The Panorama of the Last Decade’s Theoretical Groundings of Educational Leadership Research: A Concept Co-Occurrence Network Analysis

Abstract

Purpose: Given the essential role of theories in research, this study aims to identify the theories and concepts undergirding educational leadership research, illuminate the interconnections among them, and examine the evolution of the theoretical groundings of the field from 2005 to 2014. Methods: This study constructed a concept co-occurrence network, in which the nodes represent all the framing concepts that theoretically framed the 1,328 articles published in four leading educational leadership research journals (Educational Administration Quarterly, Journal of Educational Administration, Educational Management Administration & Leadership, and Journal of School Leadership) over the past decade and the ties link the concepts that co-occur in an article. The reference frequency and centrality measures were used to identify the influential concepts. Next, the k-core analysis was performed to visualize the interconnections among the concepts. Moreover, a series of network cohesion measures were used to detect the changes in conceptual cohesion over the past decade. Findings: While 295 framing concepts guided the educational leadership empirical studies, a small number of concepts exerted a disproportionately large influence on the research. Furthermore, these influential concepts closely interplay with one another, and the strongest interconnection was seen between the concepts of leadership approaches and organizational perspectives. Last, the increasingly pluralistic theoretical foundation did not yield the growing conceptual cohesion in educational leadership. Implications: This study for the first time elucidates the structure and evolution of the theoretical groundings of educational leadership research, laying the foundation for further theory development and inviting researchers to bring conceptual cohesion to this field through integrating concepts, allowing random ideas to mutate, and developing new theories.

Keywords

co-occurrence network educational leadership epistemological paradigm epistemology network analysis theory theory development

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. A.

(1996). Communication theory. New York, NY: Guildford Press.

Anderson

R. E.

Dexter

S. L.

(2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence of effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82.

Bandura

(1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 117-148.

Bates

R. J.

(1980). Educational administration, the sociology of science, and the management of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(2), 1-20.

Bidwell

C. E.

(2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74(5), 100-114.

Bogler

Somech

(2005). Organizational citizenship behavior in school: How does it relate to participation in decision making? Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 420-438.

Bonacich

(1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.

Borgatti

S. P.

(2006). Identifying sets of key players in a network. Computational, Mathematical and Organizational Theory, 12(1), 21-34.

Borgatti

S. P.

Everett

M. G.

Freeman

L. C.

(2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytical Technologies.

10.

Borgatti

S. P.

Everett

M. G.

Johnson

J. C.

(2013). Analyzing social networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Bowman

M. J.

(1969). Economics of education. Review of Educational Research, 39(5), 641-670.

12.

Boyan

N. J.

(1981). Follow the leader: Commentary on research in educational administration. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 6-21.

13.

Bridges

(1982). Research on the school administrator: The state-of-the-art, 1967-1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 12-33.

14.

Bush

(2004). The global significance of educational leadership and management in the late 1990s. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), 239-252.

15.

Camburn

E. M.

Spillane

J. P.

Sebastian

(2010). Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 707-737.

16.

Campbell

R. F.

(1979). Fifteenth anniversary perspective: A critique of the Educational Administration Quarterly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(3), 1-19.

17.

Campbell

R. F.

(1981). The professorship in educational administration: A personal view. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 1-24.

18.

Cherkowski

Currie

Hilton

(2011). Who should rank our journals . . . and based on what? Journal of Educational Administration, 50(2), 206-230.

19.

Chung

C. J.

Barnett

G. A.

Kim

Lackaff

(2013). An analysis on communication theory and discipline. Scientometrics, 95(3), 985-1002.

20.

Coleman

J. S.

(1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95-S120.

21.

Corwin

R. G.

(1974). Models of educational organization. In Kerlinger

F. N.

Carroll

J. B.

(Eds.), Review of research in education (pp. 274-295). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

22.

Culbertson

J. A.

(1981). Antecedents of the theory movement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 25-47.

23.

Culbertson

J. A.

(1988). A century’s quest for a knowledge base. In Boyan

N. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 3-26). New York, NY: Longman.

24.

Daly

A. J.

(2010). Social network theory and educational change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

25.

Dinh

J. E.

Lord

R. G.

Gardner

W. L.

Meuser

J. D.

Liden

R. C.

(2014). Leadership theory and research in new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36-62.

26.

Donmoyer

(1999). The continuing quest for a knowledge base (1976-1998). In Murphy

Louis Seashore

(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 25-43). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.

27.

Erickson

D. A.

(1979). Research on educational administration: The state of the art. Educational Researcher, 8(3), 9-14.

28.

Evers

C. W.

(2007). Culture, cognitive pluralism and rationality. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39(4), 364-382.

29.

Evers

C. W.

Lakomski

(2015). Naturalism and educational administration: New directions. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 47(4), 402-419.

30.

