This study examines the environmentally responsible behaviors (ERBs) of undergraduates (n = 575). ERBs were measured in an online survey and the influence of situational context on behavior was explored at two scales: 1) green versus non-green building and 2) building characteristics. The Positive Sustainable Built Environments model was used to analyze three building characteristics: Prime, Permit, and Invite. Prime refers to characteristics that prepare occupants to adopt ERBs via communicating a sustainable ethos or restoring attentional capacity (e.g., use of natural materials and views to nature). Permit refers to features that allow occupants to conserve resources (e.g., operable light switches). Invite pertains to features that explicitly encourage ERBs (e.g., signage prompting occupants to turn off lights). Regression results demonstrated that living in a green building had no significant impact on ERBs. However, the Prime and Invite building characteristics significantly predicted improved Energy, Water, and Materials conservation. Results yield implications for designers seeking to create sustainable buildings that promote ERBs.
AbbaszadehS.ZagreusL.LehrerD.HuizengaC. (2006). Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality in green buildings. Healthy Buildings, 3, 365–370.
2.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.002
3.
AbrahamseW.StegL.VlekC.RothengatterT. (2007). The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002
4.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
5.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). A theory of reasoned action. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 5–9). Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6.
AronsonE.O’LearyM. (1983). The relative effectiveness of models and prompts on energy conservation: A field experiment in a shower room. Journal of Environmental Systems, 12(3), 219–224.
7.
AulisioG. J. (2013). Green libraries are more than just buildings. Electronic Green Journal, 1(35), 1–11.
8.
BarkerR. G. (1965). Explorations in ecological psychology. The American Psychologist, 20(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021697
ColeL. B. (2014). The teaching green school building: A framework for linking architecture and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 20(6), 836–857. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833586
13.
ColeL. B. (2015). Green building literacy in the school building : A study of five middle schools in the United States. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 145–174.
14.
ColeL. B.AltenburgerE. (2019). Framing the teaching green building: Environmental education through multiple channels in the school environment. Environmental Education Research, 25(11), 1654–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1398817
15.
ColeL. B.HamiltonE. M. (2019). Can a green school building teach? A pre- and post-occupancy evaluation of a teaching green school building. Environment and Behavior, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518825283
16.
Corral-VerdugoV.Frías-ArmentaM. (2016). The sustainability of positive environments. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 18(4), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9701-7
17.
CranzG.LindsayG.MorhayimL.LinA. (2014). Communicating sustainability: A postoccupancy evaluation of the David Brower Center. Environment and Behavior, 46(7), 826–847. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513475449
18.
De YoungR. (1996). Some psychological aspects of a reduced consumption lifestyle: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence. Environment and Behavior, 28(3), 358–409.
19.
De YoungR. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509–526.
20.
De YoungR. (2010). Restoring mental vitality in an endangered world: Reflections on the benefits of walking. Ecopsychology, 2(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0043
21.
De YoungR.DuncanA.FrankJ.GillN.RothmanS.ShenotJ.ShotkinA.ZweizigM. (1993). Promoting source reduction behavior: The role of motivational information. Environment and Behavior, 25(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593251003
22.
Der-KarabetianA.AlfaroM.CaoY. (2018). Relationship of sustainable behavior, world-mindedness, national and global identities, perceived environmental risk and globalization impact among college students in the United States. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal, 4(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.17140/pcsoj-4-138
23.
DietzT.GardnerG. T.GilliganJ.SternP. C.VandenberghM. P. (2009). Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(44), 18452–18456. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908738106
FelstenG. (2008). Where to take a study break on the college campus: An attention restoration theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.006
26.
GreseR. E.KaplanR.RyanR. L.BuxtonJ. (2000). Psychological benefits of volunteering in stewardship programs. In GobsterP. H.HullR. B. (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the social sciences and humanities (pp. 265–280). Island Press.
27.
