Though the literature largely recognizes adult drug treatment courts (ADCs) as beneficial to participants, with lower rates of recidivism and drug use, the question remains of how ADCs impact communities and how other institutions (e.g., law enforcement) react to their presence. This study extends previous work estimating higher arrests associated with ADCs, particularly for crimes involving higher degrees of law enforcement discretion. Results indicate lower drug possession arrest rates for White residents in rural communities, and higher in urban areas, generally, but especially for Black citizens. Though the exact source of these changes has yet to be determined, current analysis indicates larger effect sizes for arrests scaled per officer, as compared to per population, pointing toward changes in law enforcement behavior.
AllardS. W. (2004). Access to social services: The changing urban geography of poverty and service provision (p. 19). The Brookings Institution: Metropolitan Policy Program.
2.
AngristJ. D.PischkeJ.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
3.
BanksD.GottfredsonD. C. (2003). The effects of drug treatment and supervision on time to rearrest among drug treatment court participants. Journal of Drug Issues, 33(2), 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260303300206
4.
BelenkoS. R. (1999). Research on drug courts: A critical review 1999 update. In National Drug Court Institute Review (Vol. 2, 2nd ed., pp. 1–58). National Drug Court Institute.
5.
BouffardJ. A.SmithS. (2005). Programmatic, counselor, and client-level comparison of rural versus urban drug court treatment. Substance Use & Misuse, 40(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1081/JA-200049340
6.
BoylanR. T. (2018). Imputation methods make crime studies suspect: Detecting biases via regression discontinuity (Working Paper No. 30).
7.
BrunsonR. K.MillerJ. (2006). Young black men and urban policing in the United States. The British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 613–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi093
8.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2021). Local area unemployment statistics. US Bureau of Labor Statistic.
9.
CengizD.DubeA.LindnerA.ZippererB. (2019). The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(3), 1405–1454. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz014
10.
ChaneyT. (2013). The gravity equation in international trade: An explanation (Working Paper No. 19285). National Bureau of Economic Research.
11.
Collaborative Justice Court Roster [Database]. (2020). Judicial Council of California.
12.
DeMatteoD.MarloweD. B.FestingerD. S.ArabiaP. L. (2009). Outcome trajectories in drug court: Do all participants have drug problems?Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36(4), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809331547
13.
DowneyP. M.RomanJ. (2010). A Bayesian meta-analysis of drug court cost-effectiveness (p. 40). Brookings Institution/Urban Institute: The District of Columbia Crime Policy Institute.
14.
EricsonR. V. (1993). Making crime: A study of detective work. University of Toronto Press.
15.
GAO. (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes: (538962006-001) (GAO-05-219) [Data set]. US Government Accountability Office.
16.
GottfredsonD. C.ExumM. L. (2002). The Baltimore City drug treatment court: One-year results from a randomized study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242780203900304
17.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.NajakaS. S.RochaC. M. (2005). The Baltimore City drug treatment court: 3-year self-report outcome study. Evaluation Review, 29(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X04269908
18.
GottfredsonD. C.NajakaS. S.KearleyB. (2003). Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: Evidence from a randomized trial. Criminology & Public Policy, 2(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2003.tb00117.x
19.
GottfredsonD. C.NajakaS. S.KearleyB. W.RochaC. M. (2006). Long-term effects of participation in the Baltimore City drug treatment court: Results from an experimental study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 67–98.
20.
GrossJ. (2010). The effects of net-widening on minority and indigent drug offenders: A critique of drug courts. University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, 10, 161–178.
21.
HarcourtB. E.LudwigJ. (2007). Reefer madness: Broken windows policing and misdemeanor marijuana arrests in New York city, 1989–2000. Criminology & Public Policy, 6(1), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00427.x
22.
HoffmanM. B. (2000). The drug court scandal. North Carolina Law Review, 78, 1437–1534.
23.
JewellJ. D.RoseP.BushR.BartzK. (2017). The long term effectiveness of drug treatment court on reducing recidivism and predictors of voluntary withdrawal. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 15(1), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-016-9652-8
24.
