This paper contributes to our understanding of the micro-policy experience of an implemented curriculum from the perspective of students, in addition to teachers, as the key coupling agents in the schools of a Chinese global city. Although the phenomenon of decoupling in educational policy is widely recognized, much less attention has been paid to the micro-dynamics involved in implementing education reform policy from the perspective of students and teachers. It is argued that these local actors’ experiences are best captured by the bi-dimensional framework of loose coupling and pedagogic modalities. This argument is illustrated through a case study of the implementation of the Liberal Studies reform under Senior Secondary Curriculum in Hong Kong since 2009. The study demonstrates how students and teachers interpret and make sense of policy, strategic, and practical needs manifested in the microprocesses of policy coupling and decoupling.
BallS. J.MaguireM.BraunA. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
2.
BensonK. M. (2006). Conversations of curriculum reform: Students’ and teachers’ voices interpreted through autobiographical and phenomenological texts. Peter Lang.
3.
BernsteinB. (1973). Class, codes and control (Vol. 2). Routledge.
4.
BernsteinB. (1975). Class and pedagogies: Visible and invisible. Educational Studies, 1(1), 23–41.
5.
BernsteinB. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (revised ed.). Rowman and Littlefield.
6.
BormanK. M.CooksonP. W.Jr. (1996). Sociology of education and educational policy: When worlds collide or happily ever after? In BormanK. M.SpadeJ. Z.CooksonP. W.Jr, (Eds.), Implementing educational reform: Sociological perspectives on educational policy (pp. 3–20). Greenwood Publishing Group.
7.
BromleyP.PowellW. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530.
8.
BrunssonN. (2009). Reform as routine: Organizational change and stability in the modern world. Oxford University Press.
9.
ChengY. C. (2009). Hong Kong educational reforms in the last decade: Reform syndrome and new developments. International Journal of Educational Management, 23(1), 65–86.
10.
CheungA. C. K.WongP. M. (2012). Factors affecting the implementation of curriculum reform in Hong Kong: Key findings from a large-scale survey study. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(1), 39–54.
11.
CoburnC. E. (2004). Beyond decoupling: Rethinking the relationship between the institutional environment and the classroom. Sociology of Education, 77(3), 211–244.
12.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
13.
CoburnC. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349.
14.
CoburnC. E.HillH. C.SpillaneJ. P. (2016). Alignment and accountability in policy design and implementation: The common core state standards and implementation research. Educational Researcher, 45(4), 243–251.
15.
CoburnC. E.TalbertJ. E. (2006). Conceptions of evidence use in school districts: Mapping the terrain. American Journal of Education, 112(4), 469–495.
16.
Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2001). Learning to learn. Government Printer.
17.
Curriculum Development Council (CDC). (2009). Senior secondary curriculum guide: The future is now: From vision to realisation (secondary 4–6). Curriculum Development Council.
18.
Curriculum Development Council and Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority (CDC & HKEAA). (2007). Liberal studies curriculum and assessment guide (secondary 4–6). HKSAR Government Logistic Department.
19.
DengZ. Y. (2009). The formation of a school subject and the nature of curriculum content: An analysis of liberal studies in Hong Kong. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(5), 585–604.
20.
DiamondJ. B. (2007). Where the rubber meets the road: Rethinking the connection between high-stakes testing policy and classroom instruction. Sociology of Education, 80(4), 285–313.
21.
DonnellyM. (2015). Progressing to university: Hidden messages at two state schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(1), 85–101.
22.
EvansJ.DaviesB.RichE.DePianL. (2013). Understanding policy: Why health education policy is important and why it does not appear to work. British Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 320–337.
23.
HallettT. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited institutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74.
24.
HamiltonM. P.HeiligJ. V.PazeyB. L. (2014). A nostrum of school reform? Turning around reconstituted urban Texas high schools. Urban Education, 49(2), 182–215.
25.
HurshD. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 493–518.
26.
LamC. C.ChanJ. K. S. (2011). How schools cope with a new integrated subject for senior secondary students: An example from Hong Kong. Curriculum Perspectives, 31(3), 23–32.
27.
LamC. C.HoS. C.WongN. Y. (2002). Parents’ beliefs and practices on education in Confucian heritage cultures: The Hong Kong case. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 3(1), 99–114.
28.
LeungL. S. (2013). An inquiry of teachers’ perception on the relationship between higher-order thinking nurturing and Liberal Studies public assessment in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Teachers’ Centre Journal, 12, 183–215.
29.
LingardB.MartinoW.Rezai-RashtiG. (2013). Testing regimes, accountabilities and education policy: Commensurate global and national developments. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 539–556.
30.
McCallR. B.BeachS. R.LauS. (2000). The nature and correlates of underachievement among elementary schoolchildren in Hong Kong. Child Development, 71(3), 785–801.
31.
MeyerH. D.BenavotA. (Eds.). (2013). PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance. Symposium Books Ltd.
32.
MeyerH. D.RowanB. (Eds.). (2006). New institutionalism in education. SUNY Press.
33.
MeyerJ.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
34.
MitchellJ. C. (1983). Case and situation analysis. Sociological Review, 31(2), 187–211.
35.
MoraisA.RochaC. (2000). Development of social competences in the primary school-study of specific pedagogic practices. British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 91–119.
36.
MorrisP.ScottI. (2003). Educational reform and policy implementation in Hong Kong. Journal of Education Policy, 18(1), 71–84.
37.
MorrisP.SweetingA. (1991). Education and politics: The case of Hong Kong from an historical perspective. Oxford Review of Education, 17(3), 249–267.
38.
OrtonJ. D.WeickK. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.
39.
PalmerD.RangelV. (2011). High stakes accountability and policy implementation: Teacher decision making in bilingual classrooms in Texas. Educational Policy, 25(4), 614–647.
40.
PostD. (1994). Educational stratification, school expansion, and public policy in Hong Kong. Sociology of Education, 67, 121–138.
41.
PostD. (2010). Postsecondary educational expansion and social integration in Hong Kong. Research in Sociology and Socialization, 17, 231–270.
42.
ShenS. M.PangI. W.TsoiS. Y. S.YipP. S. F.YungK. K. (1994). Home school co-operation research report. The Government Printer.
43.
SinghP.ThomasS.HarrisJ. (2013). Recontextualising policy discourses: A Bernsteinian perspective on policy interpretation, translation, enactment. Journal of Education Policy, 28(4), 465–480.
44.
SmallM. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.
45.
SpillaneJ. P.PariseL. M.ShererJ. Z. (2011). Organizational routines as coupling mechanisms: Policy, school administration, and the technical core. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 586–619.
46.
SpillmanL. (2014). Mixed methods and the logic of qualitative inference. Qualitative Sociology, 37(2), 189–205.
47.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2012). Lessons from PISA for Japan, strong performers and successful reformers in education. OECD Publishing.
48.
TongS. Y. A. (2010). Lessons learned? School leadership and curriculum reform in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 30(2), 231–242.
49.
WeickK. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.
50.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. SAGE.
51.
YeungS. Y. S. (2009). Is student-centered pedagogy impossible in Hong Kong? The case of inquiry in classrooms. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(3), 377–386.
52.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
