Relationships between transportation noise and the level of annoyance attributed to a certain noise source are well established in adults. Little is known about the noise annoyance in children. The authors assessed the reported annoyance due to different noise sources of 8- to 14-year-old children in a representative population and compared the results with existing data on adults. The primary focus was on road traffic noise because of its pervasiveness. From all over Germany, 1,048 children were randomly selected. They completed a questionnaire regarding living conditions, including noise annoyance from different noise sources such as road traffic noise. The percentage of children’s homes located on busy roads was 16.5%, and approximately half of the children (47.7%) had their bedroom facing the street. Among the 8- to 10-year-olds, 7.3% were annoyed by road traffic noise during daytime (“yes” on a dichotomous annoyance scale). Among the 11- to 14-year-olds, 16.4% were at least “slightly” annoyed by road traffic noise during daytime (sum of the upper four categories of a 5-point annoyance scale). Compared with regularly reported representative data on adults, the relative frequency of children annoyed by road traffic noise at home was considerably lower.
BabischW. (2006). Transportation noise and cardiovascular risk: Updated review and synthesis of epidemiological studies indicate that the evidence has increased. Noise & Health, 8(30), 1-29.
2.
BabischW. (2009). Kinder-Umwelt-Survey (KUS) 2003/06 Lärm. Daten und Materialiensammlung, Deskription und Zusammenhangsanalysen. Umwelt & Gesundheit 01/2009 [The German Environmental survey on children 2003/06–Noise: data and methods, descriptive and analytic results]. Berlin, Germany: Umweltbundesamt. Retrieved from http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-medien/mysql_medien.php?anfrage=Kennummer&Suchwort=3617
3.
BabischW.NeuhauserH.ThammM.SeiwertM. (2009). Blood pressure in 8-14 year old children in relation to traffic noise at home: Results of the German Environmental Survey On Children (GerES IV). Science of the Total Environment, 407, 5839-5843.
4.
BeckerK.SchulzC.BabischW.DürkopJ.RosskampE.SeiwertM.. . .SeifertB. (2005). German environmental survey for children (GerES IV) 2003-2006. Pollution Atmosphérique, 188, 475-479.
5.
BerglundB.LindvallT.NilssonM. E. (2007). The children’s community response to environmental noise. In Calvo-ManzanoA.Pérez-LópezA.SantiagoJ. S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, September 2-7 (Paper ENV-02-003). Madrid, Spain: Sociedad Espanola de Acústica.
6.
BistrupM.-L.BabischW.StansfeldS.SulkowskiW. (2006). PINCHE’s policy recommendations on noise: How to prevent noise from adversely affecting children. Acta Paediatrica, 453(Suppl. 95), 31-35.
BullingerM.HyggeS.EvansG. W.MeisM.von MackensenS. (1998). The psychological cost of aircraft noise for children. Zentralblatt für Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, 202, 127-138.
9.
European Commission Working Group on Dose–Effect Relations. (2002). Position paper on dose response relationships between transportation noise and annoyance. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/noise/pdf/noise_expert_network.pdf
Felscher-SuhrU.GuskiR.SchuemerR. (2000). Internationale Standardisierungsbestrebungen zur Erhebung von Lärmbelästigung [International attempts of standardization for the assessment of noise annoyance]. Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung, 47, 68-70.
12.
FieldsJ. M.de JongR.BrownA. L.FlindellI. H.GjestlandT.JobR. F. S.. . .ValletM. (1997). Guidelines for reporting core information from community noise reaction surveys. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 206, 685-695.
13.
FieldsJ. M.de JongR. G.GjestlandT.FlindellI. H.JobR. F. S.KurraS.. . .SchumerR. (2001). Standardized general-purpose noise reaction questions for community noise surveys: Research and recommendation. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 242, 641-679.
14.
GlassD. C.SingerJ. E. (1972). Urban stress: Experiments on noise and social stressors. New York, NY: Academic Press.
15.
GuskiR. (1999). Personal and social variables as co-determinants of noise annoyance. Noise & Health, 1(3), 45-56.
16.
GuskiR.Felscher-SuhrU.SchuemerR. (1999). The concept of noise annoyance: How international experts see it. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 223, 513-527.
17.
HainesM.BrentnallS. L.StansfeldS. A.KlinebergE. (2003). Qualitative responses of children to environmental noise. Noise & Health, 5(19), 19-30.
18.
HainesM.StansfeldS. (2000). Measuring annoyance and health in child social surveys. In CassereauD. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering, Nice, August 27-30 (Paper IN2000/2824). Paris: Société Francaise d’Acoustique.
19.
HainesM.StansfeldS. A.BrentnallS. L.HeadJ. A.BerryB.JigginsM.HyggeS. (2001). The West London Schools Study: The effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure exposure on child health. Psychological Medicine, 31, 1385-1396.
20.
HainesM. M.StansfeldS. A.JobR. F. S.BerglundB.HeadJ. (2001). A follow-up study of effects of chronic aircraft noise exposure on child stress responses and cognition. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 839-845.
21.
ISO/TS 15666. (2003). Technical specifications: Acoustics—Assessment of noise annoyance by means of social and socio-acoustic surveys. Berlin, Germany: Beuth Verlag.
22.
JobR. F. S. (1988). Community response to noise: A review of factors influencing the relationship between noise exposure and reaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 83, 991-1001.
23.
JobR. F. S. (1991). Impact and potential use of attitude and other modifying variables in reducing community reaction to noise. Transport Research Record, 1312, 109-115.
24.