HamiltonE. M. (2018). Positive sustainable built environments: The cognitive and behavioral affordances of environmentally responsible behavior in green residence halls (Doctoral dissertation). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
HartigT.KaiserF. G.BowlerP. A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973142
30.
HeftH.NasarJ. L. (2000). Evaluating environmental scenes using dynamic versus static displays. Environment and Behavior, 32(3), 301–322.
31.
HiggsA. L.McMillanV. M. (2006). Teaching through modeling: Four schools’ experiences in sustainability education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.1.39-53
32.
HinesJ. M.HungerfordH. R.TomeraA. N. (1987). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1–8.
33.
HuaY.GöçerÖ.GöçerK. (2014). Spatial mapping of occupant satisfaction and indoor environment quality in a LEED platinum campus building. Building and Environment, 79, 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.029
34.
HungerfordH. R.VolkT. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8–21.
35.
HussainS. T.LeiS.AkramT.HaiderM. J.HussainS. H.AliM. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002
36.
IzadpanahiP.ElkadiH.TuckerR. (2017). Greenhouse affect: The relationship between the sustainable design of schools and children’s environmental attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 901–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1072137
37.
JacobJ.JovicE.BrinkerhoffM. B. (2009). Personal and planetary well-being: Mindfulness meditation, pro-environmental behavior and personal quality of life in a survey from the social justice and ecological sustainability movement. Social Indicators Research, 93(2), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9308-6
38.
JagersS. C.MattiS. (2010). Ecological citizens: Identifying values and beliefs that support individual environmental responsibility among Swedes. Sustainability, 2(4), 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2041055
KaiserF. G.FuhrerU. (2003). Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(4), 598–613.
41.
KaiserF. G.WolfingS.FuhrerU. (1996). Environmental attitude and ecological behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19.
KaplanR.KaplanS. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective (pp. 177–187). Cambridge University.
44.
KaplanS. (1991). Beyond rationality: Clarity-based decision making. In GarlingT.EvansG. W. (Eds.), Environment, cognition and action: An integrative multidisciplinary approach (pp. 171–190). Oxford University Press.
45.
KaplanS.BermanM. G. (2010). Directed attention as a common resource for executive functioning and self-regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691609356784
46.
KaplanS.KaplanR. (2009). Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: The Reasonable Person Model as an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.005
47.
KelzC.EvansG. W.RödererK. (2015). The restorative effects of redesigning the schoolyard. Environment and Behavior, 47(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513510528
48.
KhasheS.HeydarianA.GerberD.Becerik-GerberB.HayesT.WoodW. (2015). Influence of LEED branding on building occupants’ pro-environmental behavior. Building and Environment, 94, 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.10.005
49.
KokG.GottliebN. H.PetersG. J. Y.MullenP. D.ParcelG. S.RuiterR. A. C.FernándezM. E.MarkhamC.BartholomewL. K. (2016). A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: An intervention mapping approach. Health Psychology Review, 10(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155
50.
KollmussA.AgyemanJ. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior ?Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
51.
KosticA.StankovicD.TanicM. (2015). Inclusion of ‘green’ principles in the design of pre-school buildings. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 12(3), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.12.3.13023
52.
LandisJ. R.KochG. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
53.
LennonM.DouglasO.ScottM. (2017). Urban green space for health and well-being: Developing an “affordances” framework for planning and design. Journal of Urban Design, 22(6), 778–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2017.1336058
54.
MacNaughtonP.SatishU.LaurentJ. G. C.FlaniganS.VallarinoJ.CoullB.SpenglerJ. D.AllenJ. G. (2017). The impact of working in a green certified building on cognitive function and health. Building and Environment, 114, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.041
MarkowitzE. M.GoldbergL. R.AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2012). Profiling the “pro-environmental individual”: A personality perspective. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 81–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00721.x
57.
McFarlandS.HackettJ.HamerK.Katzarska-MillerI.MalschA.ReeseG.ReysenS. (2019). Global human identification and citizenship: A review of psychological studies. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12572
58.