Feigl

(1949). Operationism and scientific method. In Feigl

Sellars

(Eds.), Readings in philosophical analysis (pp. 498-509). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

31.

Freeman

L. C.

(1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215-239.

32.

Fukuyama

(1995). Trust: The social virtues and creation of prosperity. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

33.

Getzels

J. W.

(1977). Educational administration twenty years later, 1954-1974. In Cunningham

L. L.

Hack

W. G.

Nystrand

R. O.

(Eds.), Educational administration: The developing decades (pp. 3-24). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.

34.

Glatter

(1987). Towards an agenda for education management. Educational Management and Administration, 15(1), 5-12.

35.

Glatter

(1999). From struggling to juggling: Towards a redefinition of the field of educational leadership and management. Educational Management and Administration, 27(3), 253-266.

36.

Glimcher

P. W.

Fehr

(2014). Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. London, England: Elsevier.

37.

Goldring

Xiu

Murphy

Porter

Elliott

(2015). The convergent and divergent validity of the Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education (VAL-ED): Instructional leadership and emotional intelligence. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(2), 177-196.

38.

Greenfield

T. B.

(1980). The man who comes back through the door in the wall: Discovering truth, discovering self, discovering organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 26-59.

39.

Greenfield

W. D.

Jr. (1995). Toward a theory of school administration: The centrality of leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 61-85.

40.

Griffiths

D. E.

(1959). Administrative theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

41.

Griffiths

D. E.

(1983). Evolution in research and theory: A study of prominent researchers. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(3), 201-221.

42.

Gronn

P. C.

(1982). Neo-Taylorism in educational administration? Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(4), 17-35.

43.

Haas

Wilson

G. Y.

Cobb

C. D.

Hyle

A. E.

Jordan

Keamey

(2007). Assessing influence on the field: An analysis of citations to Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979-2003. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 494-512.

44.

Haller

E. J.

(1968). The interdisciplinary ideology in educational administration: Some preliminary notes on the sociology of knowledge. Educational Administration Quarterly, 4(2), 61-77.

45.

Haller

E. J.

Knapp

T. R.

(1985). Problems and methodology in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 157-168.

46.

Hallinger

(2010). A review of three decades of doctoral studies using the principal instructional management rating scale: A lens on methodological progress in educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 271-306.

47.

Hallinger

(2013). A conceptual framework for systematic reviews of research in educational leadership and management. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(2), 126-149.

48.

Hallinger

(2014). Reviewing reviews of research in educational leadership: An empirical assessment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 539-576.

49.

Hallinger

Heck

R. H.

(1996). The principal’s role in school effectiveness: An assessment of methodological progress, 1980-1995. In Leithwood

Chapman

J. D.

Corson

Hallinger

(Eds.), The international handbook of research on educational leadership and administration (pp. 723-785). New York, NY: Springer.

50.

Halpin

A. W.

(1970). Administrative theory: The fumbled torch. In Kroll

A. M.

(Ed.), Issues in American education: Commentary on the current sense (pp. 156-183). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

51.

Harary

(1969). Graph theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

52.

Hargreaves

Goodson

(2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41.

53.

Heck

R. H.

(2015). Organizational theory and the study of educational leadership and school improvement: Some reflections. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 1(1), 58-67.

54.

Heck

R. H.

Hallinger

(2005). The study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229-244.

55.

Hill

P. W.

Rowe

K. J.

(1996). Multilevel modeling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 1-34.

56.

Hodgkinson

(1981). A new taxonomy of administrative process. Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 141-152.

57.

Honig

M. I.

Seashore Louis

(2007). A new agenda for research in educational leadership: A conversational review. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(3), 177-187.

58.

Howard

T. C.

Navarro

(2016). Critical race theory 20 years later: Where do we go from here? Urban Education, 51(3), 253-273.

59.

Hoy

W. K.

(1982). Recent developments in theory and research in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 1-11.

60.

Hoy

W. K.

(1994). Foundations of educational administration: Traditional and emerging perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(2), 178-198.

61.

Hoy

W. K.

(1996). Science and theory in the practice of educational administration: A pragmatic perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 366-378.

62.

Hoy

W. K.

Miskel

C. G.

(1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

63.

Hunt

S. D.

(1983). General theories and the fundamental explananda of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 47(4), 9-17.

64.

Hunt

S. D.

(2010). Marketing theory: Foundations, controversy, strategy, resource-advantage theory. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

65.

Iannaccone

(1984). Political legitimacy and the administration of education. Burwood, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.

66.

Iannaccone

Lutz

F. W.

(1970). Politics, power and policy: The governing of local school districts. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

67.

Krackhardt

(1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In Carley

Prietula

(Eds.), Computational organizational theory (pp. 89-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

68.

Kuhn

(1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (1st ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

69.

Kuhn

(2012). The structure of scientific revolutions: 50th anniversary edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

70.

