public space: A public life study in poblenou, Barcelona. In Seminario Internacional de Investigación En Urbanismo. https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6622

32.

Honey-Rosés

Stevens

(2017). Commentary on the absence of experiments in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17739352

33.

Honold

Beyer

Lakes

van der Meer

(2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002

34.

Hull

R. B.

Harvey

(1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21(3), 323–345.

35.

Hur

Nasar

J. L.

Chun

(2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005

36.

Jacobs

(1961). The death and life of great American cities. Vantage Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/794509

37.

Jirovec

R. L.

Marmoll Jirovec

Bosse

(1985). Residential satisfaction as a function of micro and macro environmental conditions among urban elderly men. Research on Aging, 7(4), 601–616.

38.

Keane

(1998). Evaluating the influence of fear of crime as an environmental mobility restrictor on women’s routine activities. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 60–74.

39.

Kearney

A. R.

(2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction. Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 112–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277607

40.

Keizer

Linderberg

Steg

(2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681–1685.

41.

Kirk

N. L.

(1988). Factors affecting perceptions of safety in a campus environment. EDRA: Environmental Design Research Association, 19, 215–221.

42.

Kuo

F. E.

Bacaicoa

Sullivan

W. C.

(1998). Transforming inner_city landscapes: Tress, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 28–59.

43.

Kweon

B.-S.

Sullivan

W. C.

Wiley

A. R.

(1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 832–858.

44.

McCauley

Coleman

De Fusco

(1978). Commuters’ eye contact with strangers in city and suburban train stations: Evidence of short-term adaptation to interpersonal overload in the city. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 2, 215–225.

45.

Mehta

(2007). Lively streets. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(2), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x07307947

46.

Mehta

(2013). The street: A quintessential social public space. Routledge.

47.

Mehta

Bosson

J. K.

(2021). Revisiting lively streets: Social interactions in public space. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18781453

48.

Meng

Kang

(2016). Effect of sound-related activities on human behaviours and acoustic comfort in urban open spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.130

49.

Meng

Zhao

Kang

(2018). Influence of music on the behaviors of crowd in urban open public spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00596

50.

Miralles-Guasch

Melo

M. M.

Marquet

(2016). A gender analysis of everyday mobility in urban and rural territories: From challenges to sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(3), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013448

51.

Nasar

J. L.

(1981). Visual preferences of elderly public housing residents: Residential street scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(81)80028-X

52.

Nasar

J. L.

(1983). Adult viewers’ preferences in residential scenes. A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15(5), 589–614.

53.

Ocejo

R. E.

Tonnelat

(2014). Subway diaries: How people experience and practice riding the train. Ethnography, 15(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491171

54.

Ortiz Escalante

(2019). Planning the everyday/everynight: A feminist participatory action research with women nightshift workers. Doctoral Thesis, The University of British Columbia.

55.

Ortiz Escalante

Gutiérrez Valdivia

(2015). Planning from below: Using feminist participatory methods to increase women’s participation in urban planning. Gender & Development, 23(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.1014206

56.

Patterson

A. H.

(1985). Fear of crime and other barriers to use of public transportation by the elderly. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2(4), 277–288.

57.

Sadik-Khan

Solomonow

(2017). Streetfight: Handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin Publishing Group.

58.

Toderian

(2014, June 17). Let’s make sticky streets for people! Planetizen. https://www.planetizen.com/node/69454

59.

Villanueva

Giles-Corti

Bulsara

Timperio

McCormack

Beesley

Trapp

Middleton

(2013). Where do children travel to and what local opportunities are available? The relationship between neighborhood destinations and children’s independent mobility. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512440705

60.

Whitley

Prince

(2005). Are inner-cities bad for your health? Comparisons of residents’ and third parties’ perceptions of the urban neighbourhood of Gospel Oak, London. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(1), 44–67.

61.

Whyte

(1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.

62.

Whyte

(1998). City: Rediscovering the center. Doubleday.

63.

Widgery

R. N.

(1982). Satisfaction with the quality of urban life: A predictive model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(1), 37–48.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.15 MB