Purpose: This article presents a case for addressing evidence-based practice (EBP) in educational administration. Content is arranged around four objectives: (a) summarizing the status of educational administration as a profession, (b) defining evidence and the model, (c) explaining EBP's social and professional merit, and (d) identifying barriers that may prevent the concept from being understood correctly, accepted philosophically, and implemented appropriately. Proposed Conceptual Argument: The need to consider EBP is framed by society's demand for greater accountability from professions, the realities of practice in an information-based society, and a proclivity to rely on the theory of legal accountability to improve schools. In the aftermath of the No Child Left Behind Act, critics have portrayed educational administration as a field lacking internal accountability, epistemological consistency, and a focused research agenda. The alleged deficiencies may be contributing to an erosion of state licensing laws for superintendents and principals and casting a cloud over the future of educational administration departments. Implications: Reliance on external accountability in the absence of internal accountability is unlikely to improve schools or to provide social authority for educational administration. Instead of continuing to agree to disagree over the most fundamental issues, scholars in this field need to define EBP in a manner that integrates empirical evidence, tacit knowledge, and values and then conduct research to determine the concept's effectiveness.
Adams, J.E., & Kirst, M.W. (1999). New demands and concepts for educational accountability: Striving for results in an era of excellence. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 463-490). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Alexander, H.A. (2006). A view from somewhere: Explaining paradigms of educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 205-221.
3.
Anderson, R.E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly , 41, 49-82.
4.
Anthes, K. (2004). Administrator license requirements, portability, waivers and alternative certification. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.
5.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective . Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
7.
Babbie, E. (1998). The practice of social research (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
Banning, M. (2005). Conceptions of evidence, evidence-based medicine, evidence-based practice and their use in nursing: Independent nurse prescribers' views. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 411-417.
9.
Bates, R.J. (1984). Toward a critical practice of educational administration . In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice (pp. 260-274). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
10.
Bates, R. (1987). Corporate culture, schooling, and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 79-115.
11.
Bauch, P., & Goldring, E. (1998). Parent-teacher participation in the context of school restructuring. Peabody Journal of Education, 73, 15-35.
12.
Bauman, P.C. (1996). Governing education: Public sector reform or privatization . Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
13.
Berliner, D.C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all . Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18-20.
14.
Biesta, G. (2007). Why "what works" won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1-22.
15.
Björk, L.G., Kowalski, T.J., & Browne-Ferrigno, T. (2005). Learning theory and research: A framework for changing superintendent preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 71-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
Björk, L.G., Kowalski, T.J., & Young, M. (2005). National education reform reports: Implications for professional preparation and development. In L. G. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice, and development (pp. 45-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17.
Blumberg, A. (1984). The craft of school administration and some other rambling thoughts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20(4), 24-40.
18.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Bredeson, P.V. (1995). Building a professional knowledge base in educational administration: Opportunities and obstacles. In R. Donmoyer, M. Imber, & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives (pp. 47-61). Albany : State University of New York Press.
20.
Bridges, D. (2008). Evidence-based reform in education: A response to Robert Slavin. European Educational Research Journal, 7, 129-133.
21.
Broad Foundation & Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2003). Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto . Los Angeles: Author.
22.
Brooks-Young, S. (2006). Critical technology issues for school leaders . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press .
23.
Burns, J.M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
24.
Callahan, R.E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of public schools . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Callahan, R.E. (1966). The superintendent of schools: A historical analysis . Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 0104 410)
26.
Carney, D.P., & Williams, R. (1997). No such thing as . . . scientific management. Management Decision, 35, 779-784.
27.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.
28.
Carroll, S.R., & Carroll, D.J. (2002). Statistics made simple for school leaders: Data-driven decision making. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
29.
Connor, P.E., & Lake, L.K. (1988). Managing organizational change. New York: Praeger.
30.
Corcoran, K. (2007). From the scientific revolution to evidence-based practice: Teaching the short history with a long past. Research on Social Work Practice, 17, 548-552.
31.
