Theories about ambivalence, as well as quantitative and qualitative empirical approaches, are applied to obtain an understanding of recycling among young adults. A questionnaire was mailed to 422 Swedish young people. Regression analyses showed that a mix of negative emotions (worry) and positive emotions (hope and joy) about the environmental problems was positively related to recycling. The opposite pattern was found for attitudinal ambivalence toward recycling. Thereafter, semistructured interviews were performed. In a group of reluctant recyclers, the ambivalent attitudes consisted of views that recycling is something beneficial for the environment and is a civic duty. On the other hand, they wanted more information, were unable to integrate youthful ideals about living in an environmentally friendly way with the everyday life of young adulthood, and felt low self-efficacy. In addition, strategies to activate positive emotions alongside a high degree of environmental worry were explored in a group who recycle regularly.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Arcury, T.A., & Christianson, E.H. (1990). Environmental worldview in response to environmental problems: Kentucky 1994 and 1988 compared. Environment and Behavior, 22, 387-407.
3.
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1421-1432.
4.
Arnett, J.J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist , 55, 469-480.
5.
Ball, R., & Lawson, S.M. (1990). Public attitudes towards glass recycling in Scotland . Waste management and Research, 8, 177-182.
6.
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Oxford, UK: Polity.
7.
Beck, U. (2005). Den kosmopolitiska blicken eller: krig är fred (Swedish translation of Der kosmopolitische Blick-oder: Krieg ist Frieden) [Cosmopolitan Vision]. Riga, Latvia: Daidalos.
8.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.
9.
Biswas, A., Licata, J.W., McKee, D., Pullig, C., & Daughtridge, C. (2000). The recycling cycle: An empirical examination of consumer waste recycling and recycling shopping behaviors . Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(1), 93-105.
10.
Boehm, G., & Pfister, H.-R. (2000). Action tendencies and characteristics of environmental risks. Acta Psychologica, 104, 317-337.
11.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Berntson, G.G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin , 115, 401-423.
12.
Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). "If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it": A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research , 5, 95-113.
13.
Conner, M., Sparks, P., Povey, R., James, R., Shepard, R., & Armitage, C.J. (2002). Moderator effect of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 705-718.
14.
Costarelli, S., & Colloca, P. (2004). The effect of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 24, 279-288.
15.
Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588-601.
16.
Derksen, L., & Gartell, J. (1993). The social context of recycling. American Sociological Review, 58, 434-442.
17.
Eckersley, R. (1999). Dreams and expectations: Young people's expected and preferred futures and their significance for education. Futures, 31, 73-90.
18.
Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J.T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55, 647-654.
19.
Fredrickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218-226.
20.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21.
Haenze, M. (2001). Ambivalence, conflict, and decision making: Attitudes and feelings in Germany towards NATO's military intervention in the Kosovo war. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 693-706.
22.
Hartig, T., Kaiser, F.G., & Bowler, P.A. (2001). Psychological restoration in nature as a positive motivation for ecological behavior. Environment and Behavior , 33, 590-607.
23.
Hicks, D. (1996). A lesson for the future: Young people's hopes and fears for tomorrow. Futures, 28, 1-13.
24.
Hine, D.W., & Gifford, R. (1991). Fear appeals, individual differences and environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(1), 36-41.
25.
Höijer, B., Lidskog, R., & Uggla, Y. (2006). Facing dilemmas: Sense-making and decision-making in late modernity. Futures, 38, 350-366.
26.
Hosmer, D.W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley.
27.
Kitzinger, J., & Williams, C. (2005). Forecasting science futures: Legitimising hope and calming fears in the embryo stem cell debate. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 731-740.
28.
Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., & Wells, M. (2004). An analysis of intention to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 237-246.
29.
Larsen, J.T., Hemenover, S.H., Norris, C.J., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2003). Turning adversity to advantage: On the virtues of the coactivation of positive and negative emotions. In L. G. Aspinwall & U. M. Staudinger (Eds.), A psychology of human strengths: Fundamental questions and future directions for a positive psychology (pp. 211-226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
30.
Lavine, H., Thomsen, C.J., Zanna, M.P., & Borgida, E. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398-421.
31.
Lidskog, R., Sandstedt, E., & Sundqvist, G. (1997). Samhälle, risk och miljö [Society, risk, and environment] . Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur .
32.
Lindén, A.-L. (1994). Människa och miljö: Om attityder, värderingar, livsstil och livsform [Man and environment: Attitudes, values, life style and form of life]. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlssons.
33.
Lindén, A.-L. (2004). Miljömedvetna medborgare och grön politik [Environmentally friendly citizens and green politics]. Stockholm, Sweden: Formas.
34.
Maio, G.R., Bell, D.W., & Esses, V.M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 513-536.
35.
Maio, G.R., Bell, D.W., & Esses, V.M. (2000). Examining conflict between components of attitudes: Ambivalence and inconsistency are distinct constructs. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 32, 71-83.
36.
Marcus, G.E. (2002). The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
37.
Marcus, G.E., Neuman, W.R., & MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
Meneses, G.D., & Palacio, A.B. (2005). Recycling behavior: A multidimensional approach . Environment and Behavior, 37, 837-860.
39.
Naturvårdsverket. (2002 ). Ett ekologiskt hållbart omhändertagande av avfall [Ecologically sustainable waste management]. Report 5177. Stockholm, Sweden: Author.
40.
Nord, M., Luloff, A.E., & Bridger, J.C. (1998). The association of forest recreation with environmentalism . Environment and Behavior, 30, 235-246.
41.
Ojala, M. (2005). Adolescents' worries about environmental risks: Subjective well-being, values, and existential dimensions. Journal of Youth Studies, 8, 331-348.
42.
Olsen, S.O., Wilcox, J., & Olsson, U. (2005). Consequences of ambivalence on satisfaction and loyalty. Psychology & Marketing, 22, 247-269.
43.
Povey, R., Wellens, B., & Conner, M. (2001). Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian, and vegan diets: An examination of the role of ambivalence. Appetite, 37, 15-26.
44.
Saphores, J.-D., Nixon, H., Ogunsitan, O.A., & Shapiro, A.A. (2006). Household willingness to recycle electronic waste: An application to California. Environment and Behavior, 38, 183-208.
45.
Schwartz, S.H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221-279). New York: Academic Press.
46.
Scott, D. (1999). Equal opportunity, unequal results: Determinants of household recycling intensity. Environment and Behavior , 31, 267-290.
47.
Smith, J.A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51-80). London : Sage.
48.
Sparks, P., Conner, M., James, R., Shepherd, R., & Povey, R. (2001). Ambivalence about health-related behaviours: An exploration in the domain of food choice. British Journal of Health Psychology, 6, 53-68.
49.
Thompson, M.M., Zanna, M.P., & Griffin, D.W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about attitudinal ambivalence . In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength, antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
von Borgstede, C., & Lundqvist, L. (2002). Nytt klimat för miljöpolitiken [A new climate for environmental politics]. In S. Holmberg & L. Weibull (Eds.), Det våras för politiken [Politics is coming back] (pp. 143-165). Gothenburg, Sweden: SOM-rapport 30.
