“Good Intentions Can Only Get You So Far”: Critical Reflections From Teach For America Corps Members Placed in Special Education

Abstract

Research on Teach For America (TFA) continues to grow, but scant scholarship has explored the experiences of its corps members working in special education in urban schools. As teachers who require in-depth knowledge of legal and liability processes as well as effective pedagogical practices, corps members in special education positions have significant demands placed on them that often lie beyond the roles and responsibilities of other TFA teachers. This article therefore focuses on the experiences of five TFA corps members placed in special education as it explores their critical reflections about the minimal preparation and support they received from TFA. In light of recent special education initiatives launched by TFA, the article raises questions about the continued involvement of TFA in the field of special education and its ability to adequately prepare corps members for the unique responsibilities served by special education teachers in the United States.

Keywords

educational policy Teach For America special education teachers students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2013a). Teach for America and the dangers of deficit thinking. Critical Education, 4(11), 28-47.

Anderson

(2013b). Teach for America and symbolic violence: A Bourdieuian analysis of education’s next quick-fix. The Urban Review, 45, 684-700.

Antecol

Eren

Ozbeklik

(2013). The effect of Teach for America on the distribution of student achievement in primary school: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Economics of Education Review, 37, 113-125.

Billingsley

B. S.

Crockett

Kamman

M. L.

(2014). Recruiting and retaining teachers and administrators in special education. In Sindelar

McCray

E. D.

Brownell

M. T.

Lignugaris

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 94-112). New York, NY: Routledge.

Blanton

Boveda

Munoz

Pugach

(2017). The affordances and constraints of special education initial teacher licensure policy for teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 77-91.

Brewer

T. J.

(2013). From the trenches: A Teach for America corps member’s perspective. Critical Education, 4(12), 1-17.

Brewer

T. J.

(2014). Accelerated burnout: How Teach for America’s academic impact model and theoretical culture of accountability can foster disillusionment among its corps members. Educational Studies, 50, 246-263.

Brewer

T. J.

(2015, October). Teach for America’s biggest problem isn’t green teachers or failing schools. It’s that it can’t take criticism. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/10/20/teach-for-americas-biggest-problem-isnt-green-teachers-or-failing-schools-its-that-it-cant-take-criticism/

Brewer

T. J.

Wallis

(2015). #TFA: The intersection of social media and education reform. Critical Education, 6(13), 1-13.

10.

Brody

(2015, April 27). Why we are the diverse learner initiative. Teach for America. Retrieved from https://www.teachforamerica.org/top-stories/why-we-are-diverse-learner-initiative

11.

Brown

(2016, April 12). Teach for America applications fall again, diving 35 percent in three years. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/education/wp/2016/04/12/teach-for-america-applications-fall-again-diving-35-percent-in-three-years/

12.

Carter

Amrein-Beardsley

Hansen

(2011). So NOT amazing! Teacher for America corps members’ evaluation of the first semester of their teacher preparation program. Teachers College Record, 113, 861-894.

13.

Chiang

H. S.

Clark

M. A.

McConnell

(2014). Supplying disadvantaged schools with effective teachers: Experimental evidence on secondary math teachers from teach for America (No. 31). Princeton, NJ: Mathematic Policy Research.

14.

Cochran-Smith

Dudley-Marling

(2012). Diversity in teacher education and special education the issues that divide. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 237-244.

15.

Crawford-Garrett

(2009). Voicing the first year of teaching: The narration of self, other and institution through reported speech. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 24, 19-33.

16.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

17.

Darling-Hammond

(1994). Who will speak for the children? How “Teach for America” hurts urban schools and students. The Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 21-34.

18.

Darling-Hammond

(2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

19.

Donaldson

Johnson

S. M.

(2010). The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach for America teachers’ exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 299-323.

20.

Farr

(2010). Teaching as leadership: The highly effective teacher’s guide to closing the achievement gap. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

21.

Foote

(2008). Relentless pursuit: A year in the trenches with Teach for America. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

22.

Friedrich

(2014). “We brought it upon ourselves”: University-based teacher education and the emergence of boot-camp style routes to teacher certification. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22(2), 1-21.

23.

Hansen

Backes

Brady

(2014). Examining spillover effects from Teach for America corps members in Miami—Dade County public schools (Working Paper 113). Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.

24.

Heineke

A. J.

Mazza

B. S.

Tichnor-Wagner

(2014). After the two-year commitment: A quantitative and qualitative inquiry of Teach for America teacher retention and attrition. Urban Education, 49, 7750-7782.

25.

Hopkins

(2008a). Training the next teachers for America—A proposal for reconceptualizing Teach for America. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 721-725.

26.

Hopkins

(2008b). A vision for the future: Collective effort for systematic change. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 737-740.

27.

Hopkins

Heineke

A. J.

(2013). Teach for America and English language learners: Shortcomings of the organization’s training model. Critical Education, 4(12), 18-36.

28.

Kavanagh

(2010). A dichotomy examined: Beginning Teach for America educators navigate culturally relevant teaching and a scripted literacy program in their urban classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, Atlanta.

29.

Kena

Hussar

McFarland

de Brey

Musu-Gillette

Wang

. . . Dunlop Velez

(2016). The condition of education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch

30.

Kopp

(2003). One day, all children. . . The unlikely triumph of Teach for America and what I learned along the way. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

31.

Kopp

(2008). Building the movement to end educational inequity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 734-736.

32.

Kramer

(2014, March 29). Teach for America launches special education and ability initiative. The Huffington Post. Retrieved http://www.huffingtonpost.com/matt-kramer/teach-for-america-launche_b_5042388.html?ir=Australia

33.

Kretchmar

(2014). The revolution will be privatized: Teach for America and charter schools. Urban Review, 46, 632-653.

34.

Kumashiro

(2010). Seeing the bigger picture: Troubling movements to end teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 56-65.

35.

Labaree

(2010). Teach for America and teacher ed: Heads they win, tails we lose. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 48-55.

36.

Laczko-Kerr

Berliner

D. C.

(2002). The effectiveness of” Teach for America” and other under-certified teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(37), 1-53.

37.

Lanier

H. K.

(2012). Teaching in the terrordome: Two years in west Baltimore with Teach for America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.

38.

Lefebvre

E.L.

Thomas

M.A.M.

(2017). ‘Shit shows’ or ‘like-minded schools’: Charter schools and the neoliberal logic of Teach For America. Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 357-371.

39.

Lortie

(1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

40.

Maier

(2012). Doing good and doing well: Credentialism and Teach for America. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 10-22.

41.

Mamlin

(2012). Preparing effective special education teachers. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

42.

Matsui

(2015). Learning from counternarratives in Teach for America—Moving from idealism towards hope. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

43.

Maxwell

J. A.

(2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

44.

Ness

(2004). Lessons to learn: Voices from the front lines of Teach for America. New York, NY: Routledge.

45.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

46.

Penner

E. K.

(2016). Teaching for all? Teach For America’s effects across the distribution of student achievement. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9(3), 259-282.

47.

Popkewitz

T. S.

(1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

48.

Rock

M. L.

Billingsley

B. S.

(2015). Who makes a difference! Next generation special education workforce renewal. In Bateman

Lloyd

J. W.

Tankersley

(Eds.), Enduring issues in special education: Personal perspectives (pp. 168-185). New York, NY: Routledge.

49.

Ronfeldt

Reininger

(2012). More or better student teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1091-1106.

50.

Schneider

(2011). Excellence for all—How a new breed of reformers is transforming America’s public schools. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.

51.

Schneider

(2014). Rhetoric and practice in pre-service teacher education: The case of Teach for America. Journal of Education Policy, 29, 425-442.

52.

Scott

(2015). Teach for America, neoliberalism, and the effect on special education. In Brewer

T. J.

deMarrais

(Eds.), Teach for America counter-narratives: Alumni speak up and speak out (pp. 47-54). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

53.

Scott

Trujillo

Rivera

M.D.

(2016). Reframing Teach For America: A conceptual framework for the next generation of scholarship. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(12), 1-33.

54.

Seidman

(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

55.

Sentilles

(2005). Taught by America: A story of struggle and hope in Compton. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

56.

Sindelar

Wasburn-Moses

Thomas

R.A.

Leko

(2014). The policy and economic contexts of teacher education. In Sindelar

McCray

E. D.

Brownell

M. T.

Lignugaris

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Routledge.

57.

Sondel

(2015). Raising citizens or raising test scores? Teach for America, “no excuses” charters, and the development of the neoliberal citizen. Theory & Research in Social Education, 43, 289-313.

58.

Stern

Johnston

D. K.

(2013). I want to do Teach for America, not become a teacher. Critical Education, 4(13), 1-27.

59.

Straubhaar

Gottfried

(2014). Who joins Teach for America and why? Insights into the “typical” recruit in an urban school district. Education and Urban Society, 48(7), 627-649.

60.

Tatel

(1999). Teaching in under-resourced schools: The Teach for America example. Theory Into Practice, 38, 37-45.

61.

Teach for America. (2015a). Holding high expectations for all students. Retrieved from https://www.teachforamerica.org/blog/holding-high-expectations-all-students

62.

Teach for America. (2015b). How we support our teachers. Retrieved from https://www.teachforamerica.org/teach-with-tfa/your-training-and-support/how-we-support-our-teachers

63.

Teach for America. (2016). Diverse learner initiative. Retrieved from https://www.teachforamerica.org/about-us/our-initiatives/diverse-learner-initiative

64.

Téllez

(2011). A case study of a career in education that began with “Teach for America.” Teaching Education, 22, 15-38.

65.

Thomas

M.A.M.

(2016). Review of the book. Destination: Teach for America: Building leadership, mastering the application, acing the interviews, by J. Whitman. Education and Urban Society, 48(5), 527-529.

66.

Thomas

M.A.M.

Lefebvre

E.L.

(2017). The dangers relentless pursuit: Teaching, personal health, and the symbolic/real violence of Teach For America. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01596306.2017.1311298

67.

U.S. Department of Education. (2015). Teacher shortage areas nationwide listing, 1990-1991 through 2015-2016. Washington, DC: Office of Postsecondary Education.

68.

Vasquez Heilig

(2016, March 18). Not so special education: Alums describe chaos inside Teach for America. Cloaking Inequality. Retrieved from https://cloakinginequity.com/2016/03/18/not-so-special-education-alum-describe-chaos-inside-teach-for-america/

69.

Vasquez Heilig

Jez

S. J.

(2014). Teach for America: A return to the evidence. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.

70.

Veltri

B. T.

(2008). Teaching or service? The site-based realities of Teach for America teachers in poor, urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 40, 511-542.

71.

Veltri

B. T.

(2010). Learning on other people’s kids: Becoming a Teach for America teacher. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

72.

Wasburn-Moses

(2012). Response to Cochran-Smith and Dudley-Marling, “Diversity in teacher education and special education: The issues that divide.” Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 276-278.

73.

Hannaway

Taylor

(2011). Making a difference? The effects of Teach for America in high school. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30, 447-469.