We surveyed 351 inhabitants of a part of the Netherlands that suffers from gas-extraction-induced (and thus “human-caused”) earthquakes. Based on geological reports, we distinguished between three differently affected subregions. We first tested whether being more strongly, objectively affected also implies a stronger subjective disadvantage. Second, we tested whether objective disadvantage moderates which type of perceived rights violations (i.e., perceived violations of personal/family, or collective rights to safety, health, and financial stability) predict collective action intentions. In line with our hypotheses, the participants living in the objectively most affected area perceived their rights to be violated the most, and their collective action intentions were motivated by perceived violations of personal/family rights. In contrast, the collective action intentions of those in the least affected areas were motivated by perceived violations of collective rights. We discuss the importance of understanding the interplay between objective disadvantage, perceived rights violations, and collective action.
BaumA.GatchelR. J.SchaefferM. A. (1983). Emotional, behavioral, and physiological effects of chronic stress at Three Mile Island. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 565-572. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.4.565
2.
BlumerH. (1939). Collective behavior. In McClung LeeA. (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 219-288). New York, NY: Barnes & Noble.
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
5.
BurninghamK. (2000). Using the language of NIMBY: A topic for research not an activity for researchers. Local Environment, 5, 55-67. doi:10.1080/135498300113264
6.
CovelloV. T.von WinterfeldtD.SlovicP. (1987). Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks: Problems and opportunities from a social and behavioral perspective. In CovelloV. T.LaveL. B.MoghissiA.UppuluriV. R. R. (Eds.), Uncertainty in risk assessment, risk management, and decision making (pp. 221-239). Boston, MA: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-5317-1_19
7.
DearM. (1992). Understanding and overcoming the NIMBY syndrome. Journal of the American Planning Association, 58, 288-300. doi:10.1080/01944369208975808
8.
Devine-WrightP. (2009). Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place protective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 426-441. doi:10.1002/casp.1004
9.
Devine-WrightP. (2011). Place attachment and public acceptance of renewable energy: A tidal energy case study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 336-343. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.001
EllemersN. (1993). The influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 22-57. doi:10.1080/14792779343000013
12.
GertheissJ.TutzG. (2009). Penalized regression with ordinal predictors. International Statistical Review, 77, 345-365. doi:10.1111/j.1751-5823.2009.00088.x
13.
GreenbergM. R. (2009). NIMBY, CLAMP, and the location of new nuclear-related facilities: U.S. national and 11 site-specific surveys. Risk Analysis, 29, 1242-1254. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01262.x
14.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
15.
HovlandC. I.SearsR. R. (1940). Minor studies of aggression: VI. Correlation of lynchings with economic indices. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 9, 301-310. doi:10.1080/00223980.1940.9917696
16.
JonesC.EiserR. (2009). Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy, 37, 4604-4614. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.015
17.
JostJ. T.Chaikalis-PetritsisV.AbramsD.SidaniusJ.Van Der ToornJ.BrattC. (2012). Why men (and women)do and don’t rebel: Effects of system justification on willingness to protest. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 197-208. doi:10.1177/0146167211422544
18.
KlandermansB. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
KrauseR. M.CarleyS. R.WarrenD. C.RuppJ. A.GrahamJ. D. (2014). “Not in (or under) my backyard”: Geographic proximity and public acceptance of carbon capture and storage facilities. Risk Analysis, 34, 529-540. doi:10.1111/risa.12119
20.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
LickelB.HamiltonD. L.WieczorkowskaG.LewisA.ShermanS. J.UhlesA. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.223
22.
MannariniT.RoccatoM.FediA.RovereA. (2009). Six factors fostering protest: Predicting participation in locally unwanted land uses movements. Political Psychology, 30, 895-920. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00732.x
23.
MazzoniD.van ZomerenM.CicognaniE. (2015). The motivating role of perceived right violation and efficacy beliefs in identification with the Italian water movement. Political Psychology, 36, 315-330. doi:10.1111/pops.12101
24.
MitchellR. C. (1982). Rationality and irrationality in the public’s perception of nuclear power. In FreudenburgW. R.RosaE. A. (Eds.), Public reactions to nuclear power: Are there critical masses? (pp. 137-179). Boulder, CO: American Association for the Advancement of Science/W.
25.
MorganM. I.HineD. W.BhullarN.DunstanD. A.BartikW. (2016). Fracked: Coal seam gas extraction and farmers’ mental health. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 22-32. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.012
PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.MeertensR. W.Van DickR.ZickA. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 385-401. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x
28.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T.LightdaleJ. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493. doi:10.1177/0146167294205005
29.
RoccatoM.MannariniT.PacilliM. G. (2017). Ingroup identification, outgroup infrahumanization, and intention to mobilize in land use conflicts. Environment and Behavior, 1-23. doi:10.1177/0013916517708396
30.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W. (2008). Moral conviction and political engagement. Political Psychology, 29, 29-54. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00611.x
SmithH. J.PettigrewT. F.PippinG. M.BialosiewiczS. (2012). Relative deprivation: A theoretical and meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 203-232. doi:10.1177/1088868311430825
33.
StoneR. A.LevineA. G. (1985). Reactions to collective stress: Correlates of active citizen participation at Love Canal. Prevention in Human Services, 4, 153-177. doi:10.1080/10852358509511166
34.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-48). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
TetlockP. E.KirstelO. V.ElsonS. B.GreenM. C.LernerJ. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates and heretic counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 853-870. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.853
36.
ThomasE. F.McGartyC. (2009). The role of efficacy and moral outrage norms in creating the potential for international development activism through group-based interaction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 115-134. doi:10.1348/014466608X313774
37.
Van Der PligtJ.De BoerJ. (1991). Contaminated soil: Public reactions, policy decisions, and risk communication. In KaspersonR. E.StallenP. J. (Eds.), Communicating risks to the public (pp. 127-144). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
38.
Van der VoortN.VanclayF. (2015). Social impacts of earthquakes caused by gas extraction in the Province of Groningen, The Netherlands. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2014.08.008
39.
Van ZomerenM. (2013). Four core social psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378-388. doi:10.1111/spc3.12031
40.
Van ZomerenM.IyerA. (2009). Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 645-660. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.x
41.
Van ZomerenM.LeachC. W.SpearsR. (2012). Protesters as “passionate economists”: A dynamic dual pathway model of approach coping with collective disadvantage. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 180-199. doi:10.1177/1088868311430835
42.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
43.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 52-71. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x
44.
WalshE. J. (1981). Resource mobilization and citizen protest in communities around Three Mile Island. Social Problems, 29, 1-21. doi:10.1525/sp.1981.29.1.03a00010
45.
WalshE. J. (1987). Challenging official risk assessments via protest mobilization: The TMI case. In JohnsonB. B.CovelloV. T. (Eds.), The social and cultural construction of risk (pp. 85-101). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3395-8_4
46.
Wester-HerberM. (2004). Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts—The role of place-identity in risk perception. Environmental Science & Policy, 7, 109-116. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2003.12.001
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
