Does Departmental Fairness Lead to Fairness on the Street? Testing the Relationship Between Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Procedurally Just Policing

Abstract

Police officers have been encouraged to act with “procedural justice” for at least two decades. Previous research has identified organizational justice as an antecedent to procedurally just policing—sometimes referred to as internal procedural justice and external procedural justice, respectively. Be that as it may, the association between perceptions of organizational justice and procedurally just police behavior has not been analyzed. Using a combination of survey data and observational data collected by using Systematic Social Observation of body-worn camera footage, this study tests the proposition that police officer perceptions of organizational justice are associated with procedurally just and procedurally unjust police behavior. The findings of this study do not support the proposition that perceptions of organizational justice are associated with levels of procedurally just policing. Procedurally unjust policing, on the other hand, is influenced by internal procedural justice. Implications for research and for police practice are discussed.

Keywords

procedural justice police attitudes behavior law enforcement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abadie

Athey

Imbens

G. W.

Wooldridge

J. M.

(2023). When should you adjust standard errors for clustering? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 138(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjac038

Ajzen

Fishbein

Lohmann

Albarracín

(2018). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracin

Johnson

B. T.

(Eds.), The Handbook of Attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 197–255). Routledge.

Ambrose

M. L.

Cropanzano

(2003). A longitudinal analysis of organizational fairness: An examination of reactions to tenure and promotion decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 266–275. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.266

Bayley

D. H.

(1996). Police for the future. Oxford University Press.

Brandl

S. G.

Frank

Worden

R. E.

Bynum

T. S.

(1994). Global and specific attitudes toward the police: Disentangling the relationship. Justice Quarterly, 11(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829400092161

Chen

Sun

Ding

(2025). Predicting procedural injustice and turnover intention among Chinese sworn and civilian police officers. Policing: An International Journal, 48(3), 668–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-12-2024-0201

Colquitt

J. A.

(2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Colquitt

J. A.

(2012). Organizational justice. In Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 526–547). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199928309.013.0016

Colquitt

J. A.

Conlon

D. E.

Wesson

M. J.

Porter

C. O.

K. Y.

(2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

10.

Dai

(2021). Training police for procedural justice: An evaluation of officer attitudes, citizen attitudes, and police-citizen interactions. The Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles, 94(4), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X20960791

11.

Dettori

J. R.

Norvell

D. C.

Chapman

J. R.

(2018). The sin of missing data: Is all forgiven by way of imputation? Global Spine Journal, 8(8), 892–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218811922

12.

Engel

R. S.

Sobol

J. J.

Worden

R. E.

(2000). Further exploration of the demeanor hypothesis: The interaction effects of suspects’ characteristics and demeanor on police behavior. Justice Quarterly, 17(2), 235–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000096311

13.

Engel

R. S.

Worden

R. E.

(2003). Police officer’s attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: An analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41(1), 131–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00984.x

14.

Frank

Brandl

(1991). The police attitude-behavior relationship: Methodological and conceptual considerations. American Journal of Police, 10(4), 83–103.

15.

Gau

J. M.

(2010). A longitudinal analysis of citizens’ attitudes about police. Policing: an International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 33(2), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511011044867

16.

Guyot

(1991). Policing as though people matter. Temple University Press.

17.

Haas

N. E.

Van Craen

Skogan

W. G.

Fleitas

D. M.

(2015). Explaining officer compliance: The importance of procedural justice and trust inside a police organization. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 15(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895814566288

18.

Holmes

Assmann

Perlongo

(2023). Executive Leadership and Procedural Justice [Conference session]. Division of Criminal Justice Services Public Safety Symposium, Albany, NY, United States.

19.

Jakobsen

J. C.

Gluud

Wetterslev

Winkel

(2017). When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials—A practical guide with flowcharts. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0442-1

20.

Johnson

R. R.

(2011). Officer attitudes and management influences on police work productivity. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(4), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-010-9090-2

21.

Jonathan-Zamir

Harpaz

(2018). Predicting support for procedurally just treatment: The case of the Israel National Police. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(6), 840–862. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818763230

22.

