The rapid development of digitalization has not only reshaped criminal activities but also driven changes in crime governance models. The relationship between digitalization and crime has garnered increasing academic attention. This study utilizes urban panel data from 2014 to 2021 to analyze the impact of government digital transformation (GDT) on urban crime rates. The results indicate that GDT significantly reduces urban crime rates, and the finding remains robust after undergoing multiple robustness and endogeneity tests. Employment rates and social welfare levels serve as mediators in the impact of GDT on crime rates. Further analysis reveals that the impact of GDT on crime rates is more effective in eastern regions, cities with high levels of digitalization, and cities with high income levels. These findings not only expand the research dimensions of the relationship between digitalization and crime but also provide reference for government departments in formulating crime governance policies.
AbbasH. S. M.QaisarZ. H.XuX.SunC. (2021). Nexus of e-government, cybersecurity and corruption on public service (PSS) sustainability in Asian economies using fixed-effect and random forest algorithm. Online Information Review, 46(4), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2021-0069
2.
AdamI.FazekasM. (2021). Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence. Information Economics and Policy, 57, Article 100950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
3.
AndresenM. A. (2015). Unemployment, GDP, and crime: The importance of multiple measurements of the economy. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 57(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJCCJ.2013.E37
4.
ApelR.HorneyJ. (2017). How and why does work matter? Employment conditions, routine activities, and crime among adult male offenders. Criminology, 55(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12134
5.
ArkushaL.DykyiO.FedchunN.DiachkovaM.OsadchyiB. (2023). The effect of digitalization on the extent of criminal activity in the context of the pandemic. Revista Amazonia Investiga, 12(64), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2023.64.04.25
6.
BeckerG. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169–217.
7.
BellB.CostaR.MachinS. (2022). Why does education reduce crime?Journal of Political Economy, 130(3), 732–765. https://doi.org/10.1086/717895
8.
BoivinR. (2018). Routine activity, population(s) and crime: Spatial heterogeneity and conflicting Propositions about the neighborhood crime-population link. Applied Geography, 95, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.04.016
BriciI.AchimM. V. (2023). Does the digitalization of public services influence economic and financial crime?Studies in Business and Economics, 18(2), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2023-0025
11.
BroadhurstR. (2006). Developments in the global law enforcement of cyber-crime. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 29(3), 408–433. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510610684674
12.
CaiQ. (2025). How does government digital transformation impact enterprise innovation?Information Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251338212
13.
ChaiM.WuL. (2024). Unveiling the concealed risks: The influence of digital finance on cyber financial crime in China. Crime & Delinquency. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241287137
14.
ChatterjeeA. (2024). Digital finance: A developing country perspective with special focus on gender and regional disparity. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 26(4), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2023-0149
15.
ChenL.TongT. W.TangS.HanN. (2022). Governance and design of digital platforms: A review and future research directions on a meta-organization. Journal of Management, 48(1), 147–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211045023
16.
ChuhaoW.KhanK.HaiyuanZ. (2025). Digital transformation of government: Sustainability through e-governance. Public Money & Management. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2484795
CornishD. B.ClarkeR. V. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 41–96.
19.
CullenF. T.WrightJ. P.ChamlinM. B. (1999). Social support and social reform: A progressive crime control agenda. Crime & Delinquency, 45(2), 188–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128799045002002
20.
DingX.VukovićD. B.SokolovB. I.VukovicN.LiuY. (2024). Enhancing ESG performance through digital transformation: Insights from China’s manufacturing sector. Technology in Society, 79, Article 102753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102753
21.
DjatmikoG. H.SinagaO.PawirosumartoS. (2025). Digital transformation and social lnclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
22.
DunleavyP.MargettsH.BastowS.TinklerJ. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui057
EnsN.HukalP.Blegind JensenT. (2023). Dynamics of control on digital platforms. Information Systems Journal, 33(4), 890–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12429
26.
FarooqU.TabashM. I.Al-FaryanM. A. S.DanielL. N.AburezeqI. M. (2024). Effect of financial sector development and FDI inflow on employment rate in South Asia: New empirical evidence from ARDL approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 24(2), e2911. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2911
27.
FelkaP.Mihale-WilsonC.HinzO. (2020). Mobile phones and crime: The protective effect of mobile network infrastructures. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 36(4), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09437-6
28.
FengY.NieC. (2024). The effect of government informatization construction on corporate digital technology innovation: New evidence from China. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 34(3), 657–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12671
29.
FerraraE. L.ChongA.DuryeaS. (2012). Soap operas and fertility: Evidence from Brazil. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4(4), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.4.4.1
30.
