Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Personal space of physically abused children (N = 36) and nonabused children (N = 38) ages 7 to 9 was assessed using a stop-distance technique. All children were approached by female and male experimenters from four directions. The personal space of abused children is significantly larger than that of their nonabused peers. Boys and girls do not significantly differ in the preferred size of personal space. The personal space of abused children is significantly larger when approached by a male person. Such effect is not found in the control group. Interaction of Sex of Participant × Sex of Approaching Person yields significant results only when children are approached frontally, and this significance can be observed in both participant groups. In all, abused children, presumably due to their traumatic experiences, demonstrate stronger need for personal space. The author finds these results to be consistent with the protective function of personal space.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aiello, J. R. (1987). Human spatial behavior. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-505). New York: John Wiley.

Aiello, J. R., & Aiello, T. D. C. (1974). The development of personal space: Proxemic behavior of children 6 through 16. Human Ecology, 2, 177-189.

Ajdukovic, M. (1997). Zlostavljanje djece u obitelji—Jedan od izazova drustvene skrbi o djeci u 21. stoljecu [Child abuse in family—One of the challenges of social welfare in the 21st century]. Dijete-list radne skupine za prava djeteta, 4, 23-28.

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Bell, P. A., Fisher, J. D., Baum, A., & Greene, T. C. (1996). Environmental psychology. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

Brown, J., Cohen, P., Johnson, J., & Smailes, E. (1999). Childhood abuse and neglect: Specificity of effects on adolescent and young adult depression and sucidality. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 38, 1490-1497.

Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66-77.

Carton, J. S., & Nowicki, S. (1996). Origins of generalized control expectancies-reported child stress and observed maternal control and warmth. Journal of Social Psychology, 136, 753-760.

Cicchetti, D., & Toth, S. (1995). Developmental psychopathology of abuse and neglect. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 521-565.

10.

Dosey, M. A., & Meisels, M. (1969). Personal space and self-protection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 93-97.

11.

Duke, M. P., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (1972). A new measure and social learning model for interpersonal distance. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 119-132.

12.

Evans, G. W., & Howard, R. B. (1973). Personal space. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 334-344.

13.

Feiring, C., Taska, L., & Lewis, M. (1999). Age and gender differences in children's and adolescents' adaptation to sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 115-128.

14.

Frankel, A. S., & Barrett, J. (1971). Variations in personal space as a function of authoritarianism, self-esteem, and racial characteristics of a stimulus situation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 37, 95-98.

15.

Hall, E. T. (1963). A system of notation of proxemic behavior. American Anthropologist, 65, 1003-1026.

16.

Haskett, M. E., & Kistner, J. A. (1991). Social interactions and peer perceptions of young physically abused children. Child Development, 62, 979-990.

17.

Hayduk, L. A. (1983). Personal space: Where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 293-335.

18.

Horowitz, M. J., Duff, D. F., & Stratton, L. O. (1964). Body-buffer zone. Exploration of personal space. Archives of General Psychiatry, 11, 651-656.

19.

Kendall-Tackett, K. A. (2000). Physiological correlates of childhood abuse: Chronic hyperarousal in PTSD, depression, and irritable bowel syndrome. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24, 799-810.

20.

Lomranz, J., Shapira, A., Choresh, N., & Gilat, Y. (1975). Children's personal space as a function of age and sex. Developmental Psychology, 11, 541-545.

21.

McBride, G., King, M. G., & James, J. W. (1965). Social proximity effects on GSR in adult humans. Journal of Psychology, 61, 153-157.

22.

Papalia, D. E., & Wendkos Olds, S. (1992). Human development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

23.

Patterson, M. L. (1977). Interpersonal distance, affect, and equilibrium theory. Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 205-214.

24.

Snow, M. E., Jacklin, C. N., & Maccoby, E. E. (1983). Sex-of-child differences in the father-child interaction at one year of age. Child Development, 54, 227-232.

25.

Sommer, R. (1967). Small group ecology. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 145-152.

Personal Space in Physically Abused Children

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References