Children are more impaired than adults by unfavorable listening conditions such as reverberation and noise. Nevertheless, the acoustical conditions in classrooms often do not fit the specific needs of young listeners. This field study aimed to analyze the effects of classroom reverberation on children's performance and well-being at school. Performance and questionnaire data were collected from 487 children from 21 classrooms which differed in mean reverberation time from 0.49 to 1.1 seconds. Significant effects of reverberation on speech perception and short-term memory of spoken items were found. Furthermore, the children from reverberating classrooms performed lower in a phonological processing task, reported a higher burden of indoor noise in the classrooms, and judged the relationships to their peers and teachers less positively than children from classrooms with good acoustics. The results demonstrate the importance of good acoustical conditions in classrooms.
AdamsA. M., and GathercoleS. E. (1996). Phonological working memory and spoken language development in children.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 216–233.
2.
BaddeleyA. D., GathercoleS. E., and PapagnoC (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device.Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.
3.
BaddeleyA. D., and GathercoleS. E. (1993). Working memory and language.Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
BaddeleyA. D. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview.Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.
5.
BeamanC. P. (2005). Auditory distraction from low-intensity noise: A review of the consequences for learning and workplace environments.Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1041–1064.
BoweyJ. A. (2001). Nonword repetition and young children's receptive vocabulary: A longitudinal study.Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 441–469.
8.
BradleyB, and BryantP (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection.Nature, 310, 419–421.
9.
BradlowA, KrausN, & HayesE (2003). Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: Sentence perception in noise.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 80–97.
10.
ChaitM, EdenG, PoeppelD, SimonJ, HillD, & FlowerD (2007). Delayed detection of tonal targets in background noise in dyslexia.Brain and Language, 102, 80–90.
11.
CunninghamJ, NicolT, ZeckerS, BradlowA, and KrausN (2001). Neurobiologic responses to speech in noise in children with learning problems: deficits and strategies for improvement.Clinical Neurophysiology, 112, 758–767.
12.
de JongP, & van der LeijA (1999). Specific contributions of phonological variables to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450–476.
13.
DempsterF (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing mechanism. In HoweL, & PasnakR (Eds.), Emerging themes in cognitive development (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.
14.
DIN 18041 (2004). Hörsamkeit in kleinen bis mittelgroβen Räumen.Berlin: Beuth.
15.
DockrellJ. E., and ShieldB (2004). Children's perceptions of their acoustic environment at school and at home.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 2964–2973.
16.
DoyleA. B. (1973). Listening to distraction: A developmental study of selective attention.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 15, 100–115.
17.
DufvaM, NiemiP, and VoetenM. J. (2001). The role of phonological memory, word recognition, and comprehension skills in reading development: from preschool to grade 2.Reading and Writing, 14, 91–117.
18.
EdwardsJ, FoxR. A., and RogersC. L. (2002). Final consonant discrimination in children: Effects of phonological disorder, vocabulary size, and articulatory accuracy.Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 45, 231–42.
19.
EisenbergL. S., ShannonR. V., MartinezA. S., WygonskiJ, & BoothroydA (2000). Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America107, 2704–2710.
20.
ElliottE. M. (2002). The irrelevant speech effect and children: Theoretical implications of developmental change.Memory and Cognition, 30, 478–487.
21.
EvansG, and HyggeS (2007). Noise and cognitive performance in children and adults. In LuxonL. M., & PrasherD (Eds.), Noise and its effects (pp. 549–566). New York: John Wiley.
22.
EvansG, and MaxwellL (1997). Chronic noise exposure and reading deficits: The mediating effects of language acquisition.Environment and Behavior, 29, 638–656.
23.
EvansG. W., HyggeS, and BullingerM (1995). Chronic noise and psychological stress.Psychological Science, 6, 333–338.
24.
FallonM, TrehubS. E., and SchneiderB. A. (2000). Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 3023–3029.
25.
FlookL, RepettiR. L., and UllmanJ. B. (2005). Classroom social experiences as predictors of academic performance.Developmental Psychology, 41, 319–327.
26.
GathercoleS. E. (2006). Nonword repetition and word learning: The nature of the relationship.Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 513–543.
27.