GanT.ZhangM.ZhangZ. (2023). The impact of digital government policy on entrepreneurial activity in China. Economic Analysis and Policy, 79, 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.029
31.
Gil-GarciaJ. R.DawesS. S.PardoT. A. (2018). Digital government and public management research: Finding the crossroads. Public Management Review, 20(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1327181
32.
GouldE. D.WeinbergB. A.MustardD. B. (2002). Crime rates and local labor market opportunities in the United States: 1979–1997. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331919
33.
GulerM.BuyukozkanG. (2023). A survey of digital government: Science mapping approach, application areas, and future directions. Systems, 11(12), 563. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11120563
34.
GuoF.WangJ.WangF.KongT.ZhangX.ChengZ. (2020). Measuring the development of China’s digital inclusive finance: Index compilation and spatial characteristics. China Economic Quarterly, 19(4), 1401–1418. https://doi.org/10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2020.03.12
35.
HainmuellerJ. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr025
36.
HeR.XuY.JiangS. (2022). Applications of GIS in public security agencies in China. Asian Journal of Criminology, 17(2), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-021-09360-5
37.
HeckmanJ.IchimuraH.ToddP. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. The Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654. https://doi.org/10.2307/2971733
38.
HegheșN.-E. (2025). Digital technologies and crime. In CremadesJ.HermidaC. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of contemporary constitutionalism (pp. 1–13). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_230-1
39.
JiangZ.YuanC.XuJ. (2024). The impact of digital government on energy sustainability: Empirical evidence from prefecture-level cities in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 209, Article 123776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123776
40.
JinY.LiX.ZengH.ChengX. (2024). Does digital government transformation inhibit corporate environmental violations? Evidence from the big data bureau in China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 9414–9425. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2023.3307599
41.
KangS. (2016). Inequality and crime revisited: Effects of local inequality and economic segregation on crime. Journal of Population Economics, 29(2), 593–626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-015-0579-3
42.
KeeganK. (2024). Corruption and digital authoritarianism: Political drivers of e-government adoption in Central Asia. Democratization, 31(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2255146
43.
KimB.SeoC.HongY.-O. (2022). A systematic review and meta-analysis of income inequality and crime in Europe: Do places matter?European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 28(4), 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-020-09450-7
44.
KimJ. H.YeasminM. (2005). The size and power of the bias-corrected bootstrap test for regression models with autocorrelated errors. Computational Economics, 25(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-005-2208-9
45.
KuC.-H.LeroyG. (2014). A decision support system: Automated crime report analysis and classification for e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 31(4), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.003
LiJ. (2024). Space–time exploration of the east–west gap in economic development and digital financial inclusion: Evidence from China pre and post-COVID-19. GeoJournal, 89(3), 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-024-11120-8
48.
LiY.ZhangZ.TengR.FanS. (2025). Dose tariff exposure stimulate city crimes? Evidence from China-US trade war. Economic Analysis and Policy, 85, 1563–1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.02.010
49.
LinM.-J. (2008). Does unemployment increase crime? Evidence from US data 1974-2000. Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0022
50.
LiuD.TuY.ChenZ.ZhengY. (2025). Analysis of the synergistic effect of digital financial inclusion and social security on crime governance based on regional differences. International Review of Economics & Finance, 98, 103967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.103967
51.
LoughranT. A.PaternosterR.ChalfinA.WilsonT. (2016). Can rational choice be considered a general theory of crime? Evidence from individual-level panel data. Criminology, 54(1), 86–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12097
52.
LynchM. J.StreteskyP. B.LongM. A. (2018). Situational crime prevention and the ecological regulation of green crime: A review and discussion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 679(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716218789080
MachinS.MeghirC. (2004). Crime and economic incentives. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(4), 958–979. https://doi.org/10.2307/3559034
55.
MarcusJ. (2013). The effect of unemployment on the mental health of spouses: Evidence from plant closures in Germany. Journal of Health Economics, 32(3), 546–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.02.004
MengT.LuD.YuD.YahyaM. H.ZariyawatiM. A. (2024). Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1560. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04094-y
59.
MessnerS. F. (2022). Marketization and crime in contemporary China: Puzzles for criminological theorizing. Criminology, 60(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12301
60.
MestersG.van der GeestV.BijleveldC. (2016). Crime, employment and social welfare: An individual-level study on disadvantaged males. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9258-5
61.
MillerJ. M.HigginsG. E.LopezK. M. (2013). Considering the role of e-government in cybercrime awareness and prevention: Toward a theoretical research program for the 21st century. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Digital rights management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 789–800). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2136-7.ch036
62.
