Whether or not different environmentally beneficial choices have common motivational causes are discussed in the framework of partial correlation analysis with structural equation modeling. Correlations between recycling, buying organic food products, and using public transport or bicycle are analyzed based on telephone interviews with a random sample of about 1,100 Danish residents and two replication samples of about 300 from the same population. The study finds that theoretically meaningful correlations are suppressed by background characteristics. Common motivational causes, that is, environmental values and environmental concern, can account for the significant partial correlations between behaviors after controlling for background characteristics.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin84, 888-918.
2.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
Aoyagi-Usui, M., Vinken, H., & Kuribayashi, A. (2003).Pro-environmentalattitudes and behavior: An international comparison. Human Ecology Review10, 23-31.
4.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 users'guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation, Marketing Division SPSS.
6.
Bagozzi, R. P. (1980). Performance and satisfaction in an industrial sales force: An examination of their antecedents and simultaneity. Journal of Marketing44(2), 65-77.
7.
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology23, 21-32.
8.
Bentler, P. M. (1988). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin107, 238-246.
9.
Berger, I. E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior29, 515-531.
10.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445-455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Carmines, E. G., & McIver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables. In G. W. Bohrstedt & E. F. Borgatta (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115).Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
De Kruijk, M. D., & van Raaij, W. F. (1991, June). Similarities andfrequencies of behaviors in an environmental context. Paper presented at the International Association for Research in Economic Psychology/Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics Conference, Stockholm, Sweden.
13.
Dunlap, R. E. (2002, September/October).Anenduringconcern. Public Perspective, pp.10-14.
14.
Dunlap, R. E., Grieneeks, J. K., & Rokeach, M. (1983). Human values and pro-environmental behavior. In W. D. Conn (Ed.), Energy and material resources: Attitudes, values, and public policy (pp. 145-168). Boulder, CO: Westview.
15.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental attitudes and values. In R. Fernandez-Ballesteros (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychological assessment (Vol. 1, pp. 364-369). London: Sage.
16.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17.
Enders, C. K. (2001). The impact of nonnormalityon full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data. Psychological Methods6, 352-370.
18.
Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology19, 369-382.
19.
Gray, D. B. (1985). Ecological beliefs and behaviors: Assessment and change. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
20.
Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining pro-environmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology29, 2505-2528.
21.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1988). LISREL7: A guide to the program and applications (2nd ed.). Chicago: SPSS.
22.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
23.
Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28, 395-422.
24.
Mackenzie, S. B. (2001).Opportunities for improving consumer research throughlatent variable structural equation modeling. Journal of Consumer Research28, 159-166.
25.
Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U.-K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003). Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite40, 109-117.
26.
Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: The influence of environmental concern on consumer behaviour. Journal of Social Psychology137, 189-204.
27.
Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). Psychology in action: A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist30(7), 787-790.
28.
Medin, D. L. (1989).Conceptsandconceptualstructure. American Psychologist44, 1469-1481.
29.
Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology35, 113-138.
30.
Midden, C. J. H., & Ritsema, B. S. M. (1983). The meaning of normative processes for energy conservation. Journal of Economic Psychology4, 37-55.
31.
Minton, A. P., & Rose, R. L. (1997). The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendlyconsumerbehavior:Anexploratorystudy. Journalof Business Research40, 37-48.
32.
Pickett, G. M., Kangun, N., & Grove, S. J. (1993). Is there a general conserving consumer? A public policy concern. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing12, 234-243.
33.
Pieters, R. G. M. (1991). Changing garbage disposal patterns of consumers: Motivation, ability, and performance. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing10, 59-76.
34.
Roberts, D. A., & Bacon, D. R. (1997). Exploring the subtle relationship between environmental concern and ecological conscious consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research40, 79-89.
35.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
36.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999).Value as predictorsof environmentalattitudes: Evidencefor consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology19, 255-265.
37.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
38.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values?Journal of Social Issues50(4), 19-45.
39.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology53, 550-562.
40.
Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58, 878-891.
41.
Siegfried, W. D., Tedeschi, R. G., & Cann, A. (1982). The generalizability of attitudinal correlates of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Social Psychology118, 287-288.
42.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Towards a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues56, 407-424.
43.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999).A value-belief-normtheory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review6, 81-97.
44.
Stern, P. C., & Oskamp, S. (1987). Managing scarce environmental resources. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbookof environmentalpsychology (Vol. 2, pp.1043-1088).New York: John Wiley.
45.
Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentallyresponsiblebehavior. Journalof Environmental Psychology24, 93-103.
46.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002).Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology23, 605-630.
47.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2003).Spillover of environment-friendlyconsumerbehavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology23, 225-236.
48.
Verhallen, T. M. M., & Pieters, R. G. M. (1984). Attitude theory and behavioral costs. Journal of Economic Psychology5, 223-249.
49.
Weigel, R., & Weigel, J. (1978). Environmental concern. The development of a measure. Environment and Behavior10, 3-14.