GathercoleS. E., BriscoeJ, ThornA, and TifannyC (2008). Deficits in verbal long-term memory and learning in children with poor phonological short-term memory skills.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 474–490.
28.
GeffnerD, LuckerJ. R., and KochW (1996). Evaluation of auditory discrimination in children with ADD and without ADD.Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 26, 169–180.
29.
GumenyukV, KorzyukovO, AlhoK, EsceraC, and NaatanenR (2004). Effects of auditory distraction on electrophysiological brain activity and performance in children aged 8–13 years.Psychophysiology, 41, 30–36.
30.
HainesM. M., StansfeldS. A., BerglundR. F., and HeadJ (2001). Chronic aircraft noise exposure, stress responses, mental health and cognitive performance in school children.Psychological Medicine, 31, 265–277.
31.
HasselhornM, and WernerI (2000). Zur Bedeutung des phonologischen Arbeitsgedächtnisses für die Sprachentwicklung [The role of phonological short-term memory in language development]. In GrimmH (Ed.). Sprachentwicklung. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie C/III/3 (pp. 363–378). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
32.
HazanV, and BarrettS (2000). The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12.Journal of Phonetics, 28, 377–396.
33.
HenzeA (2006). Entwicklung eines Lärmfragebogens für Grundschulkinder. (Unpublished Diploma Thesis, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt).
34.
JohnsonC. E. (2000). Children's phoneme identification in reverbaration and noise.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 43, 144–157.
35.
JonesD. M. (1999). The cognitive psychology of auditory distraction: The 1997 BPS Broadbent Lecture.British Journal of Psychology, 90, 167–187.
36.
JonesD. M., MackenW. J., and NichollsA. P. (2004). The phonological store of working memory: Is it phonological and is it a store?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,30, 656–674.
37.
KlatteM, LeeN, & HellbrückJ (2002). Effects of articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech on serial recall of heard and read materials.Psychologische Beiträge, 44, 166–186.
38.
KlatteM, MeisM, SukowskiH, and SchickA (2007). Effects of irrelevant speech and traffic noise on speech perception and cognitive performance in elementary school children.Noise and Health, 9, 64–74.
39.
LubmanD, and SutherlandL (2002). Role of soundscape in children's learning. Proceedings of first Pan-American/Iberian Meeting on Acoustics; Cancun, Mexico.
40.
MacKenzieD. J., and AireyS (1999). Classroom Acoustics. A Research Projekt—Summary Report.Edinburgh: Heriot-Watt University.
41.
ManloveE. E., FrankT, & Vernon-FeagansL (2001). Why should we care about noise in classrooms and child care settings?Child and Youth Care Forum,30, 55–64.
MayoL. H., FlorentineM, and BuusS (1997). Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 686–693.
46.
MayringerH, and WimmerH (2003). Salzburger Lese-Screening (SLS) für die Klassenstufen 1–4.Göttingen: Hogrefe.
47.
McCoyS. L., TunP. A., CoxL. C., ColangeloM. L., StewartR. A., & WingfieldA (2005). Hearing loss and perceptual effort: Downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 22–33.
48.
MetsalaJ (1997). An examination of word frequency and neighborhood density in the development of spoken-word recognition.Memory and Cognition, 25, 47–56.
49.
NeathI (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 403–423.
50.
NelsonP, KohnertK, SaburS, and ShawD (2005). Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: Double Jeopardy?Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools,36, 219–229.
51.
NeumanA. C., and HochbergI (1983). Children's perception of speech in reverberation.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 73, 2145–2149.
52.
NicklosJ (1967). Structural efficiency of the Raven Coloured Matrices.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 489.
53.
NorrelgenF, LacerdaF, and ForssbergH (2001). Temporal resolution of auditory perception in relation to perception, memory and language skills in typical children.Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 359–369.
54.
OberdoersterM, and TieslerG (2006). Acoustic ergonomics of school.Schriftenreihe der Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin BAuA, FB 1071e. Bremerhaven: NW-Verlag, (in English)
55.
OberdoersterM, and TieslerG (2007, September 2007). Modern teaching needs modern conditions. Room acoustics as an ergonomic factor. Paper presented at the 19th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid. Retrieved January 3, 2009, from http://www.sea-acustica.es/web_ica_07/fchrs/papers/rba-04-003.pdf
56.