KroesenM.MolinE. J. E.van WeeB. (2008). Testing a theory of aircraft noise annoyance: A structural equation analysis. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 4250-4260.
25.
KryterK. D. (1972). Non-auditory effects of environmental noise. American Journal of Public Health, 62, 389-398.
26.
KurthB.-M.KamtsiurisP.HöllingH.SchlaudM.DölleR.EllertU.. . .WolfU. (2008). The challenge of comprehensively mapping children’s health in a nation-wide health survey: Design of the German KiGGS-Study. BMC Public Health, 8(196). doi:110.1186/1471-2458-8-196110.1186/1471-2458-8-196
27.
LercherP. (1998). Context and coping as moderators of potential health effects in noise-exposed persons. In PrasherD.LuxonL. (Eds.), Advances in noise research. Volume I: Biological effects of noise (pp. 328-335). London, UK: Whurr Publishers.
28.
LercherP. (2003). Annoyance, disturbance and severances in children exposed to transportation noise. In de JongR. G.HoutgastT.FranssenE. A. M.HofmanW. F. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Rotterdam, 29 June-3 July (pp. 241-248). Schiedam, Netherlands: Foundation ICBEN.
29.
LercherP.BrauchleG.KoflerW.WidmanU.MeisM. (2000). The assessment of noise annoyance in schoolchildren and their mothers. In CassereauD. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 29th International Congress and Exhibition on Noise Control Engineering (Paper IN2000/2567). Paris: Sociéte Francaise d’Acoustique.
30.
MiedemaH. M. E.OudshoornC. G. M. (2001). Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109, 409-416.
31.
NiemannH.BonnefoyX.BraubachM.HechtK.MaschkeC.RodriguesC.RöbbelN. (2006). Noise-induced annoyance and morbidity results from the pan-European LARES study. Noise & Health, 8(31), 63-79.
32.
OuisD. (2001). Annoyance from road traffic noise: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 101-120.
33.
OuisD. (2002). Annoyance caused by exposure to road traffic noise: An update. Noise & Health, 4(15), 69-79.
34.
Passchier-VermeerW. (2000). Noise and health of children: TNO report PG/VGZ/2000.042. Leiden: Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research.
35.
SchultzT. J. (1978). Synthesis of social surveys on noise annoyance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 377-406.
36.
SchulzC.SeiwertM.BeckerK.ConradA.Kolossa-GehringM. (2008). Der Kinder-Umwelt-Survey 2003-2006 (KUS): Stichprobe und Studienbeschreibung [The German Environmental Survey on Children 2003-2006 (GerES IV): Sample and study description]. Umweltmedizin in Forschung und Praxis, 13, 379-390.
37.
Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks. (2008). Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music players and mobile phones including a music playing function. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. Directorate-General Health & Consumer Protection. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_018.pdf
38.
Socialstyrelsen. (2005). Environmental health report 2005: Extended summary. Stockholm, Sweden: National Board of Health and Welfare.
39.
StansfeldS. A.BerglundB.ClarkC.Lopez-BarrioI.FischerP.ÖhrströmE.. . .BerryB. F.(2005). Aircraft and road traffic noise and children’s cognition and health: A cross-national study. Lancet, 365, 1942-1949.
40.
SukowskiH.MeisM.LercherP. (2004). Der Einfluss chronischer and akuter Verkehrslärmexposition auf das Lästigkeitsempfinden von Kindern für Geräusche [Effects of chronic and acute traffic noise exposure on annoyance in children: Results from a traffic noise study]. Zeitschrift für Lärmbekämpfung, 51, 110-117.
41.
SukowskiH.MeisM.LercherP.HeydingerD.SchickA. (2000). Noise annoyance of children exposed to chronic traffic noise: Results from the Tyrol School Study II. In SchickA.MeisM.ReckhardtC. (Eds.), Contributions to psychological acoustics: Results of the 8th Oldenburg Symposium on Psychological Acoustics (pp. 571-580). Oldenburg, Germany: Bibliotheks-und Informationssystem der Universität Oldenburg.
42.
Umweltbundesamt. (2005). Data on the environment. The state of the environment in Germany, 2005 edition. Dessau, Germany: Federal Environmental Agency.
43.
Van den HazelP.ZuurbierM.BistrupM. L. (Eds.). (2005). Policy interpretation network on children’s health and environment: Report WP7, summary PINCHE policy recommendations. Arnhem, Netherlands: Public Health Services Gelderland Midden. Retrieved from http://www.pinche.hvdgm.nl/resource/pdf/documents/final/PINCHE_WP7_final_110106.pdf
44.
van KempenE. E. M. M.van KampI. (2005). Annoyance from air traffic noise: Possible trends in exposure–response relationships (Report 01/2005 MGO EvK). Bilthoven, Netherlands: RIVM.
45.
van KempenE. E. M. M.van KampI.StellatoR. K.Lopez-BarrioI.HainesM. M.NilssonM. E.. . . StansfeldS. A. (2009). Children’s annoyance reactions to aircraft and road traffic noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 895-904.
46.
WinklerJ.StolzenbergH. (1999). Der Sozialschichtindex im Bundes-Gesundheitssurvey [Social status scaling in the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey]. Gesundheitswesen 61, Sonderheft2, 178-183.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. (2009). Night noise guidelines for Europe. Copenhagen, Denmark: Author. Retrieved from http://www.euro.who.int/Document/E92845.pdf
49.
ZuurbierM.LundqvuistC.SalinesG.StansfeldS.HankeW.BabischW.MoshammerH. (2007). The environmental health of children: Priorities in Europe. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 20, 291-308.
