Teach For America (TFA), an organization that places college graduates as teachers in low-income areas for 2 years, contributes to teacher attrition. With this mixed methods study in one urban region, we investigated teachers’ professional decisions at the end of 2 years. Respondents fell into categories in relation to the organization’s 2-year commitment, including leavers, lingerers, and lasters, and descriptors related to remaining at placement school or relocating to another school. Historical, environmental, and external factors impacted teachers’ professional decisions related to retention and attrition. Findings provide insight to improve retention of TFA teachers.
BarnesG.CroweE.SchaeferB. (2007). The cost of teacher turnover in five school districts: A pilot study. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
2.
BillingsleyB. S. (2004). Special education teacher retention and attrition: A critical analysis of the research literature. Journal of Special Education, 38, 39-55.
3.
BoglerR. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 662-683.
4.
BormanG. D.DowlingN. M. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Education Research, 78, 367-409.
5.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2006). How changes in entry requirements alter the teacher workforce and affect student achievement. Education Finance and Policy, 1, 176-216.
6.
BoydD.GrossmanP.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2008). Who leaves? Teacher attrition and student achievement. Washington, DC: National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
7.
BrownellM. T.SmithS. W. (1993). Understanding special education teacher attrition: A conceptual model and implications for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16, 270-282.
8.
ChapmanT. K. (2005). Expressions of “voice” in portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 27-51.
9.
Cochran-SmithM. (2004). Stayers, leavers, lovers, and dreamers: Insights about teacher retention. Journal of Teacher Education, 55, 387-392.
10.
CreswellJ. W.Plano-ClarkV. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
11.
Darling-HammondL. (2006). Constructing 21st century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300-314.
12.
Darling-HammondL.HoltzmanD. J.GatlinS. J.HeiligJ. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach For America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epa/v13n42/
13.
DonaldsonM. L. (2012). The promise of older novices: Teach For America teachers’ age of entry and subsequent retention in teaching and schools. Teachers College Record, 114, 1-14.
14.
DonaldsonM. L.JohnsonS. M. (2010). The price of misassignment: The role of teaching assignments in Teach for America teachers’ exit from low-income schools and the teaching profession. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 299-323.
15.
DonaldsonM. L.JohnsonS. M. (2011) . Teach for America teachers: How long do they teach? Why do they leave?Phi Delta Kappan, 93, 57-61.
16.
FantilliR. D.McDougalD. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 814-825.
17.
FreedmanS. W.ApplemanD. (2008). What else would I be doing? Teacher identity and teaching retention in urban schools. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35, 109-126.
18.
FreedmanS. W.ApplemanD. (2009). In it for the long haul: How teacher education can contribute to teacher retention in high-poverty, urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 323-337.
19.
GabrielR. (2011). A practice-based theory of professional education: Teach for America’s professional development model. Urban Education, 46, 975-986.
20.
GallM. D.GallJ. P.BorgW. R. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7th ed.). Boston, MA: A & B Publications.
21.
GlassG. V. (2008). Alternative certification of teachers. East Lansing, MI: Great Lakes Center for Education and Research and Practice.
22.
HabermanM. (2004). Teacher burnout in black and white. Houston, TX: The Haberman Educational Foundation.
23.
HawkinsE. F.StancavageF. B.DorseyJ. A. (1998). School policies affecting instruction in mathematics. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
24.
HeiligJ. V.JezS. J. (2010). Teach for America: A review of the evidence. Boulder, CO: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit. Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/teach-for-america
25.
HeinekeA. J.DesimoneM.CarterH.CameronQ. (2010). Working together in urban schools: How a university teacher education program and Teach For America partner to support alternatively certified teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37, 123-136.
26.
HeinekeA. J.PreachD. (in press). Integrating graduate coursework to prepare alternatively certified teachers. Teacher Education & Practice. Manuscript submitted for publication.
27.
HongJ. Y. (2010). Pre-service and beginning teachers’ professional identity and its relation to dropping out of the profession. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26, 1530-1543.
28.
HopkinsM. (2008). Training the next teachers for America: A proposal for reconceptualizing Teach For America. Phi Delta Kappan, 89, 721-725.
29.
HumphreyD. C.WechslerM. E.HoughH. J. (2008). Characteristics of effective alternate teacher certification programs. Teachers College Record, 110, 218-250.
30.
HuntJ. B.CarrollT. G. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Washington, DC: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.
31.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 14-26.
32.
KersaintG.LewisJ.PotterP.MeiselsG. (2005). Why teachers leave: Factors that influence retention and resignation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 775-794.
33.
KoppW. (2011). A chance to make history: What works and what doesn’t work in providing an excellent education for all. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
34.
Laczko-KerrI.BerlinerD.C. (2002). The effectiveness of Teach For America and other under-certified teachers on student academic achievement: A case of harmful public policy. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10. Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n37
35.
LarabeeD. (2010). Teach For America and Teacher Ed: Heads they win, tails we lose. Journal of Teacher Education, 61, 48-55.
36.
Lawrence-LightfootS.DavisJ. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
37.
LelandC. H.MurtadhaK. (2011). Cultural discourse on the frontline: Preparing and retaining urban teachers. Urban Education, 46, 895-912.
38.
LiuX. S.MeyerJ. P. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions of their jobs: A multilevel analysis of the Teacher Follow-Up Survey for 1994-95. Teacher College Record, 107, 985-1003.
39.
LoebS.Darling-HammondL.LuczakJ. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80, 44-70.
40.
MacIverM. A.VaughnE. S.III. (2007). “But how long will they stay”: Alternative certification and new teacher retention in an urban district. Educational Research Service Spectrum, 25, 33-44.
41.
NgJ. C. (2003). Teacher shortages in urban schools: The role of traditional and alternative certification routes in filling the voids. Education and Urban Society, 35, 380-398.
42.
NoellG. H.GansleK. A. (2009). Teach For America teachers’ contribution to student achievement in Louisiana in Grades 4-9: 2004-2005 to 2006-2007. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
43.
OlsenB.AndersonL. (2007). Courses of action: A qualitative investigation into urban teacher retention and career development. Urban Education, 42, 5-29.
44.
RinkeC. R. (2011). Career trajectories of urban teachers: A continuum of perspectives, participation, and plans: Shaping retention in the educational system. Urban Education, 46, 639-662.
45.
TamirE. (2009). Choosing to teach in urban schools among graduates of elite colleges. Urban Education, 44, 522-544.
VeltriB. T. (2008). Teaching or service? The site based realities of Teach For America in poor, urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 40, 511-542.
49.
YonezawaS.JonesM.SingerN. R. (2011). Teacher resilience in urban schools: The importance of technical knowledge, professional community, and leadership opportunities. Urban Education, 46, 913-931.
