Research in open office design has shown that it is negatively related to workers’ satisfaction with their physical environment and perceived productivity. A longitudinal study was conducted within a large private organization to investigatethe effects of relocating employees from traditional offices to open offices. A measure was constructed that assessed employees’satisfaction with the physical environment, physical stress, coworker relations, perceived job performance, and the use of open office protocols. The sample consisted of 21 employees who completed the surveys at all three measurement intervals: prior to the move, 4 weeks after the move, and 6 months after the move. Results indicated decreased employee satisfaction with all of the dependent measures following the relocation. Moreover, the employees’dissatisfaction did not abate, even after an adjustment period. Reasons for these findings are discussed and recommendations are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allen, T. J. , & Gerstberger, P. G. (1973). A field experiment to improve communication in a product engineering department: The non-territorial office. Human Factors, 15, 487-498.
2.
Becker, F. D. , Gield, B., Gaylin, K., & Sayer, S. (1983). Office design in a community college. Environment and Behavior, 15, 699-726.
3.
Boje, A. (1971). Open plan offices. London: Business Books.
4.
Brill, M. , Margulis, S., & Konar, E. (1984). Using office design to increase productivity. Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design and Productivity.
5.
Brookes, M. J. , & Kaplan, A. (1972). The office environment: Space planning and affective behavior. Human Factors, 14(5), 373-391.
6.
Carlopio, J. R. (1996). Construct validity of a physical work environment satisfaction questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health and Psychology, 1, 330-344.
7.
Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and the allocation of attention. In A. Baum & S. Valins (Eds.), Advances in environmental psychology (pp. 283-302). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Donald, I. (1994). The structure of office workers experience of organizational environments. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 67, 241-258.
9.
Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiplecomparisons among means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 52-64.
10.
Geen, R. G. , & Gange, J. J. (1977). Drive theory of social facilitation: Twelve years of theory and research, Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1267-1288.
11.
Hedge, A. (1982). The open-plan office: A systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environment and Behavior, 14, 519-542.
12.
Hundert, A. T. , & Greenfield, N. (1969). Physical space and organizational behavior. Proceedings of the 77th Annual Convention, APA, 1, 601-602.
13.
Ives, R. S. , & Ferdinands, R. (1974). Working in a landscaped office. Personal Practice Bulletin, 30, 126-141.
14.
Louis Harris & Associates, Inc. (1978). The Steelcase national study of office environments: Do they work?Grand Rapids, MI: Steelcase Inc.
15.
Marans, R. W. , & Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1981). Evaluating built environments: A behavioral approach. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
16.
Marans, R. W. , & Yan, X. (1989). Lighting quality and environmental satisfaction in open and enclosed offices. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 6, 118-131.
17.
McCarrey, M. W. , Peterson, L., Edwards, S., & Von Kulmiz, P. (1974). Landscape office attitudes: Reflections of perceived degree of control over transactions with the environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 401-403.
18.
Mercer, A. (1979). Office environments and clerical behavior. Environment and Planning, 6, 29-39.
19.
Nemecek, J. , & Grandjean, E. (1973). Results of an ergonomic investigation of large-space offices. Human Factors, 15, 111-124.
20.
Oldham, G. R. (1988). Effects of changes in workspace partitions and spatial density on employee reactions: A quasi-experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 253-258.
21.
Oldham, G. R. , & Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally-occurring quasi-experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 267-284.
22.
Oldham, G. R. , & Rotchford, N. L. (1983). Relationships between office characteristics and employee reactions: A study of the physical environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 542-556.
23.
Pile, J. F. (1978). Open office planning: A handbook for interior designers and architects. London: Architectural Press.
24.
Riland, L. H. (1970). Summary: A re-survey of employee reactions to the landscape environment one year after initial occupation. Rochester, New York: Eastman Kodak.
25.
Sanders, M. S. , & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
Spreckelmeyer, K. F. (1993). Office relocation and environmental change: A case study. Environment and Behavior, 25, 181-204.
27.
Stokols, D. , Churchman, A., Scharf, T., & Wright, S. (1990). Workers’ experiences of environmental change and transition at the office. In S. Fisher & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), On the move: The psychology of change and transition (pp. 231-249). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
28.
Stokols, D. , & Scharf, F. (1990). Developing standardized tools for assessing employees’ratings of facility performance. In G. Davis & F. T. Ventre (Eds.), Performance of buildings and serviceability of facilities (pp. 55-79). Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
29.
Sundstrom, E. (1978). Crowding as a sequential process: Review of research on the effects of density on humans. In A. Baum & Y. M. Epstein (Eds.), Human response to crowding (pp. 31-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
30.
Sundstrom, E. (1986). Work places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Sundstrom, E. , Burt, R. E., & Kamp, D. (1980). Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 101-117.
32.
Sundstrom, E. , Town, J. P., Brown, D. W., Forman, A., & McGee, C. (1982). Physical enclosure, typeof office, and privacy in theoffice. Environment and Behavior, 14, 543-559.
33.
Sundstrom, E. , Town, J. P., Rice, R. W., Osborn, D. P., & Brill, M. (1994). Officenoiseand satis faction, and performance. Environment and Behavior, 26, 195-222.
34.
Wineman, J. D. (1986). Behavioral issues in office design. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
35.
Zahn, L. G. (1991). Faceto facecommunication in an officesetting: Theeffects of position, proximity and exposure. Communication Research, 18, 737-754.
36.
Zalesny, M. D. , & Farace, R. V. (1987). Traditional versus open offices: A comparison of sociotechnical, social, relations, and symbolic meaning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 240-259.
