Since the 1970s, there has been a trend to move away from punitive and retributive approaches to reintegrative practices. This article provides an account of how young offenders in five Asia Pacific jurisdictions are diverted from being prosecuted in the youth courts and of to where they are diverted. The five cases demonstrate that diversionary measures in the Australasian jurisdictions tend to be more restorative in their practices than are those in Chinese-dominated jurisdictions, which adopt welfare responses. It is concluded that although there is some progress in the areas of decarceration and delegalization, the diversion goals of decategorization and deprofessionalization in Chinese-dominated jurisdictions have yet to be achieved. Such diversionary strategies carry the risk that many more young people committing minor offences may be subject to more intrusive measures and disguised social control in the name of diversion, welfare, or the prevention of future offending.
Alder, C., & Wundersitz, J. (Eds.). (1994). Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism?Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
2.
Ang, B. L. (2002, March). Developing a relevant approach towards the rehabilitation of juvenile delinquents: The Singapore context. Paper presented at the Seminar on Urban Youth Work II, Singapore.
3.
Bazemore, G., & Walgrave, L. (Eds.). (1999). Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
4.
Biddulph, S. (1993). Review of police powers of administrative detention in the People’s Republic of China. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 337-354.
5.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Setting standards for restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42, 563-577.
7.
Braithwaite, J. (2003). Principles of restorative justice. In A. von Hirsch, J. V. Roberts, & A. E. Bottoms (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 1-20). Oxford, UK: Hart.
8.
Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (2002). The penal system. London: Sage.
9.
Chan, L. W. (1993). The myth of neighborhood mutual help. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
10.
China Law Yearbook Editorial Committee. (2002). China law year book 2002. Beijing: Press of Law Year-book of China.
11.
Choi, A. (2003). Measures alternative to prosecution of children and young persons: Law and policies in Singapore. In T. W. Lo & D. S. W. Wong (Eds.), Child protection and measures alternative to prosecution: Experiences of six overseas countries (pp. 201-228). Hong Kong: Youth Studies Net, City University of Hong Kong.
12.
Chui, W. H., Kidd, J., & Preston, C. (2003). Treatment of child and juvenile offenders in Queensland, Australia: Alternatives to prosecution. In T. W. Lo & D. S. W. Wong (Eds.), Child protection and measures alternative to prosecution: Experiences of six overseas countries (pp. 97-142). Hong Kong: Youth Studies Net, City University of Hong Kong.
13.
Clark, J. P. (1989). Conflict management outside the courtrooms of China. In R. J. Troyer, J. P. Clark, & D. G. Rojet (Eds.), Social control in the People’s Republic of China (pp. 57-69). New York: Praeger.
14.
Cohen, S. (1988). Against criminology. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
15.
Curran, D. J., & Cook, S. (1993). Growing fears, rising crime: Juveniles and China’s justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 296-315.
16.
Daly, K., & Hayes, H. (2001). Restorative justice and conferencing in Australia. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice (No. 186). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
17.
Dignan, J. (1999). The Crime and Disorder Act and the prospects for restorative justice. Criminal Law Review, 1, 48-60.
18.
Garland, D. (1996). The limits of the sovereign state: Strategies of crime control in contemporary society. British Journal of Criminology, 36, 445-471.
19.
Gelsthorpe, L., & Morris, A. (1994). Juvenile justice 1945-1992. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 949-993). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
20.
Gray, P. (1991). Juvenile crime and disciplinary welfare. In H. Traver & J. Vagg (Eds.), Crime and justice in Hong Kong (pp. 25-41). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
21.
Gumz, E. J. (2004). American social work, corrections and restorative justice: An appraisal. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 449-460.
22.
Harris, R. (2003). Political corruption: In and beyond the nation state. London: Routledge.
23.
Hayes, H. (2002). Youth justice conferencing and re-offending in Queensland (working paper no. 1). Brisbane, Australia: School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Griffith University.
24.
Hayes, H., & Daly, K. (2004). Conferencing and re-offending in Queensland. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(2), 167-191.
25.
Hayes, H., Prenzler, T., & Wortley, R. (1998). Making amends: Final evaluation of the Queensland community conferencing pilot. Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Crime Policy and Public Safety, Griffith University.
26.
Legislative Council. (2002). Legislative Council paper no. CB(2) 298/02-03(02): Appendix C. Hong Kong: Author.
27.
Li, S. Q., Xu, X., Wang, N., Zhang, H. Y., & Tang, C. (1999). Question and answer: A practical guide to preventing juvenile delinquency law. Beijing, China: Zhongguo jian cha chu ban she.
