We analyze data from the 2010 General Social Survey to illuminate the relationship of social capital with pro-environmental behavior, a willingness to make sacrifices for the environment, and participation in organized environmental activism. Three kinds of social capital are examined: relational social capital, generalized trust, and community social capital. Specifically, we find that time spent with neighbors was positively correlated with both environmental lifestyle and willingness to sacrifice variables, whereas time spent with relatives was negatively correlated. Generalized trust was positively correlated with willingness to sacrifice variables, as well. Social evening spent with friends was associated with a single outcome variable: having attended an environmental issue demonstration. These findings are consistent with previous research concerning the influence of community-level dynamics on behavior, and suggest that social capital may be an important, though as of yet not well explored, mechanism for understanding shifts toward pro-environmental behavior.
BrehmJ.RahnW. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 999-1023.
2.
BridgerJ. C.LuloffA. (2001). Building the sustainable community: Is social capital the answer?Sociological Inquiry, 71, 458-472.
3.
BrunieA. (2009). Meaningful distinctions within a concept: Relational, collective, and generalized social capital. Social Science Research, 38, 251-265.
4.
BullardR. D. (1990). Dumping in Dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. Boulder, CO: Westview.
5.
BurtR. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365.
ChristakisN.FowlerJ. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370-379.
8.
ClarkB.FosterJ. B. (2001). William Stanley Jevons and the Coal Question: An introduction to Jevon’s “Of the economy and fuel.”Organization & Environment, 14, 93-98.
9.
CohenD.FinchB.BowerA. S. (2006). Collective efficacy and obesity: The potential influence of social factors on health. Social Science Medicine, 14, 769-778.
10.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
11.
CostanzaR.d’ArgeR.de GrootR.FarberS.GrassoM.HannonB.. . .van den BeltM. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260.
12.
CvetkovichG.WinterP. L. (2003). Trust and social representations of the management of threatened and endangered species. Environment and Behavior, 35, 286-307.
13.
DerksenL.GartrellJ. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.
14.
DietzT.DanA.ShwomR. (2007). Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72, 185-214.
15.
DietzT.GardnerG. T.GilliganJ.SternP. C.VandenberghM. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce U.S. carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 18452-18456.
16.
DietzT.SternP. C.GuagnanoG. A. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
17.
DietzT.VineE. L. (1982). Energy impacts of a municipal conservation policy. Energy, 7, 755-758.
18.
DiPreteT. A.GelmanA.McCormickT.TeitlerJ.ZhengT. (2011). Segregation in social networks based on acquaintanceship and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1234-1283.
19.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
20.
DutzikT.BaxandallP. (2013). A new direction: Our changing relationship with driving and the implications for America’s future. Boston, MA: US PIRG Education Fund.
21.
EckbergD. L.JeanB. T. (1996). Christianity, environmentalism, and the theoretical problem of fundamentalism. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35, 343-355.
22.
EricksonB. H. (1996). Culture, class, and connections. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 217-251.
23.
EricksonB. H. (2003). Social networks: The value of variety. Contexts, 2, 25-31.
24.
FischerC. S. (2009). The 2004 GSS finding of shrunken social networks: An artifact?American Sociological Review, 74, 657-669.
25.
FloraC. B. (1995). Social capital and sustainability: Agriculture and communities in the Great Plains and Corn Belt. Research in Rural Sociology and Development: A Research Annual, 6, 227-246.
26.
FoleyM. W.EdwardsB. (1999). Is it time to disinvest in social capital?Journal of Public Policy, 19, 141-173.
27.
GardnerG. T.SternP. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
28.
GranovetterM. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
29.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
30.
GrengsJ. (2002). Community-based planning as a source of political change: The transit equity movement of Los Angeles’ bus riders union. Journal of American Planning Association, 68, 165-178.
31.
GroothuisP. A.MillerG. A. (1997). The role of social distrust in risk-benefit analysis: A study of the siting of a hazardous waste disposal facility. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 15, 241-257.
32.
GuagnanoG.SternP. C.DietzT. (1995). Influences on attitude behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
33.
HamiltonL. C. (2008). Who cares about polar regions? Results from a survey of U.S. public opinion. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research, 40, 671-678.
34.
HamiltonL. C. (2009). Statistics for STATA. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
HeberleinT. A.WarrinerK. G. (1983). The influence of price and attitude on shifting residential electricity consumption from on- to off-peak periods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, 107-130.
36.
InglehartR. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 57-72.
37.
JevonsW. S. (2001). Of the economy of fuel. Organization and the Environment, 14, 99-104.
38.
JonesN.SophoulisC. M.IosifidesT.BotetzagiasI.EvangelinasK. (2009). The influence of social capital on environmental policy instruments. Environmental Politics, 18, 595-611.
39.
KawachiI.KennedyB. P.GlassR. (1999). Social capital and self-related health: A contextual analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1187-1193.
40.
KrishnaA. (2002). Active social capital: Tracing the roots of development and democracy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
41.
La TrobeH. L.AcottT. G. (2000). Localising the global food system. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 7, 309-320.
42.
LinN. (2008). A network theory of social capital. In CastiglioneD.Van DethJ.WollebG. (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 50-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
LutzenhiserL. (2002). Marketing household energy conservation: The message and the reality. In DietzT.SternP. C. (Eds.), New tools for environmental protection: Education, information and voluntary measures (pp. 49-65). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
LyonF. (2000). Trust, networks and norms: The creation of social capital in agricultural economies in Ghana. World Development, 28, 663-681.
