To address concerns about a legal system frequently viewed as overly punitive and racially unjust, progressive chief prosecutors have sought to reduce or eliminate the prosecution of low-level drug offenses. Yet, no empirical research has examined whether jurisdictions led by progressive prosecutors treat such offenses less punitively or exhibit smaller racial/ethnic disparities than jurisdictions led by traditional prosecutors. Using case-level data, we find that low- and high-level drug offenses receive less punitive outcomes in progressive jurisdictions, which are more likely to impose non-felony convictions and alternatives to incarceration. Additionally, disparities disadvantaging racial minorities were more common in traditional than in progressive jurisdictions. Decomposition models suggest these differences stem from prosecutorial discretion rather than case characteristics. These findings highlight the potential of progressive prosecution to promote more equitable, less punitive justice.
AmaralF. A.OussA.OzierD. I. (2025). Prosecutor-driven reform and racial disparities. Criminology & Public Policy, 24(4), 527–555.
2.
BelenkoS.SpohnC. (2015). Drugs, crime, and justice. Sage.
3.
BellinJ. (2020). Expanding the reach of progressive prosecution. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 110(4), 707–717.
4.
BlumsteinA.BeckA. J. (1999). Population growth in U.S. prisons, 1980-1996. Crime and Justice, 26, 17–61.
5.
BowmanR. (2024). Disruption in the court community: Progressive lead prosecutors and their role in reforming the criminal legal system. [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. Arizona State University ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
6.
BoyumD.ReuterP. (2005). An analytic assessment of U.S. drug policy. The AEI Press.
CovertD. (2021). Transforming the progressive prosecutor movement. Wisconsin Law Review, 1, 187–252.
9.
CrowM. S.KunselmanJ. C. (2009). Sentencing female drug offenders: Reexamining racial and ethnic disparities. Women & Criminal Justice, 19(3), 191–216.
10.
DavisA. J. (2019). Reimagining prosecution: A growing progressive movement. UCLA Criminal Justice Law Review, 3(1), 1–28.
11.
DemleitnerN. V. (2020). State prosecutors at the center of mass imprisonment and criminal justice reform. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 32(4), 187–194.
12.
EisensteinJ.FlemmingR. B.NardulliP. F. (1988). The contours of justice: Communities and their courts. Little, Brown & Co.
13.
Executive Office of the Governor Ron Desantis. (2023). Governor Ron DeSantis suspends state attorney Monique Worrell for neglect of duty and incompetence.
GarlandD. (2023). The current crisis of American criminal justice: A structural analysis. Annual Review of Criminology, 6, 43–63
18.
GelbachJ. B. (2014). B1X2: Stata module to account for changes when X2 is added to a base model with X1. Statistical Software Components S457814, Boston College Department of Economics.
19.
GelbachJ. B. (2016). When do covariates matter? And which ones, and how much?Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2), 509–543.
20.
GottliebA.EppersonM.GiugnoL.JungH. (2025). What happens to imprisonment rates when a progressive prosecutor is elected: Quasi-experimental evidence from Cook County. Punishment & Society, 27(2), 315–337.
21.
GrodenskyC. A.CrozierW. E.GiffordE. J.GarrettB. L. (2023). Understanding plea bargaining in a new progressive DA’s office: How line prosecutors understand and implement progressive goals through plea decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 50(3), 429–453.
LabS.WilliamsMHolcombJ.BurekM.KingW.BuergerM. E. (2021). Criminal justice: The essentials. Oxford University Press.
24.
LevineK. L.WrightR. F. (2012). Prosecution in 3-D. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(4), 1119–1180.
25.
LongJ. S.MustilloS. A. (2021). Using predictions and marginal effects to compare groups in regression models for binary outcomes. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(3), 1284–1320.
26.
MitchellO. (2020). Racial disparities in drug sanctions. In AveryJ.CooperJ. (Eds.), Bias in the law: A definitive look at racial prejudice in the U.S. criminal justice system (pp. 141–160). Rowman & Littlefield.
27.
MitchellO.Oramas MoraD.SticcoT. L.BoggessL. N. (2022). Are progressive chief prosecutors effective in reducing prison use and cumulative racial/ethnic disadvantage? Evidence from Florida. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(3), 535–565.
28.
MitchellO.PetersenN. (2025). The rise of progressive prosecutors in the United States: Politics, prospects, and perils. Annual Review of Criminology, 8(14), 1–26.
29.
MizeT. D. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117.
30.
MurakawaN. (2014). The first civil right: How liberals built prison America. Oxford University of Press.
31.
PetersenN.MitchellO.YanS. (2024). Do progressive prosecutors increase crime? A quasi-experimental analysis of crime rates in the 100 largest counties, 2000–2020. Crime & Public Policy, 23(2), 459–490.
32.
PfaffJ. (2017). Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. Basic Books.
33.
RaphaelS.StollM. A. (2013). Why are so many Americans in prison?Russell Sage Found.
34.
RouhaniS.TomkoC.SilberzahnB. E.WeickerN. P.ShermanS. G. (2023). Racial disparities in drug arrest before and after de facto decriminalization in Baltimore. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 65(4), 560–567.
35.
RouhaniS.WinikerA.ZhangL.ShermanS.BandaraS. (2024). “What should I be doing is harm reduction, if I’m doing my job right”: Engagement with harm reduction principle among prosecutors enacting drug policy reform in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy, 131, Article 104541.
36.
RouhaniS.ZhangL.WinikerA. K.ShermanS. G.BandaraS. (2024). Emerging models of de facto reforms in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 260, Article 111341.
37.
SevignyE. L.CaulkinsJ. P. (2004). Kingpins or mules: An analysis of drug offenders incarcerated in federal and state prisons. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(3), 401–434.
38.
SklanskyD. A. (2021). Foreword: The future of the progressive prosecutor movement. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties, 16, i–vii.
39.
SpohnC. (2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. Criminal Justice, 3, 427–501.
40.
SpohnC. (2015). Race, crime, and punishment in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Crime and Justice, 44(1), 49–97.
41.
SpohnC.SampleL. L. (2013). The dangerous drug offender in federal court: Intersections of race, ethnicity, and culpability. Crime & Delinquency, 59(1), 3–31.
42.
TestaA.LeeJ. G. (2021). Trends in sentencing of federal drug offenders: Findings from U.S. district courts 2002–2017. Journal of Drug Issues, 51(1), 81–108.
43.
UlmerJ. T.KramerJ. H. (1996). Court communities under sentencing guidelines: Dilemmas of formal rationality and sentencing disparity. Criminology, 34(3), 383–408.
44.
WidraE. (2024, January30). Addicted to punishment: Jail and prisons punish drug use far more than they treat it. Prison Policy Initiative. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/blog/2024/01/30
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