Cordell, W.H., & Chisholm, C.D. (2001). Will the real evidence-based medicine please stand up?Emergency Medicine News, 23(6), 4, 11-14.
32.
Crowson, R.L., & McPherson, R.B. (1987). The legacy of the theory movement: Learning from the new tradition. In J. Murphy & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Approaches to administrative training in education (pp. 45-64). Albany: State University of New York Press.
33.
Culbertson, J.A. (1981). Antecedents of the theory movement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(1), 25-47.
34.
Culbertson, J.A. (1988). A century's quest for a knowledge base. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research in educational administration (pp. 3-36). White Plains, NY: Longman.
35.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1989). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91, 59-80.
36.
Donmoyer, R. (1999). The continuing quest for a knowledge base: 1976-1998 . In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 25-43). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Duke, D. (2004). The challenge of educational change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
Earl, L.M., & Timperley, H. (2008). Understanding how evidence and learning conversations work. In L. M. Earl & H. Timperley (Eds.), Professional learning conversations: Challenges in using evidence for improvement (pp. 1-12). New York: Springer.
39.
Eisner, E.W. (1992). Are all causal claims positivistic? A reply to Francis Schrag. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 8-9.
40.
Elliott, J. (2006). Educational research as a form of democratic rationality . Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 169-185.
41.
Elmore, E.F. (1987). Reform and the culture of authority in schools . Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 60-78.
42.
Elmore, R.F. (2007). Education: A "profession" in search of practice . Teaching in Educational Administration, 15, 1-4.
43.
Elmore, R.F., & Fuhrman, S.H. (2001). Research finds the false assumption of accountability . Education Digest, 67(4), 9-14.
44.
Eraut, M. (2004). Practice-based evidence. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 91-102). Berkshire , UK: Open University Press.
45.
Evers, C.W., & Lakomski, G. (1996). Science in educational administration: A postpositivist conception. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 379-402.
46.
Evers, C.W., & Lakomski, G. (2001). Theory in educational administration: Naturalistic directions. Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 499-520.
47.
Feistritzer, E.M. (2003). Certification of public-school administrators: A summary of state practices. In Better leaders for America's schools: A manifesto (pp. 67-76). Los Angeles: Broad Foundation & Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
Foskett, N., Lumby, J., & Fidler, B. (2005). Evolution or extinction? Reflections on the future of research in educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33, 245-253.
51.
Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
52.
Freire, P. (1998). Politics and education. Los Angeles: UCLA Latin American Center Publications.
53.
Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Fulmer, C.L. (1996). Training school administrators to use information systems: A review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Research, 25(4), 1-10.
55.
Fusarelli, B.C., & Fusarelli, L.D. (2005). Reconceptualizing the superintendency: Superintendent as applied social scientists and social activists. In L. Björk & T. J. Kowalski (Eds.), The contemporary superintendent: Preparation, practice and development (pp. 71-108). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
56.
Getzels, J.W. (1977). Educational administration twenty years later, 1954-1974. In L. Cunningham, W. Hack, & R. Nystrand (Eds.), Educational administration: The developing decades (pp. 3-24). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
57.
Ginsberg, R. (1996). The new institutionalism, the new science, persistence and change: The power of faith in schools. In R. L. Crowson, W. L. Boyd, & H. B. Mawhinney (Ed.), The politics of education and the new institutionalism: Reinventing the American school (pp. 153-166). London: Falmer .
58.
Giroux, H.A. (1983). Theory and resistance: A pedagogy for the opposition . South Hadley, MA: J. F. Bergin.
59.
Giroux, H.A. (1986). Authority, intellectuals, and the politics of practical learning. Teachers College Record, 88(1), 22-40.
60.
Goldhammer, K. (1983). Evolution in the profession. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19, 249-272.
61.
Gorard, S. (2005). Current contexts for research in educational leadership and management. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 33, 155-164.
62.
Greenfield, T. (1978). Reflections on organizational theory and the truths of irreconcilable realities. Educational Administration Quarterly , 14(2), 1-23.
63.