45.
LysonT. A. (2004). Civic agriculture: Reconnecting farm, food, and community. Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.
46.
MaciasT. (2008). Working toward a just, equitable, and local food system: The social impact of community-based agriculture. Social Science Quarterly, 89, 1086-1101.
47.
McAdamD. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of freedom summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 64-90.
48.
McCrightA. M.DunlapR. E. (2011). Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1163-1172.
49.
MckenzieM. D. (2000). Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 543-554.
50.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.BrashearsM. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71, 353-375.
51.
McPhersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review Sociology, 27, 415-444.
52.
MeadowsD. H.MeadowsD. L.RandersJ.BehrenW. W. (1972). The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.
53.
MillerE.BuysL. (2008). The impact of social capital on residential water-affecting behaviors in a drought-prone Australian community. Society & Natural Resources, 21, 244-257.
54.
NewtonK. (1997). Social capital and democracy. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 575-586.
55.
ParaskevopoulosS.KorfiatisK. J.PantisJ. D. (2003). Social exclusion as constraint for the development of environmentally friendly attitudes. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 759-774.
56.
PellowD.BrulleR. J. (2005). Power, justice and the environment: Toward critical environmental justice studies. In PellowD.BrulleR. (Eds.), Power justice and the environment: A critical appraisal of the environmental justice movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1-19.
57.
PortesA. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
58.
PrettyJ. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302, 1912-1914.
59.
PrettyJ.WardH. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29, 209-227.
60.
PutnamR. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61.
PutnamR. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 664-683.
62.
PutnamR. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
63.
RöperA. V.FlapH. (2009). Social networks and getting a home: Do contacts matter?Social Networks, 31, 40-51.
64.
SandersJ. M.NeeV. (1996). Immigrant self-employment: The family as social capital and the value of human capital. American Sociological Review, 61, 231-249.
65.
SchnaibergA. (1980). The environment: From surplus to scarcity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
66.
SchorJ. (1998). The overspent American: Upscaling, downshifting, and the new consumer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
67.
SchultzP. W.NolanJ. M.CialdiniR. B.GoldsteinN. J.GriskeviciusV. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18, 429-434.
68.
SemenzaJ. C.MarchT. L. (2009). An urban community-based intervention to advance social interactions. Environment and Behavior, 41, 22-42.
69.
ShahD. V. (1998). Civic engagement, interpersonal trust, and television use: An individual-level assessment of social capital. Political Psychology, 19, 469-496.
70.
ShemtovR. (2003). Social networks and sustained activism in local NIMBY campaigns. Sociological Forum, 18, 215-244.
71.
SkocpolT. (1996). Unravelling from above. The American Prospect, 25 (March-April), 20-25.
72.
SmithT. W.MarsdenP. V.HoutM.KimJ. (2011). General Social Surveys, 1972-2010: Cumulative codebook. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
73.
SonderskovK. (2008). Environmental group membership, collective action and generalised trust. Environmental Politics, 17, 78-94.
74.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
75.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6, 81-98.
76.
SternP. C.DietzT.GuagnanoG. A. (1995). The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
77.
SternP. C.GardnerG. T.VandenberghM. P.DietzT.GilliganJ. M. (2010). Design principles for carbon emissions reductions programs. Environmental Science & Technology, 44, 4847-4848.
78.
SternP. C.KalofL. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25, 322-348.
79.
StolleD.RochonT. R. (1998). Are all associations alike? Member diversity, associational type, and the creation of social capital. American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 47-65.
80.
USEIA. (2011). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990-2009. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
81.
UslanerE. (1998). Social capital, television, and the “mean world”: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441-467.
82.
UslanerE. (2000). Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly, 115, 569-590.
83.
UslanerE. (2008). Trust as a moral value. In CastiglioneD.Van dethJ.WollebG. (Eds.), The handbook of social capital (pp. 101-121). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
84.
VandenberghM.SternP. C.GardnerG.DietzT.GilliganJ. (2010). Implementing the behavioral wedge: Design and adopting effective carbon emissions reduction programs. Environmental Law Reporter, 40, 10547-10554.
85.
von HippelP. T. (2007). Regression with missing Ys: An improved strategy for analyzing multiply imputed data. Sociological Methodology, 37, 83-117.
86.
WhiteI. R.RoystonP.WoodA. M. (2010). Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Statistics in Medicine, 30, 377-399.
87.
WilkersonA.CarlsonN. E.YenI. H.MichaelY. L. (2012). Neighborhood physical features and relationships with neighbors: Does positive physical environment increase neighborliness. Environment and Behavior, 44, 595-615.
88.
WilliamsonT. (2002). Sprawl, politics and participation: A preliminary analysis. National Civic Review, 91, 235-244.
89.
WoodL. G.-C.ZubrickS. R.BulsaraM. K. (2013). “Through the kids . . . we connected with our community”: Children as catalysts of social capital. Environment and Behavior, 45, 344-368.
90.
YorkR.RosaE. A. (2003). Key challenges to ecological modernization theory: Institutional efficacy, case study evidence, units of analysis, and the pace of eco-efficiency. Organization & Environment, 16, 273-288.
91.
YorkR.RosaE. A.DietzT. (2003). Footprints on the Earth: The environmental consequences of modernity. American Sociological Review, 68, 279-300.
92.
ZhaoX. (2009). Media use and global warming perceptions: A snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Communication Research, 36, 698-723.