Jonathan-Zamir

Mastrofski

S. D.

Moyal

(2015). Measuring procedural justice in police-citizen encounters. Justice Quarterly, 32(5), 845–871. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.845677

23.

Kim

J. H.

(2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6), 558–569. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.19087

24.

Lambert

E. G.

Qureshi

Hogan

N. L.

White

Frank

(2024). Organizational structure and its connection with the justice views of police officers. Asian Journal of Criminology, 19(4), 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-024-09445-x

25.

Lawrence

D. S.

Christoff

T. E.

Escamilla

J. H.

(2017). Predicting procedural justice behavior: Examining communication and personality. Policing: An International Journal, 40(1), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2016-0107

26.

Sun

(2024). Linking police and citizen data: A multilevel analysis on the effects of organizational effectiveness and fairness on procedural justice. Policing: An International Journal, 47(4), 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-01-2024-0004

27.

Mastrofski

S. D.

Jonathan-Zamir

Moyal

Willis

J. J.

(2016). Predicting procedural justice in police–citizen encounters. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815613540

28.

Mastrofski

S. D.

Ritti

R. R.

Snipes

J. B.

(1994). Expectancy theory and police productivity in DUI enforcement. Law & Society Review, 28(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054139

29.

Mastrofski

S. D.

Worden

R. E.

Snipes

J. B.

(1995). Law enforcement in a time of community policing. Criminology, 33(4), 539–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1995.tb01189.x

30.

McCluskey

J. D.

Reisig

(2017). Explaining procedural justice during police-suspect encounters: A systematic social observation study. Policing: An International Journal, 40(3), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-06-2016-0087

31.

McCluskey

J. D.

Uchida

C. D.

(2023). Video data analysis and police body-worn camera footage. Sociological Methods & Research, 52(3), 1120–1154. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241231156968

32.

McCluskey

J. D.

Uchida

C. D.

Solomon

S. E.

Wooditch

Connor

Revier

(2019). Assessing the effects of body-worn cameras on procedural justice in the Los Angeles Police Department. Criminology, 57(2), 208–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12201

33.

Mell

S. M.

(2016). The role of procedural justice within police-citizen contacts in explaining citizen behaviors and other outcomes. Virginia Commonwealth University.

34.

Murphy

McCarthy

(2024). Guardian versus warrior cops: Predicting officers’ support for procedural justice and coercive policing. Policing and Society, 34(10), 1011–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2024.2357653

35.

Myhill

Bradford

(2013). Overcoming cop culture? Organizational justice and police officers’ attitudes toward the public. Policing: An International Journal, 36(2), 338–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639511311329732

36.

National Research Council. (2004). Fairness and effectiveness in policing: The evidence (p. 10419). National Academies Press.

37.

Nawaz

Tankebe

(2018). Tracking procedural justice in stop and search encounters: Coding evidence from body-worn video cameras. Cambridge Journal of Evidence-Based Policing, 2(3), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41887-018-0029-z

38.

Paoline

E. A.

Terrill

(2005). The impact of police culture on traffic stop searches: An analysis of attitudes and behavior. Policing: An International Journal, 28(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510510614555

39.

Paoline

E. A.

Terrill

Somers

L. J.

(2021). Police officer use of force mindset and street-level behavior. Police Quarterly, 24(4), 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211025523

40.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Podsakoff

N. P.

Williams

L. J.

Huang

Yang

(2024). Common method bias: It’s bad, it’s complex, it’s widespread, and it’s not easy to fix. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 17–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030

41.

President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. (2015). Final report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

42.

Reynolds

P. D.

Fitzgerald

B. A.

Hicks

(2018). The expendables: A qualitative study of police officers’ responses to organizational injustice. Police Quarterly, 21(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611117731558

43.

Rosenbaum

D. P.

McCarty

W. P.

(2017). Organizational justice and officer “buy in” in American policing. Policing: An International Journal, 40(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1108/PIJPSM-07-2016-0114

44.

