Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Purpose: Though school boards play an important role in governing schools, little empirical research examines board governance particularly with respect to administrator hiring decisions. This study aimed to help close this research gap with a stated preferences experiment, focusing on administrator hiring decisions by private Christian school boards. Research Methods: This study uses an experimental identification strategy known as conjoint analysis to examine whether academic achievement, education, and experience impact the likelihood of school administrator hire. We use data from the Flourishing Faith Index (FFI), a survey instrument fielded by the Association of Christian Schools International (ACSI), the largest Protestant school organization in the United States and one of the largest school organizations of any kind worldwide. Findings: We find evidence that board members place a premium on extensive teaching or leadership experience, strong academic achievement and qualifications, and graduation from a postsecondary institution sharing their school's religious tradition. Implications: As school administrators play an important role in leading their schools and school boards exercise oversight in part by hiring school administrators, this study has important implications for board governance, school administrator hiring, and educational leadership, even outside the context of Christian schools.

Keywords

school board governance private school leadership Christian education labor economics randomized controlled trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

S. F.

Kocak

Magazinnik

(2022). What do we learn about voter preferences from conjoint experiments? American Journal of Political Science, 66(4), 1008–1020. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12714

Acton

K. S.

(2021). School leaders as change agents: Do principals have the tools they need? Management in Education, 35(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020620927415

Anderson

M. E.

(1991). Principals: How to train, recruit, select, induct, and evaluate leaders for America’s schools. University of Oregon. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED337843.pdf

Asioli

Næs

Øvrum

Almli

V. L.

(2016). Comparison of rating-based and choice-based conjoint analysis models. A case study based on preferences for iced coffee in Norway. Food Quality and Preference, 48(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.09.007

Baltzell

D. C.

Dentler

R. A.

(1983). Selecting American school principals; Research report. Abt Associates, Inc. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED238206.pdf

Banke

Maldonado

Lacey

C. H.

(2011, April). Christian school leaders and spirituality: A phenomenological study [Paper presentation]. American Educational Research Association, Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED518486.pdf

Banke

Maldonado

Lacey

C. H.

(2012). Christian school leaders and spirituality. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 21(3), 235–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2012.732806

Bansak

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D. J.

Yamamoto

(2023). Using conjoint experiments to analyze election outcomes: The essential role of the average marginal component effect. Political Analysis, 31(4), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2022.16

Beckman

J. E.

Drexler

J. L.

Eames

K. J.

(2012). “Faithful presence”: The Christian school head, personhood, relationships, and outcomes. Journal of School Choice, 6(1), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2012.650096

10.

Beteille

Kalogrides

Loeb

(2012). Stepping stones: Principal career paths and school outcomes. Social Science Research, 41(4), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.003

11.

Biesma

R. G.

Pavlova

van Merode

G. G.

Groot

(2007). Using conjoint analysis to estimate employers preferences for key competencies of master level Dutch graduates entering the public health field. Economics of Education Review, 26(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2006.01.004

12.

Boyd

Grossman

Ing

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2011). The influence of school administrators on teacher retention decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 303–333. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27975291. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210380788

13.

Boyd

Grossman

Lankford

Loeb

Wyckoff

(2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1(2), 176–216. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.2006.1.2.176

14.

Branch

G. F.

Hanushek

E. A.

Rivkin

S. G.

(2013). School leaders matter: Measuring the impact of effective principals. Education Next, 13(1), 62–69. Retrieved from https://www.educationnext.org/school-leaders-matter/

15.

Brewer

D. J.

(1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7757(93)90062-L

16.

Broughman

Kincel

Willinger

Peterson

(2021). Characteristics of private schools in the United States: Results from the 2019–20 private school universe survey first look [NCES 2021-061, U.S. Department of Education]. National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2021/2021061.pdf

17.

Bryk

A. S.

Schneider

(2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

18.

Cheng

Green

Smith

(2023). The development and validation of the Practicing Faith Survey. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 51(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/00916471221095110

19.

Cheng

Trivitt

J. R.

Wolf

P. J.

(2016). School choice and the branding of Milwaukee Private schools. Social Science Quarterly, 97(2), 362–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12222

20.

Chiang

Hanley

Lipscomb

Stephen

Gill

Brian

(2016). Is school value added indicative of principal quality? Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 283–309. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00184

21.

