Restorative justice diversion aligns with youths’ developmental needs more than traditional approaches. However, there is a research gap regarding its effectiveness among diverse youth, and when initiated by police. This study evaluated misdemeanor cases that occurred in Minneapolis between September 2014 and December 2018 finding that youth who participated in restorative justice diversion after arrest were less likely to experience re-arrest in the following year compared to those processed traditionally. Positive program impacts for Black and American Indian youth demonstrate RJ diversion can be effective with diverse youth while differences in rates of successful diversion by participating community agency highlight opportunities for further study. This study demonstrates the importance of continuing to understand and expand restorative justice diversion with youth.
BarnertE. S.DudovitzR.NelsonB. B.CokerT. R.BielyC.LiN.ChungP. J. (2017). How does incarcerating young people affect their adult health outcomes?Pediatrics, 139(2), e20162624. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2624
2.
BaxterE. (2017). We are all criminals. (1st ed.) We Are All Criminals.
3.
BergsethK. J.BouffardJ. A. (2007). The long-term impact of restorative justice programming for juvenile offenders. Criminal Justice Journal, 35, 433–451.
4.
BishopD. (2006). Demystifying crime and criminal justice. In BohmR. M.WalkerJ. T. (Eds.), The myth that harsh punishments reduce juvenile crime (pp. 140–149). Roxbury Pub.
5.
BraithwaiteJ. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
6.
BraithwaiteJ. (2002). Restorative justice and response regulation. Oxford University Press.
7.
BrownB.BaileyK. (2021). Building Queens and Kings: The restructuring of identity through transformative restorative justice. In WinnM. T.WinnL. T. (Eds.), Restorative Justice in Education: Transforming Teaching and learning through the disciplines (pp. 119–136). Harvard Education Press.
8.
CavendishW. (2014). Academic attainment during commitment and postrelease education–related outcomes of Juvenile Justice-involved youth with and without disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 22(1), 41–52.
9.
DukeN. N.BorowskyI. W. (2015). Youth violence prevention and safety: Opportunities for health care providers. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 62, 1137–1158.
10.
FriedmanM. (2019). Prioritizing the welfare of youth: Design Failure in Juvenile Justice and building the restorative alternative. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 45(4), Article 2.
11.
FroniusT.Darling-HammondS.PerssonH.GuckenburgS.HurleyN.PetrosinoA. (2019). Restorative justice in U.S. schools: An updated research review. Justice and Prevention Research Center, WestEd. https://jprc.wested.org/
12.
GaseL. N.GlennB. A.GomezL. M.KuoT.InkelasM.PonceN. A. (2016). Understanding racial and ethnic disparities in arrest: The role of individual, home, school, and community characteristics. Race and Social Problems, 8(4), 296–312.
HuizingaD.ThornberryT.KnightK.LovegroveP.FarringtonD. P. (2007). Disproportionate minority contact in the juvenile justice system: A study of differential minority arrest/referral to court in three cities. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/219743.pdf
KarpD. R.BazemoreG.ChesireJ. D. (2004). The role and attitudes of restorative board members: A case study of volunteers in community justice. Crime and Delinquency, 50(4), 487–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703260262
19.
KimM. H.PorumbescuG. A.NeshkovaM. I. (2019). How does race affect perceptions of police trustworthiness?International Public Management Journal, 22(2), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1486343
LlewellynJ. J.ArchibaldB. P.ClairmontD.CrockerD. (2013). Imagining success for a restorative approach to justice: Implications for measurement and evaluation. Dalhousie Law Journal, 36, 281–316.
22.
LopesG.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.SchmidtN. M.VásquezB. E.BernburgJ. G. (2012). Labeling and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of formal police intervention on life chances and crime during emerging adulthood. Crime and Delinquency, 58(3), 456–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128712436414
23.
MearsD. P.KuchJ. J.LindseyA. M.SiennickS. E.PestaG. B.GreenwaldM. A.BlombergT. G. (2016). Juvenile Court and Contemporary Diversion: Helpful, harmful, or both?Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 953–981. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12223
National Research Council. (2013). Reforming juvenile justice: A developmental approach. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/14685
26.
OsgoodD. W.FosterE. M.CourtneyM. E. (2010). Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 209–229.
27.
PestaR. (2022). School punishment, deterrence, and Race: A partial test of Defiance Theory. Crime and Delinquency, 68(3), 463–494. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287211005396
RodriguezN. (2007). Restorative justice at work: Examining the impact of restorative justice resolutions on juvenile recidivism. Crime and Delinquency, 53(3), 355–379.
31.
RodriguezN. (2010). The cumulative effect of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes and why preadjudication detention matters. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47(3), 391–413.
32.
SchwalbeC. S.GearingR. E.MacKenzieM. J.BrewerK. B.IbrahimR. (2012). A meta-analysis of experimental studies of diversion programs for juvenile offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(1), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.10.002
33.
Shem-TovY.RaphaelS.SkogA. (2021). Can restorative justice conferencing reduce recidivism? Evidence from the make-it-right program. NBER Working Paper No. 29150. http://www.nber.org/papers/w29150
34.
ShermanL. W.StrangH.BarnesG.WoodsD. J.BennettS.InkpenN.Newbury-BirchD.RossnerM.AngelC.MearnsM.SlothowerM. (2015). Twelve experiments in restorative justice: The Jerry Lee program of randomized trials of restorative justice conferences. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11(4), 501–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9247-6
35.
SkeemJ. L.ScottE.MulveyE. P. (2014). Justice policy reform for high-risk juveniles: Using science to achieve large-scale crime reduction. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 709–739.
36.
SteinbergL. (2009). Adolescent development and juvenile justice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 459–485.
37.
SteinbergL.CauffmanE.WoolardJ.GrahamS.BanichM. (2009). Are adolescents less mature than adults?: Minors' access to abortion, the juvenile death penalty, and the alleged APA "flip-flop. American Psychologist, 64(7), 583–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014763
38.
UrbanL. S.BurgeS. E. (2006). Victim/offender mediation in St. Louis: An assessment. Justice Research and Policy, 8(2), 89–114.
WilsonD. B.BrennanI.OlaghereA. (2018). Police-initiated diversion for youth to prevent future delinquent behavior: A systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 14, 1–88. https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2018.5
41.
WilsonH. A.HogeR. D. (2013). The effect of youth diversion programs on recidivism: A meta-analytic review. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(5), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812451089
42.
WongJ. S.BouchardJ.GravelJ.BouchardM.MorselliC. (2016). Can at-risk youth be diverted from crime: meta-analysis of restorative diversion programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(10), 1310–1329.
ZehrH. (2002). Little Book of Restorative Justice. Good Books, an imprint of Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
