In this exploratory study, the authors examine the recent emergence of cross-sectoral alliances—organizations voluntarily working together to solve issues of mutual concern—in kindergarten through 12th-grade education. The article utilizes an economic approach to interagency collaboration and focuses on alliances in charter schools. The authors seek to (a) analyze the extent to which charter school legislation encourages or discourages alliances, (b) examine the types of organizations that form alliances with charter schools and the range of contributions they provide, and (c) assess the various incentives that lead charter schools and other organizations to form alliances. Implications of the findings for educational practice and policy as well as future research are discussed.
Alexander, E. R. (1995). How organizations act together: Interorganizational coordination intheory and practice. Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association.
2.
American Federation of Teachers. (2002). Do charter schools measure up? The charter school experiment after 10 years. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Anfara, V. A., Jr., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28-38.
4.
Anfuso, D. (1995). Intel educates a school district about business. Personnel Journal, 74, 128-129.
5.
Arkansas Charter Schools Act of 1999, S.B. 562 of the 82nd Gen. Ass., Sect. 6 (1999).
6.
Austin, J. E. (2000). The collaboration challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Berliner, B. (1997). What it takes to work together: The promise of educational partnerships. San Francisco: West Ed.
8.
Bierlein, L. A. (1997). The charter school movement. In D. Ravitch & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.), New schools for a new century (pp. 37-60). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Borthwick, A. C. (2001). Dancing in the dark? Learning more about what makes partnerships work. In R. Ravid & M. G. Handler (Eds.), The many faces of school-university collaboration: Characteristics of successful partnerships (pp. 23-41). Englewood, CO: Teacher Ideas Press.
10.
Bowman, D. H. (2001). Charter closings come under scrutiny. Education Week, 20(24), 1.
11.
Briggs, D. (2000). Managing leadership transitions in education partnerships. San Francisco: West Ed.
12.
Brown, R. J., & Cornwall, J. R. (2000). The entrepreneurial educator. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
13.
Bulkley, K. (2003). Balancing act: Educational management organizations and charter school autonomy. In K. Bulkley & P. Wohlstetter (Eds.), Taking account of charter schools: What’s happened and what’s next? (pp. 121-141). New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15.
Capper, C. A., & Jamison, M. T. (1993). Let the buyer beware: Total quality management and educational research and practice. Educational Researcher, 22(8), 15-30.
16.
Center for Education Reform. (2001). Charter school closures: The opportunity for accountability. Retrieved July 17, 2002, from http://www.edreform.com/pubs/cs_closures.htm
17.
Center for Education Reform. (2002a, September 17). Growth in charter schools reflects increasing demands for choices. Retrieved November 21, 2002, from http://www.edreform.org/press/2002/charternumbers.htm
18.
Center for Education Reform. (2002b, October). Statewatch. Retrieved November, 21, 2002,from http://www.edreform.org/charter_schools/laws/ranking_chart.pdf
19.
Charter Public School Act of Rhode Island, Title 16 Education, Chapt. 16-77 Establishment of Charter Public Schools of Rhode Island General Laws (1995).
20.
Child, J., & Faulkner, D. (1998). Strategies of cooperation: Managing alliances, networks, and joint ventures. New York: Oxford University Press.
21.
Chrislip, D. D.,& Larson, C. E. (1994). Collaborative leadership: Howcitizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Cohen, S. (2001). Astrategic framework for devolving responsibility and functions from government to the private sector. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 432-440.
23.
Colorado Charter Schools Act, Colorado Rev. Stat. 22-30.5-106 (1993).
24.
Das, T. K.,& Teng, B. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
25.
Davies, B., & Hentschke, G. (2002). Changing resource and organizational patterns: The challenge of resourcing education in the 21st Century. Journal of Educational Change, 3, 135-159.
26.
Delaware Charter Schools, Title 14, Education, Chapt. 5, Charter Schools of Delaware Laws 503 (2001).
27.
Dunn, J. A., Jr. (2000). Transportation: Policy-level partnerships and project-based partnerships. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 77-92). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
>Education Commission of the States. (2003, August). Vouchers, tax credits, and tax deductions. Retrieved September 30, 2003, from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/14/44/1444.doc
29.
Elmore, R. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
30.
Finn, C. E., Manno, B. V., & Vanourek, G. (2000). Charter schools in action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
31.
Fromm, J., Hentschke, G., & Kern, T. (2003). Educational leader as educational entrepreneur: Managing the educational mission within and across economic sectors. In B. Davies & J. West-Burnham (Eds.), Handbook of leadership and management (pp. 269-370). London: Pearson Education.
32.