MeerbeekB. W.de BakkerC.de KortY. A. W.van LoenenE. J.BergmanT. (2016). Automated blinds with light feedback to increase occupant satisfaction and energy saving. Building and Environment, 103, 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.04.002
59.
NisbetE. K.ZelenskiJ. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101–1106.
60.
OrrD. W. (1997). Architecture as pedagogy II. Conservation Biology, 11(3), 597–600.
61.
PaulW. L.TaylorP. A. (2008). A comparison of occupant comfort and satisfaction between a green building and a conventional building. Building and Environment, 43(11), 1858–1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.11.006
62.
PetersenJ. E.FrantzC. M.ShamminM. R.YanischT. M.TincknellE.MyersN. (2015). Electricity and water conservation on college and university campuses in response to national competitions among dormitories: Quantifying relationships between behavior, conservation strategies and psychological metrics. PLoS One, 10(12), e0144070. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144070
63.
PrettyJ.PeacockJ.SellensM.GriffinM. (2005). The mental and physical health outcomes of green exercise. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 15(5), 319–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603120500155963
64.
RaanaasR. K.EvensenK. H.RichD.SjøstrømG.PatilG. (2011). Benefits of indoor plants on attention capacity in an office setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2010.11.005
65.
RamseyC. E.RicksonR. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 10–18.
66.
RoczenN.KaiserF. G.BognerF. X.WilsonM. (2014). A competence model for environmental education. Environment and Behavior, 46(8), 972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
67.
RunhaarP.WagenaarK.WesselinkR.RunhaarH. (2019). Encouraging students’ pro-environmental behaviour: Examining the interplay between student characteristics and the situational strength of schools. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 13(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408219840544
68.
RyanR. L.KaplanR.GreseR. E. (2001). Predicting volunteer commitment in environmental stewardship programmes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 44(5), 629–648.
69.
SchuetteS. A. P.CorderoE.SlosburgK.AddingtonE. L.VictorsonD. (2019). A scoping review of positive lifestyle and wellness interventions to inform the development of a comprehensive health promotion program: “HealthPro.”American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 13(4), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1559827617704825
70.
SchwarzG. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464.
StegL.VlekC. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
73.
SternP. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.
74.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916593255002
75.
SungQ. C.LinM. L.ShiaoK. Y.WeiC. C.JanY. L.HuangL. T. (2014). Changing behaviors: Does knowledge matter? A structural equation modeling study on green building literacy of undergraduates in Taiwan. Sustainable Environment Research, 24(3), 173–183.
76.
TaylorA. F.KuoF. E. (2009). Children with attention deficits concentrate better after walk in the park. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(5), 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054708323000
77.
TennessenC. M.CimprichB. (1995). Views to nature: Effects on attention. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 77–85.
78.
ThatcherA.MilnerK. (2016). Is a green building really better for building occupants? A longitudinal evaluation. Building and Environment, 108, 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.08.036
79.
TrueloveH. B.CarricoA. R.WeberE. U.RaimiK. T.VandenberghM. P. (2014). Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: An integrative review and theoretical framework. Global Environmental Change, 29, 127–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
80.
TudorT.BarrS.GilgA. (2007). A tale of two locational settings: Is there a link between pro-environmental behaviour at work and at home?Local Environment, 12(4), 409–421.
81.
U.S. Green Building Council. (2009). LEED 2009 for new construction and major renovations rating system. Author.
WhitleyC. T.TakahashiB.ZwickleA.BesleyJ. C.LertpratchyaA. P. (2018). Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 245–262.
88.
WhitmarshL.O’NeillS. (2010). Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.003
89.
WuD. W.-L.DiGiacomoA.KingstoneA. (2013). A sustainable building promotes pro-environmental behavior: An observational study on food disposal. PLoS One, 8(1), 1–5.