Greenfield, T. (1980). The man who comes back through the door in the wall: Discovering truth, discovering self, discovering organizations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16(3), 26-59.
64.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and practice. Boston : Beacon.
Hargreaves, D. (1997). In defense of research for evidence-based teaching: A rejoinder to Martyn Hammersley. British Educational Research Journal, 23, 405-419.
68.
Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). Study of educational leadership and management: Where does the field stand today? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 33, 229-244.
69.
Heifetz, R.A. (2006). Educational leadership: Beyond a focus on instruction . Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 512-513.
70.
Hess, F.M. (2003). A license to lead? A new leadership agenda for America's schools. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy Institute.
71.
Howard, M.O., McMillen, C.J., & Pollio, D.E. (2003). Teaching evidence-based practice: Toward a new paradigm for social work education. Research on Social Work Practice, 13, 234-259.
72.
Hoy, W.K. (1996). Science and theory in the practice of educational administration: A pragmatic perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 366-378.
73.
Hunsley, J. (2007). Addressing key challenges in evidence-based practice in psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice , 38, 113-121.
74.
Kellogg Foundation. (1961). Toward improved school administration: A decade of professional effort to heighten administrative understanding and skills. Battle Creek, MI: Author.
Kowalski, T.J. (2004). The ongoing war for the soul of school administration . In T. J. Lasley (Ed.), Better leaders for America's schools: Perspectives on the manifesto (pp. 92-114). Columbia, MO: University Council for Educational Administration .
77.
Kowalski, T.J., Lasley, T.J., & Mahoney, J. (2008). Data-driven decisions and school leadership: Best practices for school improvement. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
78.
Lakomski, G. (1987). Values and decision making in educational administration . Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(3), 70-82.
79.
Lather, P. (2004). Scientific research in education: A critical perspective . British Educational Research Journal, 30, 759-772.
80.
Leithwood, K.A. (1995). Cognitive perspectives on school leadership. Journal of School Leadership, 5, 115-135.
81.
Leithwood, K.A., & Hallinger, P. (1993). Cognitive perspectives on educational administration: An introduction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 29, 296-301.
82.
Leithwood, K.A., & Riehl, C. (2003). What we know about successful school leadership . Philadelphia: Temple University, Laboratory for Student Success.
83.
Levin, H.M. (2006). Can research improve educational leadership? Educational Researcher, 35(8), 38-43.
84.
Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
85.
Maxwell, J.A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
86.
May, W.F. (2001). Beleaguered rulers: The public obligation of the professional. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
87.
Mayer, R.E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: Freeman.
88.
Mayer, R.E. (2003). Learning environments: The case for evidence-based practice and issue-driven research. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 359-366.
89.
McMillan, J.H., & Schumacker, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
90.
Murphy, J. (2002). Reculturing the profession of educational leadership: New blueprints. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 176-191.
91.
Murphy, J. (2005). The knowledge base in school administration: Historical footings and emerging trends. In R. Donmoyer , M. Imber, & J. J. Scheurich (Eds.), The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives (pp. 62-73). Albany : State University of New York Press.
92.
Nance, J.P. (2003). Public school administrators and technology policy making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 434-467.
93.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform . Washington, DC: Author.
94.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
95.
Osterman, K.F., & Kottkamp, R.B. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
96.
Patton, M.Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97.
Peile, E. (2004). Reflections from medical practice: Balancing evidence-based practice with practice-based practice. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 102-118). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Pirrie, A. (2001). Evidence-based practice in education: The best medicine? British Journal of Educational Studies, 49, 124-136.
100.
Pring, R. (2004). Conclusion: Evidence-based policy and practice . In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 201-212). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
101.
Riley, D.J. (2007). The paradox of positivism. Social Science History, 31, 115-126.
102.
Rosen, A. (1993). Systematic planned practice. Social Service Review, 3, 84-100.
103.
Rowbottom, D.P., & Aiston, S.J. (2006). The myth of "scientific method" in contemporary educational research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40, 137-156.
104.
