The biophysical context and contextual change have significant economic, cultural, social, and psychological consequences for individuals and communities. Although acknowledging the importance of the biophysical context for theoretical and conceptual issues, social science research typically is conducted as if context does not matter. The authors discuss the relevance of context and outline research that examines the effects of context through assumed contextual variation, subjective contextual variables, objective contextual variables, and temporal contextual variation. The authors hypothesize that an ecological disaster occurring in a community where people are connected to the biophysical environment and ecological processes will result in the adoption of a more ecological worldview. This hypothesis is tested by analyzing data collected in the renewable resource communities of Cordova and Petersburg, Alaska, in the aftermath of the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill. The authors find support for this hypothesis and provide suggestions for future research.
Arata, C. M., Picou, J. S., Johnson, G. D., & McNally, T. S. (2000). Coping with technological disaster: An application of the conservation of resources model to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13, 23-39.
2.
Arcury, T. A., & Christianson, E. H. (1990). Environmental world view in response to environmental problems: Kentucky 1984 and 1988 compared. Environment and Behavior, 22, 387-407.
3.
Bechtel, R. B., & Churchman, A. (Eds.).(2002). Handbook of environmental psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: John Wiley.
4.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
5.
Bevc, C., Marshall, B. K., & Picou, J. S. (2003, November). Integrating environmental and social data using GIS: Addressing social and health impact in the Wingate Community. Paper presented at the Mid-South Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Baton Rouge, LA.
6.
Bord, R. J., & O’Connor, R. E. (1997). The gender gap in environmental attitudes: The case of perceived vulnerability to risk. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 830-840.
7.
Brody, J. G., Vorhees, D. J., Melly, S. J., Swedis, S. R., Drivas, P. J., & Rudel, R. A. (2002). Using GIS and historical records to reconstruct residential exposure to large-scale pesticide application. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 12, 64-80.
8.
Brody, S. D., Highfield, W., & Alston, L. (2004). Does location matter?: Measuring environmental perceptions of creeks in two San Antonio watersheds. Environment and Behavior, 36, 229-250.
9.
Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In I. Altman & S. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 279-304). New York: Plenum.
10.
Brown, L. (2003). Plan B: Rescuing a planet under stress and a civilization in trouble. New York: Norton.
11.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
12.
Canter, D. (1977). The psychology of place. London: Architectural Press.
13.
Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., & Daniels, S. E. (2003). “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 87-104.
14.
Clitheroe, H. C., Jr., Stokols, D., & Zmuidzinas, M. (1998). Conceptualizing the context of environment and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18, 103-112.
15.
Cohen, M. J. (1995). Technological disaster and natural resource damage assessment: An evaluation of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Land Economics, 71, 65-82.
16.
Cohen, M. J. (1997). Economic impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In J. S. Picou, D. A. Gill, & M. J. Cohen (Eds.), The Exxon Valdez disaster: Readings on a modern social problem (pp. 133-164). New York: Kendall/Hunt.
17.
Davidson, D., & Freudenberg, W. (1996). Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environment and Behavior, 28, 302-339.
18.
Dietz, T., Stern, P., & Guagnano, G. (1998). Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 30, 450-471.
19.
Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20.
Drabek, T. E. (1970). Methodology of studying disasters: Past patterns and future possibilities. American Behavioral Scientist, 13, 331-343.
21.
Drabek, T. E. (1986). Human system responses to disaster: An inventory of sociological findings. New York: Springer-Verlag.
22.
Dunlap, R. E., & Catton, W. R. (1979). Environmental sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 5, 243-274.
23.
Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues. In R. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbookof environmental sociology (pp. 482-524). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
24.
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.
25.
Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425-442.
26.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The division of labor in society (W. D. Halls, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
27.
Erikson, K. T. (1976). Everything in its path: Destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon & Schuster.
28.
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council. (2002). Recovery of injured resources and services: 2001 update. Anchorage: State of Alaska and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
29.
Fall, J. A., & Field, L. J. (1996). Subsistence uses of fish and wildlife before and after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. In S. D. Rice, R. B. Spies, D. A. Wolfe,& B. A. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium (pp. 819-836). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Symposium 18.
30.
Freudenburg, W. R. (1997). Contamination, corrision, and the social order: An overview. Current Sociology, 45, 19-40.
31.
Fried, N. (1994, March). A trends profile—The City of Cordova. Alaska Economic Trends, 14, 1-4.
32.
Gray, D. (1985). Ecological beliefs and behaviors. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
33.
Inglehart, R. (1995). Public support for environmental protection: Objective problems and subjective values in 43 societies. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 57-72.
34.
