This article looks at arguments concerning the supposed low status of smell in relation to the other senses to shed light on how smell has been perceived historically, across time. It also locates olfactory enquiries beyond scientific, biological concerns and argues for smell as a social medium present in our everyday life experiences. The article explores smell in the fields of history, anthropology, religion, gender and sociospatial analysis, enabling us to comprehend and critique theoretical/conceptual trajectories employed in social science research on olfaction. By looking at theoretical and methodological approaches towards an understanding of our olfactory capacities, ideas are developed about how one can ‘do’ a sociology of smell, where smell is perceived as a social intermediary that affects our ways of knowing, understanding and (re)creating social realities, premised upon the use of smell as a moral judgement of others. These ideas are exemplified through preliminary findings from an ongoing research project on the social construction(s) of smell in Singapore.
ABDULLAH, Noorman (forthcoming, 2005) ‘Foreign Bodies at Work: Good, Docile and Other-ed’ , Asian Journal of Social Science33(2).
2.
ACKERMAN, Diane (1990) A Natural History of the Senses. New York: Random House .
3.
ALMAGOR, Uri (1990) ‘Odours and Private Language: Observations on the Phenomenology of Scent’ , Human Studies13: 253-274 .
4.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt (1993) ‘The Sweet Scent of Decomposition’, in Chris Rojek and Bryan Turner (eds) Forget Baudrillard?, pp. 22-46. London: Routledge .
5.
BELL, Graham and WATSON, Annesley J. (eds) (1999) Tastes and Aromas: The Chemical Senses in Science and Industry. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press .
6.
BENNETT, Tony and WATSON, Diane (eds) (2002) Understanding Everyday Life. Oxford: Blackwell .
7.
BENSON, Douglas and HUGHES, John A. (1983) The Perspective of Ethnomethodology. London: Longman .
8.
BIGELOW, Charles (1992) ‘The Typography of Perfume Advertising’, in S. van Toller and G. H. Dodd (eds) Fragrance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume, pp. 243-259. London: Elsevier Science .
9.
BUBANDT, Nils (1998) ‘The Odour of Things: Smell and the Cultural Elaboration of Disgust in Eastern Indonesia’ , Ethnos63(I): 48-80 .
10.
CLASSEN, Constance (1993) Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge .
11.
CLASSEN, Constance (1997a) ‘Engendering Perception: Gender Ideologies and Sensory Hierarchies in Western History’ , Body and Society3(2): 1-19 .
12.
CLASSEN, Constance (1997b) ‘Foundations for an Anthropology of the Senses’ , International Social Science Journal153: 401-412 .
13.
CLASSEN, Constance (1998) The Colour of Angels: Cosmology, Gender and the Aesthetic Imagination. London: Routledge .
14.
CLASSEN, Constanceet al. (1994) Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. London: Routledge .
15.
COHEN, Erik (1988) ‘The Broken Cycle: Smell in a Bangkok Soi (Lane)’ , Ethnos53(I-II): 37-49 .
16.
COLLIN, Finn (1997) Social Reality. London: Routledge .
17.
CORBIN, Alain (1986) The Foul and the Fragrant: Odour and the French Social Imagination. New York: Berg .
18.
DANN, Graham M. S. (2003) ‘Tourism Smellscapes’ , Tourism Geographies5(1): 3-25 .
19.
DORLAND, Gabrielle J. (1993) Scents Appeal: The Silent Persuasion of Aromatic Encounters. Mendham, NJ: Wayne Dorland .
20.
DOUGLAS, Mary (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul .
21.
DOUGLAS, Mary (1970) Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: The Cresset Press .
22.
ELIAS, Norbert (2000) The Civilising Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations, rev. edn, eds Eric Dunning , Johan Goudsblom and Stephen Mennell , trans. Edmund Jephcott. Oxford: Blackwell .
23.
FINNEGAN, Ruth (2002) Communicating: The Multiple Modes of Human Interconnection. London and New York: Routledge .
24.