Ryan, K.E., & Hood, L.K. (2004). Guarding the castle and opening the gates. Qualitative Inquiry, 10, 79-95.
105.
Rycroft-Malone, J. (2006). The politics of the evidence-based practice movements: Legacies and current challenges. Journal of Research in Nursing , 11, 95-108.
106.
Sackett, D.L., Straus, S.E., Richardson, W.S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R.B. (2000). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM (2nd ed.). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
107.
Salpeter, J. (2004). Data: Mining with a mission. Technology & Learning, 24(8). Retrieved February 17, 2008, from http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18311595
108.
Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting "the culture of school and the problem of change." New York: Teachers College Press.
109.
Schrag, F. (1992). In defense of positivist research paradigms. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 5-8.
110.
Sergiovanni, T.J. (1992). Reflections on administrative theory and practice in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 304-313.
111.
Sergiovanni, T. J., & Corbally, J. E. (Eds.). (1984). Leadership and organizational culture: New perspectives on administrative theory and practice. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
112.
Shulman, L.S. (1990). Paradigms and programs. New York: Macmillan.
113.
Simon, H.A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
114.
Slavin, R.E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher , 31(7), 15-21.
115.
Slavin, R.E. (2008a). Evidence-based reform in education: What will it take? European Educational Research Journal, 7, 124-128.
116.
Slavin, R.E. (2008b). Evidence-based reform in education: Which evidence counts? Educational Researcher, 37(1), 47-50.
117.
Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Who accepts Savage's axiom? Behavioral Science, 19, 368-373.
118.
Spillane, J. (2003). Educational leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25, 343-346.
119.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1999). Discrepancies between normative and descriptive models of decision making and the understanding/acceptance principle. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 349-385.
120.
Steinmetz, G. (2005). Positivism and its others in the social sciences . In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others (pp. 1-56). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
121.
Talbert, J.E., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1994). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts. American Journal of Education, 102, 123-153.
122.
Thomas, G. (2004). Introduction: Evidence and practice. In G. Thomas & R. Pring (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in education (pp. 1-18). Berkshire , UK: Open University Press.
123.
Thyer, B.A. (2004). What is evidence-based practice?Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 167-176.
124.
Traynor, M. (1999). Managerialism and nursing: Beyond profession and oppression. London: Routledge.
125.
Trinder, L. (2000). Introduction: The context of evidence-based practice . In L. Trinder & S. Reynolds (Eds.), Evidence-based practice: A critical appraisal (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
126.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The "grammar" of schooling: Why has it been so hard to change? American Educational Research Journal, 31, 453-479.
127.
Upshur, R., & Tracy, C.S. (2004). Legitimacy, authority, and hierarchy: Critical challenges for evidence-based medicine. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 4, 197-204.
128.
Wayman, J.C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-driven decision making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 295-308.
129.
Weiler, H.N. (1990). Comparative perspectives on educational decentralization: An exercise in contradiction? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 433-448.
130.
Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
131.
White, S. (1997). Evidence-based practice and nursing: The new panacea ? British Journal of Nursing6, 175-178.
132.
Whitehurst, G.J. (2002, April). Charting a new course for the U. S. Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans.
133.
Whitehurst, G.J. (2008). Evidence-based education. Retrieved February 5, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/methods/whatworks/eb/evidencebased.pdf
134.
Willower, D.J. (1998). Fighting the fog: A criticism of postmodernism . Journal of School Leadership, 8, 448-463.
135.
Willower, D.J. (2001). Epistemology, science, and moral practice. Interchange, 32, 1-16.
136.
Willower, D.J., & Uline, C.L. (2001). The alleged demise of science: A critical inquest . Journal of Educational Administration, 39, 455-471.
137.
Wirt, F., & Kirst, M. (2001). The political dynamics of American education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
138.
Wong, K.K., & Nicotera, A. (2007). Successful schools and educational accountability: Concepts and skills to meet leadership challenges. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
139.
Zeichner, K.M. (1991). Contradictions and tensions in the professionalization of teaching and the democratization of schools. Teachers College Record, 92, 363-379.
