Research has explored the use of evidence-based practices within schools but less is known about evidence-based decision-making among school district central office administrators. This study explored how individual and school-level characteristics of administrators were related to the implementation of evidence-based practices. Findings suggested that administrators were more knowledgeable about evidence-based practices if they were working in districts with existing policies in place to address the use of research in decision-making. Administrators were less knowledgeable about evidence-based practices in small, rural districts.
BaezB. (2002, November). Degree of distinction: The EdD. or the Ph.D. in education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Sacramento, CA.
2.
BrowniellM. T., BishopA. M., & SinderlarP. T. (2005). NCLB and the demand for highly qualified teachers: Challenges and solutions for rural schools.Rural Special Education Quarterly,24(1), 9–15. doi: 10.1177/875687050502400103.
3.
CarnineD. (1993, December 8). Facts, not fads.Education Week, p. 40.
4.
Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy. (2002, November). Bringing evidence-driven progress to education: A recommended strategy for the U.S. Department of Education (Executive Summary). Washington, D.C. Retrieved from the ERIC database. (ED474378)
5.
CoburnC. E., HonigM. I., & SteinM. K. (2009). What is the evidence on districts’ use of evidence? In BradfordJ., StipekD., GomezL., LamD., & VyeN. (Eds.), The role of research in educational improvement (pp. 67–87). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
6.
CoburnC. E., & TalbertJ. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain.American Journal of Education,112, 469–95. doi: 10.1086/505056
7.
CoburnC. E., ToureJ., & YamashitaM. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision-making at the district central office.Teachers College Record,111, 1115–1161.
8.
CookT. D., CampbellD. T., & DayA. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
9.
CookC., HeathF., & ThompsonR. L. (2000). A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys.Educational and Psychological Measurement,60, 821–836. doi: 10.1177/00131640021970934.
10.
CookG. C., TankersleyM., & LandrumT. J. (2009). Determining evidence- based practices in special education.Exceptional Children,75, 365–383. doi: 10.1177/001440290907500306.
11.
CorcoranT. (2003, November). The use of research evidence in instructional improvement. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (CPRE Policy Brief No. RC 40). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/flles/policybrief/880_rb40.pdf.
12.
CourvilleT., & ThompsonB. (2001). Use of structure coefficients in published multiple regression articles: is not enough.Educational and Psychological Measurement,61, 229–248. doi: 10.1177/0013164401612006.
13.
DillD. D., & MorrisonJ. L. (1985). Ed.D. and Ph.D. research training in the field of higher education: A survey and a proposal.The Review of Higher Education,8, 169–186.
14.
Farley-RippleE. N. (2008). Accountability, evidence, and school district decisionmaking. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis (UIM Number 3328555).
15.
FinneyS. J., & SchrawG. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs in college statistics courses.Contemporary Educational Psychology,28, 161–186. doi: 10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00015-2.
FleischmanS. (2006, March). Moving to evidence-based professional practice.Educational Leadership, 87–90.
18.
GordonG.J. (2010). What we don't know we don't know.Against the Grain,22, 18.
19.
Gaumer-EricksonA. S., NoonanP. M., & McCallZ. (2012). Effectiveness of online professional development for rural special educators.Rural Special Education Quarterly,37(1), 22–32.
20.
HammersleyM. (2004). Some questions about evidence-based practice in education. In ThomasG., & PringR. (Eds.), Evidence-based Practice in Education (pp. 133–149). New York: Open University Press.
21.
HonigM. I. (2003). Building policy from practice: District central office administrators’ roles and capacity for implementing collaborative education policy.Educational Administration Quarterly,39, 292–338. doi:10.1177/0013161X03253414.
22.
HonigM. I., & CoburnC. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agendaEducation Policy,22, 578–608. doi: 10.1177/0895904807307067.
