The authors estimate the relationship between trees and three crime aggregates (all crime, violent crime, and property crime) and two individual crimes (burglary and vandalism) in Portland, Oregon. During the study period (2005-2007), 431 crimes were reported at the 2,813 single-family homes in our sample. In general, the authors find that trees in the public right of way are associated with lower crime rates. The relationship between crime and trees on a house’s lot is mixed. Smaller, view-obstructing trees are associated with increased crime, whereas larger trees are associated with reduced crime. The authors speculate that trees may reduce crime by signaling to potential criminals that a house is better cared for and, therefore, subject to more effective authority than a comparable house with fewer trees.
AkbariH.KurnD. M.BretzS. E.HanfordJ. W. (1997). Peak power and cooling energy savings of shade trees. Energy and Buildings, 25, 139-148.
2.
AndersonL.CordellH. K. (1988). Residential property values improve by landscaping with trees. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 9, 162-166.
3.
AnselinL.HudakS. (1992). Spatial econometrics in practice. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 22, 509-536.
4.
AustinD. M. (1991). Neighborhood attributes and crime prevention activity. Criminal Justice Review, 16, 17-28.
5.
BeauregardE.ProulxJ.RossmoD. K. (2005). Spatial patterns of sex offenders: Theoretical, empirical, and practical issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 579-603.
6.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76, 169-217.
7.
BoggsS. L. (1965). Urban crime patterns. American Sociological Review, 30, 899-908.
8.
BragaA. A.BondB. J. (2008). Policing crime and disorder hot spots: A randomized controlled trail. Criminology, 46, 577-607.
9.
BrowerS.DockettK.TaylorR. B. (1983). Residents’ perceptions of territorial features and perceived local threat. Environment and Behavior, 15, 419-437.
10.
BrownB. B.AltmanI. (1983). Territoriality, defensible space and residential burglary: An environmental analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 203-220.
11.
ClarkR. V. (1995). Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention. Crime and Justice, 19, 91-150.
12.
CohenL.FelsonM. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
13.
DavisJ. B. (2006). The distribution of property crime and arrest rates across Los Angeles neighborhoods. Western Criminology Review, 7, 7-26.
14.
DeFrancesC. J.TitusR. M. (1993). Urban planning and residential burglary outcomes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 179-191.
15.
DonovanG. H.ButryD. T. (2009). The value of shade: Estimating the effect of urban trees on summertime electricity use. Energy and Buildings, 41, 662-668.
16.
FarrellG.ClarkK.EllingworthD.PeaseK. (2005). Of targets and supertargets: A routine activity theory of high crime rates. Internet Journal of Criminology, 25,1-25.
17.
GodwinM.CanterD. (1997). Encounter and death: the spatial behavior of US serial killers. Policing, 20, 24-38.
18.
GouldE. D.WeinbergB. A.MustardD. B. (2002). Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979-1997. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 45-61.
19.
GrahnP.StigsdotterU. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 2, 1-18.
20.
GreeneW. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21.
GroggerJ. (1998). Market wages and youth crime. Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 756-791.
22.
HansmannR.HugS.-M.SeelandK. (2007). Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening,6, 213-225.
23.
HilbeJ. M. (2007). Negative binomial regression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
ImaiS.KatayamaH.KrishnaK. (2006). Crime and young men: The role of arrest, criminal experience, and heterogeneity. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
25.
KaplanS. (1987). Mental fatigue and the designed environment. In HarveyJ.HenningD. (Eds.), Public environments (pp. 55-60). Washington, DC: Environmental Design Research Association.
26.
KeizerK.LindenbergS.StegL. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681-1685.
27.
KuoF. E.BacaicoaM.SullivanW. C. (1998). Transforming inner city landscapes: Trees, sense of safety, and preference. Environment and Behavior, 30, 28-59.
28.
KuoF. E.SullivanW. C. (2001). Environment and crime in the inner city: Does vegetation reduce crime?Environment and Behavior, 33, 343-367.
29.
McPhersonE. G.SimpsonJ. R.PeperP. J.MacoS. E.XiaoQ. (2005). Municipal forest benefits and costs in five U.S. cities. Journal of Forestry, 103, 411-416.
30.
NasarJ. L. (1982). A model relating visual attributes in the residential environment to fear of crime. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 247-255.
31.
NasarJ. L.FisherB.GrannisM. (1993). Proximate physical cues to fear of crime. Landscape and Urban Planning, 26, 161-178.
32.
NasarJ. L.FisherB. S. (1993). “Hot spots” of fear and crime: A multi-method investigation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 187-206.
33.
ParkB.-J.TsunetsuguY.IshiiH.FuruhashiS.HirandoH.KagawaT.MiyazakiY. (2008). Physiological effects of shinrin-yoku (taking in the atmosphere of the forest) in a mixed forest in Shinano Town, Japan. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23, 278-283.
34.
ReppettoT. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime and Delinquency, 22, 166-177.
35.
RosenbaumD. P. (1986). The theory and research behind Neighborhood Watch: Is it a sound fear and crime reduction strategy?Crime and Delinquency, 33, 103-134.
36.
ShafferG. S.AndersonL. M. (1985). Perceptions of the security and attractiveness of urban parking lots. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 5, 311-323.
37.
SimpsonJ. R.McPhersonE. G. (1996). Potential of tree shade for reducing residential energy use in California. Journal of Arboriculture, 22, 10-18.
38.
UlrichR. S. (1976). Visual landscapes and psychological well-being. Landscape Research, 4, 17-23.
39.
van der VoordtT. (1987). Residential crime and environmental design. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 2, 1566-1573.
40.
WeisburdD.WyckoffL.ReadyJ.EckJ. E.HinckleJ. C.GajewskiF. (2006). Does crime just move around the corner? A controlled study of spatial displacement and diffusion of crime control benefits. Criminology, 44, 549-592.
41.
WilsonJ. Q.KellingG. L. (1982). The police and neighborhood safety: Broken windows. Atlantic, 249, 29-38.
