This study examines support for climate adaptation planning and the role of perceived risk, uncertainty, and trust on adaptation of U.S. coastal communities. This assessment is based on the analysis of web-based questionnaires (n = 137) among state, local, and non-government organization (NGO) planners in Alaska, Florida, and Maryland. Ordinal regression and correlation analysis were used to assess which factors are related to support for adaptation during two planning stages. Findings from this study suggest the influence of perceived risk, uncertainty, and trust on support for climate change adaptation (CCA) varies across two stages of adaptation planning (support for the development of plans and willingness to allocate human and financial resources to implement plans). The disaggregation of planning entities into different study areas and levels of management revealed significant differences in the relationship between perceived risk, uncertainty, and trust and support for CCA planning. These findings have implications for the design of communication and engagement strategies.
AbbottJ. (2005). Understanding and managing the unknown: The nature of uncertainty in planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 237-251.
2.
AdgerW. N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16, 268-281.
3.
AdgerW. N.DessaiS.GouldenM.HulmeM.LorenzoniI.NelsonD. R.. . .WrefordA. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?Climatic Change, 93, 335-354.
4.
American Planning Association. (2006). Planning and urban design standards. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
BierbaumR.SmithJ.LeeA.BlairM.CarterL.ChapinF. S. I.. . .VerduzcoL. (2013). A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: More than before, but less than needed. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 18, 361-406.
7.
BordR.O’ConnorR. E.FisherA. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205-218.
8.
BrewerG. D.SternP. C. (2005). Decision making for the environment: Social and behavioral science research priorities. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9.
BrewerN.WeinsteinN.CuiteC.HerringtonJ. (2004). Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 27, 125-130.
10.
BudescuD. V.PorH.-H.BroomellS. B. (2012). Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports. Climatic Change, 113, 181-200.
11.
CicchettiD. V.ShowalterD.TyrerP. J. (1985). The effect of number of rating scale categories on levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 31-36.
12.
CollinsM. R.KnuttiR.ArblasterJ.DufresneJ.-L.FichefetT.FriedlingsteinP.. . . WehnerM. (2013). Long-term Climate Change: Projections, Commitments and Irreversibility. In StockerT.F.QinD.PlattnerG.-K.. (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contributions of Working Group 1 to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1029-1136). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CullingworthJ. B.CavesR. (2009). Planning in the USA (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
DessaiS.O’BrienK.HulmeM. (2007). Editorial: On uncertainty and climate change. Global Environmental Change, 17, 1-3.
15.
DietzT.DanA.SwhwomR. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185-214.
16.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley.
17.
DuncanR. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1713, 313-327.
18.
EarleT. C. (2010). Trust in risk management: A model-based review of empirical research. Risk Analysis, 30, 541-574.
19.
FolkeC. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global and Planetary Change, 16, 253-267.
20.
FusselH. M. (2007). Adaptation planning for climate change: Concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustainability Science, 2, 265-275.
21.
Gagnon-LebrunF.AgrawalaS. (2006). Progress on adaptation to climate change in developed countries: An analysis of broad trends. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
22.
GoreC.RobinsonP. (2009). Local government response to climate change: Our last, best hope? In SelinH.VanDeveerS. (Eds.), Changing climates in North American politics (pp. 137-158). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23.
GrothmannT.PattA. (2005). Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 199-213.
24.
HaywoodB.BrennanA.DowK.KettleN.LackstromK. (2014). Negotiating a mainstreaming spectrum: Climate change response and communication in the Carolinas. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16, 75-94.
25.
JonesN.ClarkJ. R. A. (2013). Social capital and climate change mitigation in coastal areas: A review of current debates and identification of future research directions. Ocean & Coastal Management, 80, 12-19.
26.
JonesN.ClarkJ. R. A. (2014). Social capital and the public acceptability of climate change adaptation policies: A case study in Romney Marsh, UK. Climatic Change, 123, 133-145.
27.
KettleN. P. (2012a). Coastal climate change adaptation: The influence of perceived risk, uncertainty, trust, and scale (Doctoral dissertation). University of South Carolina, Columbia, S.C.
28.
KettleN. P. (2012b). Exposing compounding uncertainties in sea level rise assessments. Journal of Coastal Research, 28, 161-173.
29.
KettleN. P.DowK. (2014). Cross-level differences and similarities in coastal climate change adaptation planning. Environmental Science and Policy, 44, 279-290.
30.
KleinR. J. T.MidgleyG. F.PrestonB. L.AlamM.BerkhoutF. G. H.DowK.ShawM. R. (2014). Adaptation opportunities, constraints and limits. In FieldC. B.. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 46). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
31.