Lakomski

Evers

C. W.

(2001). The incomplete naturalist: Donald Willower on science and inquiry in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 39(5), 442-454.

71.

Lin

(1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28-51.

72.

Lin

(2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

73.

MacBeath

(2007). Leadership as a subversive activity. Journal of Educational Administration, 45(3), 242-264.

74.

McLeod

Richardson

J. W.

(2011). The dearth of technology-related articles in educational leadership scholarship. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 216-240.

75.

Merton

R. K.

(1968). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.

76.

Meuser

J. D.

Gardner

W. L.

Dinh

J. E.

Liden

R. C.

Lord

R. G.

(2016). A network analysis of leadership theories: The infancy of integration. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1374–1403.

77.

Moye

M. J.

Henkin

A. B.

(2005). Teacher-principal relationships: Exploring linkages between empowerment and interpersonal trust. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(3), 260-277.

78.

Murphy

Vriesenga

Storey

(2007). Educational Administration Quarterly, 1979-2003: An analysis of types of works, methods of investigation, and influences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 612-628.

79.

Newman

M. E. J.

(2013). Networks: An introduction. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

80.

Ogawa

R. T.

Hart

A. W.

(1985). The effect of principals on the instructional performance of schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 23(1), 59-72.

81.

Oplatka

(2009). The field of educational administration: An historical overview of scholarly attempts to recognise epistemological identities, meanings and boundaries from 1960s onwards. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(1), 8-35.

82.

Oplatka

(2010). The legacy of educational administration: A historical analysis of an academic field. Berlin, Germany: Peter Lang.

83.

Oplatka

(2012). Fifty years of publication: Pondering the legacies of the Journal of Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 50(1), 34-56.

84.

Oplatka

(2014). Differentiating the scholarly identity of educational administration: An epistemological comparison of two neighbouring fields of study. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(1), 116-136.

85.

Owens

R. G.

Shakeshaft

(1992). The new “revolution” in administrative theory. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(2), 4-17.

86.

Putnam

R. D.

(1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

87.

Reichers

A. E.

Schneider

(1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of constructs? In Schneider

(Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

88.

Richardson

J. W.

McLeod

(2009). Where should educational leadership authors publish to get noticed by the top journals in the discipline? Educational Administration Quarterly, 45(4), 631-639.

89.

Riehl

C. J.

(2015). Mostly unpunctuated disequilibrium: A commentary on new directions in research and practice in education leadership. In Bowers

A. J.

Shoho

A. R.

Barnett

B. G.

(Eds.), Challenges and opportunities of educational leadership research and practice: The state of the field and its multiple futures (Vol. 6, pp. 225-248). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

90.

Riffel

J. A.

(1986). The study of educational administration: A developmental point of view. Journal of Educational Administration, 24(2), 152-172.

91.

Rowan

(1995). Learning, teaching and educational administration: Toward a research agenda. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 344-354.

92.

Rowan

(1982). Instructional management in historical perspective: Evidence on differentiation in school district. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(1), 43-59.

93.

Scerri

(2016). A tale of seven scientists and a new philosophy of science. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

94.

Seidman

S. B.

(1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3), 269-287.

95.

Shields

C. M.

Edwards

M. M.

(Eds.). (2005). Dialogue is not just talk: A new ground for educational leadership. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

96.

Thomas

A. R.

(1986). Seeing isn’t believing? Neither is hearing! In defense of observational studies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(1), 29-48.

97.

Tschannen-Moran

Firestone

W. A.

Hoy

W. K.

Moore-Johnson

(2000). The write stuff: A study of productive scholars in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 358-390.

98.

Walker

W. G.

(1965). Theory and practice in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 3(1), 18-43.

99.

Walton

(1955). The theoretical study of educational administration. Harvard Educational Review, 25(3), 169-178.

100.

Wang

(2016). Big opportunities and big concerns of big data in education. TechTrends, 60(4), 381-384.

101.

Wang

Bowers

A. J.

(2016). Mapping the field of educational administration research: A journal citation network analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(3), 242-269.

102.

Wang

Bowers

A. J.

Fikis

(2017). Automated text data mining analysis of five decades of educational leadership research literature: Probabilistic topic modeling of EAQ articles from 1965 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(2), 289-323.

103.

Watts

D. J.

(2003). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.

104.

Watts

D. J.

Strogatz

S. H.

(1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393, 440-442.

105.

Wiles

D. K.

(1974). Politics and planning: A rationale for synthesis in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 10(1), 44-59.

106.

Willower

D. J.

(1975). Theory in educational administration. Journal of Educational Administrating, 13(1), 77-91.

107.

Willower

D. J.

(1980). Contemporary issues in theory in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 1-25.

108.

Willower

D. J.

(1981). Educational administration: Some philosophical and other considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 19(2), 115-139.