HuberD. S., HowleyA. A., & HowleyC. B. (2004). Prescriptions for Rural Mathematics Instruction: Analysis of the Rhetorical Literature. Working Paper No. 22. Appalachian Collaborative Center for Learning, Assessment, and Instruction in Mathematics (ACCLAIM).
25.
HuckS. W. (2000). Reading statistics and research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
26.
KennedyM. M. (1982). Working Knowledge. In KennedyM. M. (Ed.), Working knowledge and other essays (pp. 59–103). Cambridge, MA: Huron Institute.
27.
KohlmoosJ., & JoftusS. (2005, August). Building communities of knowledge: Ideas for more effective use of knowledge in education reform. (Discussion Paper). Washington, DC: National Education Knowledge Industry Association.
28.
KolbertJ.B., & BrendelJ.M. (1997). Current Perceptions of the Doctor of Philosophy and Doctor of Education in Counselor Preparation.Counselor Education & Supervision36, 207–215. doi: 10.1002/j.1556-6978.1997.tb00387.x.
29.
KowalskiT. (2009). Need to address evidence-based practice in educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly,45, 351–374. doi: 10.1177/0013161X09333623.
30.
KrosnickJ. (1999). The causes of no-opinion responses to attitude measures n surveys: They are rarely what they appear to be. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Non-response, Portland OR.
31.
NelsonJ. K., & CooroughC. (1994). Content Analysis of the Ph.D. versus Ed.D. Dissertations.Journal of Experimental Education,62, 158–168. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1994.9943837.
32.
NelsonS. R., LefflerJ. C., & HansenB. A. (2009). Toward a research agenda for understanding and improving the use of research evidence.Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Education Laboratory
33.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 115, Stat. 1425. (2002).
34.
PellegrinoJ. W., & GoldmanS. R. (2002). Comment: Be careful what you wish for: You may get it. Educational research in the spotlight.Educational Researcher,31(8), 15–17. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031008015.
35.
PophamW. J. (2005). All about accountabihty/instructional quality: Collecting credible evidence.Educational Leadership,62(6), 80–81.
36.
ReevesC. (2003). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts.Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
37.
ReichardtR. E. (2000). The state's role in supporting data-driven decision making: A view of Wyoming.Aurora: Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning.
38.
RickinsonM. (October, 2005). Practitioners’ use of research: A research review for the National Evidence for Education Portal (NWWP) Development Group.London: National Educational Research Forum.
39.
RothmanR. (Winter, 2005). A fad or the real thing? Making evidence-based practice work.Voices in Urban Education, 6, 2–4.
40.
SlavinR. E. (2008). Perspectives on evidence-based research in education: What works? Issues in synthesizing educational program evaluations.Educational Researcher,37(1), 5–14. doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08314117.
ThompsonB. (1993). The use of statistical significance test in research: Bootstrap and other alternatives.Journal of Experimental Education61, 361–377. doi: 10.1080/00220973.1993.10806596.
46.
ThompsonB. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
47.
ThompsonB. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach.New York, NY: Guilford.
48.
UptonD., & UptonP. (2006). Development of an evidence-based practice questionnaire for nurses.Journal of Advanced Nursing,54, 454–458. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365–2648.2006.03739.x.
49.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Individuals With Disabilities Education Act of 2004, 20 U. S. C. § 1400.Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://idea.ed.gov/download/statute.html.
50.
U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ed/gov/essa.
WilkinsonL., & APA Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals. Guidelines and explanations.American Psychologist,54, 594–604. doi:10.1037/0003–066X.54.8.594.
53.
ZientekL. R., & ThompsonB. (2006). Commonality analysis: Partitioning variance to facilitate better understanding of data.Journal of Early Intervention,28, 299–307. doi: 10.1177/105381510602800405.
54.
ZientekL. R., & ThompsonB. (2007). Applying the bootrstap to the multivariate case: Bootstrap factor analysis.Behavior Research Methods,39, 318–325. doi:10.3758/BF03193163.