FOUCAULT, Michel (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London: Tavistock Publications .
25.
GARFINKEL, Harold (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
26.
GELL, Alfred (1977) ‘Magic, Perfume, Dream...’, in Ioan Lewis (ed.) Symbols and Sentiments: Cross-Cultural Studies in Symbolism. pp. 25-38. London: Academic Press .
27.
GLASER, Barney G. and STRAUSS, Anselm L. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson .
28.
GOFFMAN, Erving (1956) The Presentation of Self In Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin .
29.
GOFFMAN, Erving (1963a) Behaviour in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organisation of Gatherings. New York: Free Press .
30.
GOFFMAN, Erving (1963b) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
31.
GOFFMAN, Erving (1971) Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books .
32.
GUBA, Egon G. and LINCOLN, Yvonna S. (2000) ‘Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 105-117. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
33.
GUBRIUM, Jaber F. and HOLSTEIN, James A. (2000) ‘Analysing Interpretive Practice’, in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edn, pp. 487-508. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
34.
HALL, Edward T. (1966) The Hidden Dimension: Man’s Use of Space in Public and Private. London: The Bodley Head .
35.
HANNIGAN, Terence P. (1995) ‘Body Odour: The International Student and Cross-Cultural Communication’ , Culture and Psychology1: 497-503 .
36.
HARPER, R. , BATE SMITH, E. C. and LAND, D. G. (1968) Odour Description and Odour Classification: A Multidisciplinary Examination. London: J. and A. Churchill .
37.
HOWES, David (1991) ‘Olfaction and Transition’, in David Howes (ed.) The Varieties of Sensory Experience: A Sourcebook in the Anthropology of the Senses, pp. 28-147. Toronto: Toronto University Press .
38.
HUGHES, John A. (1990) The Philosophy of Social Research, 2nd edn.New York: Longman .
39.
ILLICH, Ivan (2000) ‘ “The Dirt of Cities”, “The Aura of Cities”, “The Smell of the Dead” and “Utopia of an Odourless City” ’, in Malcolm Miles , Tim Hall and Iain Borden (eds) The City Cultures Reader, pp. 249-252. London: Routledge .
40.
JENNER, Mark S. R. (2000) ‘Civilisation and Deodorisation? Smell in Early Modern English Culture’, in Peter Burke , Brian Harrison and Paul Slack (eds) Civil Histories: Essays Presented to Sir Keith Thomas, pp. 127-144. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
41.
JOHANSEN, T. K. (1998) Aristotle on the Sense-Organs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
42.
LARGEY, Gale Peter and WATSON, David Rodney (1972) ‘The Sociology of Odours’ , American Journal of Sociology77(6): 1021-1034 .
43.
LAW, Lisa (2001) ‘Home Cooking: Filipino Women and Geographies of the Senses in Hong Kong’ , Ecumene8(3): 264-283 .
44.
LOWE, Donald (1982) History of Bourgeois Perception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
45.
MCKENZIE, Dan (1923) Aromatics and the Soul: A Study of Smells. London: William Heinemann .
46.
MARTIN, Guy and LAFFORT, Paul (eds) (1994) Odours and Deodorisation in the Environment. New York: VCH Publishers .
47.
MEHAN, Hugh and WOOD, Houston (1994) ‘The Ethnomethodology of the Human Reality Constructor’, in Randall Collins (ed.) Four Sociological Traditions: Selected Readings, pp. 322-340. New York: Oxford University Press .
48.
MILLER, William Ian (1997) The Anatomy of Disgust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
49.
ONG, Walter J. (1977) Interfaces of the Word: Studies in the Evolution of Consciousness and Culture. London: Cornell University Press .
50.
ORTNER, Sherry (1984) ‘Theory in Anthropology since the Sixties’ , Comparative Studies in Society and History26(1): 126-166 .
51.
PORTEOUS, J. Douglas (1985) ‘Smellscape’ , Progress in Human Geography9(3): 356-378 .
52.
