William Whyte originally hypothesized that the presence of people in a public space would attract more people. Contemporary planners now refer to “sticky streets” as places where pedestrians are compelled to linger and enjoy vibrant public life. We test the hypothesis that adding users to a public space will attract more people using an experimental design with confederates to add pedestrian movement and staying activity in a residential street for 45 randomly selected hours. We observed staying behavior by gender with and without our intervention. We find that the addition of public users reduced the total number of people staying in our study area, especially among women. We find that women’s right to the city may be constrained by the mere presence of other individuals, even in safe spaces and during daylight hours. Our findings suggest that Whyte’s claim is not universal, but depends on the conditions of a particular site.
AbdulkarimD.NasarJ. L. (2014). Do seats, food vendors, and sculptures improve plaza visitability?Environment and Behavior, 46(7), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512475299
2.
AkaltinD.ChenJ.ChoW.De Haan BoschC.FlockI.GrondinS.GuzmánI. A.KingS.KinmanA.McCauslandS.OscilowiczE.RachelsonH.RoeJ.Soler CruzJ.KangY. K.ZhuJ.MuxíZ.Honey-RosésJ. (2019). Life in poblenou: Observing spaces in transition. School of Community and Regional Planning. University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0384917
3.
AndersonR.ChinS.DaraN.HarlosD.JohnsonE.LabahnS.LaRocqueE.LloydG.LoneS.McBurnieM.NakaoT.NesbittC.OswaldT.RaphaelL.ShenH.van der VeenA.ZhouS.VillagomezE.Honey-RosésJ. (2018). Life in poblenou: Observation and exploration. School of Community and Regional Planning. University of British Columbia. https://dx.doi.org/10.14288/1.0372821
4.
AndersonJ.RuggeriK.SteemersK.HuppertF. (2017). Lively social space, Well-being activity, and urban design: Findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and Behavior, 49(6), 685–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516659108
5.
AokiK.DownesE. J. (2003). An analysis of young people’s use of and attitudes toward cell phones. Telematics and Informatics, 20(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5853(03)00018-2
6.
AriasD.MuxiZ. (2018). Feminist contributions to architecture and cities for a change of paradigm. Habitat y Sociedad, 11, 5–12.
7.
Barlow RogersE. (1987). Rebuilding Central Park. MIT Press.
CameronA. C.TrivediP. K. (2010). Microeconometrics Using Stata (2nd ed.). Stata Press.
10.
CasanovasR.CiocolettoA.Fonseca SalinasM.Gutiérrez ValdiviaB.MuxíZ.Ortiz EscalanteS. (2014). Mujeres Trabajando. Guía de reconocimiento urbano con perspectiva de género. Col.lectiu Punt 6 Comanegra.
11.
ChenY.LiuT.LiuW. (2016). Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: A case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China. Habitat International, 53, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.10.027
12.
CiocolettoA. (2014). Espacios para la vida cotidiana. Comanegra Col.lectiu Punt 6.
13.
City of Vancouver. (2018). Downtown Vancouver public space and public life study. City of Vancouver.
ColeyR. L.KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (1997). Where does community grow? The social context Created by nature in urban public housing. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 468–494.
16.
CookC. C. (1988). Components of neighborhood satisfaction: Responses from urban and suburban single-parent women. Environment and Behavior, 20(2), 115–149.
17.
DayK. (2011). Feminist approaches to urban design. In BanerjeeT.Loukaitou-SiderisA. (Eds.), Companion to urban design (pp. 150–161). Routledge Companions.
18.
Garcia-MiraR.ArceC.SabucedoJ. M. (1997). Perceived quality of neighbourhoods in a city in Northwest Spain: An individual differences scaling approach. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(3), 243–252.
19.
GärlingT.Svensson-GärlingA.ValsinerJ. (1984). Parental concern about children’s traffic safety in residential neighborhoods. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 4(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80045-6
GerberA. S.GreenD. P. (2012). Field experiments: Design, analysis, and interpretation. W. W. Norton & Company.
23.
GiffordR. (2014). Environmental psychology: Principles and practice (5th ed.). Optimal Books.
24.
GiffordR.PeacockJ. (1979). Crowding: More fearsome than crime-provoking? Comparison of an Asian city and a North American city. Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 22(2), 79–83.
25.
GlennersterR.TakavarashaK. (2013). Running Randomized Evaluations: A Practical Guide. Princeton University Press.