Clark

Martorell

Rockoff

(2009). School principals and school performance (CALDER Working Paper No. 38). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509693

22.

Coelli

Green

D. A.

(2012). Leadership effects: School principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.001

23.

Cook

(2023). The keystones of head of school tenure [Master’s Leadership Program Thesis]. Gordon College.

24.

Cruzeiro

P. A.

Boone

(2009). Rural and small school principal candidates: Perspectives of hiring superintendents. The Rural Educator, 31(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35608/ruraled.v31i1.437

25.

Dean

J. R.

(2015). Comparing schools: From value added to sound policy [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas]. ScholarWorks@UARK.

26.

Dhuey

Smith

(2014). How school principals influence student learning [IZA Discussion Paper No. 7949]. Institute for the Study of Labor.

27.

Eckert

(2017). Leading together: Teachers and administrators improving student outcomes. Corwin press.

28.

Eckert

Iselin

(2024). Catalytic improvement through collective leadership in Christian schools. International Journal of Christianity & Education, 29(2), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/20569971241299716

29.

Egalite

A. J.

Jensen

L. I.

Stewart

Wolf

P. J.

(2014). Finding the right fit: Recruiting and retaining teachers in Milwaukee choice schools. Journal of School Choice, 8(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2014.875418

30.

Eriksson

Johansson

Langenskiöld

(2017). What is the right profile for getting a job? A stated choice experiment of the recruitment process. Empirical Economics, 53, 803–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-016-1133-1

31.

Fink

Brayman

(2006). School leadership succession and the challenges of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 623–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X05278186

32.

Frawley

(2014). The impact of leadership on the role and mission of a Christian college. Journal of Applied Christian Leadership, 8(2), 34–48. https://digitalcommons.andrews.edu/jacl/vol8/iss2/4

33.

Ganter

(2023). Identification of preferences in forced-choice conjoint experiments: Reassessing the quantity of interest. Political Analysis, 31(1), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.41

34.

Gates

S. M.

Ringer

J. S.

Santibañez

Ross

K. E.

Chung

C. H.

(2023). Who is leading our schools? An overview of school administrators and their careers [Originally published in 1968]. RAND. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2024-09/overview-of-school-administrators-and-their-careers.doi_.10.7249%252FMR1679.pdf

35.

Giersch

Dong

(2018). Principals’ preferences when hiring teachers: A conjoint experiment. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2017-0074

36.

Green

P. E.

Rao

V. R.

(1971). Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377100800312

37.

Green

P. E.

Srinivasan

(1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: Issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), 103–123. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2489001. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721

38.

Grissom

J. A.

Condon

(2021). Leading schools and districts in times of crisis. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211023112

39.

Grissom

J. A.

Egalite

A. J.

Lindsay

C. A.

(2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. https://wallacefoundation.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/How-Principals-Affect-Students-and-Schools.pdf

40.

Grissom

J. A.

Loeb

(2011). Triangulating principal effectiveness: How perspectives of parents, teachers, and assistant principals identify the central importance of managerial skills. American Educational Research Journal, 48(5), 1091–1123. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211402663

41.

Hainmueller

Hopkins

D. J.

Yamamoto

(2014). Causal inference in conjoint analysis: Understanding multidimensional choices via stated preference experiments. Political Analysis, 22(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt024

42.

Hallinger

(2005). Instructional leadership and the school principal: A passing fancy that refuses to fade away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760500244793

43.

Harrison

(2012). Leadership in private Christian schools: Perceptions of administrators. International Christian Community of Teacher Educators Journal, 8(1), 1–14. https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/icctej/vol8/iss1/6/

44.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs1. Teachers College Record, 109(1), 244–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900105

45.

Holmes

H. E.

(2017). How do parents choose schools, and what schools do they choose? A literature review of private school choice programs in the United States. Journal of School Choice, 11(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1395618

46.

Horiuchi

Markovich

Z. D.

Yamamoto

(2020). Does conjoint analysis mitigate social desirability bias? [MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2018-15]. Political Analysis, 30(4), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3219323

47.

Horng

E. L.

Klasik

Loeb

(2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.1086/653625

48.