MuiH. W.AliM. M. (1997). Economic analysis of crime and punishment: An Asian case. Applied Economics Letters, 4(4), 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/758518507
63.
OsifoO. C. (2018, May21–25). Examining digital government and public service provision: The case of Finland [Conference session]. 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia (pp. 1342–1347). https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO.2018.8400242
64.
PengZ.HuangY.LiuL.XuW.QianX. (2024). How government digital attention alleviates enterprise financing constraints: An enterprise digitalization perspective. Finance Research Letters, 67, Article 105883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105883
65.
Puron-CidG. (2017, June7–9). From technology to social development. Applying a public value perspective to digital government in local governments in Mexico. In HinnantC. C.OjoA. (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on digital government research: Innovations and transformations in government, Staten Island, United States (pp. 336–345). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3085228.3085272
66.
RanR.YangX.LiuZ.WangQ.ChenY. (2025). Does digital government transformation drive social inclusion? Evidence from female entrepreneurship in China?Journal of Chinese Political Science, 30, 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-024-09899-x
67.
RaphaelS.Winter-EbmerR. (2001). Identifying the effect of unemployment on crime. Journal of Law & Economics, 44(1), 259–283. https://doi.org/10.1086/320275
68.
RosenfeldR.FornangoR. (2007). The impact of economic conditions on robbery and property crime: The role of consumer sentiment. Criminology, 45(4), 735–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00096.x
69.
RotoloT.TittleC. R. (2006). Population size, change, and crime in U.S. cities. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9015-x
SarzaeimP.MahmoudQ. H.AzimA.BauerG.BowlesI. (2023). A systematic review of using machine learning and natural language processing in smart Policing. Computers, 12(12), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12120255
72.
SharmaS.KarA. K.GuptaM. P. (2024). Untangling the web between digital citizen empowerment, accountability and quality of participation experience for e-government: Lessons from India. Government Information Quarterly, 41(3), Article 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2024.101964
73.
SochaR.KogutB. (2020). Urban video surveillance as a tool to improve security in public spaces. Sustainability, 12(15), 6210. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156210
74.
StamatiT.PapadopoulosT.AnagnostopoulosD. (2015). Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: Cases in the Greek context. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.004
75.
Stratu-StreletD.Gil-GómezH.Oltra-BadenesR.Oltra-GutierrezJ. V. (2023). Developing a theory of full democratic consolidation: Exploring the links between democracy and digital transformation in developing eastern European countries. Journal of Business Research, 157, Article 113543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113543
76.
TuttleJ. (2018). Specifying the effect of social welfare expenditures on homicide and suicide: A cross-national, longitudinal examination of the stream analogy of lethal violence. Justice Quarterly, 35(1), 87–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2017.1293711
77.
VerbruggenJ.ApelR.Van Der GeestV. R.BloklandA. a. J. (2015). Work, income support, and crime in the dutch welfare state: A longitudinal study following vulnerable youth into adulthood. Criminology, 53(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12080
78.
WangH.LiG.HuY. (2025). Impact of the digital economy on public security: Evidence from rural China. Applied Economics Letters, 32(13), 1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2331665
79.
WangL.XuJ. (2024). Digital government empowers industrial structure upgrading: A quasi-natural experiment based on the comprehensive pilot project of e-government. Finance and Economics Forum, 5, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.20240201.001
80.
XiongL.WangX.LiuZ.LongX. (2024). Does government digital transformation drive high-quality urban economic development? Evidence from e-government platform construction. Systems, 12(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems12090372
81.
XuK.LiuH.WangF.WangH. (2021). ‘This crime is not that crime’—Classification and evaluation of four common crimes. Law, Probability and Risk, 20(3), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgac006
82.
YangC.GuM.AlbitarK. (2024). Government in the digital age: Exploring the impact of digital transformation on governmental efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 208, Article 123722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123722
83.
YangY.ZhangC.LiuB.HuangY.TaiY. (2024). Mystery of special government subsidies: How does digital transformation promote enterprise innovation and development?Economic Analysis and Policy, 83, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.06.003
ZhangM.XunF.ShiX.LiS. (2024). The impact of digital government construction on the quality of employment for migrant workers. China Population Science, 38(6), 40–58.
87.
ZhangY.WangJ.YueP.LiY. (2024). The promise and perils of digital finance: Evidence from crime rate in China. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2024.2425433
88.
ZhaoP.LiK.CoyteP. C. (2023). The impact of non-communicable chronic diseases on the earned income of working age Chinese residents. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 476. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01961-y
