The authors examine whether self-efficacy relates to the environmentally responsible behavior of recycling and whether intrinsic motivation serves to mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and recycling. The authors measure those constructs, along with extrinsic motivation and the self- regulatory behaviors of satisfaction with and intentions toward recycling. Residents (n = 1,501) of 55 localities in Cordoba Spain are interviewed at home. Results show that all variables are positively related to self-reported recycling, except that extrinsic motivation is negatively related to recycling. As the authors hypothesize, the relationship between self-efficacy and recycling diminishes when intrinsic motivation is added to the model, which suggests that intrinsic motivation accounts for some of the relationship between self-efficacy and recycling. With the use of structural equation modelling, all variables, except extrinsic motivation, provide a good model fit; explained variance in reported in-home recycling is also substantial (adjusted R2 = .45). The meditational analysis provides insight regarding the dynamics of motivation; the model suggests that self-efficacy relates to recycling directly, by giving rise to intrinsic motivation, which in turn relates to recycling.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25.
2.
BanduraA. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanisms in human agency. American Psychologists, 37, 122-147.
3.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
4.
BanduraA. (2002). Environmental sustainability by sociocognitive deceleration of population growth. In SchmuchP.SchultzW. (Eds.), The psychology of sustainable development (pp. 209-238). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
5.
BanduraA. (2005). The primacy of self-regulation in health promotion. Applied Psychology. An International Review, 54, 245-254.
6.
BanduraA. (2006). Guide to the construction of self-efficacy scales. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
7.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8.
BatsonC. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 282-316). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
9.
BurtonK. D.LydonJ. E.D’AlessandroD. U.KoestnerR. (2006). The differential effects of intrinsic motivation and identified motivation on well-being and performance: Prospective, experimental, and implicit approaches to Self-Determination Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 750-762.
CapraraG. V.StecaP. (2007). Prosocial agency: The contribution of values and self-efficacy beliefs to prosocial behavior across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 218-239.
12.
ClaryE. G.SnyderM. (1999). The motivations to volunteer: Theoretical and practical considerations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 156-159.
13.
CombsG. M.LuthansF. (2007). Diversity training: Analysis of the impact of self-efficacy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 18, 91-120.
14.
CorbettA. C. (2005). Experiential learning within the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entreperneurship: Theory & Practice, 29, 473-491.
15.
Corral-VerdugoV.FríasM. (2006). Personal normative beliefs, antisocial behavior, and residential water conservation. Environment and Behavior, 38, 406-421.
16.
De YoungR. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509-526.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
18.
DwyerW. O.LeemingF. C.CorbenM. K.PorterB. E.JacksonJ. M. (1993). Critical review of behavioral interventions to preserve the environment: Research since 1980. Environment and Behavior, 25, 275-321.
19.
EarleyP. C.LituchyT. R. (1991). Delineating goal and efficacy effects. A test of three models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 81-98.
20.
EislerA. D.EislerH.YoshidaM. (2003). Perception of human ecology: Cross-cultural and gender comparisons. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 89-101.
21.
FeltzD. L.ShortS.SullivanP. (2008). Self-efficacy in sport. Research and strategies for working with athletes, teams, and coaches. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
22.
GellerE. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environment behavior. In BechtelR. B.ChurchmanY. A. (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541-553). New York, NY: John Wiley.
23.
GrantA. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48-58.
24.
HartigT.KaiserF. G.BowlerP. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33, 590-607.
25.
HomburgA.StolbergA. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 1-14.
26.
JudgeT. A.JacksonC. L.ShawJ. C.ScottB. A.RichB. L. (2007). Self-efficacy and work-related performance: The integral role of individual differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 107-127.
27.
KalinowskiC. M.LynneG. D.JohnsonB. (2006). Recycling as a reflection of balanced self-interest. A test of metaeconomic approach. Environment and Behavior, 38, 333-355.
28.
KalsE.SchumacherD.MontadaL. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31, 178-202.
29.
KanferR.AckermanP. L. (1996). A self-regulatory skills perspective to reducing cognitive interference. In SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Cognitive interference: Theories, methods, and findings (pp. 153-171). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
KasserT.RyanR. M. (1996). Further examining the American dream: Differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 80-87.
31.
LevittL.LeventhalG. (1986). Litter reduction: How effective is the New York State Bottle Bill?Environment and Behavior, 18, 467-479.
32.
LockeE. A.LathamG. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. A 35-year Odyssey. American Psychologists, 57, 705-717.
33.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.OstendorfF.AngleitnerA.HrebickovaM.AviaM. D.. . . SmithP. B. (2000). Nature over nurture: Temperament, personality, and life span development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 173-186.
34.
MeinholdJ. I.MalkusA. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference?Environment and Behavior, 37, 511-532.
35.
PajaresF.UrdanT. (2006). Self-efficacy beliefs in adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
36.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.HaddadN. K. (1997). Client motivation for therapy scale: Measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation for therapy. Journal of Personal Assessment, 68, 414-435.
37.
RamusC. A.KillmerA. B. C. (2007). Corporate greening through prosocial extrarole behaviours—A conceptual framework for employee motivation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 554-570.
38.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and wellbeing. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
39.
SchultzP. W.ZeleznyL. C. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across cultures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 255-265.
40.
SheldonK. M.ElliotA. J.KimY.KasserT. (2001). What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 325-339.
41.
ShermanJ. D.SmithH. C. (1984). The influence of organizational structure of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 877-885.
42.
SrivastavaA.LockeE. A.BartolK. M. (2001). Money and subjective well-being: It’s not the money, it’s the motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 959-971.
43.
SymeG. J.NancarrowB. E.SeligmanC. (2000). The evaluation of information campaigns to promote voluntary household water conservation. Evaluation Review, 24, 539-578.
44.
TaberneroC.WoodR. E. (1999). Implicit theories versus the social construal of ability in regulation and performance on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 104-127.
45.
ThögersenJ. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmental responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103.
46.
VancouverJ. B.MooreK. M.YoderR. J. (2008). Self-efficacy and resource allocation: Support for a nonmonotonic, discontinuous model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 35-47.
47.
VancouverJ. B.ThompsonC. M.WilliamsA. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605-620.
48.
VansteenkisteM.SimonsJ.LensW.SheldonK.DeciE. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 246-260.
49.
WernerC. M.MakelaE. (1998). Motivation and behaviors that support recycling. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 373-386.
50.
WoodR. E.BanduraA. (1989). Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 407-415.
51.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (2003). Educational Psychology: A Century of Contributions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