Jones, R. E., & Dunlap, R. E. (1992). The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time?Rural Sociology, 57, 28-47.
35.
Klineberg, S. L., McKeever, M., & Rothenbach, B. (1998). Demographic predictors of environmental concern: It does make a difference how it’s measured. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 734-753.
36.
Little, B. R. (1987). Personality and the environment. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 205-244). New York: John Wiley.
37.
Lowe, P. D., & Rudig, W. (1986). Review article: Political ecology and the social sciences—The state of the art. British Journal of Political Science, 16, 513-550.
38.
Marshall, B. K. (1999). Globalization, environmental degradation, and Ulrich Beck’s risk society. Environmental Values, 8, 253-276.
39.
McFarlane, B. L., & Boxall, P. C. (2003). The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: An example of the forest sector. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 79-87.
40.
Mertig, A., Dunlap, R. E., & Morrison, D. (2002). The environmental movement in the United States. In R. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Eds.), Handbook of environmental sociology (pp. 448-481). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
41.
Mohai, P. (1990). Black environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 71, 744-765.
42.
Nash, R. F. (1989). The rights of nature: A history of environmental ethics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
43.
Nichols, B. (1989, September 7). Bird deaths alarm Alaska. USA Today, p. 3A.
44.
Ott, R. (1992, October). Could it be oil? 1992 Alaska pink salmon harvest shows possible impact of EVOS. Alaskan Fisherman’s Journal, 15, 14-15, 19.
45.
Palinkas, L. A., Patterson, J. S., Russell, J., & Downs, M. A. (1993). Community patterns of psychiatric disorders after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 1517-1523.
46.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. New York: Basic Books.
47.
Picou, J. S., & Gill, D. A. (1996). The Exxon Valdez oil spill and chronic psychological stress. In S. D. Rice, R. B. Spies, D. A. Wolfe, & B. A. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium (pp. 879-893). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Symposium 18.
48.
Picou, J. S., & Gill, D. A. (2000). The Exxon Valdez disaster as localized environmental catastrophe: Dissimilarities to risk society theory. In M. J. Cohen (Ed.), Risk in the modern world (pp. 143-170). London: McMillan.
49.
Picou, J. S., Gill, D. A., Dyer, C. L., & Curry, E. W. (1992). Disruption and stress in an Alaskan fishing community: Initial and continuing impacts of the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 6, 235-257.
50.
Picou, J. S., & Marshall, B. K. (2002). Contemporary conceptions of environmental risk: Implications for resource management and policy. Sociological Practice, 4, 293-313.
51.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70-93.
52.
Relph, E. C. (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion.
53.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
54.
Smythe, C. W. (1988). Harvest and use of fish and wildlife resources by residents of Petersburg, Alaska (Tech. Paper No. 164). Anchorage: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Subsistence.
55.
Spector, P. E. (1981). Research designs. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
56.
Spies, R. B., Rice, S. D., Wolfe, D. A., & Wright, B. A. (1996). The effects of the EVOS on the Alaskan coastal environment. In S. D. Rice, R. B. Spies, D. A. Wolfe, & B. A. Wright (Eds.), Proceedings of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Symposium (pp. 1-16). Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society Symposium 18.
57.
Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social construction?: The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 671-685.
58.
Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 407-424.
59.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1995). The New Ecological Paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27, 723-743.
60.
Stokols, D. (1987). Conceptual strategies of environmental psychology. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol.1, pp.41-70). New York: John Wiley.
61.
Stokols, D., & Altman, I. (Eds.). (1987). Handbook of environmental psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: John Wiley.
62.
Stratton, L. (1989). Resource use in Cordova: A coastal community of Southcentral Alaska (Tech. Paper No. 153). Anchorage: Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Department of Subsistence.
63.
Swartz, C. H., Rudel, R. A., Kachajian, J. R., & Brody, J. G. (2003). Historical reconstruction of wastewater and land use impacts to groundwater used for public drinking water: Exposure assessment using chemical data and GIS. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 13, 403-416.
64.
Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.
65.
Vaske, J., & Donnelly, M. (1999). A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildlife preservation voting intentions. Society and Natural Resources, 12, 523-537.
66.
Vorkinn, M., & Riese, H. (2001). Environmental concern in a local context: The significance of place attachment. Environment and Behavior, 33, 249-263.
67.
Ward, M. H., Nuckols, J. R., Weigel, S. J., Maxwell, S. K., Cantor, K. P., & Miller, R. S. (2000). Identifying populations potentially exposed to agricultural pesticides using remote sensing and a geographic information system. Environmental Health Perspectives, 108, 1-18.