KaplanJ. (2021a). Jacob Kaplan’s concatenated files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program data: Law enforcement officers killed and assaulted (LEOKA) 1960–2019 (Version 10) [Data set]. ICPSR – Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
25.
KaplanJ. (2021b). Jacob Kaplan’s concatenated files: Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program data: Arrests by age, sex, and race, 1974–2018 (Version 11) [Data set]. ICPSR – Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.
26.
KearleyB.GottfredsonD. (2020). Long term effects of drug court participation: Evidence from a 15-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 16(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-019-09382-1
27.
KearleyB. W.CosgroveJ. A.WimberlyA. S.GottfredsonD. C. (2019). The impact of drug court participation on mortality: 15-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 105, 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2019.07.004
28.
LatimerJ. G.ChretienJ. (2006). A meta-analytic examination of drug treatment courts: Do they reduce recidivism?Department of Justice Canada.
29.
LilleyD. R. (2013). Drug courts and community crime rates: A nationwide analysis of jurisdiction-level outcomes. Journal of Criminology, 2013, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/571760
LilleyD. R.DeVallK.Tucker-GailK. (2019). Drug courts and arrest for substance possession: Was the African American community differentially impacted?Crime and Delinquency, 65(3), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128718789856
32.
LilleyD. R.StewartM. C.Tucker-GailK. (2020). Drug courts and net-widening in u.s. Cities: A reanalysis using propensity score matching. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(2), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403419828045
33.
LoftinC.McDowallD. (2010). The use of official records to measure crime and delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26(4), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9120-8
34.
LowenkampC. T.HolsingerA. M.LatessaE. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Community Corrections, 15(1), 5–11.
35.
MackinJ. R.LucasL. M.LambarthC. H.WallerM. S.WellerJ. M.AbornJ. A.LinharesR.AllenT. L.CareyS. M.FiniganM. W. (2009). Baltimore City district court adult drug treatment court 10-year outcome and cost evaluation. A report to the Maryland Judiciary. Office of Problem-Solving Courts, NPC Research.
36.
MarloweD. B.HardinC. D.FoxC. L. (2016). Painting the current picture: A national report on drug courts and other problem-solving courts in the United States [Technical Report, National Drug Court Institute].
37.
MeehanA. J.PonderM. C. (2002). Race and place: The ecology of racial profiling African American motorists. Justice Quarterly, 19(3), 399–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095291
NIH | SEER. (2021). U.S. population data—1969–2019. National Institutes of Health | National Cancer Institute | Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. https://seer.cancer.gov/popdata/
PhillipsJ.LandK. C. (2012). The link between unemployment and crime rate fluctuations: An analysis at the county, state, and national levels. Social Science Research, 41(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.01.001
45.
RossmanS. B.RomanJ. K.RempelM. (2011a). The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: Study overview and design. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
46.
RossmanS. B.RomanJ. K.RempelM. (2011b). The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: The impact of drug courts. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
47.
RossmanS. B.RomanJ. K.ZweigJ. M.RempelM.LindquistC. H.MarkmanJ. A.LagersonE.SchaferC. (2011). The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: What’s happening with drug courts? A portrait of adult drug courts in 2004. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
48.
RossmanS. B.RomanJ. K.ZweigJ. M.RempelM.LindquistC. H.WillisonJ. B.DowneyP. M.YahnerJ.KralsteinD.GreenM.HenryK.FahrneyK.BhatiA. S.FaroleD. J.LagersonE.MarkmanJ.SchaferC. (2011). The multi-site adult drug court evaluation: Executive summary. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center.
49.
SekhonN. S. (2011). Redistributive policing. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 101, 1171–1226.
50.
SevignyE. L.FuleihanB. K.FerdikF. V. (2013). Do drug courts reduce the use of incarceration?: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice Journal, 41(6), 416–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.06.005
SnidermanP. M. (2011). The logic and design of the survey experiment. In LupiaA.GreeneD. P.KuklinskiJ. H.DruckmanJ. N. (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science (pp. 102–114). Cambridge University Press.
53.
StavickJ.RossJ. (2020). County-level presidential vote counts by party (1984–2019) [Database].
54.
SunL.AbrahamS. (2021). Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