28.
Lo, T. W. (1993). Corruption and politics in Hong Kong and China. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
29.
Lo, T. W., Wong, S. W., Chan, W. T., Leung, S. K., Yu, C. S., & Chan, C. K. (1997). Research on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes for young offenders: Full report. Hong Kong: Government Printing Department.
30.
Lo, T. W., Wong, S. W., & Maxwell, G. (2003). Measures alternative to prosecution for handling unruly children and young persons: Overseas experiences and options for Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Security Bureau, HKSAR Government.
31.
Luke, G., & Lind, B. (2002). Reducing juvenile crime: Conferencing versus court. Crime and Justice Bulletin: Contemporary Issues in Crime and Justice, 69. New South Wales, Australia: Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
32.
Maxwell, G. M., Kingi, V., Robertson, J., Morris, A., & Cunningham, C. (2004). Achieving effective outcomes in youth justice. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Social Development.
33.
Maxwell, G. M., Robertson, J., & Anderson, T. (2002). Police youth diversion: Final report. Wellington, New Zealand: Crime and Justice Research Centre, Victoria University of Wellington through Victoria Link.
34.
McCarney, W. (2003). Restorative justice: International approaches. In R. Magnus, H. M. Lim, M. L. Mesenas, & V. Thean (Eds.), Rebuilding lives, restoring relationships: Juvenile justice and the community (pp. 304-348). Singapore: Eastern University Press.
35.
McCold, P., & Wachtel, B. (1998). Restorative policing experiment: The Bethlehem Pennsylvania police family group conferencing project. Pipersville, PA: Community Service Foundation.
36.
Ministry of Community Development and Sports. (2003). Study on the conduct of the Guidance Programme participants discharged from 1998 to June 1999. Singapore: Rehabilitation and Protection Division, Author.
37.
Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (Eds.). (2001). Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles. Oxford, UK: Hart.
38.
O’Brian, C. O. (1994). The social welfare department. In M. S. Gaylord & H. Traver (Eds.), Introduction to the Hong Kong criminal justice system (pp. 161-172). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
41.
Palk, G., Pollard, G., & Johnson, L. (1998, July). Community conferencing in Queensland. Paper presented at the Australian and New Zealand Society of Criminology annual meeting, Gold Coast, Australia.
42.
Pollard, G., & Kidd, J. (2000, November). Dispelling the myths: Youth justice and community conferencing. Paper presented at Moving with the Times: A Conference for Older Persons and their Organizations and for Government and Other Planners, Brisbane, Australia.
43.
Raynor, P. (2002). Community penalties: Probation, punishment and “what works.” In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (3rd ed., pp. 1168-1205). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44.
Rutherford, A. (1986). Growing out of crime: Society and young people in trouble. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
45.
Sandor, D. (1994). The thickening blue wedge in juvenile justice. In C. Alder & J. Wundersitz (Eds.), Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism? (pp. 153-166). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
46.
Shen, Z. M. (Ed.). (1995). Theory and practice in grassroots security and defence work in China. Beijing, China: FuLu Chubanshe.
47.
Sherman, L., & Barnes, G. (1997). Restorative justice and offenders’ respect for the law (RISE working paper). Canberra, Australia: Australian National University.
48.
Van Ness, D. W. (2003). Proposed basic principles on the use of restorative justice: Recognizing the aims and limits of restorative justice. In A. von Hirsch, J. Roberts, A. E. Bottoms, K. Roach, & M. Schiff (Eds.), Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms? (pp. 157-176). Oxford, UK: Hart.
49.
Von Hirsch, A., Roberts, J., Bottoms, A. E., Roach, K., & Schiff, M. (2003). Restorative justice and criminal justice: Competing or reconcilable paradigms?Oxford, UK: Hart.
50.
Walgrave, L. (Ed.). (2002). Restorative justice and the law. Devon, UK: Willan.
51.
Walker, N. (1991). Why punish?New York: Oxford University Press.
52.
Warner, K. (1994). Family group conferences and the rights of the offender. In C. Alder & J. Wundersitz (Eds.), Family conferencing and juvenile justice: The way forward or misplaced optimism? (pp. 141-152). Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Criminology.
53.
West, D. J. (1982). Delinquency: Its roots, careers and prospects. London: Heinemann.
54.
Wong, D. S. W. (1999). Delinquency control and juvenile justice in China. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 32(1), 27-41.
55.
Young, R. (2001). Just cops doing shameful business?: Police-led restorative justice and the lessons of research. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles (pp. 195-226). Oxford, UK: Hart.
56.
Zehr, H. J. (1990). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald.
