This study examines how regulated cannabis businesses normalize their trade in the United States. Using interviews (N = 56) and a cross-sectional survey of cannabis professionals (N = 144), I find that the U.S. cannabis industry employs three strategies: (1) Using deviant practices to engage in legitimate business, (2) Reconciling divergent cultural frames for reducing stigma against the cannabis industry, and (3) Changing discursive repertoires that uniquely stigmatize cannabis and cannabis users. I argue that each strategy constitutes a new analytical category of social skill that contested industries leverage in a gray market context.
AbramsL. S. (2010). Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 536–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325010367821
3.
AldridgeJ.MeashamF.WilliamsL. (2013). Illegal leisure revisited: Changing patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults. Routledge.
4.
BeckerH. S. (1963). Outsiders; studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press of Glencoe.
CoomberR.MoyleL.SouthN. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs Education Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2015.1110565
7.
DeMicheleM. (2014). Studying the community corrections field: Applying neo-institutional theories to a hidden element of mass social control. Theoretical Criminology, 18(4), 546–564. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480614526276
8.
DickinsonT.JacquesS. (2019). Drug sellers’ neutralizations of guiltless drug sales and avoidance of “drug dealer” identities. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 73, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.07.012
9.
DickinsonT.JacquesS. (2021). Drug control policy, normalization, and symbolic boundaries in Amsterdam’s coffee shops. The British Journal of Criminology, 61(1), 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azaa059
10.
DiMaggioP. J. (1991). Constructing organizational fields. In WalterP.DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums, 1920-1940 (pp. 267–292). University of Chicago Press.
11.
DiMaggioP. J.PowellW. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
12.
DiounC. (2018). Negotiating moral boundaries: Social movements and the strategic (re)definition of the medical in cannabis markets. In BriscoeF.KingB. G.LeitzingerJ. (Eds.), Social movements, stakeholders and non-market strategy (Vol. 56, pp. 53–82). Emerald Publishing Limited.
13.
DuffC. (2005). Party drugs and party people: Examining the ‘normalization’ of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 16(3), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.02.001
14.
DuffC. (2003). Drugs and youth cultures: Is Australia experiencing the ‘normalization’ of adolescent drug use?Journal of Youth Studies, 6(4), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/1367626032000162131
15.
DumbiliE. W. (2020). Cannabis normalization among young adults in a Nigerian City. Journal of Drug Issues, 50(3), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042620912805
16.
EdelmanL. B.UggenC.ErlangerH. S. (1999). The endogeneity of legal regulation: Grievance procedures as rational myth. The American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 406–454. https://doi.org/10.1086/210316
FligsteinN.McAdamD. (2012). A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press.
19.
FriedlandR.AlfordR. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In PowellW. W.DiMaggioP. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). University of Chicago Press.
GreenwoodR.OliverC.LawrenceT. B.MeyerR. E. (2017). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage.
22.
HathawayA. D.ComeauN. C.EricksonP. G. (2011). Cannabis normalization and stigma: Contemporary practices of moral regulation. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811415345
23.
HechtP. (2014). Weed land: Inside America’s marijuana epicenter and how pot went legit. University of California Press.
24.
HsuG.KoçakKovácsB. (2018). Co-opt or coexist? A study of medical cannabis dispensaries’ identity-based responses to recreational-use legalization in Colorado and Washington. Organization Science, 29(1), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1167
25.
HudsonB. A. (2008). Against all odds: A consideration of core-stigmatized organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.27752775
26.
HudsonB. A.OkhuysenG. A. (2009). Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20(1), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0368
27.
KinneyA. B. (2022). Surveillance, social control, and managing semi-legality in U.S. commercial cannabis. Social Problems. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spac037.
28.
KinneyA. B. (2023). Sumptuary administration: How contested market actors shape the trajectory of policy when regulated under fragmented governance. Law & Policy.
29.
LashleyK.PollockT. G. (2020). Waiting to inhale: Reducing stigma in the medical cannabis industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 434–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219851501
30.
McRobbieA.ThorntonS. L. (1995). Rethinking “moral panic” for multi-mediated social worlds. The British Journal of Sociology, 46(4), 559–574. https://doi.org/10.2307/591571
31.
MeashamF.NewcombeR.ParkerH. (1994). The normalization of recreational drug use amongst young people in north-west England. The British Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 287–312.
32.
MeashamF.ShinerM. (2009). The legacy of “normalisation”: The role of classical and contemporary criminological theory in understanding young people’s drug use. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 20(6), 502–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2009.02.001
33.
MeyerJ. W.RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
NunnK. B. (2002). Race, crime and the pool of surplus criminality: Or why the war on drugs was a war on Blacks. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 6, 381.
38.
ParkerH. J.AldridgeJ.MeashamF. (1998). Illegal leisure: The normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. Psychology Press.
39.
PattonD. (2018). Navigating drugs at university: Normalisation, differentiation and drift?Safer Communities, 17(4), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.1108/sc-01-2018-0002
40.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed., p. 532). Sage Publications, Inc.
41.
PedersenW. (2009). Cannabis use: Subcultural opposition or social marginality?, Cannabis use: Subcultural opposition or social marginality?: A population-based longitudinal study, a population-based longitudinal study. Acta Sociologica, 52(2), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699309104001
42.
PennayA.MooreD. (2010). Exploring the micro-politics of normalisation: Narratives of pleasure, self-control and desire in a sample of young Australian ‘party drug’ users. Addiction Research & Theory, 18(5), 557–571. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066350903308415
PolsonM. (2021). Breaks, continuities, and the shifting terms of racial-capitalist governance. In CorvaD.MeiselD. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of post-prohibition cannabis research (pp. 36–43). Routledge.
45.
RoddS. (2018). As Smaller Marijuana Businesses Get Squeezed, State Revenue Takes a Hit. Stateline. https://pew.org/2JSsoDT
46.
RubinA. T. (2015). A neo-institutional account of prison diffusion. Law & Society Review, 49(2), 365–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12136
47.
RudesD. S. (2012). Framing organizational reform: Misalignments and disputes among parole and union middle managers. Law & Policy, 34(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2011.00355.x
48.
SandbergS. (2012). Is cannabis use normalized, celebrated or neutralized? Analysing talk as action. Addiction Research & Theory, 20(5), 372–381. https://doi.org/10.3109/16066359.2011.638147
SharmanJ. C. (2010). Shopping for anonymous shell companies: An audit study of anonymity and crime in the international financial system. The Journal of Economic Perspectives: A Journal of the American Economic Association, 24(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.24.4.127
52.
ShildrickT. (2002). Young people, illicit drug use and the question of normalization. Journal of Youth Studies, 5(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260120111751
53.
SingletonR.StraitsB. C. (2010). Approaches to social research. Oxford University Press.
54.
StoaR. (2016). Marijuana Appellations: The Case for Cannabicultural Designations of Origin (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2815070). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2815070
55.
SuchmanE. A. (1968). The “hang-loose” ethic and the spirit of drug use. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 9(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.2307/2948333
56.
SutterA. G. (1966). The world of the righteous dope fiend. Issues in Criminology, 2(2), 177–222.
57.
TavoryI.TimmermansS. (2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. University of Chicago Press.
58.
TaylorM.PotterG. R. (2013). From “social supply” to “real dealing”: Drift, friendship, and trust in drug-dealing careers. Journal of Drug Issues, 43(4), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042612474974
59.
TimmermansS.TavoryI. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
WilliamsL. (2016). Muddy waters?: Reassessing the dimensions of the normalisation thesis in twenty-first century Britain. Drugs Education Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.3109/09687637.2016.1148118
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