Honey-RosésJ. (2019b). Measuring neighbourhood change in public space: A public life study in poblenou, Barcelona. In Seminario Internacional de Investigación En Urbanismo. https://doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6622
32.
Honey-RosésJ.StevensM. (2017). Commentary on the absence of experiments in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(3), 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17739352
33.
HonoldJ.BeyerR.LakesT.van der MeerE. (2012). Multiple environmental burdens and neighborhood-related health of city residents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.05.002
34.
HullR. B.HarveyA. (1989). Explaining the emotion people experience in suburban parks. Environment and Behavior, 21(3), 323–345.
35.
HurM.NasarJ. L.ChunB. (2010). Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
JirovecR. L.Marmoll JirovecM.BosseR. (1985). Residential satisfaction as a function of micro and macro environmental conditions among urban elderly men. Research on Aging, 7(4), 601–616.
38.
KeaneC. (1998). Evaluating the influence of fear of crime as an environmental mobility restrictor on women’s routine activities. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 60–74.
39.
KearneyA. R. (2006). Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction. Impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior, 38(1), 112–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916505277607
40.
KeizerK.LinderbergS.StegL. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322(5908), 1681–1685.
41.
KirkN. L. (1988). Factors affecting perceptions of safety in a campus environment. EDRA: Environmental Design Research Association, 19, 215–221.
42.
KuoF. E.BacaicoaM.SullivanW. C. (1998). Transforming inner_city landscapes: Tress, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30(1), 28–59.
43.
KweonB.-S.SullivanW. C.WileyA. R. (1998). Green common spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30(6), 832–858.
44.
McCauleyD.ColemanG.De FuscoP. (1978). Commuters’ eye contact with strangers in city and suburban train stations: Evidence of short-term adaptation to interpersonal overload in the city. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, 2, 215–225.
MehtaV. (2013). The street: A quintessential social public space. Routledge.
47.
MehtaV.BossonJ. K. (2021). Revisiting lively streets: Social interactions in public space. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18781453
48.
MengQ.KangJ. (2016). Effect of sound-related activities on human behaviours and acoustic comfort in urban open spaces. Science of the Total Environment, 573, 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.130
49.
MengQ.ZhaoT.KangJ. (2018). Influence of music on the behaviors of crowd in urban open public spaces. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(APR), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00596
50.
Miralles-GuaschC.MeloM. M.MarquetO. (2016). A gender analysis of everyday mobility in urban and rural territories: From challenges to sustainability. Gender, Place & Culture, 23(3), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2015.1013448
51.
NasarJ. L. (1981). Visual preferences of elderly public housing residents: Residential street scenes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 1(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(81)80028-X
52.
NasarJ. L. (1983). Adult viewers’ preferences in residential scenes. A study of the relationship of environmental attributes to preference. Environment and Behavior, 15(5), 589–614.
53.
OcejoR. E.TonnelatS. (2014). Subway diaries: How people experience and practice riding the train. Ethnography, 15(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138113491171
54.
Ortiz EscalanteS. (2019). Planning the everyday/everynight: A feminist participatory action research with women nightshift workers. Doctoral Thesis, The University of British Columbia.
55.
Ortiz EscalanteS.Gutiérrez ValdiviaB. (2015). Planning from below: Using feminist participatory methods to increase women’s participation in urban planning. Gender & Development, 23(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2015.1014206
56.
PattersonA. H. (1985). Fear of crime and other barriers to use of public transportation by the elderly. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 2(4), 277–288.
57.
Sadik-KhanJ.SolomonowS. (2017). Streetfight: Handbook for an urban revolution. Penguin Publishing Group.
VillanuevaK.Giles-CortiB.BulsaraM.TimperioA.McCormackG.BeesleyB.TrappG.MiddletonN. (2013). Where do children travel to and what local opportunities are available? The relationship between neighborhood destinations and children’s independent mobility. Environment and Behavior, 45(6), 679–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512440705
60.
WhitleyR.PrinceM. (2005). Are inner-cities bad for your health? Comparisons of residents’ and third parties’ perceptions of the urban neighbourhood of Gospel Oak, London. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27(1), 44–67.
61.
WhyteW. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces.
62.
WhyteW. (1998). City: Rediscovering the center. Doubleday.
63.
WidgeryR. N. (1982). Satisfaction with the quality of urban life: A predictive model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(1), 37–48.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