Giroux, H. A. (1999a). Corporate culture and the attack on higher education and public schooling. Phi Delta Kappan Fastbacks, 442, 7-55.
33.
Giroux, H. A. (1999b). Schools for sale: public education, corporate culture, and the citizen consumer. Education Forum, 63(2), 140-149.
34.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Griffin, N. C.,& Wohlstetter, P. (2001). Building a plane while flying it: Early lessons from charter schools. Teachers College Record, 103(2), 336-365.
36.
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 619-652.
37.
Guydish, M. (2002, August 25). More schools turn to public partnerships. Retrieved November 4, 2002, from http://www.timesleader.com/mil/timesleader/living/education/k_12/3901726.htm
38.
Hassel, B. C. (1999). The charter school challenge: Avoiding the pitfalls, fulfilling the promise. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
39.
Hill, P., Lake, R., Celio, M. B., Campbell, C., Herdman, P.,& Bulkley, K. (2001). A study of charter school accountability. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, University of Washington & Office of Educational Research & Improvement, Center on Reinventing Education.
40.
Idaho Public Charter Schools Act of 1998, Chapt. 52, Title 33—Idaho Code Public Charter Schools (1998).
41.
Illinois Charter Schools Law, Chapt. 105 of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, Schools, Common Schools, Act 5. School Code, Article 27A Charter Schools, through P.A. 91-405 & 407 (1996, amended 1999).
42.
Kamieniecki, S., Shafie, D.,& Silvers, J. (2000). Forming partnerships in environmental policy: The business of emissions trading in clean air management. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 111-128). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43.
Kanter, R. M. (1994, July-August). Collaborative advantage: The art of alliances. Harvard Business Review, 96-108.
44.
Kaplan, G. R. (1996). Profits R Us: Notes on commercialization of America’s schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, K1-K12.
45.
Kretzmann, J. P., & McKnight, J. L. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s asset. Chicago: ACTA Publications.
46.
Leach, W. D., Pelkey, N. W., & Sabatier, P. A. (2002). Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: Evaluation criteria applied towatershed management in California and Washington. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21(4), 645-670.
47.
Massachusetts Charter Schools, General Laws of Massachusetts, Part I. Administration of the Government. Title XII Education, Chapt. 71 Public Schools, Sect. 89, Charter Schools (1993, amended 2000).
48.
Minnesota Charter Schools, 124.10 Charter Schools of Minnesota Stat. of 2001 (1991, amended 2001).
49.
Miron, G., & Nelson, C. (2002). The effects of education management organizations. In What’s public about charter schools? Lessons learned about choice and accountability (pp. 170-193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
50.
Missouri Charter School Provisions of SB781 (1998).
51.
Molnar, A. (2001). Calculating the benefits and costs of for-profit public education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 9(15), 22.
52.
Murphy, J., & Schiffman, C. D. (2002). Understanding and assessing the charter school movement. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
Nathan, J. (1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Nathan, J. (2002). Small schools: The benefits of sharing. Educational Leadership, 59(5), 71-75.
55.
Nathan, J., & Febey, K. (2001). Smaller, safer, saner, successful schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
56.
National Association of Partners in Education. (2001). Partnerships 2000: A decade of growthand change. Alexandria, VA: Author.
57.
New Hampshire Charter Schools and Open Enrollment Act, Title XV Education, Chapter 194-B of State of New Hampshire Rev. Stat. (1995).
58.
New Jersey Charter School Program Act of 1995, Title 18A, Education, Sect. 36A of the New Jersey Stat. (1995, amended 2000).
59.
Newmann, F. M., & Sconzert, K. (2000). School improvement with external partners. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
60.
Newmann, F. M.,& Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring. Madison: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin–Madison.
61.
New Mexico 1999 Charter Schools Act, New Mexico Stat. Annotated 1978 Public School Code, Sect. 3 (1999).
62.
Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241-265.
63.
Olson, L. (1992a, March 11). Florida district vows to infuse quality principles into schools. Education Week, 11, 24-25.
64.
Olson, L. (1992b, March 11). Schools getting swept up in current of business’s “quality” movement. Education Week, 11, 24-25.
65.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Catalytic government: Steering rather than rowing. In Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector(pp. 25-48). Reading, MA: William Patrick.
66.
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
67.
Public Act 97-290, 97-247, 97-47, 98-168,& 98-252, Connecticut General Stat. 0-66bb (1997).
68.
Public Education: General Provisions, 228.056 Charter Schools, Title XVI Education, Chapt. 228 of the 2001 Florida Stat. (2001).
69.
Research, Policy, & Practice International. (2000). The state of charter schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research & Improvement.
70.