PURUSHOTAM, Nirmala Srirekam (1998) ‘The Narrative Interview Process’, in P. Lim Pui Huen , James H. Morrison and Kwa Chong Guan (eds) Oral History in Southeast Asia: Theory and Method, pp. 86-97. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies .
53.
PURUSHOTAM, Nirmala Srirekam (2000) Negotiating Multiculturalism: Disciplining Difference in Singapore. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter .
54.
RINDISBACHER, Hans J. (1995) The Smell of Books: A Cultural-Historical Study of Olfactory Perception in Literature. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press .
55.
RODAWAY, Paul (1994) Sensuous Geographies: Body, Sense and Place. London: Routledge .
56.
SCHUTZ, Alfred (1970) On Phenomenology and Social Relations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
57.
SHILLING, Chris (1993) The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage .
58.
SIDDIQUE, Sharon and PURUSHOTAM, Nirmala (1982) Singapore’s Little India: Past, Present and Future. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies .
59.
SIMMEL, Georg (1997) ‘Sociology of the Senses’, in David Frisby and Mike Featherstone (eds) Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. London: Sage .
60.
SMART, Barry (1996) ‘Facing the Body: Goffman, Levinas and the Subject of Ethics’ , Body and Society2(2): 67-78 .
61.
SMITH, Jillyn (1989) Senses and Sensibilities. New York: John Wiley .
62.
SPERBER, Dan (1974) Rethinking Symbolism, trans. Alice L. Morton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
63.
STOLTE, John F. , FINE, Gary Alan and COOK, Karen S. (2001) ‘Sociological Miniaturism: Seeing the Big Through the Small in Social Psychology’ , Annual Review of Sociology27: 387-413 .
64.
SYNNOTT, Anthony (1991) ‘A Sociology of Smell’ , The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology28(4): 437-459 .
65.
SYNNOTT, Anthony (1993) The Body Social: Symbolism, Self and Society. London: Routledge .
66.
THE NEW PAPER (2003) ‘Eeew, What a Smell!’ , 16 February.
67.
THE STRAITS TIMES (1992) ‘The World in Singapore: Growing Old but Going Strong’ , 9 August.
68.
THE STRAITS TIMES (2001) ‘The Thai-Dyed Mile’ , 14 September.
69.
THE STRAITS TIMES (2002) ‘Women Go for Men Who Smell Most Like Dad’ , 1 February.
70.
THE SUNDAY TIMES (2003) ‘Is that Perfume I Smell? No, Dear... It’s My Shirt’ , 9 March.
71.
TODAY (2002) ‘Smelly Individuals Need Not Apply’ , 14 October.
72.
TURNER, Bryan S. (1984) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell .
73.
TURNER, Bryan S. (1997) ‘The Body in Western Society: Social Theory and its Perspectives’, in Sarah Coakley (ed.) Religion and the Body, pp. 15-41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
74.
VAN TOLLER, S. and DODD, G. H. (eds) (1992) Fragrance: The Psychology and Biology of Perfume. London: Elsevier Science .
75.
VROON, Piet (1994) Smell: The Secret Seducer. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux .
76.
WALLACE, Ruth A. and WOLF, Alison (1999) Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition, 5th edn.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .
77.
WATSON, Lyall (2000) Jacobson’s Organ and the Remarkable Nature of Smell. New York: W.W. Norton .
78.
WEBER, Max (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation, trans. A. M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York: Free Press .
79.
WEIGERT, Andrew J. (1981) Sociology of Everyday Life. New York: Longman .
80.
WILLIAMS, Simon J. and BENDELOW, Gillian (1998) The Lived Body: Sociological Themes, Embodied Issues. London and New York: Routledge .
81.
WINTER, Ruth (1976) The Smell Book: Scents, Sex, and Society. Philadelphia, PA and New York: J. B. Lippincott .
82.
WRIGHT, R. H. (1982) The Sense of Smell. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press .
83.
WYBURN, G. M. , PICKFORD, R. W. and HIRST, R. J. (1964) Human Senses and Perception. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd .
