The purpose of this studywas to investigate the relationship between sample size and the quality of factor solutions obtained from exploratory factor analysis. This research expanded upon the range of conditions previously examined, employing a broad selection of criteria for the evaluation of the quality of sample factor solutions. Results showed that when communalities are high, sample size tended to have less influence on the quality of factor solutions than when communalities are low. Overdetermination of factors was also shown to improve the factor analysis solution. Finally, decisions about the quality of the factor solution depended upon which criteria were examined.
Arrindell, W. A.,& van der Ende, J. (1985). An empirical test of the utility of the observationstovariables ratio in factor and components analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 165-178.
2.
Barrett, P. T.,& Kline, P. (1981). The observation to variable ratio in factor analysis. Personality Study in Group Behavior, 1, 23-33.
3.
Browne, M. W.,& Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternativeways of assessing model fit. InK. A. Bollen& J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models(pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Cattell, R. B. (1978). The scientific use of factor analysis in behavioral and life sciences. New York: Plenum.
5.
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304-1312.
6.
Comrey, A. L.,& Lee, H. B. (1973). Afirst course in factor analysis. NewYork: Academic Press.
7.
Cudeck, R., & O'Dell, L. (1994). Applications of standard error estimates in unrestricted factor analysis: Significance tests for factor loadings and correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 475-487.
8.
Everitt, B. S. (1975). Multivariate analysis: The need for data, and other problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 126, 237-240.
9.
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Grice, J. W. (2001). A comparison of factor scores under conditions of factor obliquity. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 67-83.
11.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Hair, J. F. J., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611-637.
14.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S.,& Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
15.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16.
Mundfrom, D. J., Shaw, D. G., & Ke, T. L. (2001, April). Sample size issues in factor analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
17.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Pennell, R. (1968). The influence of communality and N on the sampling distributions of factor loadings. Psychometrika, 33, 423-439.
19.
Robey, R. R., & Barcikowski, R. S. (1992). Type I error and the number of iterations in Monte Carlo studies of robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 283-288.
20.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983). Using multivariate statistics(2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
21.
Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F.,& Linn, R. L. (1969). Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 34, 421-459.
22.
Velicer, W. F.,& Fava, J. L. (1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3, 231-251.