Rosenbaum

D. P.

Schuck

A. M.

Costello

S. K.

Hawkins

D. F.

Ring

M. K.

(2005). Attitudes toward the police: The effects of direct and vicarious experience. Police Quarterly, 8(3), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611104271085

45.

Schuman

Johnson

M. P.

(1976). Attitudes and behavior. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 161–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.001113

46.

Somers

L. J.

Terrill

(2022). Confidence in Their craft: Assessing the relationship between officer work experiences and their perceptions of self-efficacy. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(11), 1656–1675. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548221105879

47.

Spector

P. E.

(1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150503

48.

Staw

B. M.

Ross

(1985). Stability in the midst of change: A dispositional approach to job attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(3), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.70.3.469

49.

Sun

I. Y.

Otu

S. E.

Aro

G. C.

Akor

I. C.

Nnam

M. U.

(2022). Linking organizational justice to organizational commitment among Nigerian police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 220–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211036177

50.

Sun

I. Y.

Van Craen

Hsu

K. K.

(2018). Internal procedural justice, moral alignment, and external procedural justice in democratic policing. Police Quarterly, 21(3), 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611118772270

51.

Tankebe

(2014). The making of ‘democracy’s champions’: Understanding police support for democracy in Ghana. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 14(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895812469380

52.

Telep

C. W.

Weisburd

Jonathan-Zamir

Zastrow

(2024). Examining the relationship between officer attitudes and behaviour in a multi-site trial of procedural justice training. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18, paae031. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae031

53.

Terpstra

B. L.

van Wijck

P. W.

(2023). Investigating the relation between police behavior and perceptions of procedural justice: A response to Rick Trinkner. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 60(3), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278221135807

54.

Terrill

Paoline

E. A.

Manning

P. K.

(2003). Police culture and coercion. Criminology, 41(4), 1003–1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01012.x

55.

Tyler

D. H.

(2024). Unpacking the mechanisms connecting: Internal and external procedural fairness. Crime & Delinquency, 71(11), 3646–3668. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241227927

56.

Tyler

T. R.

(2004). Enhancing police legitimacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627

57.

Van Craen

Skogan

W. G.

(2017a). Achieving fairness in policing: The link between internal and external procedural justice. Police Quarterly, 20(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611116657818

58.

Van Craen

Skogan

W. G.

(2017b). Officer support for use of force policy: The role of fair supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(6), 843–861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854817696341

59.

Wilson

J. Q.

(2009). Varieties of police behavior: The management of law and order in eight communities. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjnrszw (Originally published in 1968)

60.

Wolfe

S. E.

Lawson

S. G.

(2020). The organizational justice effect among criminal justice employees: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 58(4), 619–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12251

61.

Wolfe

S. E.

Piquero

A. R.

(2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810397739

62.

Worden

R. E.

(1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law & Society Review, 23(4), 667–711. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053852

63.

Worden

R. E.

Holladay

B. P.

McLean

S. J.

(2024). Police legitimacy, procedural justice, and formal social control. In Oxford research encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264079.013.308

64.

Worden

R. E.

Holladay

B. P.

McLean

S. J.

Cochran

Reynolds

D. L.

(2025). Systematic social observation of police-citizen encounters: Coding and measurement through body-worn cameras. Justice Quarterly, 42(6), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2025.2463406

65.

Worden

R. E.

McLean

S. J.

(2017). Mirage of police reform: Procedural justice and police legitimacy. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.30

66.

Worden

R. E.

McLean

S. J.

(2018). Measuring, managing, and enhancing procedural justice in policing: Promise and pitfalls. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 29(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403416662505

67.

Worden

R. E.

Pollitz

A. A.

(1984). Police arrests in domestic disturbances: A further look. Law & Society Review, 18(1), 105–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053482

68.

Yadav

L. K.

Yadav

(2016). Organizational justice: An analysis of approaches, dimensions and outcomes. NMIMS Management Review, 31, 14–40.

69.

Yesberg

J. A.

Sargeant

Fenn

Murphy

Madon

(2024). Fairness in policing: How does internal procedural justice translate to external procedural justice? Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18, paae126. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/paae126

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB