Programs with restorative justice ideals attempt to incorporate victims and community members into the administration of justice. Although these programs have become increasingly popular, only a few programs in the United States have been the focus of prior studies. Using official juvenile court data from an urban, metropolitan area, this study finds that juveniles who participated in a restorative justice program were less likely to recidivate than juveniles in a comparison group. Also, gender and prior offenses indirectly influence recidivism in important ways. Girls and offenders with minimal criminal history records exhibit the most success from participating in such programs. Findings demonstrate the importance of examining additive and interactive effects in restorative justice research.
Acoca, L. (1998). Outside/inside: The violation of American girls at home, on the street, and in the juvenile justice system. Crime & Delinquency, 44(4), 561-589.
2.
Bazemore, G. (1992). On mission statements and reform in juvenile justice: The case of the “Balanced Approach.” Federal Probation , 56(3), 64-70.
3.
Bazemore, G. (2005). Reaction essay: Whom and how do we reintegrate? Finding community in restorative justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 4(1), 131-148.
4.
Bazemore, G., & Griffiths, C. (1997). Conferences, circles, boards, and mediations: The “new wave” of community justice decision making. Federal Probation, 61(2), 25-37.
5.
Bazemore, G., & Maloney, D. (1994). Rehabilitating community service: Toward restorative service sanctions in a balanced justice system. Federal Probation , 58(1), 24-35.
6.
Bazemore, G., & Schiff, M. (2004). Paradigms muddle or paradigm paralysis? The wide and narrow roads to restorative justice reform (or, a little confusion may be a good thing). Contemporary Justice Review, 7(1), 35-57.
7.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M.S. (1994). Balanced and restorative justice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
8.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M.S. (1995). Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime. Crime & Delinquency, 41(3), 296-316.
9.
Bazemore, G., & Umbreit, M.S. (2001). A comparison of four restorative conferencing models. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
10.
Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K. (1998). An overview of delinquent girls: How theory and practice have failed and the need for innovated changes. In R. Zaplin (Ed.), Female crime and delinquency: Critical perspectives and effective interventions (pp. 33-64). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
11.
Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (1988). The influence of race in juvenile justice processing . Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 25(3), 242-263.
12.
Bishop, D.M., & Frazier, C.E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86(2), 392-413.
13.
Bloom, B., Owen, B., Deschenes, E.P., & Rosenbaum, J. (2002). Moving toward justice for female juvenile offenders in the new millennium: Modeling gender-specific policies and programs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18, 37-56.
14.
Bortner, M., & Reed, W. (1985). The preeminence of process: An examination of refocused justice research. Social Science Quarterly, 66(2), 413-425.
15.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Braithwaite, J. (2001). Restorative justice and a new criminal law of substance abuse. Youth and Society, 33(2), 227-248.
17.
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and response regulation. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Chesney-Lind, M. (1997). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R.G. (1998). Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice. Belmont, CA: West/Wadsworth.
20.
Clear, T.R., & Karp, D.R. (1999). The community justice ideal. Boulder, CO: Westview.
21.
Clear, T.R., & Karp, D.R. (2000). Toward the ideal of community justice. National Institute of Justice Journal, pp. 21-27.
22.
Crawford, A. (2004). Reaction essay: Involving lay people in criminal justice. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(4), 693-702.
23.
Fagan, J., Slaughter, A., & Harstone, E. (1987). Blind justice? The impact of race on juvenile justice process. Crime & Delinquency, 33(2), 224-258.
24.
Feld, B. (1999). Rehabilitation, retribution, and restorative justice: Alternative conceptions of juvenile justice. In G. Bazemore & L. Walgrave (Eds.), Restorative juvenile justice: Repairing the harm of youth crime (pp. 17-44). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
25.
Frazier, C.E., & Bishop, D.M. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology , 76(4), 1132-1152.
26.
Hayes, H. (2005). Assessing re-offending in restorative justice conferences. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology , 38(1), 77-101.
27.
Hayes, H., & Daly, K. (2003). Youth justice conferencing and re-offending. Justice Quarterly, 20(4), 725-764.
28.
Hayes, H., & Daly, K. (2004). Conferencing and re-offending in Queensland. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(2), 167-191.
29.
Horowitz, R., & Pottieger, A. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , 28(1), 75-100.
30.
Hoyt, S., & Scherer, D. (1998). Female juvenile delinquency: Misunderstood by juvenile justice system, neglected by social science. Law and Human Behavior, 22(1), 81-107.
31.
Karp, D. (2001). Harm and repair: Observing restorative justice in Vermont. Justice Quarterly, 18(4), 727-757.
32.
Karp, D. (2002). The offender/community encounter: Stakeholder involvement in the Vermont community reparative boards. In D. Karp & T. Clear (Eds.), What is community justice? Case studies of restorative justice and community supervision (pp. 61-86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Karp, D., & Drakulich, K.M. (2004). Minor crime in a quaint setting: Practices, outcomes, and limits of Vermont reparative probation boards . Criminology & Public Policy, 3(4), 655-686.
34.
Karp, D., Lane, J., & Turner, S. (2002). Ventura county and the theory of community justice . In D. Karp & T. Clear (Eds.), What is community justice? Case studies of restorative justice and community supervision (pp. 3-33). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Kurki, L. (2000). Restorative and community justice in the United States. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime & justice: A review of research (Vol. 27, pp. 303-325). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2001). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Ottawa, Canada: Canada Department of Justice.
37.
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127-144.
38.
Levrant, S., Cullen, F., Fulton, B., & Wozniak, J. (1999). Reconsidering restorative justice: The corruption of benevolence revisited. Crime & Delinquency, 45, 3-27.
39.
