AppleM. W. (1986). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
AuW. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25-45.
3.
BanksJ. A. (2003). Teaching literacy for social justice and global citizenship. Language Arts, 81(1), 18-19.
4.
CaweltiG. (2006). The side effects of NCLB. Educational Leadership, 64(3), 64-68.
5.
CroccoM. S.CostiganA. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42, 512-535.
6.
Darling-HammondL. (1994). Who will speak for our children? How “Teach for America” hurts urban schools and students. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(1), 21-34.
7.
Darling-HammondL. (2010). The flat world and education. New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
EdeA. (2006). Scripted curriculum: Is it a prescription for success?Childhood Education, 83(1), 29-32.
McCutcheonG. (2002). Developing the curriculum: Solo and group deliberation. Troy, NY: Educators’ Press International.
13.
MilnerH. R. (2010a). Start where you are but don’t stay there: Understanding diversity, opportunity gaps, and teaching in today’s classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14.
MilnerH. R. (2010b). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1/2), 118-131.
15.
SecadaW. G. (1989). Agenda setting, enlightened self-interest, and equity in mathematics education. Peabody Journal of Education, 66(2), 22-56.
16.
ShulmanL.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 19(2), 4-14.
17.
SleeterC. E. (2001). Preparing teachers for culturally diverse schools. Research and the overwhelming presence of Whiteness. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(2), 94-106.
18.
SmagorinskyP.LaklyA.JohnsonT. S. (2002). Acquiescence, accommodation, and resistance in learning to teach within a prescribed curriculum. English Education, 34, 187-211.
19.
SrikantaiahD. (2009). How state and federal accountability policies have influenced curriculum and instruction in three states: Common findings from Rhode Island, Illinois, and Washington. Washington DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from http://www.cepdc.org/displayDocument.cfm?DocumentID=217
20.
TateW. F. (2008). Geography of opportunity: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37, 397-411.
21.
Vasquez HeiligJ.JezS. J. (2010). Teach for America: A review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/teach-for-america
22.
ZeichnerK. (2006). Reflections of a university-based teacher educator on the future of college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 326-340.