Rich, M. J., Giles, M. W., & Stern, E. (2001). Collaborating to reduce poverty: Views from city halls and community-based organizations. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 184-204.
71.
Ring, P. S.,& Van De Ven, A. H. (1994). Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 90-118.
72.
Robertson, P. J. (1998). Interorganizational relationships: Key issues for integrated services. In J. McCroskey & S. D. Einbinder (Eds.), Universities and communities: Remaking professional and interprofessional education for the next century (pp. 67-87). Westport, CT: Praeger.
73.
Rom, M. C. (2000). From welfare state to opportunity, Inc.: Public-private partnerships in welfare reform. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 161-182). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74.
Rosenau, P. V. (Ed.). (2000). The strengths and weaknesses of public-private policy partnerships. In Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 217-241). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75.
Sagawa, S., & Segal, E. (2000). Common interest, common good: Creating value through business and social sector partnerships. California Management Review, 42(2), 105-122.
76.
Schneider, A. L. (2000). Public-private partnerships in the U.S. prison system. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 199-216). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
77.
Senate Enrolled Act No. 165, Article 5.5 Charter Schools, The Indiana Code, Sect. 21. IC 20-5.5, Chapt. 8 (2001).
78.
Shipps, D. (1997). The invisible hand: Big business and Chicago school reform. Teachers College Record, 99, 73-116.
79.
Shipps, D. (2000). Echoes of corporate influence: Managing away urban school troubles. In L. Cuban & D. Shipps (Eds.), Reconstructing the common good in education: Coping with intractable American dilemmas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
80.
Snell, L. (2001, May). Workplace charter schools: Florida blazes the trail (No. E-Brief 114). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
81.
South Carolina Charter Schools Act of 1996, Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1976, Title 59 Education, Chapt. 40 (1996).
82.
Sparer, M. S. (2000). Myths and misunderstandings: Health policy, the devolution revolution, and the push for privatization. In P. V. Rosenau (Ed.), Public-private policy partnerships (pp. 143-160). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83.
Spring, J. (1986). The American school 1642-1985. White Plains, NY: Longman.
84.
Subtitle B—Public Charter Schools, H3872, Subtitle B of D.C. Code, Sect. 2204 (1996, amended 1999).
85.
Taylor, M. D., & Snell, L. (2000). Innovative school facility partnerships: Downtown, airport, and retail space (No. 276). Los Angeles: Reason Public Policy Institute.
86.
Tejada, C. (2002, May 28). These students wear hardhats and learn how to cut tiles. The Wall Street Journal, p. B12.
87.
Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
88.
Waddock, S. A. (1989). Understanding social partnerships: An evolutionary model of partnership organizations. Administration & Society, 21(1), 78-100.
89.
Waide, P. J., Jr. (1999). Principles of effective collaboration. In F. Hesselbein, M. Goldsmith,& I. Somerville (Eds.), Leading beyond the walls (pp. 243-250). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
90.
Walsh, M. (2002). Businesses flock to charter frontier. Education Week, 21, 1, 12, 15.
91.
Weiss, J. A. (1987). Pathways to cooperation among public agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7, 94-117.
92.
Wells, A. S., Artiles, L., Carnochan, S., Cooper, C. W., Grutzik, C., Holme, J. J., et al. (1998). Beyond the rhetoric of charter school reform: A study of ten California school districts. Los Angeles: UCLA.
93.
West Ed. (2002, December). Using school-community partnerships to bolster student learning. San Francisco: Author.
94.
Williamson, O. (1983). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
95.
Wisener, B. F. (1996). Influence of Callahan’s vulnerability thesis on thought and practice in educational administration, 1962-1992. Peabody Journal of Education, 71(2), 41-63.
96.
Wohlstetter, P., & Anderson, L. (1994). What can U.S. charter schools learn from England’s grant-maintained schools?Phi Delta Kappan, 75(6), 486-491.
97.
Wohlstetter, P., & Briggs, K. (2001). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy. In J. Simmons (Ed.), School reform in Chicago: Lessons and opportunities. Chicago: Chicago Community Trust.
98.
Wohlstetter, P., & Griffin, N. (1998). Creating and sustaining learning communities: Early lessons from charter schools. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, University of Pennsylvania.
99.
Wohlstetter, P., Mohrman, S. A., & Robertson, P. J. (1997). Successful school-based management: Lessons for restructuring urban schools. In D. Ravitch & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.), New schools for a new century: The redesign of urban education (pp. 201-225). New Haven: Yale University Press.
100.
Wohlstetter, P., Smyer, R.,& Mohrman, S. A. (1994). New boundaries for school-based management: The high involvement model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16(3), 268-286.
