The role of habit was investigated using two potential measures of habitual recycling behavior: past recycling behavior and perceived lack of habit as a reason for previous failure to recycle. Data were collected from 252 participants in Scotland, United Kingdom. Situational constraints, demographic characteristics, and variables associated with the theory of planned behavior were controlled for. Both past behavior and lack of habit made significant independent contributions to the variance of intention to recycle, suggesting that past recycling behavior was not an adequate measure of habit. Lack of habit moderated the attitude–intention relationship, such that the attitudes of those lacking a recycling habit did not predict intention to recycle. This suggests that those who had failed to recycle because of lack of habit may have had the habit of treating recyclables as garbage. Further work is required to develop a range of adequate measures of habit in the recycling domain.
Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1355-1374.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behaviors (pp. 11-39). New York: Springer .
4.
Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 1-63). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
6.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107-122.
7.
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Assessment of predictive validity and "perceived control." British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 35-54.
8.
Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology , 40, 471-499.
9.
Baffour, B. (2006). Modelling census under-enumeration: A logistical regression perspective. Occasional paper, General Register Office for Scotland. Retrieved September 19, 2007, from the General Register Office for Scotland Website, http://81.201.129.42/statistics/publications-and-data/occpapers/modelling-census-under-enumeration/index.html
10.
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25, 175-187.
11.
Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students' car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis . Environment and Behavior, 35, 264-285.
12.
Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford.
13.
Bentler, P.M., & Speckart, G. (1979). Models of attitude-behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86, 452-464.
14.
Conner, M., Sheeran, P., Norman, P., & Armitage, C.J. (2000). Temporal stability as a moderator of relationships in the Theory of Planned Behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 469-493.
15.
Costarelli, S., & Colloca, P. (2004). The effects of attitudinal ambivalence on pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 24, 279-288.
16.
Dahlstrand, U., & Biel, A. (1997). Pro-environmental habits: Propensity levels in behavioral change. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 588-601.
17.
Eagly, A.H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
18.
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPower: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28, 1-11.
19.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
20.
Fransson, N., & Gärling, T. (1999). Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 369-382.
21.
General Register Office for Scotland. (2006 ). The Registrar General's annual review of demographic trends , 151st edition: Scotland's population 2005. Edinburgh, UK: Author.
22.
Her Majesty's Stationery Office. (1991). Standard occupational classification. London: HMSO, Office of Population Censuses and Surveys.
23.
Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C.K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Kaiser, F.G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour . Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1-19.
25.
Klöckner, C.A., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 319-327.
26.
Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J., & Wells, M. (2004). An analysis of intentions to recycle household waste: The roles of past behaviour, perceived habit, and perceived lack of facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 237-246.
27.
McDonald, S., & Oates, C. (2003). Reasons for non-participation in a kerbside recycling scheme. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 39, 369-385.
28.
Mee, N., Clewes, D., Phillips, P.S., & Read, A.D. (2004). Effective implementation of a marketing communications strategy for kerbside recycling: A case study from Rushcliffe, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 42, 1-26.
29.
Ouellette, J.A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54-74.
30.
Preacher, K.J. (2003). A primer on interaction effects in multiple linear regression. Retrieved March 27, 2006, from University of North Carolina Website, http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/interact/interactions.htm
31.
Scottish Executive. (2005). Public attitudes to the environment in Scotland. Scottish Executive Social Research. Retrieved April 2006 from the Scottish Executive Social Research Website, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch
32.
Sheeran, P., Orbell, S., & Trafimow, D. (1999). Does the temporal stability of behavioral intentions moderate intention-behavior and past behavior-future behavior relations? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 721-730.
33.
Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins .
34.
Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., & White, K.M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225-244.
35.
Thøgersen, J. (1994). A model of recycling behaviour, with evidence from Danish source separation programmes. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 11, 145-163.
36.
Thøgersen, J. (2004). A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 93-103.
37.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology , 23, 605-630.
38.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2006). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment-friendly buying behavior: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1758-1780.
39.
Tonglet, M., Phillips, P.S., & Read, A.D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: A case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 41, 191-214.
40.
Trafimow, D. (2004). Problems with change in R2 as applied to theory of reasoned action research. British Journal of Social Psychology , 43, 515-530.
Verplanken, B. (2006). Beyond frequency: Habit as mental construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 639-656.
43.
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., van Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment . British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111-128.
44.
Verplanken, B., & Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on past behaviour: A self-report index of habit strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1313-1330.
45.
Yule, F., & Knussen, C. (2000). Environmental attitudes and behaviour research project. Interim report to Scotland and Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research/Scottish Environment Protection Agency. Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK: Department of Psychology.