Humburg

van der Velden

(2015). Skills and the graduate recruitment process: Evidence from two discrete choice experiments. Economics of Education Review, 49(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.001

49.

Johnson

A. H.

Lee

M. H.

(2023a). Learning to lead: An analysis of the teacher pipeline in Christian schools. Association of Christian Schools International.

50.

Johnson

A. H.

Lee

M. H.

(2023b). Tending the teacher pipeline: An analysis of the teacher pipeline in Christian schools. Association of Christian Schools International.

51.

Johnson

A. H.

Lee

M. H.

Cheng

(2024). Which characteristics do religious school administrators value in teachers? Experimental evidence from the global Christian school sector. Journal of Religious Education, 72(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40839-024-00221-8

52.

Johnson

R. M.

(1974). Trade-off analysis of consumer values. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377401100201

53.

Kaufmann

Eames

(2007). The leader as risk taker—Equipping students to engage the world. In Drexler

J. L.

(Ed.), Schools as communities—Educational leadership, relationships, and the eternal value of Christian schooling (pp. 59–82). Purposeful Design.

54.

Klutts

C. S.

(2024). The growth and governance of American classical and Christian schools [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Arkansas. https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/5377/

55.

Kwan

(2011). Assessing school principal candidates: Perspectives of the hiring superintendents. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.617838

56.

Ladd

H. F.

(2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711398128

57.

Lee

Matthew H

Djita

Rian R.

Price

Eric W

(2024). Spiritual Formation in College and University: Do Students in Religious Higher Education Institutions Feel More Supported in Their Faith?. Christian Higher Education, 23(5), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2024.2358035

58.

Lee

Matthew H

Johnson

Alison

Cheng

Albert

(2024). How do parents choose schools for their children? Experimental evidence from the private christian school sector. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 63(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/jssr.v63.3

59.

Lee

M. H.

Cheng

(2021). The preparation and practice of protestant school leadership: Evidence from a nationally representative U.S. sample. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 30(3), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2021.1986443

60.

Lee

M. H.

Cheng

Wiens

(2021). 2020 principal survey. Council on Educational Standards and Accountability.

61.

Lee

M. H.

Djita

R. R.

(2024). Sabbath-keeping in private Christian schools. ACSI Working Paper No. 2024-02. Association of Christian Schools International. https://www.acsi.org/docs/default-source/website-publishing/research/wp2024-02.pdf

62.

Lee

M. H.

Price

E. W.

Swaner

L. E.

(2023). The faith flourishing index: Measuring biblical worldview and spiritual formation in Christian schools. Association of Christian Schools International.

63.

Lee

M. H.

Swaner

L. E.

(2023). Supportive leadership, teacher wellness, and school promotion. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 32(3), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2023.2284798

64.

Lee

S. W.

Mao

(2020). Recruitment and selection of principals: A systematic review. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(1), 6–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220969694

65.

Leeper

T. J.

Hobolt

S. B.

Tilley

(2020). Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis, 28(2), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2019.30

66.

Luce

R. D.

Tukey

J. W.

(1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(64)90015-X

67.

Maranto

Teodoro

M. P.

Carroll

Cheng

(2019). Gendered ambition: Men’s and women’s career advancement in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804564

68.

Martin

M. E.

(2018). Qualities of instructional leadership among principals in high-performing Christian schools. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 27(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2018.1500501

69.

Marzano

Robert J.

Waters

Timothy

McNulty

Brian A.

(2005). School leadership that works: From research to practice. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

70.

McShane

M. Q.

(2023). Surfing the pipeline: Understanding pathways into teaching in alternative models of schooling. EdChoice.

71.

Moore

Kochan

(2013). Principals’ perceptions of professional development in high- and low-performing high-poverty schools. International Journal of Educational Reform, 22(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/105678791302200204

72.

Onozaka

McFadden

D. T.

(2011). Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claim. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(3), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar005

73.

Palmer

(2016). Principal selection: a national study of selection criteria and procedures. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 13(3), 6–22. Retrieved from: https://www.aasa.org/docs/default-source/publications/journal-of-scholarship-and-practice/jps-fall2016-final.pdf#page=6

74.

Pennings

Seel

Van Pelt

D. A.

Sikkink

Wiens

(2011). Cardus education survey: Do the motivations for private religious Catholic and Protestant schooling in North America align with graduate outcomes. Vol. Hamilton, ON: Cardus.

75.

Richardson

Tipton Hindman

(2023). Soulful leadership: Spiritual practices of school principals. Ethical and Compassionate Leadership, 7(1), 1–39. Retrieved from https://jecel.sacredheart.edu/index.php/jecel/article/view/21

76.

Rivkin

S. G.

Hanushek

E. A.

Kain

J. F.

(2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x

77.

Segiovanni

(2001). The principalship—A reflective practice perspective. Allyn and Bacon.

78.

Shakeel

M. D.

DeAngelis

C. A.

(2017). Who is more free? A comparison of the decision-making of private and public school principals. Journal of School Choice, 11(3), 442–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2017.1345235

79.

Shuls

J. V.

McShane

M. W.

(2025). The conservative appeal of private schools. Journal of School Choice, 19(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2025.2491048

80.

Sikkink

(2012). Religious school differences in school climate and academic mission: A descriptive overview of school organization and student outcomes. Journal of School Choice, 6(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15582159.2012.651394

81.

Smith

David I.

Green

Beth

Cheng

Albert

(2021). Assessing Christian learning: Towards a practices-based approach to faith, vocation, and assessment. International Journal of Christianity & Education, 25(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056997121997156

82.

Smith

D. I.

(2017). Christian mind ≠ Christian pedagogy. International Journal of Christianity and Education, 21(1), 2–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056997116687982

83.

Smith

D. I.

(2025). Everyday Christian teaching: A guide to practicing faith in the classroom. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

84.

Smith

D. I.

Smith

J. K. A.

(2011). Introduction: Practices, faith, and pedagogy. In Smith

D. I.

Smith

J. K. A.

(Eds.), Teaching and Christian practices: Reshaping faith and learning (pp. 1–19). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.

85.

Smith

Phillip A

(2017). Does racism exist in the hiring and promotion of K-12 school administrators? Urban Education Research & Policy Annuals, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.55370/uerpa.v4i1.336

86.

Staiger

D. O.

Rockoff

J. E.

(2010). Searching for effective teachers with imperfect information. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.3.97

87.

Swaner

L. E.

(2016). Professional development for Christian school educators and leaders. Christian Educators Journal. https://www.cejonline.com/article/professional-development-for-christian-school-educators-and-leaders/

88.

Swaner

L. E.

Cheng

Eckert

(2024). School-sector influence on graduate outcomes and flourishing: Findings from the 2023 Cardus Education Suvey. Cardus.

89.

Swaner

L. E.

Marshall

C. A.

Tesar

S. A.

(2019). Flourishing schools: Research on Christian school culture and community. Association of Christian Schools International. https://www.acsi.org/docs/default-source/website-publishing/research/fsci-research-report-2019.pdf?sfvrsn=4718e426_0

90.

Trivitt

J. R.

Wolf

P. J.

(2011). School choice and the branding of Catholic schools. Education Finance and Policy, 6(2), 202–245. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00032

91.

Vick

Scott

(1998). Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor–patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17(5), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00035-0

92.

Vigneau

Choukroun

Isnard-Bagnis

Pau

Sinnasse-Raymond

Pibre

Moranne

(2019). “Doctor, can I have less frequent injection with highly efficient treatment?” A patient centered study using an electronic choice-based conjoint analysis to assess real world preferences regarding erythropoiesis stimulating agent to treat anaemia in chronic kidney disease. Néphrologie & Thérapeutique, 15(3), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nephro.2018.11.009

93.

Waters

Maranzo

R. J.

McNulty

(2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement [Working paper]. Mid-Continent Regional Educational Lab. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED481972

94.

White

R. S.

(2023). Ceilings made of glass and leaving en masse? Examining superintendent gender gaps and turnover over time across the United States. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231163139

95.

Zaharris

Sims

Safer

Hendricks

Sekulich

Glasgow

(2017). The impact of spirituality on school leadership. Education Leadership Review, 18(1), 81–95. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1162588.

96.

Zandstra

A. M.

(2012). Mission statements of Christian elementary schools in the United States and the Netherlands. Journal of Research on Christian Education, 21(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10656219.2012.698827

Which Characteristics Do School Boards Value When Hiring School Administrators? Experimental Evidence from American Christian Schools

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References