LackstromK.DowK.HaywoodB.BrennanA.KettleN. P.BrosiusA. (2012). Engaging climate-sensitive sectors in the Carolinas (Technical Report: CISA-2012-03). Columbia, SC: Carolinas Integrated Sciences and Assessments.
32.
LaurianL. (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10, 369-391.
33.
LeiserowitzA. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climate Change, 77, 45-72.
LindellM.PerryR. (2000). Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research. Environment and Behavior, 32, 461-501.
36.
LuhmannN. (1988). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. In GambettaD. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 94-108). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
37.
McMullenJ. S.ShepherdD. A. (2006). Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31, 132-152.
38.
MimuraN.PulwartyR.DucM. D.ElshinnawayI.RedsteerM. H.HuangH.-Q.. . .SourminskiS. (2014). Adaptation planning and implementation. In FieldC.B.. (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 46). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MoserS. C. (2005). Impact assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: An exploration of human-dimension uncertainties. Global Environmental Change, 14, 353-369.
40.
MoserS. C. (2009). Governance as a cross-cutting theme in human dimensions science. IHDP Update Issue3, 31-36.
41.
MoserS. C.DavidsonM. A.KirshenP.MulvaneyP.MurleyJ. F.NeumannJ. E.. . .ReedD. (2014). Coastal zone development and ecosystems. In MelilloJ. M.. (Eds.), Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment (pp. 579-618). U.S. Global Change Research Program. Retrieved from http://nca2014.globalchange.gov/downloads
42.
MoserS. C.EkstromJ. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 22026-22031.
43.
MRAG Americas. (2009). Systematic review of the needs and issues of the U.S. coastal resource management community. Charleston, SC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center. Retrieved from https://www.mragamericas.com/
National Research Council. (2011). America’s climate choices: Adapting to the impacts of climate change. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
46.
O’ConnorR. E.BordR. J.FisherA. (1999). Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Analysis, 19, 461-471.
47.
O’ConnorR. E.BordR. J.FisherA.StanevaM.Kozhouharova-ZhivkovaV.DobrevaS. (1999). Determinants of support for climate change policies in Bulgaria and the USA. Risk Decision and Policy, 4, 255-269.
48.
O’ConnorR. E.YarnalB.DowK.JocoyC. L.CarboneG. J. (2005). Feeling at risk matters: Water managers and the decision to use forecasts. Risk Analysis, 25, 1265-1275.
49.
PielkeR. J.PrinsG.RaynerS.SarewitzD. (2007). Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, 445, 597-598.
50.
PoortingaW.PidgeonN. F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23, 961-972.
51.
RabinovichA.MortonT. A.BirneyM. (2012). Communicating climate science: The role of perceived communicator’s motives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 11-18.
52.
RasmussenJ. L. (1989). Analysis of likert-scale data: A reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167-170.
SlovicP.FinucaneM. L.PetersE.MacGregD. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24, 311-322.
55.
Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact. (2011). A unified sea level rise projection for Southeast Florida (A document prepared for the Southeast Florida: Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact Technical Ad hoc Work Group, Regional Climate Change Compact Steering Committee). Retrieved from http://southeastfloridaclimatecompact.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/sea-level-rise.pdf
56.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
57.
TamJ.McDanielsT. (2013). Understanding individual risk perceptions and preferences for climate change adaptations in biological conservation. Environmental Science & Policy, 27, 114-123.
58.
TribbiaJ.MoserS. C. (2008). More than information: What coastal managers need to plan for climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 11, 315-328.
59.
von MisesL. (1963). Human action: A treatise on economics (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Fox & Wilkes.
60.
WalkerW. E.HarremoesP.RotmansJ.Van der SluijsJ. P.JanssenP.Krayer von KraussM. P. (2003). Defining uncertainty: A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated Assessment, 4(1), 5-17.
61.
WhitmarshL. (2009). What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of “climate change” and “global warming.”Public Understanding of Science, 18, 401-420.
62.
WongP. P.LosadaI. J.GattusoJ.-P.HinkelJ.KhattabiA.McInnesK.SaitoY.SallengerA. (2014). Coastal systems and low-lying areas. In FieldC.B.BarrosV.R.DokkenD.J.. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 85). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
63.
ZahranS.BrodyS. D.GroverH.VedlitzA. (2006). Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Society & Natural Resources, 19, 1-19.
64.
ZahranS.BrodyS. D.VedlitzA.GroverH.MillerC. (2008). Vulnerability and capacity: Explaining local commitment to climate-change policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 26, 544-562.