Long, J.S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
MacDonald, J., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2001). Gender bias and juvenile justice revisited: A multiyear analysis. Crime & Delinquency , 47(2), 173-195.
41.
Maloney, D., & Holcomb, D. (2001). In pursuit of community justice: Deschutes County , Oregon. Youth and Society, 33(2), 296-313.
42.
Marshall, T., & Merry, S. (1990). Crime and accountability. London: Home office.
43.
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (1993). Family, victims, and culture: Youth justice in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington, Social Policy Agency and Institute of Criminology .
44.
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (1997). Family group conferences and restorative justice . Journal on Community Corrections, 8(2), 37-40.
45.
Maxwell, G., & Morris, A. (2001). Family group conferences and re-offending. In A. Morris & G. Maxwell (Eds.), Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles (pp. 243-263). Oxford, UK: Hart.
46.
McCarthy, B.R. (1987). Preventive detention and pretrial custody in the juvenile court. Journal of Criminal Justice, 15(3), 185-198.
47.
McCold, P. (2004). Paradigm muddle: The threat to restorative justice posed by its merger with community justice. Contemporary Justice Review, 7(1), 13-35.
48.
McCold, P., & Wachtel, B. (1998). Restorative policing experiment: The Bethlehem Pennsylvania police family group conferencing project. Pipersville, PA: Community Service Foundation.
49.
McElrea, F.W. (1996). New Zealand youth court: A model for use with adults. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: International perspectives (pp. 69-83). New York: Willow Tree.
50.
McElrea, F.W. (1998). New sanctioning options. European Journal on CriminalPolicy and Research, 6(4), 475-579.
51.
McGarrell, E.F. (2001). Restorative justice conferences as an early response to young offenders. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
52.
Melton, A. (1995). Indigenous justice systems and tribal society . Judicature, 70(3), 126-133.
53.
Morris, A. (2002). Critiquing the critics: A brief response to critics of restorative justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 596-615.
54.
Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (1998). Restorative justice in New Zealand: Family group conferences as a case study. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). Retrieved August 12, 2003, from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/morris.html
55.
Morris, A., Maxwell, G., & Robertson, J. (1993). Giving victims a voice: A New Zealand experiment . Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 32(4), 304-321.
56.
Niemeyer, M., & Shichor, D. (1996). A preliminary study of a large victim/offender reconciliation program. Federal Probation, 60, 30-34.
57.
Nugent, W., Umbreit, M., Wiinamaki, L., & Paddock, J. (2001). Participation in victimoffender mediation and reoffense: Successful replication? Research on Social Work Practice, 11(1), 5-23.
58.
Pranis, K. (1998). Guide for implementing the balanced and restorative justice model. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
59.
Presser, L., & Van Voorhis, P. (2002). Values and evaluations: Assessing processes and outcomes of restorative justice programs. Crime & Delinquency, 48(1), 162-188.
60.
Reetz, R. (2005). Restorative justice inventory: Assessment results . Unpublished manuscript (prepared for the Maricopa County Probation Department).
61.
Roberts, J., & LaPrairie, C. (1996). Sentencing circles: Some unanswered questions . Criminal Law Quarterly, 39, 69-83.
62.
Rodriguez, N. (2005). Restorative justice, communities, and delinquency: Whom do we reintegrate? Criminology & Public Policy, 4(1), 103-130.
63.
Roy, S. ( 1993). Two types of juvenile restitution programs in two Midwestern counties: A comparative study. Federal Probation, 57(4), 48-53.
64.
Schutt, R.K., & Dannefer, D. (1988). Detention decisions in juvenile cases: JINS, JDs, and gender. Law and Society Review, 22(3), 509-520.
65.
Secret, P.E., & Johnson, J.B. (1997). The effect of race on juvenile, justice decision making in Nebraska: Detention, adjudication, and disposition, 1988-1993. Justice Quarterly, 14(3), 445-478.
66.
Sherman, L., Strang, H., & Woods, D. (2000). Recidivism patterns in the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments. Canberra: Australian National University, Centre for Restorative Justice, Research School of Social Sciences.
67.
Umbreit, M. (1994). Victim meets offender: The impact of restorative justice and mediation. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
68.
Umbreit, M. (2000). The restorative justice and mediation collection: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Office for Victims of Crime.
69.
Umbreit, M., & Coates, R. (1992). Victim offender mediation: An analysis of programs in four states of the U.S.: Executive summary. St. Paul : University of Minnesota, Center for Restorative Justice and mediation.
70.
Umbreit, M., & Coates, R. (1993). Cross-site analysis of victim-offender mediation in four states. Crime & Delinquency, 39(4), 565-585.
71.
Umbreit, M., Coates, R., & Vos, B. (2001). The impact of victim-offender mediation: Two decades of research. Federal Probation, 65(3), 29-33.
72.
Umbreit, M., Coates, R., & Vos, B. (2004). Restorative justice versus community justice: Clarifying a muddle or generating confusion? Contemporary Justice Review, 7(1), 81-88.
73.
Umbreit, M., & Greenwood, J. (1997). National survey of victim offender mediation programs in the U.S. St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Center for Restorative Justice and Mediation.
74.
Umbreit, M., & Stacey, S. (1996). Family group conferencing comes to the U.S.: A comparison with victim offender mediation. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 47(2), 29-38.
75.
Umbreit, M., & Zehr, H. (1996). Restorative family group conferences: Differing models and guidelines for practice. Federal Probation, 60(3), 24-29.
76.
Van Ness, D., & Strong, K. (2002). Restoring justice. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
77.
Wordes, M., Bynum, T.S., & Corley, C.J. (1994). Locking up youth: The impact of race on detention decision. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(2), 149-165.
78.
Zehr, H. (1995). Changing lenses: A new focus for crime and justice . Scottsdale, PA: Herald.
