Shifts from professionals to volunteers are observed across national contexts and in various types of public services, particularly in long-term care and social work. This article examines how professionals and volunteers in the Netherlands perform boundary work to construct, maintain and dissolve boundaries between them in the context of social service reform. Two types of boundary work were found: demarcation work and welcoming work. Demarcation work relates to a situation where differences in knowledge, authority and reliability between professionals and volunteers are emphasised. Welcoming work involves the efforts of professionals to welcome specific volunteers to their professional domain. This study examines the implications of the second type of boundary work for structural characteristics of the social service sector. It concludes that although welcoming work can lead to deprofessionalisation, it can also promote the professionalisation of nurses and social workers.
AndrewsTMWærnessK (2011) Deprofessionalization of a female occupation: Challenges for the sociology of professions. Current Sociology59(1): 42–58.
2.
Apesoa-VaranoEC (2013) Interprofessional conflict and repair: A study of boundary work in the hospital. Sociological Perspectives56(3): 327–349.
3.
BachSKesslerIHeronP (2012) Nursing a grievance? The role of healthcare assistants in a modernized national health service. Gender, Work and Organization19(2): 205–224.
4.
BainesD (2004) Caring for nothing: Work organization and unwaged labour in social services. Work, Employment and Society18(2): 267–295.
5.
BijkerWEBalRHendriksR (2009) The Paradox of Scientific Authority: The Role of Scientific Advice in Democracies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
6.
BredewoldFTonkensETrappenburgM (2016) Solidarity and reciprocity between people with and without disabilities. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. Epub ahead of print 25July2016. DOI: 10.1002/casp.2279
7.
BucherSVChreimSLangleyAReayT (2016) Contestation about collaboration: Discursive boundary work among professions. Organization Studies37(4): 497–522.
8.
CBS (2014) Vrijwilligers: Soort organisaties en vrijwilligerswerk in uren per week. Den Haag/Heerlen: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek/StatLine.
ConnLGHaasBCuthbertsonBHet al. (2016) Communication and culture in the surgical intensive care unit: Boundary production and the improvement of patient care. Qualitative Health Research26(7): 895–906
11.
DahlbergL (2006) The complementarity norm: Service provision by the welfare state and voluntary organisations in Sweden. Health and Social Care in the Community14(4): 302–310.
12.
EliasophN (2011) Making Volunteers: Civic Life after Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
ElsonP (2009) A short history of voluntary sector-government relations in Canada. The Philanthropist21(1): 36–74.
14.
EtzioniA (1969) The Semi-Professions and their Organization: Teachers, Nurses, Social Workers. New York: The Free Press.
15.
FaulknerMDaviesS (2005) Social support in the healthcare setting: The role of volunteers. Health and Social Care in the Community13(1): 38–45.
16.
FournierV (2000) Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In: MalinN (ed.) Professionalism, Boundaries and the Workplace. London: Routledge.
17.
FreidsonE (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
19.
GierynTF (1995) Boundaries of science. In: JasanoffSMarkleGEPetersenJCPinchT (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. London: SAGE.
20.
GilbertN (2002) Transformation of the Welfare State: The Silent Surrender of Public Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21.
Gil-LacruzAIMarcuelloC (2013) Voluntary work in Europe: Comparative analysis among countries and welfare systems. Social Indicators Research114(2): 371–382.
22.
GrootegoedEM (2013) Dignity of dependence: Welfare state reform and the struggle for respect. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
23.
HalffmanW (2003) Boundaries of regulatory science. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24.
HardillIBainesS (2011) Enterprising Care? Unpaid Voluntary Action in the 21st Century. Bristol: Policy Press.
25.
HeiteC (2012) Setting and crossing boundaries: Professionalization of social work and social work professionalism. Social Work and Society10(2): 1–14.
26.
HoadP (2002) Drawing the line: The boundaries of volunteering in the community care of older people. Health and Social Care in the Community10(4): 239–246.
27.
HustinxLCnaanRAHandyF (2010) Navigating theories of volunteering: A hybrid map for a complex phenomenon. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior40(4): 410–434.
28.
JohanssonSLeonardRNoonanK (2012) Caring and the generation of social capital: Two models for a positive relationship. International Journal of Social Welfare21(1): 44–52.
29.
KampenTElshoutJTonkensE (2013) The fragility of self-respect: Strategies to prevent erosion of self-respect of unemployed citizens in activation programs. Social Policy and Society12(3): 427–438.
30.
KingONancarrowSABorthwickAMGraceS (2015) Contested professional role boundaries in health care: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research8(2): 1–9.
31.
KompKVan KersbergenKVan TilburgT (2013) Policies for older volunteers: A study of Germany and Italy, 1990–2008. Journal of Aging Studies27(4): 443–455.
32.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
33.
LiljegrenAHöjerSForkbyT (2014) Laypersons, professions, and governance in the welfare state: The Swedish child protection system. Journal of Professions and Organization1: 161–175.
34.
LorentzenHHenriksenLS (2014) The invention and institutionalization of volunteer centers: A comparative analysis of Norway and Denmark. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43(3): 589–608.
35.
MuehlebachA (2012) The Moral Neoliberal: Welfare and Citizenship in Italy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
NicoliniD (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lenses and trailing connections. Organization Studies30(12): 1391–1418.
37.
OldenhofL (2015) The multiple middle: Managing in healthcare. PhD dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
38.
OsborneTGaeblerD (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Plume.
39.
OvergaardC (2015) The boundaries of care work: A comparative study of professionals and volunteers in Denmark and Australia. Health and Social Care in the Community23(4): 380–388.
40.
SaksM (2015) Inequalities, marginality and the professions. Current Sociology63(6): 850–868.
41.
ScholtenC (2011) Zonder cement geen bouwwerk: Vrijwilligerswerk in de zorg, nu en in de toekomst. Utrecht: Vilans/Movisie/NOV.
42.
StebbinsRA (2009) Would you volunteer?Social Science and Public Policy46: 155–159.
43.
TonkensE (2012) Working with Arlie Hochschild: Connecting feelings to social change. Social Politics19(2): 194–218.
44.
TrontoJC (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
45.
VerhoevenITonkensE (2013) Talking active citizenship: Framing welfare state reform in England and the Netherlands. Social Policy and Society12(3): 415–426.