OhE. L., WightmanF, and LutfiR (2001). Childrens detection of pure tone signals with random multitone maskers.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2888–2895.
57.
PekkarinenE, and ViljanenJ (1990). Effect of sound-absorbing treatment on speech discrimination in rooms.Audiology, 29, 219–227.
58.
PicardM, and BradleyJ. S. (2001). Revisiting speech interference in classrooms.Audiology, 40, 221–244.
59.
RauerW, and SchuckK. D. (2004). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von emotionalen und sozialen Schulerfahrungen von Grundschulkindern erster und zweiter Klassen (FEESS).Göttingen: Hogrefe.
60.
RavenJ (2002). Coloured progressive matrices.Frankfurt a. M.: Swets & Zeitlinger.
61.
RogersC. L., ListerJ. J., FeboD. M., BesingJ. M., and AbramsH. B. (2006). Effects of bilingualism, noise, and reverberation on speech perception by listeners with normal hearing.Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 465–485.
62.
SchickA, KlatteM, and MeisM (1999). Die Lärmbelastung von Lehrern und Schülern - ein Forschungsstandbericht.Zeitschrift fir Lärmbekämpfung, 46, 77–87.
63.
SchlittmeierS. J., HellbrückJ, and KlatteM (2008a). Does irrelevant music cause an irrelevant sound effect for auditory items?European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,20, 252–271.
64.
SchlittmeierS. J., HellbrückJ, and KlatteM (2008b). Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 665–673.
65.
SchönwälderH. G. (2001). Die Arbeitslast der Lehrerinnen und Lehrer.Essen: Verlag Neue Deutsche Schule.
66.
Schulte-KörneG, DeimelW, BartlingJ, RemschmidtH (1999). The role of phonological awareness, speech perception, and auditory temporal processing for dyslexiaEuropean Child and Adolescent Psychiatry,8, 28–24.
67.
SerniclaesW, Sprenger-CharollesL, CarreR, and DemonetJ. F. (2001). Perceptual discrimination of speech sounds in developmental dyslexia.Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 44, 384–399.
68.
ShieldB, and DockrellJ. E. (2003). The effects of noise on children at school: A review.Building Acoustics, 10, 97–116.
69.
ShieldB, and DockrellJ. E. (2004). External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 730–738.
70.
SteinbrinkC, and KlatteM (2008). Phonological working memory in children with poor reading and spelling abilities.Dyslexia, 14, 271–290.
71.
StockC, MarxP, and SchneiderW (2004). Basiskompetenzen für Lese-/Rechtschreibleistungen. Ein Test zur Erfassung der phonologischen Bewusstheit vom ersten bis vierten Grundschuljahr.Göttingen: Hogrefe.
72.
StuartA (2005). Development of auditory temporal resolution in school-age children revealed by word recognition in continuous and interrupted noise.Ear and Hearing, 26, 78–88.
73.
SurprenantA (1999). The effect of noise on memory for spoken syllables.International Journal of Psychology, 34, 328–333.
74.
TalaricoM, AbdillaG, AliferisM, BalazicI, GiaprakisI, StefanakisT (2007). Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities.Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 12, 13–19.
75.
VelutinoF. R., FletcherJ. M., SnowlingM. J., and ScanlonD. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades?Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45, 2–40.
76.
WagnerR. K., and TorgesonJ. K. (1987). The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills.Psychological Bulletin, 101, 192–212.
77.
WarnerC. M., JohnsonK. L., HayesE. A., NicolT, and KrausN (2004). Learning impaired children exhibit timing deficits and training-related improvements in auditory cortical responses to speech in noise.Experimental Brain Research, 157, 431–441.
78.
WhitlockJA, and DoddG (2008). Speech intelligibility in classrooms: Specific acoustical needs for primary school children.Building Acoustics, 15, 35–47.
79.
WijngaardenS. J., SteenekenH. J., and HoutgastT (2003). Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1906–1916.
80.
ZieglerJ. C., Pech-GeorgelC, GeorgeF, AlarioF. X., and LorenziC (2005). Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 14110–14115.
