Sociologists often imagine society as spaces, yet how social spaces are related remains ambiguous in most theories. In developing his field theory, Bourdieu used extensively the concept of homology to describe the structural similarities across fields, but he had not taken seriously the spaces between fields or how fields are related to each other. Adopting the Simmelian approach of formal sociology, this article outlines six basic social forms by which social spaces are related. It argues that relations between social spaces can be understood along two dimensions: heterogeneity and social distance. In terms of heterogeneity, social spaces can be kindred, symbiotic or oppositional. In terms of social distance, they can be linked, nested or overlapping. These social forms of interspatial relations are constituted by the boundary work of a variety of actors, including guardians, brokers and space travellers. The article provides a general vocabulary for thinking about how social spaces are related and how they interact across boundaries.
AbbottA. (2016). Processual sociology. The University of Chicago Press.
6.
AbelR. L. (1989). American lawyers. Oxford University Press.
7.
AlpesM. J.SpireA. (2014). Dealing with law in migration control: The powers of street-level bureaucrats at French consulates. Social & Legal Studies, 23, 261–274.
8.
AndreasP. (2000). Border games: Policing the US-Mexico divide. Cornell University Press.
9.
BaeckerD. (2017). Systems in social theory. In BenzecryC. E.KrauseM.ReedI. A. (Eds.), Social theory now (pp. 201–226). The University of Chicago Press.
10.
Block-LiebS.HallidayT. C. (2017). Global lawmakers: International organizations in the crafting of world markets. Cambridge University Press.
11.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste (NiceR., Trans. & Ed.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1979)
12.
BourdieuP. (1993). In: JohnsonR. (Ed.), The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.
13.
BourdieuP. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field (EmanuelS., Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1992)
14.
BourdieuP. (2000). Pascalian meditations (NiceR., Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1997)
15.
BourdieuP. (2005). The social structures of the economy (TurnerC., Trans.). Polity Press.
16.
BourdieuP.WacquantL. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. The University of Chicago Press.
17.
BurtR. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
18.
BurtR. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press.
19.
ChildressC. (2015). Regionalism and the publishing class: Conflicted isomorphism and negotiated identity in a nested field of American publishing. Cultural Sociology, 9, 364–381.
20.
ChildressC. (2017). Under the cover: The creation, production, and reception of a novel. Princeton University Press.
21.
DeweyJ.BentleyA. F. (1949). Knowing and the known. Beacon Press.
22.
EmirbayerM. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.
23.
EriksonE. (2013). Formalist and relationalist theory in social network analysis. Sociological Theory, 31, 219–242.
24.
EvansR.KayT. (2008). How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review, 73, 970–991.
25.
EyalG. (2013). Spaces between fields. In GorskiP. S. (Ed.), Bourdieu and historical analysis (pp. 158–182). Duke University Press.
26.
FligsteinN.McAdamD. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.
27.
GarridoM. Z. (2019). The patchwork city: Class, space, and politics in Metro Manilla. The University of Chicago Press.
28.
GierynT. F. (1983). Boundary work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.
29.
GlaeserA. (2000). Divided in unity: Identity, Germany, and the Berlin police. The University of Chicago Press.
30.
GranovetterM. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
31.
HarveyD. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
32.
HarveyD. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: A theory of uneven geographical development. Verso.
33.
HawleyA. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. The University of Chicago Press.
34.
HeinzJ. P.LaumannE. O. (1982). Chicago lawyers: The social structure of the bar. Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
HoytH. (1933). One hundred years of land values in Chicago: The relationship of the growth of Chicago to the rise of its land values, 1830-1933. Beard Books.
36.
JohnstonJ.BaumannS. (2015). Foodies: Democracy and distinction in the gourmet foodscape (2nd ed.). Routledge. (Original work published 2009)
37.
KrauseM. (2018). How fields vary. British Journal of Sociology, 69, 3–22.
38.
KrippnerG. R. (2012). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Harvard University Press.
39.
LahireB. (2010). The double life of writers. New Literary History, 41, 433–465.
40.
LahireB. (2015). The limits of the field: Elements for a theory of the social differentiation of activities. In HilgersM.MangezE. (Eds.), Bourdieu’s theory of social fields: Concepts and applications in (pp. 62–101). Routledge.
41.
LarsonM. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. University of California Press.
42.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
43.
LefebvreH. (1991). The production of space (Nicholson-SmithD., Trans.). Blackwell. (Original work published 1974)
44.
LeiY. W. (2016). Freeing the press: How field environment explains critical news reporting in China. American Journal of Sociology, 122, 1–48.
45.
LeschzinerV. (2015). At the chef’s table: Culinary creativity in elite restaurants. Stanford University Press.
46.
LewisS. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 836–866.
47.
LiangL.LiuS. (2018). Beyond the manifesto: Mustafa Emirbayer and relational sociology. In DépelteauF. (Ed.), Palgrave handbook of relational sociology (pp. 395–411). Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
LipskyM. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russel Sage Foundation. (Original work published 1980)
49.
LiuS. (2015). Boundary work and exchange: The formation of a professional service market. Symbolic Interaction, 38, 1–21.
50.
LiuS. (2017). Overlapping ecologies: Professions and development in the rise of legal services in China. Sociology of Development, 3, 212–231.
51.
LiuS.EmirbayerM. (2016). Field and ecology. Sociological Theory, 34, 62–79.
52.
LowreyW. (2006). Mapping the journalism–blogging relationship. Journalism, 7, 477–500.
53.
LuhmannN. (1995). Social systems (BednarzJ.JrBaeckerD., Trans.). Stanford University Press. (Original work published 1984)
54.
MartinJ. L. (2003). What is field theory?American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1–49.
55.
MartinJ. L.GreggF. (2015). Was Bourdieu a field theorist? In HilgersM.MangezE. (Eds.), Bourdieu’s theory of social fields: Concepts and applications (pp. 39–61). Routledge.
56.
MasseyD. S.DentonN. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Harvard University Press.
57.
McAdamD.McCarthyJ. D.ZaldM. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings. Cambridge University Press.
58.
MeadG. H. (2015). Mind, self, and society (MorrisC. W., Ed.), The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1934)
59.
MedvetzT. (2012). Think tanks in America. The University of Chicago Press.
60.
MichelsonE. (2007). Lawyers, political embeddedness, and institutional continuity in china’s transition from socialism. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 352–414.
61.
NelsonR. J. (1988). Partners with power: The social transformation of the large law firm. The University of California Press.
62.
ParkR. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 881–893.
63.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W. (1969). Introduction to the science of sociology. The University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1921)
64.
ParkR. E.BurgessE. W.McKenzieR. D. (1967). The city. The University of Chicago Press.
65.
PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. The University of Chicago Press.
66.
SerafinM. (2019). Cabdrivers and their fares: Temporal structures of a linking ecology. Sociological Theory, 37, 117–141.
67.
SilverD.BrocicM. (2019). Three concepts of form in Simmel’s sociology. The German Review, 94, 114–124.
68.
SimmelG. (1950). The sociology of Georg Simmel (WolfK. H., Trans. & Ed.). Free Press.
69.
SimmelG. (1955). Conflict: The web of group affiliations (WolffK. H.BendixR., Trans.). Free Press.
70.
SimmelG. (1971). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms (LevineD. N., Ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
