This study develops spatial lag models to evaluate the performance of neighborhoods with new urbanist features in the recent housing recession in the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area. It found that single-family homes that are closer to the central city held their value better in the recent recession, which might be a sign of recentralization. The effects of new urbanist features on home appreciation rate, however, were moderate and many of them were neutral or even negative. The study revealed that there existed synergistic effects between some dimensions of new urbanist development on appreciation rates of single-family homes in the recession.
AbbottC.1997. “The Portland Region: Where City and Suburbs Talk to Each Other—and Often Agree.”Housing Policy Debate8:11–51.
2.
AhlfeldtG. M.WendlandN.2009. “Looming Stations: Valuing Transport Innovations in Historical Context.”Economics Letters150:97–99.
3.
AndersonN. B.BogartW. T.2001. “The Structure of Sprawl: Identifying and Characterizing Employment Centers in Polycentric Metropolitan Areas.”American Journal of Economics and Sociology60:147–69.
4.
Atkinson-PalomboC.2010. “Comparing the Capitalization Benefits of Light-Rail Transit and Overlay Zoning for Single-Family Houses and Condos by Neighborhood Type in Metropolitan Phoenix, Arizona.”Urban Studies47 (11): 2409–26.
5.
BartholomewK.EwingR.2011. “Hedonic Price Effects of Pedestrian- and Transit-Oriented Development.”Journal of Planning Literature26 (1): 18–34.
6.
Baum-SnowN.KahnM. E.2000. “The Effects of New Public Projects to Expand Urban Rail Transit.”Journal of Public Economics77:241–63.
7.
BhattaS. D.DrennanM. P.2003. “The Economic Benefits of Public Investment in Transportation: A Review of Recent Literature.”Journal of Planning Education and Research22:288–96.
8.
BowesD.IhlanfeldtK. R.2001. “Identifying the Impacts of Rail Transit Stations on Residential Property Values.”Journal of Urban Economics50:1–25.
9.
CaoX.2008. “Is Alternative Development Undersupplied? Examination of Residential Preferences and Choices of Northern California Movers.”Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board2077:97–105.
CalthorpeP.FultonW.2001. The Regional City: Planning for the End of Sprawl. Washington, DC: Island Press.
12.
CerveroR.KockelmanK.1997. “Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design.”Transportation Research Part D2 (3): 199–219.
13.
ChatmanD. G.TulachN. K.KimK.2012. “Evaluating the Economic Impacts of Light Rail by Measuring Home Appreciation: A First Look at New Jersey’s River Line.”Urban Studies49 (3): 467–87.
14.
The College of William and Mary and the Minnesota Population Center. 2011. School Attendance Boundary Information System (SABINS): Version 1.0. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15.
DebrezionG.PelsE.RietveldP.2007. “The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis.”Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics35:161–80.
16.
DownsA.2005. “Smart Growth: Why We Discuss It More Than We Do It.”Journal of the American Planning Association71 (4): 367–80.
17.
DuncanM.2008. “Comparing Rail Transit Capitalization Benefits for Single-Family and Condominium Units in San Diego, California.”Transportation Research Record2067:120–30.
18.
DuncanM.2011. “The Impact of Transit-Oriented Development on Housing Prices in San Diego, CA.”Urban Studies48 (1): 101–27.
19.
EwingR.1997. “Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 107–26.
20.
GatzlaffD. H.SmithM. T.1993. “The Impact of the Miami Metrorail on the Value of Residences Near Station Locations.”Land Economics69 (1): 54–66.
21.
GibbonsS.MachinS.2005. “Valuing Rail Access Using Transport Innovations.”Journal of Urban Economics57: 148–69.
22.
GiulianoG.GordonP.PanQ.ParkJ.2010. “Accessibility and Residential Land Values: Some Tests with New Measures.”Urban Studies47 (14): 3013–3130.
23.
GlaeserE. L.GottliebJ. D.TobioK.2012. “Housing Booms and City Centers.”American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings102 (3): 127–33.
24.
GordonP.RichardsonH. W.1997. “Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal?”Journal of the American Planning Association63 (1): 95–106.
25.
HeppS.2013. “Foreclosures and Metropolitan Spatial Structure: Establishing the Connection.”Housing Policy Debate23 (3): 497–520.
26.
KilpatrickJ. A.ThroupeR. L.CarruthersJ. I.KrauseA.2007. “The Impact of Transit Corridors on Residential Property Values.”Journal of Real Estate Research29 (3): 303–20.
27.
LeSageJ. P.FischerM. M.2008. “Spatial Growth Regressions: Model Specification, Estimation and Interpretation.”Spatial Economic Analysis3 (3): 275–304.
28.
LevineJ.InamA.TorngG.2005. “A Choice-Based Rationale for Land Use and Transportation Alternatives: Evidence from Boston and Atlanta.”Journal of Planning Education and Research24:317–30.
29.
LevineJ.FrankL.2007. “Transportation and Land-Use Preferences and Residents’ Neighborhood Choices: The Sufficiency of Compact Development in the Atlanta Region.”Transportation34:255–74.
30.
MatthewsJ. W.TurnbullG. K.2007. “Neighborhood Street Layout and Property Value: The Interaction of Accessibility and Land Use Mix.” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics35:111–141.
31.
McMillenD. P.2003a. “The Return of Centralization to Chicago: Using Repeat Sales to Identify Changes in House Price Distance Gradients.”Regional Science and Urban Economics33:287–304.
32.
McMillenD. P.2003b. “Neighborhood House Price Indexes in Chicago: A Fourier Repeat Sales Approach.”Journal of Economic Geography3:57–73.
33.
McMillenD. P.McDonaldJ.2004. “Reaction of House Prices to a New Rapid Transit Line: Chicago’s Midway Line, 1983-1999.” Real Estate Economics32 (3): 463–86.
34.
MeddaF.2012. “Land Value Capture Finance for Transport Accessibility: A Review.”Journal of Transport Geography25:154–61.
Munoz-RaskinR.2010. “Walking Accessibility to Bus Rapid Transit: Does It Affect Property Values?”Transport Policy17:72–84.
37.
PlautP. O.BoarnetM. G.2003. “New Urbanism and the Value of Neighborhood Design.”Journal of Architectural and Planning Research20 (3): 254–65.
38.
PotiowskyT.2008. “The Housing Market Downturn: Why Has It Not Decimated the Oregon Economy?”Center for Real Estate Quarterly2 (2): Portland State University.
39.
SongY.KnaapG.2003. “New Urbanism and Housing Values: A Disaggregate Assessment.”Journal of Urban Economics54:218–38.
40.
SongY.QuerciaR. G.2008. “How Are Neighborhood Design Valued Across Different Neighborhood Types?” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment23:297–316.
41.
TuC. C.EppliM. J.1999. “Valuing New Urbanism: The Case of Kentlands.”Real Estate Economics27 (3): 425–51.
